
There is a global race to make fusion power a reality. India must step up investments soon
They will unfold within the realm of energy generation, driven by the nearly daily breakthroughs and innovations taking place in nuclear fusion technology.
In recent times, two very notable and path–breaking technology–related events have occurred that may eventually help rescue our planet from the grave dangers of climate change. The two remarkable events shall most likely be the harbingers of the eventual demise of the oil and gas industry.
Google expects the supply of fusion power by the early 2030s and Microsoft expects to buy electrical power as early as 2028 from a nuclear fusion power plant. The reason why this is so exceptional and impressive is that up until a decade or so ago, the efficient and practical generation of energy from nuclear fusion seemed very much a distant reality. To give an idea of the power nuclear fusion can generate, we need to only look at the sun. The process that powers the Sun — and also the stars — is nothing but nuclear fusion.
What is nuclear fusion? Simply put, it is a process in which light atomic nuclei are fused together to form a heavier nucleus. It is different from the process of nuclear fission — widely used to generate electricity — that involves splitting a heavy atomic nucleus into smaller nuclei. Both the processes result in huge amounts of energy. However, nuclear fission carries many potential dangers and has always triggered debates and controversies. While nuclear fusion releases more energy than what's possible via chemical reactions or fission, it also minimises radioactive waste and carries a greatly reduced risk of catastrophic failure. The primary challenge in nuclear fusion lies in achieving the temperatures in the range of hundreds of millions of degrees Celsius and managing the attendant technological challenges for a self-sustaining reaction — known as ignition.
Innovations and breakthroughs
Notable developments that are aiding the production of energy in efficient and practical ways include new materials that enable the creation of high-temperature superconductors. This has in turn resulted in smaller, more powerful magnets, leading to more compact reactor designs and accelerated timelines. Additionally, the pace of innovation has also been aided by advances in machine learning and AI that have engendered modern computational tools allowing for real-time uses and applications.
There are many other developments in technology that are making efficient energy generation from nuclear fusion a reality. Even as I pen this article on the current status of nuclear fusion technology, exciting breakthroughs are occurring with greater and greater frequency. The other very interesting facet of this story is the fact that it is not just governments that are driving the advances. Leading companies and startups in many parts of the world ranging from China to Europe to North America are driving major breakthroughs. This has brought about the emergence of well-funded startups and public-private partnerships that has injected urgency, competition, and diverse engineering philosophies into the field. The one disappointing and even worrying aspect of this game — for me personally — is that India does not seem to be anywhere in the picture when it comes to investing in the very promising private players.
At the same time, let us not lose sight of the fact that — as almost always — the public sector continues to play a crucial role in fusion research, supporting large-scale experiments and international collaboration. To put the situation into a proper perspective, I list here some very promising public sector initiatives.
– The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER), an international collaboration involving 35 countries, is the world's largest fusion project. Located in France, ITER aims to produce net energy gain from fusion. As of 2025, the project is in advanced stages of construction. Once complete, it will demonstrate the feasibility of sustained fusion and provide invaluable data for future commercial reactors. The very heartening point to note is that India is playing a very important role in the ITER project. It has designed and manufactured the cryostat, an enormous 30-metre tall and 30-metre wide chamber that houses the entire ITER Tokamak reactor. India has also built the cryolines that carry liquid helium to cool the magnets to minus 269 degrees Celsius, the temperature needed for superconductivity.
– The National Ignition Facility (NIF) is another initiative. Located at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in California, it uses powerful lasers to compress hydrogen fuel pellets. In December 2022, NIF achieved a historic milestone: a fusion experiment that produced more energy than it was supplied by the lasers — a landmark for inertial confinement fusion.
– The Joint European Torus (JET) in the UK, a nuclear fusion facility, remains a testbed for plasma science, recently setting records for sustained energy output.
– In China, the Experimental Advanced Superconducting Tokamak (EAST) has set world records for plasma temperature and duration. (A tokamak is a machine used for producing controlled fusion reactions in hot plasma.)
It is also heartening to see that globally the private sector sees a vast opportunity in this realm of nuclear fusion energy generation. Below I list a few of the many leading players.
– The Commonwealth Fusion Systems (CFS), spun out of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in 2021, successfully tested a record-breaking superconducting magnet, validating its core technology. The company aims to demonstrate net energy gain in the next few years and commercialise fusion power plants by the early 2030s.
– Based in California, TAE Technologies pursues a unique approach to nuclear fusion energy called field-reversed configuration, and has demonstrated its capability convincingly. It is developing its next machine called Copernicus, with the goal of achieving net energy gain. TAE is also investing heavily in advanced particle accelerators and AI-driven plasma control.
– Helion Energy, headquartered in Washington, uses a unique fusion technology. In 2021, Helion announced it had achieved a plasma temperature of 100 million degrees Celsius, a key engineering threshold. The startup aims to deliver electricity to the grid from a fusion device by the late 2020s.
– Canada-based General Fusion is developing magnetised target fusion, wherein plasma is compressed using a liquid metal piston. Backed by major investors and the Canadian government, General Fusion is building a demonstration plant adjacent to the UK's Culham Centre for Fusion Energy.
Also read: This Bengaluru startup's leading India's nuclear fusion research—to light up a billion homes
The challenges
Lest we get too carried away, it will be worthwhile to list a few of the formidable technical and economic challenges in generating power using nuclear fusion.
– Net energy gain: Achieving and sustaining ignition for commercially relevant periods is still a major challenge, particularly under realistic power plant conditions.
– Materials and component lifetimes: Components must be built to withstand intense neutron bombardment and extreme thermal cycles for years without degradation.
– Cost and scalability: Nuclear fusion energy must be economically competitive with current renewable energy and fission energy sources, necessitating breakthroughs in design simplicity, maintenance, and mass production.
– Regulatory and supply chain issues: Scaling nuclear fusion infrastructure requires supportive policy, new supply chains for rare isotopes (like tritium and helium-3), and standardised safety protocols.
The nuclear fusion sector is experiencing dynamic growth, with timelines for supplying electricity to the grid shrinking from 'decades away' to within the 2030s. The convergence of scientific knowledge, robust engineering, and entrepreneurial energy places fusion closer than ever to commercial realisation. Governments and private funders are investing billions, and global cooperation remains crucial. As new machines come online and lessons are learned, the dream of practical, safe, and inexhaustible fusion energy is within sight — a potential revolution in the way humanity powers its civilisation.
India's government has been actively involved in the ITER project and, through the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE), recognises nuclear fusion power as a critical element of the country's long-term energy security. The DAE plans to support several demonstration projects and aims to begin constructing two 1,000 MWe grid-connected fusion reactors by 2050. However, I must also mention that India needs to be connected with the private players in the race. I wish we had invested a couple of billion dollars in two or three of the more promising startups when, just a few years ago, emerging technologies were beginning to show genuine promise. We would have been in an enviable situation today, and over time our dependence on other nations for energy needs would have diminished significantly.
Dinesh Singh is the former Vice Chancellor of the University of Delhi and adjunct professor of mathematics at the University of Houston, Texas, USA. He tweets @DineshSinghEDU. Views are personal.
(Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
15 minutes ago
- Time of India
Goodbye, $165,000 tech jobs, student coders seek work at Chipotle
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills Since the early 2010s, a parade of billionaires, tech executives and even US presidents has urged young people to learn coding, arguing that the tech skills would help bolster students' job prospects as well as the economy. Tech companies promised computer science graduates high salaries and all manner of perks."Typically their starting salary is more than $100,000," plus $15,000 hiring bonuses and stock grants worth $50,000, Brad Smith, a top Microsoft executive, said in 2012 as he kicked off a company campaign to get more high schools to teach financial incentives, plus the chance to work on popular apps, quickly fed a boom in computer science education, the study of computer programming and processes like algorithms. Last year, the number of undergraduates majoring in the field topped 170,000 in the United States -- more than double the number in 2014, according to the Computing Research Association, a now, the spread of AI programming tools , which can quickly generate thousands of lines of computer code -- combined with layoffs at companies like Amazon, Intel, Meta and Microsoft -- is dimming prospects in a field that tech leaders promoted for years. The turnabout is derailing the employment dreams of many new computing grads and sending them scrambling for other college graduates ages 22 to 27, computer science and computer engineering majors are facing some of the highest unemployment rates, 6.1% and 7.5% respectively, according to a report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. That is more than double the unemployment rate among recent biology and art history graduates, which is just 3%.In response to questions from The New York Times, more than 150 college students and recent graduates -- from state schools as well as private universities -- shared their experiences. Some said they had applied to hundreds, and in several cases thousands, of tech jobs at companies, nonprofits and government computing education boosters are now pivoting to AI. President Donald Trump, who in 2017 directed federal funding toward computer science in schools, recently unveiled a national AI action plan that includes channeling more students into AI a major computing education sponsor, recently said it would provide $4 billion in technology and funding for AI training for students and workers. Last month, Smith said the company was also assessing how AI was changing computer science education.


The Hindu
15 minutes ago
- The Hindu
How artificial intelligence is tackling mathematical problem-solving
The International Mathematical Olympiad (IMO) is arguably the leading mathematical problem-solving competition. Every year, high school students from around the world attempt six problems over the span of three hours. Students whose scores cross a threshold, roughly corresponding to solving five of the six problems, obtain Gold medals, with Silver and Bronze medals for those crossing other thresholds. The problems do not require advanced mathematical knowledge, but instead test for mathematical creativity. They are always new, and it is ensured that no similar problems are online or in the literature. The AI gold medallist IMO 2025 had some unusual participants. Even before the Olympiad closed, OpenAI, the maker of ChatGPT, announced that an experimental reasoning model of theirs had answered the Olympiad at the Gold medal level, following the same time limits as the human participants. Remarkably, this was not a model specifically trained or designed for the IMO, but a general-purpose reasoning model with reasoning powers good enough for an IMO Gold. The OpenAI announcement raised some issues. Many felt that announcing an AI result while the IMO had not concluded overshadowed the achievements of the human participants. Also, the Gold medal score was graded and given by former IMO medalists hired by OpenAI, and some disputed whether the grading was correct. However, a couple of days later, another announcement came. Google-DeepMind attempted the IMO officially, with an advanced version of Gemini Deep Think. Three days after the Olympiad, with the permission of the IMO organisers, they announced that they had obtained a score at the level of a Gold medal. The IMO president Prof. Gregor Dolinar stated, 'We can confirm that Google DeepMind has reached the much-desired milestone, earning 35 out of a possible 42 points — a gold medal score. Their solutions were astonishing in many respects. IMO graders found them to be clear, precise and most of them easy to follow.' Stages of development Even as it became a popular sensation, ChatGPT was infamous both for hallucinations (making up facts) and for simple arithmetic mistakes. Both these would make solving even modest mathematical problems mostly impossible. The first advance that greatly reduced these errors, which came a few months after the launch of ChatGPT, was the use of so-called agents. Specifically, models were now able to use web searches to gather accurate information, and Python interpreters to run programs to perform calculations and check reasoning using numerical experiments. These made the models dramatically more accurate, and good enough to solve moderately hard mathematical problems. However, as a single error in a mathematical solution makes the solution invalid, these were not yet accurate enough to reach IMO (or research) level. Greater accuracy can be obtained by pairing language models with formal proof systems such as the Lean prover — a computer software that can understand and check proofs. Indeed, for IMO 2024 such a system from Google-DeepMind called AlphaProof obtained a silver medal score (but it ran for two days). Finally, a breakthrough came with the so-called reasoning models, such as o3 from OpenAI and Google-DeepMind's Gemini-2.5-pro. These models are perhaps better described as internal monologue models. Before answering a complex question, they generate a monologue considering approaches, carrying them out, revisiting their proposed solutions, sometimes dithering and starting all over again, before finally giving a solution with which they are satisfied. It were such models, with some additional advances, that got Olympiad Gold medal scores. Analogical reasoning and combining ingredients from different sources gives language models some originality, but probably not enough for hard and novel problems. However, verification either through the internal consistency of reasoning models or, better still, checking by the Lean prover, allows training by trying a large number of things and seeing what works, in the same way that AI systems became chess champions starting with just the rules. Such reinforcement learning has allowed recent models to go beyond training data by creating their own synthetic data. The implications Olympiad problems, for both humans and AIs, are not ends in themselves but tests of mathematical problem-solving ability. There are other aspects of research besides problem-solving. Growing anecdotal experiences suggest that AI systems have excellent capabilities in many of these too, such as suggesting approaches and related problems. However, the crucial difference between problem-solving and research/development is scale. Research involves working for months or years without errors creeping in, and without wandering off in fruitless directions. As mentioned earlier, coupling models with the Lean prover can prevent errors. Indications are that it is only a matter of time before this is successful. In the meantime, these models can act as powerful collaborators with human researchers, greatly accelerating research and development in all areas involving mathematics. The era of the super-scientist is here. Siddhartha Gadgil is a professor in the Department of Mathematics, IISc


Economic Times
15 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Goodbye, $165,000 tech jobs, student coders seek work at Chipotle
Since the early 2010s, a parade of billionaires, tech executives and even US presidents has urged young people to learn coding, arguing that the tech skills would help bolster students' job prospects as well as the economy. Tech companies promised computer science graduates high salaries and all manner of perks. "Typically their starting salary is more than $100,000," plus $15,000 hiring bonuses and stock grants worth $50,000, Brad Smith, a top Microsoft executive, said in 2012 as he kicked off a company campaign to get more high schools to teach computing. The financial incentives, plus the chance to work on popular apps, quickly fed a boom in computer science education, the study of computer programming and processes like algorithms. Last year, the number of undergraduates majoring in the field topped 170,000 in the United States -- more than double the number in 2014, according to the Computing Research Association, a nonprofit. But now, the spread of AI programming tools, which can quickly generate thousands of lines of computer code -- combined with layoffs at companies like Amazon, Intel, Meta and Microsoft -- is dimming prospects in a field that tech leaders promoted for years. The turnabout is derailing the employment dreams of many new computing grads and sending them scrambling for other work. Among college graduates ages 22 to 27, computer science and computer engineering majors are facing some of the highest unemployment rates, 6.1% and 7.5% respectively, according to a report from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. That is more than double the unemployment rate among recent biology and art history graduates, which is just 3%. In response to questions from The New York Times, more than 150 college students and recent graduates -- from state schools as well as private universities -- shared their experiences. Some said they had applied to hundreds, and in several cases thousands, of tech jobs at companies, nonprofits and government agencies. Prominent computing education boosters are now pivoting to AI. President Donald Trump, who in 2017 directed federal funding toward computer science in schools, recently unveiled a national AI action plan that includes channeling more students into AI jobs. Microsoft, a major computing education sponsor, recently said it would provide $4 billion in technology and funding for AI training for students and workers. Last month, Smith said the company was also assessing how AI was changing computer science education.