logo
EXCLUSIVE Fury over six-year-old boy's 'traumatic' wait for ambulance after car crash leaves him with bone sticking out of his leg and covered in blood

EXCLUSIVE Fury over six-year-old boy's 'traumatic' wait for ambulance after car crash leaves him with bone sticking out of his leg and covered in blood

Daily Mail​11-06-2025
A father has told how his six-year-old son was left bleeding and with a bone sticking out of his broken leg for almost an hour after a road accident while waiting for an ambulance to arrive.
Rafi Hottak, who has campaigned on behalf of Afghan interpreters who helped the British military, says young son Yousuf has been left traumatised after suffering multiple injuries close to his Birmingham home.
Yousuf, said to have been struck by an SUV while crossing the road on his journey back from school, suffered a broken leg and compound fracture, as well as cuts and bruises to his head and body.
His father, 39, has asked for answers from West Midlands Ambulance Service over why it took more than an hour for paramedics to reach the boy - and the organisation has now apologised, while blaming pressure caused by hospital handover delays.
An off-duty medic who was passing by was among those stopping to help as Yousuf lay beside the road, helping to try stemming the bleeding after the May 14 incident.
Mr Hottak, 39, has been living in Britain for the past 13 years - having previously been injured himself on the Afghanistan frontline in a Taliban blast targeting UK forces.
He has told MailOnline of his distress at Yousuf's suffering, with the boy telling his father: 'I don't want to die, Daddy.'
The schoolboy is also still struggling to even 'hop' let alone walk almost a month after suffering his injuries, having been discharged from hospital.
The accident took place in the Birmingham district of Sparkbrook shortly before 6pm on May 14, as Yousuf was crossing a road having almost reached his family home.
Mr Hottak has shared a photo online of his son lying barely conscious when finally taken into an ambulance for treatment following the incident.
The father told his 2,500 followers on X, formerly Twitter: 'My six-year-old child was hit by an SUV in Birmingham.
'He had a broken leg with the bone sticking out, head trauma, face bleeding, heavy bruising, and signs of shock.
'He was lying on the side of the road with four people pressing on his wounds just to stop the bleeding and keep him conscious.
'We called 999 multiple times, and every time we were told the same thing: "There is no ambulance available. We can't give you a timeframe."
'This is not a minor incident. This is a child - hit by a car, clearly in critical condition -and still, no priority, no urgency, no care.'
Speaking now to MailOnline, Mr Hottak said he had still not received any feedback from health officials over why it took so long to respond on that evening.
He said of Yousuf's progress since: 'He's getting better at the moment but he still can barely even hop by himself and still has wounds and cuts all over his body and everywhere he has bruises.
'Worst of all is between the knee and ankle of his broken leg - at the time the bone was sticking out of his flesh.'
Mr Hottak told how a family friend was escorting Yousuf and other children home from tuition classes they have after the end of the regular schoolday.
He said: 'Yousuf was almost home, crossing the street where lots of cars are parked on each side and a van came along.
'The lady driver, from the way she was driving, it seems she might have panicked and instead of braking, accelerated instead and his leg was driven over - we were lucky that it wasn't his head.
'I understand it was an accident, an unfortunate situation - more of a problem from my point of view is why it took so long for any ambulance to arrive.
'There are three hospitals within about half an hour's drive yet he was on the side of the street for an hour - you're telling me there were no ambulances at any of those that could get there sooner?
'Luckily a medic was passing by, not in her uniform as she was off-duty but she was there to help, along with a few other neighbours who helped hold him and stem the bleeding.'
Mr Hottak said of the delayed response by paramedics: 'It shows to me that there are wider problems down the line.
'A child of six is hit by a car, with broken bones and yet he's not being prioritised? No child should be on the side of the road like that for an hour.
'How many ambulances are there in Birmingham and was every single one of them on emergencies elsewhere?
'It's been very traumatic for us all - just to see his face looking up at me and his injuries is very difficult. He says he still can't feel his leg and times and tells me, "Dad, I don't want to die."'
A West Midlands Ambulance Service spokeswoman told MailOnline: 'Firstly, we would like to offer our sincere apologies to Master Hottak and his family for the delayed response he experienced.
'Our staff and volunteers across the service are working exceptionally hard to get to patients as quickly as possible.
'Sadly, we are seeing some patients wait much longer for a response than we would want as a result of hospital handover delays.'
The spokesperson said the call was categorised as a 'C2' incident, which would be responded to within 40 minutes in 'at least nine out of 10 cases' - while saying their team arrived 46 minutes after an initial 999 call.
The service's spokesperson added: 'When ambulances are delayed handing their patient over at hospital, they are unable to respond to the next call, which impacts on the care of patients in the community.
'There is a direct correlation between hospital handover delays and our ability to get to patients in the community quickly.
'We continue to work with our partners to find new ways to reduce delays so that our crews can respond more quickly and save more lives.'
Mr Hottak was previously blown up on the Afghan frontline in a blast that killed a British officer and now campaigns for his ex-colleagues who served alongside UK forces as translators.
On moving to Britain in 2011, he initially had his application for asylum rejected by the UK Border Agency - before they reversed their decision following a public backlash including from MPs and members of the military.
Mr Hottak had paid £8,000 to people smugglers to reach Britain, before walking into a Central London police station to make his plea for asylum.
Fluent in three languages, including English, Mr Hottak worked for the US military as an interpreter in 2004 before switching to the British two years later following in the footsteps of his elder brother.
It was on the morning of November 14 2007 that while on foot patrol with a joint British Afghan force near the centre of Sangin, in Afghanistan's Helmand province, an IED was triggered.
His boss Captain John McDermid, 43, of 2nd Battalion The Yorkshire Regiment, was killed, while Mr Hottak was badly wounded.
The interpreter suffered horrific shrapnel wounds to the head, neck, arms and chest that required 170 stitches, while also temporarily losing the use of his hand and was deaf in one ear for more than a year.
Thanks to the work of doctors, Mr Hottak returned to work after three months but was unfit for frontline duties and was given a job at Camp Souter, the main British recruitment base in Kabul, the Afghan capital.
His role involved interviewing prospective interpreters as well as liasing with the families of colleagues killed or injured, sometimes returning the remains of the dead to their families.
It was then that he began to receive death threats both by letter and telephone – threats he told British officers about and which helped encourage him to seek asylum in the UK where he has since retrained as an accountant.
The Mail's award-winning Betrayal of the Brave campaign has been highlighting the plight of hundreds of Afghan translators and has helped bring about changes in government policy, opening the way for many of those fearing for their lives to come to the UK.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Now shopkeepers are warned putting shoplifters' pictures in their windows breaches data protection - days after row over sign calling them 'scumbags'
Now shopkeepers are warned putting shoplifters' pictures in their windows breaches data protection - days after row over sign calling them 'scumbags'

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Now shopkeepers are warned putting shoplifters' pictures in their windows breaches data protection - days after row over sign calling them 'scumbags'

Shopkeepers have been warned putting shoplifters' pictures in their windows risks breaching data protection. It comes days after a business owner was told by police to remove a sign calling thieves 'scumbags'. Now the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) suggested the practice 'may not be appropriate' behaviour. On an advice page for tackling shoplifters, the watchdog said stores 'must only share personal information that's proportionate and necessary to achieve your purpose'. In response, shadow justice secretary Robert Jenrick told The Telegraph: 'Shoplifters should be named and publicly shamed.' He added that the recommendation was 'data protection gone mad'. Richard Tice, Reform UK leader, said: 'We should be letting the general public know of the photographs of people who have a track record of stealing in towns. 'This highlights the complete insanity of GDPR which is damaging to healthcare, it's damaging to law and order. It's damaging to businesses and our economy.' He claimed that the suggestion was siding with thieves over shopkeepers, who should be able to decide who enters their premises. Shadow home office minister Katie Lam recounted a story on X about a constituent who had been ordered by police to remove pictures of suspected shoplifters. The ICO, a non-departmental body sponsored by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, added in a blog post from 2023 that thefts could be tackled using data protection laws but only 'as long as it's necessary and proportionate'. In lieu of posting photos of suspected thieves, the body suggests retailers share details of the shoplifters with police or any information they may have about the incident with another store nearby. It also said that sharing photos on messaging platforms had the potential to be similarly inappropriate. Last week, it was revealed that a defiant shopkeeper who was told by police to remove a shoplifting sign in case it caused offence was planning to put up an even bigger one. Police caused a free-speech row when they turned up at Rob Davis's vintage store in North Wales and told him to take down a handwritten sign that referred to shoplifters as 'scum bags'. They told him they had received a complaint about the notice, which stated: 'Due to scum bags shoplifting please ask for assistance to open cabinets.' But Mr Davis, who says he was driven to put it up on his shop door because of escalating shoplifting in Wrexham, told The Mail on Sunday that he had no intention of taking it down. He added: 'The sign is staying – and I may even get a bigger one. 'It's a simple point, in my opinion, and succinctly put, and can't cause offence apart from to anyone intending to steal from me. 'I was even polite and put "Thank you" on the bottom.' Mr Davis, 59, said he put it up a month ago in frustration after discovering that he was losing almost his entire monthly profit because of thieves – but was astonished to then get a visit from the police. He said: 'A police officer and PCSO came in. They said the sign was provocative and potentially offensive. 'When I asked, 'Why, who it could be offensive to?' the officer didn't answer. The only person who can be offended by the words 'scum bag' is a scum bag who wants to steal from me!' Mr Davis said he had received overwhelming support from fellow shopkeepers in the face of a tidal wave of theft in the town. 'There's been massive support everywhere since the sign went up,' he added. 'Shopkeepers are all in the same boat; everyone is having stuff stolen, even cafes.' He began locking goods in cabinets after he said police failed to deal with earlier shoplifting incidents. He added: 'Over the past year I have caught five people shoplifting. After the first, I called the police. They handed the stolen shirt to me and let the shoplifter go. Now I don't bother reporting them. Almost every day I get shoplifting.' He said that after putting out 30 sets of fishnet stockings, 20 were taken, adding: 'Theft has definitely got worse. 'If you are £200 down because of shoplifting that might be my profit for the whole month.' Mr Davis said retailers in the town were facing a number of prolific shoplifters and criticised police efforts to tackle them. 'I pay two lots of rates, business and residential, and part goes to policing. I'm not getting the service I'm paying for. 'If I had a builder and he didn't provide the service properly, I wouldn't pay.' He urged police: 'Just do the job you are there for. You are a public service. You don't need to be coming here telling me anything unless I am doing something wrong, otherwise leave me alone.' North Wales Police said: 'All reports of shoplifting are taken extremely seriously. We are committed to combatting retail theft.' Shoplifting figures released this week by the British Retail Consortium (BRC) showed just 2.5 per cent of offences were recorded by the police each year. It said 50,000 shoplifting incidents go unreported every day as firms give up on the police. BRC chief executive Helen Dickinson said: 'Many retailers do not see the point of reporting incidents to the police.'

ScotRail to introduce first penalty tickets for fare dodgers
ScotRail to introduce first penalty tickets for fare dodgers

Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Times

ScotRail to introduce first penalty tickets for fare dodgers

Passengers who deliberately board trains without a ticket to escape fares are facing a crackdown. ScotRail said it was considering financial measures such as forcing dodgers to pay a 'minimum fare' for the whole route rather than, at present, being required to pay only the fee for the claimed length of their journey. Fare dodging deprives the rail company of millions of pounds a year. In the past financial year ScotRail recorded 1,644 instances of fare dodging, up from 869 the year before, although this is likely to be an underestimate of the actual number of incidents. No fares were recovered in more than half of the recorded cases. In England fare dodgers face £100 fines but this system has not been adopted in Scotland. However, charging evaders in Scotland a minimum fare is expected to act as a deterrent because passengers who make short journeys that cost less than the minimum will have to pay more. The problem is most acute when trains are busy and ticket inspectors face difficulties checking all tickets, particularly where travellers make short journeys. An industry source told Scotland on Sunday: 'This looks like a revenue protection initiative, where a passenger with no ticket on a train or at the end of their journey is obliged to buy a 'minimum fare' ticket. 'This would probably be more expensive than many low-value ScotRail tickets, such as a £3 Mount Florida to Glasgow Central single, and act as an encouragement for passengers to buy a ticket before boarding a train. It's believed to be better than a penalty fares scheme.' Claire Baker, Scottish Labour's transport spokeswoman, said: 'It is not right that commuters are forced to pay more because a small minority are trying to game the system.' ScotRail, the state-owned train operator, estimated it lost £10 million a year to ticket fraud. The company identified a minimum fares strategy among key initiatives it was considering in this financial year, subject to approval from Transport Scotland. The apparent rise in fare dodging, the company says, is mainly because of an increase in revenue protection officers aboard trains rather than a decline in passenger behaviour. Transport Scotland said: 'ScotRail has a number of ways to make it easy for passengers to buy their tickets before they board, online, via the app, ticket machine or from ticket offices. 'In line with their existing revenue protection policy, additional measures to further reduce ticketless travel are under consideration.'

Nicola Sturgeon says she still misses Alex Salmond
Nicola Sturgeon says she still misses Alex Salmond

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Nicola Sturgeon says she still misses Alex Salmond

Scotland's former first minister Nicola Sturgeon has said that she still misses her mentor Alex Salmond 'in some way'. The pair formed one of the most successful political partnerships in UK history however their relationship deteriorated and then broke down after sexual misconduct allegations against him emerged. Following a trial at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020, Mr Salmond was cleared of all 13 charges, which included attempted rape and sexual offences. In an exclusive interview with ITV News before the publication of her memoir Frankly on Thursday August 14, Ms Sturgeon said she misses the relationship she used to have with her mentor. And she said she was hit by a 'wave of grief' after hearing of his death in October last year. Speaking to ITV News at Ten presenter Julie Etchingham, she said: 'Even today I still miss him in some way, the person that I used to know and the relationship we used to have. 'But I thought I had made my peace with it, that I'd got to a point where I felt nothing. 'And then I got a call to tell me that Alex Salmond had died. I started crying on the phone and I just was hit by this wave of grief… and it was complicated because obviously we weren't just no longer friends, we were political enemies. 'There was no prospect I was going to be able to go to his funeral or anything like that and it was a kind of strange, strange feeling.' Mr Salmond went on to become leader of the Alba Party, which became a frequent critic of his former party the SNP. He died suddenly of a heart attack in October in North Macedonia at the age of 69. Ms Sturgeon, who succeeded him as Scotland's first minister in 2014, said: 'At the point he died, I hadn't spoken to him for years. 'I felt really deeply the loss of the relationship with him. I suddenly didn't have him. He wasn't there. I couldn't talk to him. And I went through this period of I would still talk to him in my head. 'I would have vivid dreams that we were still on good terms. And then I'd have this feeling of such sadness when I remembered the reality. 'So, I went through that process. I still missed him in some bizarre way.' During the interview Ms Sturgeon is also asked by Ms Etchingham about her description of Reform UK leader Nigel Farage as 'odious' in her memoir. She said: 'This is my impression, other people might have a different view of him. He just comes across as somebody who's got a very, very fragile ego. 'Somebody who's not particularly comfortable, particularly around women. 'In the 2015 leaders debate just before we went on air that night, I just remember hearing him tell somebody how much he'd had to drink, in the green room area beforehand, and it just felt this kind of bravado and just not very pleasant.' Nicola Sturgeon: The Interview will broadcast on Monday August 11 at 7pm on ITV1, ITVX & STV. An extended version of the interview will be available on ITVX in the following days.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store