logo
In Tesla's wake, more big companies propose voting "Dexit" to depart Delaware

In Tesla's wake, more big companies propose voting "Dexit" to depart Delaware

Time of India14-05-2025

In the coming weeks, investors in nine public companies worth at least $1 billion each will vote on proposals to ditch Delaware as their place of incorporation, potentially denting the state's long time reputation as Corporate America's capital, Reuters has found. Five companies with a stock market value of at least $1 billion have moved their legal home out of Delaware since last year, in what some have nicknamed "
Dexit
."
Tesla
made a high-profile move to Texas last year and in April, President Donald Trump's social media company Trump Media & Technology , which owns the Truth Social platform, decamped to Florida. Most of the companies are dominated by a significant shareholder or founder. Delaware judges have expanded the court's most stringent legal standard to a growing range of situations involving controllers, increasing the risk of
shareholder lawsuits
. The decisions culminated with the blockbuster ruling last year that rescinded Musk's $56 billion pay package from Tesla.
Less than an hour after the ruling, Musk said on X: "Never incorporate your company in the state of Delaware."
Musk's SpaceX and Tesla soon reincorporated in Texas. Musk did not respond to a request for comment.
5
5
Next
Stay
Playback speed
1x Normal
Back
0.25x
0.5x
1x Normal
1.5x
2x
5
5
/
Skip
Ads by
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Join new Free to Play WWII MMO War Thunder
War Thunder
Play Now
Undo
Trump Media, which is controlled by a trust that owns shares on behalf of President Trump and is overseen by his oldest son, said in its March proxy statement that Delaware's "increasingly litigious environment facing corporations with controlling stockholders has created unpredictability in decision-making." The company cited the Musk pay ruling as an example. It is now incorporated in Florida. Dropbox and The Trade Desk , which each has a large shareholder, and Cannae Holdings have moved their charter to Nevada from Delaware. They did not respond to a request for comment.
Among the companies set to vote on proposals to leave are Simon Property Group, which is seeking shareholder approval on Wednesday to reincorporate in Indiana, and gaming platform Roblox, which wants to move to Nevada.
Live Events
Unlike many of the other companies that have proposed a "Dexit," Simon does not have a controlling shareholder. It declined to comment on its reasons for proposing a move, referring to its latest proxy statement. Roblox said that Nevada law provides greater predictability. To be sure, the share of Delaware-based companies in the Russell 3000 index, which covers nearly all public companies, continues to grow, rising to 62% last year from 56% in 2020, according to ISS-Corporate. However, 2024 was the first year that more companies in the Russell Index left Delaware than moved their incorporation to the state.
"On the Richter scale, it's not that high," said Benjamin Edwards, a professor at the UNLV School of Law, of the changes. "But it's still shaking the ground."
FEARING AN EXODUS
Delaware, which has no sales tax, gets around a third of its general budget revenue from fees and taxes related to chartering businesses. Fearing an exodus of companies leaving after the judicial rulings, the state enacted legislation in March that limits the role of the state's judges in reviewing certain corporate deals. It also limited the scope of so-called "books and records" requests, a legal tool often used by shareholder attorneys to try to obtain directors' emails and texts.
Despite the recent changes,
corporate law
in Delaware remains relatively strict when it comes to insiders making deals that would likely benefit them directly, such as a deal to buy assets from a controlling shareholder or Musk and his Tesla pay arrangement, legal experts said.
"That's one area where Delaware has consistently said, 'Look, we're going to kick the tires of those decisions with a little bit extra force'," said Eric Talley, a professor at Columbia Law School.
Delaware law typically requires a company that strikes a deal with a controlling shareholder to prove the arrangement met a strict standard showing the price and process were fair, unless it was negotiated by independent directors or approved by shareholders.
In Nevada, the same controlling shareholder deal would likely be protected by a legal standard known as the
business judgment rule
, which shields against lawsuits, regardless of how it was negotiated and approved, legal experts said. Talley said Nevada directors are protected unless they engage in fraud. "It's actually okay to engage in self-dealing, as long as you don't lie about it," he said. A state's corporate law governs a company's relationship with shareholders and typically does not affect legal rights of employees or consumers.
In Texas, where Tesla and SpaceX are now incorporated, lawmakers last week approved amendments to its corporate law that are aimed at reducing the threat of shareholder litigation, in part by allowing companies to set stock ownership thresholds for lawsuits. The plaintiff in the Musk pay case owned just nine shares when he filed suit in 2018.
Governor Greg Abbott has not signed the bill and his office did not respond to a request for comment.
Eric Lentell, the general counsel at Delaware-chartered Archer Aviation, said the aircraft developer is considering reincorporating in Texas and believes directors of other public companies should reconsider Delaware. After a Delaware judge refused last year to recognize a vote by Tesla investors to reinstate Musk's pay, Lentell said it signaled that Delaware judges "have become kind of activist in nature" by appearing to rewrite settled law.
"I think that's where people get nervous," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Flying suitcases packed with Hard Drives to China, taking hundreds of servers on rent and ...: How Chinese AI companies dodge US chip ban
Flying suitcases packed with Hard Drives to China, taking hundreds of servers on rent and ...: How Chinese AI companies dodge US chip ban

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Flying suitcases packed with Hard Drives to China, taking hundreds of servers on rent and ...: How Chinese AI companies dodge US chip ban

(AI image) In a bid to bypass stringent U.S. restrictions on advanced AI chips, Chinese companies are resorting to innovative workarounds, including processing data abroad. According to a recent Wall Street Journal report, in early March, four Chinese engineers traveled from Beijing to Malaysia, each carrying a suitcase with 15 hard drives containing 80 terabytes of data for training an AI model. At a Malaysian data center, the engineers utilized approximately 300 servers equipped with Nvidia's advanced chips to develop the AI model, which they later brought back to China. Smuggling AI hardware Since 2022, the U.S. has tightened export controls on high-end AI chips to China, citing national security concerns. According to WSJ report, these restrictions have limited Chinese firms' access to cutting-edge American technology, prompting them to explore alternatives. Some have substituted domestic chips for American ones, while others have smuggled AI hardware through third countries. However, increased U.S. pressure has made smuggling more challenging, pushing Chinese companies to process data outside China in regions like Southeast Asia and the Middle East. 'This was something we were consistently concerned about,' said Thea Kendler, former head of export controls at the Commerce Department under the Biden administration, referring to Chinese firms' remote access to U.S. AI chips, told WSJ. The process involves layers of intermediaries, obscuring whether U.S. regulations are being violated. The Biden administration proposed country-specific caps on American chip purchases to curb such activities, but the Trump administration scrapped these in May, citing unnecessary regulatory burdens on U.S. companies like Nvidia. Instead, it issued guidance urging firms to prevent their chips from being used to train Chinese AI models. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Buy Brass Idols - Handmade Brass Statues for Home & Gifting Luxeartisanship Buy Now Undo How and why China uses countries in Southeast Asia as base In Malaysia, the Chinese company's operation required meticulous planning. Engineers reportedly spent over eight weeks optimizing data sets in China, as transferring large data volumes online could take months. Last July, the company worked through a Singaporean subsidiary but later registered a Malaysian entity to avoid scrutiny after Nvidia and its vendors intensified end-user audits. To evade suspicion at Malaysian customs, the engineers distributed hard drives across four suitcases, a shift from bundling them into one the previous year. They returned to China with several hundred gigabytes of model parameters guiding the AI system's output. Southeast Asia is reported to be emerging as a hub for such activities, with data centers rapidly expanding. Jones Lang LaSalle estimates nearly 2,000 megawatts of data-center capacity in Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, and Indonesia -- matching Europe's largest markets. Malaysia's AI chip imports from Taiwan surged to $3.4 billion in March and April, exceeding its 2024 total. Meanwhile, the Middle East is also becoming a destination for Chinese AI developers, with Nvidia recently announcing significant chip sales to Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and the UAE. These maneuvers highlight the challenges of enforcing U.S. export controls as Chinese companies exploit global data centers to access American technology. While Southeast Asian authorities, like Singapore's, are cracking down on transshipments, the region's booming infrastructure continues to attract both Western and Chinese clients, testing the limits of regulatory oversight. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Swedish pension fund AP7 blacklists Tesla, says union rights violations in U.S. crossed the ethical line
Swedish pension fund AP7 blacklists Tesla, says union rights violations in U.S. crossed the ethical line

Time of India

time34 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Swedish pension fund AP7 blacklists Tesla, says union rights violations in U.S. crossed the ethical line

Sweden's pension fund, AP7, which stands for Sjunde AP-fonden or Seventh AP Fund, has blacklisted and fully divested from US electric vehicle giant Tesla because of the EV maker's alleged violations of union rights in the United States, as per Reuters. Tesla Blacklisted Over Union Rights Violations The pension fund wrote in a statement to Reuters, "AP7 has decided to blacklist Tesla due to verified violations of labor rights in the United States," as quoted in the report. AP7 also highlighted that, "Despite several years of dialogue with Tesla, including shareholder proposals in collaboration with other investors, the company has not taken sufficient measures to address the issues," quoted Reuters. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Don't Miss The Top Packaging Trends Of 2024, Enhnace Your Brand With The Latest Insights Packaging Machines | Search Ads Search Now Undo Swedish Pension Fund AP7 Sold Off $1.36 Billion Stake in Tesla The pension fund's spokesperson revealed that the fund's stake in Tesla was worth about $1.36 billion when it was sold in late May, Reuters reported. During the time of the sell-off, AP7's stake in Tesla represented about 1% of the AP7 Equity Fund, according to the report. Tesla: The Only Non-Unionized US Carmaker According to the EV maker had employed about 70,000 workers in the United States at the end of 2024 and is the only American automaker whose workers are currently not represented by a union. Live Events Tesla's Ongoing Labor Disputes in Sweden Many unionisation efforts have consistently failed until now, like those by the United Auto Workers, the United Steelworkers, Workers United, and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, reported. Tesla has also been in a conflict with IF Metall, a Swedish trade union, after the IF Metall workers' union initiated a strike, accusing the EV maker of refusing to join a collective wage agreement, as per Brussels Times. The company's CEO, Elon Musk, has repeatedly dismissed calls for unionisation within his global workforce, according to Brussels Times. FAQs Why did AP7 divest from Tesla? Because Tesla was found to have violated labor rights in the US, and after years of engagement, AP7 felt the company failed to make any changes. How much was AP7's stake in Tesla worth? Roughly $1.36 billion when it was sold in late May 2025.

FIR Against Supertech, Its Promoter For Defrauding IDBI Bank Of Rs 126.07 Crore
FIR Against Supertech, Its Promoter For Defrauding IDBI Bank Of Rs 126.07 Crore

NDTV

time37 minutes ago

  • NDTV

FIR Against Supertech, Its Promoter For Defrauding IDBI Bank Of Rs 126.07 Crore

New Delhi: The CBI has registered an FIR against Noida-based construction firm Supertech Limited and its promoter R K Arora among others for allegedly defrauding IDBI Bank of Rs 126.07 crore, officials said Saturday. Arora has been named in the FIR alongside whole-time directors Sangita Arora, Mohit Arora, Parul Arora, Vikas Kansal, Pradeep Kumar, Anil Kumar Sharma, and Anil Kumar Jain, in addition to the Noida-based company, they said. On Saturday, the CBI conducted coordinated search operations at five locations linked to the accused," including official and residential premises in Noida and Ghaziabad," in connection with the case. During the raids, agency officials seized cash amounting to Rs 28.5 lakh, CBI's spokesperson said in a statement. The case was initiated following a complaint from IDBI Bank, which alleged that the accused had conspired to misappropriate sanctioned loan funds through fraudulent means. According to the FIR, the bank alleged that the company and its directors submitted forged documents to secure credit facilities under false pretences. The loan account was subsequently declared a wilful default and categorised as fraudulent, allegedly resulting in wrongful losses totalling Rs 126.07 crore to IDBI Bank Ltd., the CBI said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store