
Primary election 2025: 3 compete for Reading City Council president
Incumbent City Council President Donna Reed will face two challengers for the office on the Democratic ballot in the May 20 primary election.
The winner of the primary will compete against the Republican candidate in the November general election.
Republican candidate Evelyn Morrison is running unopposed in the primary.
Candidates for the council president seat are elected to four-year terms.
The council president is elected by all voters in the city and is responsible for leading the council in its duties, including approving the city budget, contracts and ordinances, levying taxes, authorizing public improvements and approving the hiring of police and firefighters.
The position is paid $6,875 annually.
Incumbent is marked with an asterisk.
We asked the candidates in the opposed race three questions:
Question 1: How would you describe your leadership style, and how do you see it shaping the work of City Council, if you are elected council president?
Question 2: What would your top priorities be as council president in terms of setting the council's agenda?
Question 3: What would you do to ensure that all council members, regardless of political or personal differences, can work collaboratively?
District 2 Councilor Jaime Baez Jr. is running for council president on the Democratic ballot in the May 20 primary election.
Jaime Baez Jr.
Age: 35
Work/career experience: Small business owner, assistant to state Rep. Johanny Cepeda-Freytiz; certified massage therapist.
Local government/community involvement: City Council District 2 representative, elected 2023. My community work began in 2012 with Atabey 360, participating in street cleanups and youth engagement.
Website: jaimeforthepeople.org
Answers:
1. My leadership style is collaborative, transparent and driven by action. I listen first, then act. As council president, I would foster an environment where voices are heard and initiatives are followed through. I believe in building consensus without compromising integrity, and in ensuring decisions reflect the needs of the people, not politics. My leadership would help City Council stay focused, grounded and responsive to the issues our constituents care about most.
2. My top priorities are housing, public safety and collaboration. I introduced the rent cap resolution to address skyrocketing rents, and I supported the gun safety ordinance that passed. As council president, I would keep these types of community-first policies at the forefront. I'd also focus on expanding access to mental health services, creating youth development opportunities and ensuring transparency in how resources are allocated. We must lead with solutions that empower every neighborhood.
3. I believe communication is the cornerstone of collaboration. I would work to build trust among council members through regular dialogue, one-on-one check-ins, and neutral facilitation of meetings. Regardless of political or personal differences, our duty is to serve our community with respect and unity. I'm committed to creating space for every member to be heard and ensuring our work reflects collective input and shared accountability.
Vanessa Campos
Age: 38
Education: Reading Area Community College; bachelor of arts in education, summa cum laude, and master of education, magna cum laude, Kutztown University.
District 1 Councilor Vanessa Campos is running for council president on the Democratic ballot in the May 20 primary election.
Work/career experience: Licensed real estate agent; former teacher and department head, Reading School District; educational specialist at BCIU; former lead teacher at a city preschool.
Local government/community involvement: City Council District 1 representative; board member, Reading Recreation Commission and Redevelopment Authority; member, city Nominations and Appointments Committee; volunteer with the 18th Wonder Association and South of Penn Task Force.
Answers:
1. My leadership experience in public service emphasizes on collaboration and inclusion. I am an active listener who prioritizes facts and data to inform my decisions. I would continue to exercise this reflective approach as president and encourage it within our council body. Communication is key when working together so maintaining consistent communication with council members, administration, stakeholders and constituents is my top priority. As an experienced leader, it is my goal to represent the legislative office with high standards and utmost regard. My professional character and demeanor are essential qualities needed for a leader to maintain order, balance and a growth mindset. I value open dialogue, agenda transparency, constituent accessibility, efficient operations within council and proactive engagement with administration. The work of City Council is to create balance in our city's government and advocate for our city's mission and progressive vision. My leadership background exemplifies this commitment to achieve our goals.
2. Expand on opportunities for engagement with stakeholders to collaborate on a unified vision to meet the needs of our growing city. I would ensure measurable goals to track progress and completion of our action items. Inclusion and accessibility are one of my top priorities since our city is enriched with diverse cultures, religions, languages, and historical assets. As councilor, I currently embrace issues that impact the equity of our communities. As president, I will continue to ensure our policies and agenda items are addressing inequalities within our population groups. One of my strongest qualities, as a leader, is my adaptability and innovative mindset. I am flexible enough to think out of the box in order to tackle our evolving political and socio-economic conditions in our city. As president, I would be open to varying perspectives when evaluating the outcome of unified efforts. I am committed to ensuring council remains fiscally responsible to secure a long-standing economic future.
3. Communication and involvement are key when bringing people together. Purpose and direction of tasks are also important. As councilors, we have a duty to attend our council meetings but we are also accountable for attending boards, commissions and authorities of choice. Communication helps all councilors stay informed of our city's operations and practices to educate our legislative decisions within council chambers. As president, it is important to bring people together — not only in council but also externally. It is a skill that comes with experience and which I have acquired very well. I am open to initiating conversations where all voices are heard from the perspective of a listener. This helps me accurately share the information to my constituents and fellow councilors for input. Above all, leaders must uphold a sense of respect and professionalism for others. I take pride in maintaining composure in challenging circumstances in order to engage in productive dialogue. I model this behavior to move past disagreements and align our efforts effectively.
Incumbent City Council President Donna Reed will face two challengers for the office on the Democratic ballot in the May 20 primary election.
*Donna Reed
Age: 72
Education: Bachelor of arts degree in political science and communications, The American University, Washington, DC.
Work/career experience: Reporter, columnist and editor at the Reading Eagle; Berks County coordinator Census 2000; assignment editor Berks Edition/Channel 69 News; vice president/communications at the former Berks County Chamber of Commerce; media and government outreach Strategic Reports Inc.; public relations manager Berks County Parks and Recreation Department; Cocalico editor/columnist at The Ephrata Review and contributor to LNP; editor Historical Review of Berks County; contributing writer Berks County Living magazine and other regional publications.
Local government/community involvement: Reading City Council District 5 representative, six terms; council president since January 2023; council representative to Reading Area Transportation Study board and council liaison to Stadium Commission and BCTV. Board member Crime Alert Berks County; Visions FCU Advisory Board member; trustee Berks History Center; board member Pagoda Foundation; founding member Reading Junior Police Academy; chair, Reading 275th anniversary committee.
Answers:
1. I see my leadership style as temperate, expecting my colleagues to understand the public trust they hold. I expect them to demonstrate respect to our constituents and to each other, particularly in times of disagreement. Streamlined communication with the administration and each other is important for the work of the city but, unfortunately, some colleagues don't adhere to the charter-mandated process. That creates additional work for the administration and our staff and can and has led to some confusion and miscommunication. I will continue to do my best to keep meetings moving along so the business of council can be accomplished.
2. Top priorities: Fiscal responsibility; clean and safe city through support of police, fire and public works and reducing blight; advancing efforts for economic development in the downtown and beyond via CRIZ, private developers, and public/private partnerships where feasible.
3. I've always been pleased that I've worked mostly with councilors over the years who were forthright and acted thoughtfully on legislation. Mostly, disagreements never impacted the true teamwork. I've seen factions arise lately which are concerning, particularly seemingly linked to the distractions during formal meetings of members apparently more focused on cellphones than the legislative process. What's being communicated and by whom? Are particular votes being directed by outside interests?

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Associated Press
13 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Iowa governor rejects GOP bill to increase regulations of Summit's carbon dioxide pipeline
DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds on Wednesday rejected a bill that could have introduced more complications for a massive carbon-capture pipeline project routed across several Midwestern states, issuing a rare veto in the Republican-controlled statehouse. The legislation was designed by Iowa House Republicans to increase regulations of Summit Carbon Solutions' estimated $8.9 billion, 2,500-mile (4,023-kilometer) project that cuts across Iowa and already has an approved permit in the state. But in the Senate, it exposed a rift within the party over how to protect property rights. It also provoked loud opposition from members of Iowa's powerful ethanol industry, which argued the project is essential for Iowa's agricultural dominance, for farmers and for construction jobs. Even with the relief from Reynolds' veto, Summit will likely have to readjust plans after South Dakota's governor signed a ban on the use of eminent domain — the government seizure of private property with compensation — to acquire land for carbon dioxide pipelines. Summit's permit application was also rejected in South Dakota. The project has permit approvals in Iowa, Minnesota and North Dakota but faces various court challenges. The Iowa bill would have prohibited the renewal of permits for a carbon dioxide pipeline, limited the use of such a pipeline to 25 years and significantly increased the insurance coverage requirements for the pipeline company. Those provisions would likely have made it less financially feasible for a company to build a carbon dioxide pipeline. As the legislative session wound down, a dozen Republican senators insisted their leaders bring the House-approved bill to the floor for a vote after several years of inaction. The stalemate ended in a long and divisive debate among the Iowa Senate's Republican supermajority, with senators openly criticizing one another and exposing the closed-door discussions that got them there. The pipeline's many critics have for years begged lawmakers for action. They accuse Summit of stepping on their property rights and downplaying the safety risks of building the pipeline alongside family homes, near schools and across ranches. Lee Enterprises and The Associated Press reviewed hundreds of cases that reveal the great legal lengths the company went to to get the project built. In South Dakota, in particular, a slew of eminent domain legal actions to obtain land sparked a groundswell of opposition that was closely watched by lawmakers in Iowa as well. But as debate in the state Senate seemed inevitable, dozens of Summit employees and leaders and members of the Iowa Corn Growers Association, the Iowa Renewable Fuels Association and labor unions made a big showing as well. The pipeline was proposed to carry carbon emissions from ethanol plants in Iowa, Minnesota, Nebraska, North Dakota and South Dakota to be stored underground permanently in North Dakota. By lowering carbon emissions from the plants, the pipeline would lower their carbon intensity scores and make them more competitive in the renewable fuels market. The project would also allow ethanol producers and Summit to tap into federal tax credits. Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a May 12 statement after the vote that a majority of the Iowa Senate 'turned their back on Iowa agriculture.'


Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
Nirenberg says San Antonio did not get heads-up about Texas National Guard
Mayor Ron Nirenberg said San Antonio did not request, nor receive notice of, the Texas National Guard being here ahead of protests planned on Saturday against the Trump administration. Why it matters: Gov. Greg Abbott's decision to send the Texas National Guard to major city protests comes amid a national debate about the militarization of law enforcement and the rights of protesters. Catch up quick: Thousands are expected to protest during "No Kings Day" on Saturday nationwide and in downtown San Antonio. Organizers expect it will be the largest single-day rally against President Trump since the start of his second term. Abbott instructed the Texas National Guard to "use every tool and strategy to help law enforcement maintain order." The White House has already deployed the National Guard and Marines in response to protests in Los Angeles against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids. Reality check: A San Antonio rally last weekend, in protest of ICE deportations and recent local arrests at the courthouse, remained peaceful. Zoom in: Democratic U.S. Reps. Joaquin Castro and Greg Casar said Abbott's decision is "inflammatory" and that he's "escalating tensions rather than promoting safety." What they're saying:"I have full faith and confidence in our community to exercise their First Amendment rights peacefully," Nirenberg said Wednesday at a press conference.


Hamilton Spectator
15 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Consultant on trial for AI-generated robocalls mimicking Biden says he has no regrets
LACONIA, N.H. (AP) — A political consultant told a New Hampshire jury Wednesday that he doesn't regret sending voters robocalls that used artificial intelligence to mimic former President Joe Biden and that he's confident he didn't break the law. Steven Kramer, 56, of New Orleans, has long admitted to orchestrating a message sent to thousands of voters two days before New Hampshire's Jan. 23, 2024, presidential primary. Recipients heard an AI-generated voice similar to the Democratic president's that used his catchphrase 'What a bunch of malarkey' and, as prosecutors allege, suggested that voting in the primary would preclude voters from casting ballots in November. 'It's important that you save your vote for the November election,' voters were told. 'Your votes make a difference in November, not this Tuesday.' Kramer, who faces decades in prison if convicted of voter suppression and impersonating a candidate, said his goal was to send a wake-up call about the potential dangers of AI when he paid a New Orleans magician $150 to create the recording. He was getting frequent calls from people using AI in campaigns, and, worried about the lack of regulations, made it his New Year's resolution to take action. 'This is going to be my one good deed this year,' he recalled while testifying in Belknap County Superior Court. He said his goal wasn't to influence an election, because he didn't consider the primary a real election. At Biden's request, the Democratic National Committee dislodged New Hampshire from its traditional early spot in the 2024 nominating calendar but later dropped its threat not to seat the state's national convention delegates. Biden did not put his name on the ballot or campaign there but won as a write-in. Kramer, who owns a firm specializing in get-out-the-vote projects, argued that the primary was a meaningless straw poll unsanctioned by the DNC. At the time the calls went out, voters were disenfranchised, he said. Asked by his attorney, Tom Reid, whether he did anything illegal, Kramer said, 'I'm positive I did not.' Later, he said he had no regrets and that his actions likely spurred AI regulations in multiple states. Kramer, who will be questioned by prosecutors Thursday, also faces a $6 million fine by the Federal Communications Commission but told The Associated Press on Wednesday that he won't pay it. Lingo Telecom, the company that transmitted the calls, agreed to pay $1 million in a settlement in August. The robocalls appeared to come from a former New Hampshire Democratic Party chair, Kathy Sullivan, and told voters to call her number to be removed from the call list. On the witness stand earlier Wednesday, Sullivan said she was confused and then outraged after speaking to one of the recipients and later hearing the message. 'I hung up the phone and said, 'There is something really crazy going on,'' she said. 'Someone is trying to suppress the vote for Biden. I can't believe this is happening.' Months later, she got a call from Kramer in which he said he used her number because he knew she would contact law enforcement and the media. He also described his motive — highlighting AI's potential dangers — but she didn't believe him, she testified. 'My sense was he was trying to convince me that he'd done this defensible, good thing,' she said. 'I'm listening to this thinking to myself, 'What does he thing I am, stupid?' He tried to suppress the vote.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .