
Will I lose the Winter Fuel Payment if I make a pension withdrawal to replace my 'clapped out' car?
I have a small private pension plus my state pension. I now need to draw a lump sum of money from my pension pot, which I built up for nine years during self employment, to replace my 'clapped out' car.
This could take me over the £35,000 income for the year.
Do I now need to return my Winter Fuel Payment? We can't really afford to take out a loan for the car, nor would we want to with sufficient funds sitting in my pension pot.
Am I now to be punished once again for putting things in place for my old age?
Steve Webb replies: If your total income from your state pension, regular private pensions and lump sum pension withdrawal takes you over the £35,000 limit, then yes, your extra tax bill next year will wipe out the value of your share of this year's Winter Fuel Payment.
However, it is worth remembering that, assuming you and your partner are under 80 and not receiving benefits, you are probably each receiving an equal share of the total £200 Winter Fuel Payment.
It is only your share (typically £100) which is at stake if your income goes above £35,000, rather than the total household payment.
There are some further aspects of this which might be worth bearing in mind.
The first is that what affects your WFP is your individual income, not the combined income of you and your spouse or partner.
This means that if your partner had access to a pension pot or other savings and could do this without taking their income above the £35,000 limit, then the car could be purchased without affecting the payment at all.
Alternatively, if your partner was able to make some contribution to the car, but not the full amount, another option would be for you to chip in by taking a smaller pension withdrawal to 'mop up' any spare income between your current annual figure and the £35,000 limit.
You could do this without affecting your WFP entitlement.
Depending on the state of your 'clapped out' car, another angle to think about is whether you could hold on until the end of this tax year.
If so, you could take your withdrawal in two lumps, one before 6 April 2026 and one afterwards. Provided each individual lump kept you within the limit, then your WFP would be unaffected.
How do you send back a Winter Fuel Payment?
Turning now to your comment about 'returning' your WFP, it's worth being clear how the process will work from this winter onwards.
Under the new system, everyone who is over state pension age should be paid a WFP in full, regardless of their income.
HMRC will then identify at the end of the year those individuals who had income over £35,000 and will add an amount to their tax bill to offset the WFP they received the previous winter.
So you are not exactly 'returning' the WFP, you are simply facing a slightly higher tax bill next year.
If you prefer, the Government has said that it will be possible, in principle, to opt out of the WFP system.
But in your situation, where your income is only temporarily over the limit for one year, it's hard to see what you would gain by doing this.
It would probably be far simpler to simply get a WFP, put it in the bank and earn a bit of interest, and then use it to help pay your increased tax bill for one year.
If you are determined to avoid this situation you could in principle opt out this year, and then (presumably) opt in again the following year, but we have yet to see any details as to how all of this will work and how bureaucratic the whole process will be.
Ask Steve Webb a pension question
Former pensions minister Steve Webb is This Is Money's agony uncle.
He is ready to answer your questions, whether you are still saving, in the process of stopping work, or juggling your finances in retirement.
Steve left the Department for Work and Pensions after the May 2015 election. He is now a partner at actuary and consulting firm Lane Clark & Peacock.
If you would like to ask Steve a question about pensions, please email him at pensionquestions@thisismoney.co.uk.
Steve will do his best to reply to your message in a forthcoming column, but he won't be able to answer everyone or correspond privately with readers. Nothing in his replies constitutes regulated financial advice. Published questions are sometimes edited for brevity or other reasons.
Please include a daytime contact number with your message - this will be kept confidential and not used for marketing purposes.
If Steve is unable to answer your question, you can also contact MoneyHelper, a Government-backed organisation which gives free assistance on pensions to the public. It can be found here and its number is 0800 011 3797.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Revealed: Clifftop mansion being offered in latest Omaze Million Pound House Draw had its price slashed by £2million a year ago
A cliff top mansion currently being offered in the latest Omaze Million Pound House Draw saw £2million slashed from its asking price, we can reveal. The four-bed mansion in the Cornish coastal village of Porthcothan - close to millionaire's playgrounds of Padstow and Mawgan Porth - is described as being worth 'over £3million'. But little over a year ago the same house was marketed with a £5million asking price. While the final sale price hasn't been released, shortly before the sale progressed to the company behind Omaze, its guide price had fallen to £3.5million. This week neighbours told the Daily Mail the house - named Llawnroc, which is Cornwall spelled backwards - has never been lived in since it was built over a decade ago. One said: 'The previous owner thought it was terrific but I wasn't surprised when it appeared in the Omaze draw. 'The £5million asking price was laughable. It would probably sell at about £2.5million. 'I know a lot of people around here have bought a ticket for the draw but if I win it'll be up for sale the next day.' Bath-based management consultants Colin Price and Sharon Toye spent £1million building the house in 2014 having demolished a 1960s three-bed house bought for £1.75million three years earlier. But the construction was far from straight-foward as Mr Price acknowledged in an interview with Homebuilding & Renovating magazine following its completion. He said: 'The build was tricky and it would have been something of a disaster if we damaged the cliff while digging down but our builders managed it with great skill, and the project was finished on time even considering we experienced one of the worst winters on record.' In 2014 during construction a spectacular rock arch in the bay cliff collapsed after it was battered by towering waves and storms. Even before breaking ground on the new house, a number of residents voiced concern about whether the cliffs would be impacted. One wrote: 'The amount of bed-rock that will have to be removed to lay the foundations and accommodate the new building is both startling and very worrying. I assume that a comprehensive geological survey has been carried out on the site (which is very close to the cliff edge) and to which accountability may be applied in the case of structural damage to any of the nearby properties and especially the cliff itself. 'In the absence of such a survey I would hope that the Planning Authority would undertake one before any permissions are granted as the ramifications of any damage occurring in this area of the cliff are too serious to contemplate. I would like to see any assurances in writing.' The original design was refused by Cornwall Council and an appeal also upheld the decision leading to the removal of a circular roof for a more conventional pitched roof The striking design has four 'lenses' of floor-to-ceiling glass - intended to mimic binoculars looking out to sea. Ten years on a number of neighbours still grumble about the design - which saw the home double the size of its processor. The original design was refused by Cornwall Council and an appeal also upheld the decision leading to the removal of a circular roof for a more conventional pitched roof. One said: 'The first design was completely unsuitable for this bay and was rejected by the council, they also lost on appeal but what they have built is actually worse if anything. 'So this is what we are left with, most people still think it's wrong for the area but what can you do? 'People walk along the coast path all the time and stop to look at the houses, you can see into almost all the rooms because they have glass walls. 'I personally wouldn't be keen on having people staring into my sitting room or bedroom. Another neighbour, who has lived in the village for 45 years, added: 'There used to be a community along the clifftop but now just three of the 15 houses are lived in. 'It used to be a quiet lane but now it's like the M1 with people rushing back and forward, different people every week on holiday. 'I have no idea who any of my neighbours are, you see different cars going up the road every week, they could be up here burgling for all we know. 'I would love to leave this house to my family but there's no way they could afford the inheritance tax bill. I feel sorry for the young people around here.' The quiet cove of Porthcothan Bay, is dubbed one of Cornwall's 'best kept secrets'. The unique design is energy efficient and the bedrooms have been planned to capture the morning sun from the east, with the main living areas placed in a triangle widening towards the sea views and sunsets. The property has 3,390 sq ft of accommodation. On the lower ground floor there is a bedroom with en-suite, a home office that could also be another bedroom, a utility and a large open plan kitchen/dining room with a pantry and walk-in fridge and bi-fold doors that open to the garden. Upstairs there are three bedrooms, two bathrooms and an impressive sitting room. Outside it has driveway parking and a secure garage, a partially covered terrace dining space, a sunken fire pit in the garden, and an outside shower to wash off sandy feet from the beach. The property has a gate leading onto the coastal path and the beach below. While a winner of the latest Omaze dream home has yet to be selected, the competition already has a track record of winners quickly putting the homes on the market - dubbed the Omaze curse. In June the youngest ever winner Lauren Keene, 24, followed in the footsteps of the vast majority of winners by cashing in on her six-bedroom Hollywood-style home in the Wirral, Merseyside, by putting it on the market for £2.5million, a discount of £500,000 on the original £3million valuation. The full time nanny and her partner Ryan Mitchell spent only a few nights at the spectacular house due to them living and working almost 200 miles away in Gloucester. Like many other winners of Omaze's Grand Designs-style homes, Lauren is also said to have been put off by the expensive running costs of her new dream home. Instead she and her Ryan, a software engineer, are buying themselves a much smaller and more practical semi-detached home in Gloucester. The Mail can now reveal that all, but a handful of the 39 winners of Omaze home draws in the UK, have sold or are planning to sell their multi-million pound prizes.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
15 reasons why the Ford Transit is the GOAT of the van world – from transporting rock bands, elephants and even ROYALS
WE could argue all night about who is the GOAT. 15 15 15 But when it comes to vehicles, it's not even a debate. G reatest O f A ll T ransit. The humble Ford Transit has been Britain's best-selling van since day one - August 9, 1965. That's like Liverpool winning the Prem for 60 years on the bounce. Everyone else might as well give up and go home. To celebrate Transit's 60th, we've peppered today's column with quirky facts, as well as hearing from owners with a cherished van from each decade. Ford's famous Backbone Of Britain telly ad from the Eighties was genius marketing. Yet also 100 per cent true. Transit keeps this country ticking. Everything we see and touch was transported in a van. 15 15 One reason Transit is successful is that Ford engineers sit with owners to find ways of making the next model even more useful. Like the bloke who shoved a lump of wood through the bottom of the steering wheel to make a lunch table. The latest Transit Custom has a tilt-up steering wheel with a tray for his quinoa tuna salad. Bosh. Ford's insane V8 1971 Transit Supervan Retired builder Peter Lee, founder of the Transit Van Club, said: 'Transit is like a forklift with two doors. "Built to work. They're good honest vans that will do the job.' The OG and still the best. 3 MILLION UK sales and counting. Always available in white. 15 15 15 15 15 15


Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
A long-term plan is needed to get the country out of its financial hole
SIR – Whether by raising income tax rates, a wealth tax or through less overt measures, the Government will try to extract more money from the people that it serves ('Reeves facing £50bn black hole as tax pressure mounts ', report, August 6). However, such measures risk being self-defeating. Those who are unable or unwilling to leave the country will bear the brunt of the tax rises. That includes standard and higher-rate taxpayers. Every pound the Government extracts from their bank accounts is a pound that cannot be spent on businesses that provide goods and services. Thus, businesses will take another hit which, in turn, will reduce their tax payments. Since the failure of the Truss administration, there has been no long-term plan to get the country out of its financial hole. Eventually, there will have to be one and it will likely involve curbing the insatiable appetite of government to control and spend. When such a plan sees the light of day we may be surprised at the boost it gives to confidence and investment. David Porter Plymouth, Devon SIR – Labour dug itself a financial hole when it pledged not to increase National Insurance (NI), VAT or income tax rates. Instead of imposing VAT on private schools and possibly even on private health, a simple 1 or 2 per cent rise on NI and/or the basic rate of income tax would have solved the Chancellor's problems. Now she is having to cast her net wider – and creating more problems as a result. John Tilsiter Radlett, Hertfordshire SIR – Taxing jobs and taxing capital is not going to result in economic growth. Is it too much to expect a former Bank of England economist to grasp this? Patrick Loxdale Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SIR – There is a limit to which any economy can be taxed. The UK is at that limit. The British public understands this. It is plain that public sector expenditure must be cut to balance the books. Given the Government throws billions around like confetti – on the Chagos Islands, the immigration fiasco, welfare, public sector pay rises, excessive numbers of civil servants – there is much low-hanging fruit. The economy is being badly managed as never before. Enough is enough. Please can we have some economic sanity. Stuart Moore Bramham, West Yorkshire SIR – Having continually criticised the Conservatives for the last 12 months for creating a £22bn black hole in the public finances, I trust Labour will now be constantly criticising itself for doubling the deficit. Paul Webster Dyserth, Denbighshire