ChargePoint's Latest EV Charging Tech Revealed
These new Level 2 chargers are rated for 80 amps and can support charging up to 19.2kW. ChargePoints claims at full strength, an EV parked at home can be charged from zero to 100 percent in about four hours. Currently, charging from zero to full is an overnight procedure. Most homeowners with ChargePoint chargers in their garage have the company's Home Flex chargers, which are rated at 50 amps and deliver up to 12kW of power.Perhaps the most exciting news buried in ChargePoint's announcement is that these new chargers will support series wiring, which allows multiple vehicles to charge from a single charger. Currently, each EV requires a dedicated charger to power up; this move should help homeowners with multiple EVs avoid installing multiple chargers, which is very costly.
Supporting multi-vehicle charging is news that these new chargers will come with ChargePoint Omni Port, allowing multiple vehicles with disparate charging connectors to use the same charger hub.
'ChargePoint's next generation of EV chargers will be revolutionary, not evolutionary,' said Hossein Kazemi, Chief Technical Officer of hardware at ChargePoint. 'The architecture underpinning them enables highly anticipated technologies which will deliver a significantly better experience for station owners and the EV drivers who charge with them.'
ChargePoint announced a joint venture with General Motors earlier this year to bring faster DC charging to public charging stations. That move will see up to 500 new fast chargers installed nationwide - also by the end of the year. These new public chargers also support ChargePoint Omni Port.
At home, ChargePoint says its new Level 2 AC chargers will have dynamic load balancing, accelerating your vehicle's charge speed when power isn't needed elsewhere in the home. To wit, the top-end charging speed of 19.2kW would occur when nothing else in the home requires significant electricity.
In addition to home charging, ChargePoint will have versions of its new Level 2 charging for fleet and commercial installations. The company hasn't said how much its new chargers will cost.Slow charging has dogged the EV industry for years. Most EV owners charge at home; people often forget to plug their vehicle in when they arrive home, which is an added stressor. Without reaching a full charge by morning, many start their days with range anxiety. ChargePoint's new chargers are a step in the right direction: faster charging at home, particularly overnight.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
GM's quarterly results illustrate the folly of tariffs
General Motors, a cornerstone of American industry, is suffering the consequences of President Trump's unconstitutional 25 percent tariffs on imported vehicles and auto parts. In the second quarter of 2025, GM suffered a $1.1 billion tariff blow to its operating income, slashing the company's profit margin from a healthy 9 percent to just 6.1 percent. Net income plunged by 36.1 percent from the prior quarter and by a staggering 40.7 percent compared to a year ago. Although the estimated tariff impact for the full year of $4 billion to $5 billion is less than 3 percent of GM's overall revenue, that cost represents more than half of the typical annual income for the company over the past decade. The consequences extend far beyond GM's balance sheet. Tariffs, paid by importers to the federal government, are partly absorbed by companies and partly passed to consumers. We've especially seen this in import-sensitive sectors including furnishings, appliances, clothes and toys. Men's shirts and sweaters, for instance, rose 4.9 percent in June alone. When businesses 'eat' the cost, as GM tried to do last quarter, the fallout is no less severe. Diminished earnings mean less capital for investment in better technology or expanded operations, slowing broader economic growth, fewer resources for pay raises or new jobs — hardly the boon for workers that tariff advocates promise. The data confirms this. Nationwide, 14,000 manufacturing jobs disappeared in the past two months, erasing all gains in 2025. In June, real average weekly earnings dropped by 0.4 percent, an annualized loss of nearly 5 percent. Shareholders are also feeling the pinch. Stock valuations track a company's expected future earnings. Since 2012, GM's stock price increased by more than 200 percent. GM's price-to-earnings ratio today stands at 6.83, almost identical to 2012 levels. Stock prices increased alongside earnings. A sustained $5 billion annual hit, wiping out over half of GM's annual net income, could erase more than $20 billion in market capitalization if valuations adjust. With tariffs eroding profits, is it any wonder that GM's stock has slid 8 percent since its post-2024 election peak and now languishes 13 percent off its 2021 highs? This affects millions of middle-class Americans and retirees with pensions and savings invested. More broadly, lower dividends and diminished returns discourage investment, starving companies of the capital needed to expand. The result: slower growth, fewer jobs and weaker wage gains. GM, to its credit, is fighting to offset 30 percent of this burden by boosting U.S. production, cutting costs and increasing domestic content to comply with the USMCA trade agreement's labyrinthine rules. Yet even if successful, the net impact of $2.8 billion to $3.5 billion will devour a significant slice of GM's already thin margins. Profit margins at GM — as in most other sectors — are far less than conventional wisdom. GM's net profit margin over the past decade has averaged less than 5 percent. In other words, a $30,000 vehicle yields less than $1,500 in profit. GM's plans to shift some production to U.S. plants and rework supply chains is a testament to private enterprise's resilience. But make no mistake: These shifts sacrifice efficiency for compliance. Restructuring operations in a free market in pursuit of efficiency yields more profit, consumer benefit and economic growth. Doing so under duress to escape arbitrary tariffs may result in survival, but without these benefits. Resources that could have fueled innovation or lowered prices are now squandered on navigating artificial trade barriers. As an important sidenote, roughly half the tariff's cost stems from GM's South Korean operations, a stark reminder of the folly of taxing trade with allies. Rather than strengthening ties with democratic partners through bold free-trade agreements, these tariffs risk pushing nations like South Korea toward China, America's chief adversary. Far from economic strategy, it is geopolitical shortsightedness. Politicians sometimes prefer tariffs to other forms of taxation because they are less visible than taxes on income or sales. This makes it easier to dodge accountability by blaming 'greedy' corporations. For this reason, Trump called Jeff Bezos to deter Amazon from listing tariff costs on purchases. The White House press secretary labeled this a 'hostile and political act by Amazon.' Regardless, protectionism is not cost-free. Sustained tariffs will raise prices, shrink profits, erode real wages and slow economic growth. GM's quarterly results are a warning.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thinking of Buying Tesla Stock? Here Are 2 Red Flags to Watch
Key Points Tesla's heavy reliance on Elon Musk adds significant leadership risk. Increasing competition from established automakers and Chinese EV makers is pressuring Tesla's dominance. Investors need to be comfortable with Tesla's high valuation. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has long been the front runner in the electric vehicle (EV) revolution in the U.S. Its innovation, brand strength, and rapid growth have made it a favorite among investors. Yet, despite its impressive track record, there are two big risks that investors should carefully consider before buying Tesla stock today. 1. The Elon Musk factor Elon Musk's leadership is often cited as Tesla's greatest strength -- and, paradoxically, one of its most significant vulnerabilities. Musk's vision and hands-on approach have driven Tesla's technological breakthroughs and ambitious expansion. However, this heavy reliance on a single individual introduces what investors refer to as "key man risk." If Musk were to step back from daily operations or shift his focus to other projects, Tesla might face challenges in maintaining its momentum. Though Tesla's management team has grown stronger, few executives command the same vision, drive, and public attention as Musk. Recently, Musk's increasing involvement in political activities has raised concerns about potential distractions or reputational risks for Tesla. While the company has remained operationally strong, these developments underscore the uncertainty around its future leadership continuity. While Tesla's success lies not only with Musk but also with his team, which has executed well on his vision -- no one can build a trillion-dollar company alone -- there is still no clear successor (or a viable management team) . The silver lining here is that the Tesla board has become more serious about finding one in recent months, largely due to the CEO's active involvement in politics. For investors, this means that Tesla's fortunes remain closely tied to Musk's presence and decisions -- a factor that adds a layer of risk to the investment. 2. Intensifying competition Tesla might have been an early mover in the EV industry, but its dominance is no longer guaranteed. The industry landscape is rapidly evolving, with legacy automakers and new entrants accelerating their electric ambitions. Companies like Ford and General Motors are aggressively expanding their EV lineups. For instance, Ford plans to introduce a $30,000 midsize truck by 2027. That price is significantly lower than the average for an EV, and Ford is investing $5 billion in its EV production to make it happen. GM, on the other hand, is working hard on next-generation battery technologies to improve range, charging performance, and cost. Meanwhile, Chinese manufacturers such as BYD are growing their international footprints, particularly in Europe, where Tesla experienced a nearly 27% sales declinein July 2025. BYD's battery technology, government support, and competitive pricing make it a formidable challenger. In addition, a host of EV start-ups are innovating in battery tech, autonomous driving, and new business models, further intensifying competition. While Tesla is not sitting still -- it is working on becoming the lowest-cost producer by cutting prices to grow sales volume and achieve economies of scale -- there is no guarantee that it can maintain its market share over time. In short, it's no longer the only player in town. What does this mean for investors? Tesla's story remains compelling: It's a pioneer with a powerful brand, innovative products, and potential optionality with some of its long shot bets (robotaxi, humanoid robots, etc). But the key man risk surrounding Musk and the escalating competitive landscape are real concerns that investors can't ignore. If Tesla continues to innovate more rapidly than its rivals, the company could sustain its growth trajectory. However, any leadership changes or slips in market position could hurt the business and its share price. While these two risks don't necessarily call for the sale of the stock, they do mean that investors should think carefully before buying the stock today. Tesla stock trades at a significant premium valuation to other carmakers. For perspective, Tesla has a price-to-sales (P/S) ratio of 12.9, compared to GM's 0.3. Unless you're comfortable with the risks and the high valuation, buying the stock today may not be a prudent decision. Don't miss this second chance at a potentially lucrative opportunity Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $467,985!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $44,015!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $668,155!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Lawrence Nga has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Tesla. The Motley Fool recommends BYD Company and General Motors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Thinking of Buying Tesla Stock? Here Are 2 Red Flags to Watch was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Where Will Ford Be in 3 Years?
Key Points Ford is launching a new EV platform for upcoming electrified models. A new $30,000 EV pickup truck is slated for 2027. The company will still have to manage tariffs and a shift in the U.S. federal government's approach to EVs over the next few years. 10 stocks we like better than Ford Motor Company › Switch Auto Insurance and Save Today! Great Rates and Award-Winning Service The Insurance Savings You Expect Affordable Auto Insurance, Customized for You There's a lot of transition in the auto industry right now, but no other legacy car manufacturer may be undergoing bigger shifts than Ford (NYSE: F). The company recently announced that it will use a new production process to build and launch an entirely new electric vehicle (EV) lineup, beginning with a pickup truck that costs around $30,000. It's an ambitious plan, and Ford hasn't laid out all the details yet, but it's clear that this is the company's roadmap over the next few years. For that reason, it's worth diving into what Ford has said about its plans, as well as some of the biggest challenges it'll face. 1. It'll have an entirely new EV platform by 2027 Ford said it assembled a stealth skunkworks team to completely rethink the assembly line for a new era. The result will be the Ford Universal EV Platform that future vehicles will be built on. Specifically, the assembly line will reduce parts by 20% compared to a typical vehicle and have 40% fewer workstations, and vehicles will be 15% faster to assemble. The goal is to get a new EV pickup truck to customers by 2027, with a price tag of around $30,000. That's an enormously ambitious plan. To get there, Ford will spend $2 billion converting a Kentucky factory for the new vehicle lineup, which will eventually make more than just the pickup truck. It'll also spend an additional $3 billion previously announced for a battery factory in Michigan. 2. Ford will shift toward improved profitability Of course, any new venture a company makes has the goal of making money. But it's worth mentioning that Ford appears laser-focused on making this successful and realizes that the next few years are a do-or-die EV scenario for the company. Ford CEO Jim Farley said in a press release: "We have all lived through far too many 'good college tries' by Detroit automakers to make affordable vehicles that ends up with idled plants, layoffs and uncertainty. So, this had to be a strong, sustainable and profitable business. From Day 1, we knew there was no incremental path to success." There's a sense of urgency from Ford here. Frankly, that's good to see. Ford understands that competition from China is fierce and that if those rivals were ever to sell their products in the U.S., legacy automakers would not be able to compete. And with the average transaction cost of an electric vehicle in the U.S. being about $57,000, Ford is positioning itself both to be profitable with its new EV line, and to appeal to the budgets of the masses. While there's no guarantee of success, Ford's aim over the next several years to have a new, profitable EV lineup that's efficiently produced and affordable is a step in the right direction. 3. There will still be some headwinds from tariffs While Ford is clearly working to reduce its exposure to automotive tariffs, it's important to note that it's not out of the woods. Ford said tariffs have cost the company about $800 million already. Management recently increased the projected hit to its pre-tax adjusted profit to $3 billion -- $500 million higher than previously estimated. In addition to tariffs, the company will have to contend with a less hospitable EV environment as the federal EV credits disappear at the end of September. Ford's new lower-cost EV model is accounting for this and could spur its own demand simply by being an affordable EV. But it's noteworthy that the federal government is backing away from trying to spur the electric vehicle market. It means that Ford and other automakers will be left to convince buyers that electric vehicles are worth buying on their own merits. Where does all this leave Ford in three years? Even with Ford's ambitious EV plans, there are still a lot of unknowns with the company over the next few years. For one, will customers want its new EVs? I wouldn't mind a $30,000 pickup truck option, and others probably wouldn't either. But that leads to another question: Can it actually deliver on that price tag? Plenty of automakers have promised an affordable EV in the U.S., and it usually ends up being more of a unicorn than reality. Ford has a lot to prove over the next three years. The company's stock will likely rise or fall based on how well it delivers on its latest EV plan. Do the experts think Ford Motor Company is a buy right now? The Motley Fool's expert analyst team, drawing on years of investing experience and deep analysis of thousands of stocks, leverages our proprietary Moneyball AI investing database to uncover top opportunities. They've just revealed their to buy now — did Ford Motor Company make the list? When our Stock Advisor analyst team has a stock recommendation, it can pay to listen. After all, Stock Advisor's total average return is up 1,070% vs. just 184% for the S&P — that is beating the market by 885.55%!* Imagine if you were a Stock Advisor member when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,155!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,106,071!* The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Chris Neiger has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Where Will Ford Be in 3 Years? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
