logo
Shark Bites In French Polynesia Reveal A Hidden Side Of Shark Behavior

Shark Bites In French Polynesia Reveal A Hidden Side Of Shark Behavior

Forbes12-05-2025

Sharks have long been cast as ruthless, mindless predators, a fear so deeply ingrained that it has ... More fueled an entire genre of Hollywood horror films.
Sharks have long been cast as ruthless, mindless predators, a fear so deeply ingrained that it has fueled an entire genre of Hollywood horror films. Yet a long-term study from French Polynesia shows that sometimes, when sharks bite humans, it is not out of predatory instinct… but rather self-defense.
A team of researchers, led by Dr. Eric Emile Germain Clua of the Paris Science et Lettres (PSL) Research University, have reviewed over 60 years of shark bite data and found that activities like spearfishing and handling fish traps often trigger a defensive response. In such cases, the sharks react immediately to human aggression, typically inflicting superficial wounds that are rarely fatal unless unfortunate circumstances, like arterial damage, occur. These defensive bites lack the typical signs seen when a shark attacks out of fear or predation, such as pectoral fin lowering or hunched swimming, and usually involve little tearing of flesh or removal of tissue. Unlike predatory attacks, where significant injury and loss of flesh are common, self-defense bites are swift, sometimes repeated, but comparatively mild.
The waters of French Polynesia, home to over 30 shark species within a 2.1 million square mile (5.5 million km²) exclusive economic zone, provide a unique environment to study shark-human interactions. Since the area was declared a shark sanctuary in 2006, the shark populations have remained relatively healthy, offering a rare opportunity to observe these interactions over decades. The team found that bites classified as self-defense were exclusively initiated after a human acted aggressively toward a shark. Harpooning, speargun strikes, and even rough handling were common triggers. In most cases, the resulting injuries were minor to moderate, reinforcing the idea that the shark's intent was not to hunt or consume but to respond to a perceived threat.
The idea that wild animals defend themselves when threatened is not new. Birds, bears, and even snakes and spiders regularly react defensively to human provocation. However, detailed documentation of this behavior in sharks has been lacking until now. Earlier mentions of defensive shark bites were anecdotal or speculative, without comprehensive data, the scientists argue. But this new analysis confirms that sharks, like many terrestrial animals, may bite defensively when cornered or attacked. Out of all the cases reviewed, a small but consistent percentage — about 5% over a 15-year span — involved self-defense motivations. These incidents were concentrated in areas like the Tuamotu archipelago, where traditional fishing practices remain common.
Sharks biting in self-defense reminds us that they are not villains of the ocean but animals trying ... More to survive in a world increasingly dominated by humans.
The new study also highlights an important caution I personally hope everyone heeds: distressed sharks should not be handled by untrained people. Even a wounded or trapped shark can lash out reflexively, and in these moments, the bite is not calculated or proportionate. Rather, it is an instinctive act of survival, much like a bear swatting at a perceived threat or a bird pecking at an intruder near its nest. By shifting the narrative to acknowledge human responsibility, public attitudes toward sharks could not only become more balanced, but can help prevent unnecessary injuries to both humans and sharks. Sharks are already facing numerous threats from overfishing, habitat loss, and climate change. Misrepresenting their behavior only adds to the challenges they face by justifying unnecessary fear and sometimes lethal retaliation.
Understanding the motivations behind shark bites is crucial for developing non-lethal management strategies. As human presence in marine environments grows, so too does the likelihood of human-wildlife conflict (in French Polynesia alone, an estimated 200,000 spearfishing sessions happen annually). Just as we have learned to modify our everyday behaviors around bears, snakes, and other wildlife to reduce conflicts, we can do the same for animals at sea. Avoiding unnecessary provocation of sharks, educating ocean users about shark behavior, and promoting respectful coexistence can lower risks for both sides. Ultimately, by respecting their space and understanding their responses, we can work toward safer waters and a better future for sharks and people alike.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Heartbreaking Video Shows Fish Fleeing Huge Nets
Heartbreaking Video Shows Fish Fleeing Huge Nets

Yahoo

time4 days ago

  • Yahoo

Heartbreaking Video Shows Fish Fleeing Huge Nets

David Attenborough has become the voice we associate with all things beautiful in nature, but he's never shied away from showing the harrowing destruction that humans visit upon our planet. This, however, might be the biggest gut-punch he's delivered yet. In his latest documentary "OCEAN," Attenborough presents us with unique footage showing the devastating effects of bottom trawling on the seafloor, right where the action is happening. The filmmakers placed a camera underwater, showing us the actual view of the trawl net as it sweeps up countless poor sea creatures, who desperately try to out-swim their doom. It's an unprecedented look — but it doesn't make for easy viewing. "I have seen the bycatch on the deck of trawlers, but like everybody else, I had never seen what the trawl does underwater," Enric Sala, a marine ecologist who served as executive producer and scientific advisor on Ocean, told IFLScience in a recent interview. "Being at the level of the net and seeing all these poor creatures trying to escape the net, that's something that nobody else had seen." Bottom trawling is a widely used method of fishing that involves dragging an enormous net across the seafloor, ensnaring hundreds if not thousands of aquatic creatures in a single sweep. It's a blunt approach that doesn't discriminate between species. Most of the fish that get caught aren't even what the fishermen are looking for, but they perish anyway. "Over three-quarters of a trawler's catch may be thrown away," Attenborough narrates in the documentary. "It's hard to imagine a more wasteful way to catch fish." Trawling also ravages the seafloor itself, as the heavy chain or beam that keeps the net open smashes into any rock or aquatic fauna in its path, while dredging up literal tons of sediment. "The trawlers tear the seabed with such force, that their trails of destruction can be seen from space," Attenborough says. It gets worse. As the seabed is thrown up, so are the vast stores of carbon it harbored. A massive 2024 study estimated that some 370 million metric tons of carbon dioxide is released by bottom trawling every single year. That puts it "on the scale of global aviation," Sala said, which produces nearly a billion tons annually. In terms of both the greenhouse impact and the sweeping scale of the damage wreaked to local habitats, it's the ocean's equivalent to deforestation. One study estimated that bottom trawlers scrape 1.9 million square miles of seafloor per year, roughly equivalent to 1.3 percent of the entire ocean. "It's happening everywhere around the ocean, including in many of our protected areas," Toby Nowlan, the director and producer on OCEAN, told IFLScience. "The difference being that this is as destructive as bulldozing your local ancient woodland, or the Amazon rainforest." "If my local ancient woodland, Leigh Woods, was just bulldozed, the entire city would be up in arms, but this is what's happening underwater," Nowlan added. "The whole reason [people aren't up in arms about trawling] is that it's remained hidden from view." Not anymore. More on the ocean: Benevolent Orca Pods Are Adopting Baby Pilot Whales in an Apparent Effort to Clean Up the Species' Image

Shark Skeletons Aren't Bones. They're Blueprints.
Shark Skeletons Aren't Bones. They're Blueprints.

Forbes

time6 days ago

  • Forbes

Shark Skeletons Aren't Bones. They're Blueprints.

Blacktips are medium-sized coastal sharks commonly found in warm, shallow waters around the world, ... More including the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean, and parts of the Indian and Pacific Oceans. Sharks don't have bones. Instead, their skeletons are made from mineralized cartilage, an adaptation that has helped these predators move through the oceans for over 400 million years. A new study takes a deeper look — quite literally — at how this cartilage works. Using a combination of high-resolution 3D imaging and in-situ mechanical testing, a global team of scientists have mapped out the internal structure of shark cartilage and found it to be much more complex than it appears on the surface. The findings not only help explain how sharks maintain their strength and flexibility, but also open the door for developing tough, adaptable materials based on nature's own engineering. The research focused on blacktip sharks (Carcharhinus limbatus) and involved a collaboration between the Charles E. Schmidt College of Science, the College of Engineering and Computer Science at Florida Atlantic University, the German Electron Synchrotron (DESY) in Germany, and NOAA Fisheries. Blacktips are medium-sized coastal sharks commonly found in warm, shallow waters around the world, including the Gulf of Mexico, the Caribbean, and parts of the Indian and Pacific Oceans. They typically grow to about 5 feet (1.5 meters) in length, though some individuals can reach up to 8 feet (2.4 meters). Named for the distinctive black markings on the tips of their dorsal, pelvic, and tail fins, blacktip sharks primarily eat small fish, squid, and crustaceans, using quick bursts of speed to chase down prey. The team zoomed in on their cartilage using synchrotron X-ray nanotomography, a powerful imaging technique that can reveal details down to the nanometer scale. What they found was that the cartilage wasn't uniform. In fact, it had two distinct regions, each with its own structure and purpose. One is called the 'corpus calcareum,' the outer mineralized layer, and the other is the 'intermediale,' the inner core. Both are made of densely packed collagen and bioapatite (the same mineral found in human bones). But while their chemical makeup is similar, their physical structures are not. In both regions, the cartilage was found to be full of pores and reinforced with thick struts, which help absorb pressure and strain from multiple directions. That's especially important for sharks, since they are constantly in motion. Their spines have to bend and flex without breaking as they swim. The cartilage, it turns out, acts almost like a spring. It stores energy as the shark's tail flexes, then releases that energy to power the next stroke. The scientists also noted the presence of tiny, needle-like crystals of bioapatite aligned with strands of collagen. This alignment increases the material's ability to resist damage. Researchers also noted helical fiber structures in the cartilage, the twisting patterns of collagen helping prevent cracks from spreading. These structures work together to distribute pressure and protect the skeleton from failure; this kind of layered, directional reinforcement is something human engineers have tried to mimic in synthetic materials, but nature has been perfecting it for hundreds of millions of years. The intermediale cartilage of a blacktip shark, with arrows highlighting the internal mineralized ... More network that supports and reinforces the structure. Dr. Vivian Merk, senior author of the study and an assistant professor in the FAU Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, the FAU Department of Ocean and Mechanical Engineering, and the FAU Department of Biomedical Engineering, explained in a press release that this is a prime example of biomineralization: 'Nature builds remarkably strong materials by combining minerals with biological polymers, such as collagen – a process known as biomineralization. This strategy allows creatures like shrimp, crustaceans and even humans to develop tough, resilient skeletons. Sharks are a striking example. Their mineral-reinforced spines work like springs, flexing and storing energy as they swim.' Merk hopes that understanding how sharks pull this off can help inspire new materials that are both strong and flexible, perfect for medical implants, protective gear, or aerospace design. To test just how tough this cartilage really is, the team applied pressure to microscopic pieces of the shark's vertebrae. At first, they saw only slight deformations of less than one micrometer. Only after applying pressure a second time did they observe fractures, and even then, the damage stayed confined to a single mineralized layer, hinting at the material's built-in resistance to catastrophic failure. 'After hundreds of millions of years of evolution, we can now finally see how shark cartilage works at the nanoscale – and learn from them,' said Dr. Marianne Porter, co-author and an associate professor in the FAU Department of Biological Sciences. 'We're discovering how tiny mineral structures and collagen fibers come together to create a material that's both strong and flexible, perfectly adapted for a shark's powerful swimming. These insights could help us design better materials by following nature's blueprint.' Dr. Stella Batalama, dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Science, agreed: 'This research highlights the power of interdisciplinary collaboration. By bringing together engineers, biologists and materials scientists, we've uncovered how nature builds strong yet flexible materials. The layered, fiber-reinforced structure of shark cartilage offers a compelling model for high-performance, resilient design, which holds promise for developing advanced materials from medical implants to impact-resistant gear.' This research was supported by a National Science Foundation grant awarded to Merk; an NSF CAREER Award, awarded to Porter; and seed funding from the FAU College of Engineering and Computer Science and FAU Sensing Institute (I-SENSE). The acquisition of a transmission electron microscope was supported by a United States Department of Defense instrumentation/equipment grant awarded to Merk.

The Ocean Is Getting Darker, Threatening All That Lives Within
The Ocean Is Getting Darker, Threatening All That Lives Within

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

The Ocean Is Getting Darker, Threatening All That Lives Within

Almost all life in the ocean depends on the upper waters where sunlight filters in, known as the photic zone – but new research suggests this narrow window of valuable marine light is shrinking in oceans worldwide. In the past 20 years, marine scientists have found, more than a fifth of our oceans have been growing darker. Thomas Davies, a marine biologist from the University of Plymouth, and Tim Smyth, a marine biogeochemist from the University of Exeter, noticed that despite growing concerns from scientists about ocean darkening, nobody had really quantified its extent. "There has been research showing how the surface of the ocean has changed color over the last 20 years, potentially as a result of changes in plankton communities," Davies says. "Our results provide evidence that such changes cause widespread darkening that reduces the amount of ocean available for animals that rely on the Sun and the Moon for their survival and reproduction." Pairing NASA satellite data from 2003 to 2022 with numerical modeling, the duo has uncovered a pattern of the photic zone depth – which inherently constrains the habitat for most ocean life – shrinking across the years. The photic zone is the topmost layer of the ocean, where light from the Sun (including that reflected off the Moon) permeates the water. All marine organisms that photosynthesize – seagrasses, kelps, and most essential of all, phytoplanktons – must live in the shallower parts of this layer to harness the Sun's energy. So the many other organisms that depend on these primary producers – like corals, crustaceans, fish, and marine mammals – hang out in the photic zone too. The study found in nearly 10 percent of the world's oceans, the depth of the photic zone has shrunk by more than 50 meters (164 feet). This means that three-dimensional habitat has become a lot smaller, which leads to greater competition for resources. Even worse, in 2.6 percent of the ocean, the photic zone has reduced by more than 100 meters. "The ocean is far more dynamic than it is often given credit for. For example, we know the light levels within the water column vary massively over any 24-hour period, and animals whose behavior is directly influenced by light are far more sensitive to its processes and change," says Smyth. "If the photic zone is reducing by around 50 meters in large swathes of the ocean, animals that need light will be forced closer to the surface, where they will have to compete for food and the other resources they need. That could bring about fundamental changes in the entire marine ecosystem." A few factors affect the depth of the photic zone. Light that hits the ocean in a vertical nosedive, like equatorial rays shining in the middle of the day, can penetrate further into the water, with fewer photons reflecting off the surface. And the less resistance those plunging photons encounter, in the form of suspended sediment and organic matter, the further they can dive. That's why, in clear tropical waters, light can penetrate up to 80 meters deep. When entering the water at an angle, however, more light reflects off the surface, and photons that do break the surface have to travel farther on their way down. This results in a much narrower photic zone at the poles – less than 10 meters deep in some places. This may partially explain why some of the most prominent changes were seen in the photic zones of the Arctic and Antarctic. But sediment and other suspended matter, like algal blooms, make the water more opaque, affecting the depths that light can reach. This is what Davies and Smyth suspect is darkening the world's waters in recent decades. "A combination of nutrient, organic material, and sediment loading near the coasts and changes in global ocean circulation are probable causes of increases in primary and secondary productivity that have reduced light penetration into surface waters," they write in their research paper. In extreme cases, like the recent algal blooms across Australia's Great Southern Reef, a lack of light can lead to mass mortality events. But the world's photic zones aren't only shrinking near the coast, where we would expect excess runoff from human activities to cloud the waters, as is evident in the Baltic Sea and the eastern coasts of England and Scotland. Darkening was also prominent in the Gulf Stream and the poles, where climate change is rapidly changing the natural systems. "We also rely on the ocean and its photic zones for the air we breathe, the fish we eat, our ability to fight climate change, and for the general health and wellbeing of the planet," Davies says. "Taking all of that into account, our findings represent genuine cause for concern." This research was published in Global Change Biology. Your Salad Could Be Carrying Microplastics From Soil Into Your Body UN Warns: High Odds We'll Exceed 1.5°C Temp Rise by 2029 Earth's Crust Is Hiding Vast Reserves of Hydrogen – Here's How We Can Find It

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store