Ozempic Is Costing Grocery Stores Billions
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
GLP-1 medications, including Ozempic and Mounjaro, are already costing grocery stores billions.
According to a new report from Big Chalk Analytics, GLP-1 users have cut $6.5 billion from U.S. grocery spending, and the popularity of the weight loss and diabetes medications appears to only be growing.
Why It Matters
The use of weight-loss medications called glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists has skyrocketed in recent years.
Popular products include Ozempic, Mounjaro, Wegovy and Zepound and have been key treatments for many Americans who are obese or have type 2 diabetes.
While the full health effects of these drugs in the long term has not been studied, their prevalence has shown the potential to disrupt industries by lowering grocery and even restaurant profits in the long term.
People shop at a grocery store in Brooklyn on May 13, 2025 in New York City.
People shop at a grocery store in Brooklyn on May 13, 2025 in New York City.What To Know
While GLP-1 medications are already reportedly costing grocers $6.5 billion, the impact could be even costlier in the years to come as 8.3 percent of Americans are planning to start the medications, according to the new Big Chalk survey of more than 4,500 consumers.
If this happens, the survey projects losses as much as an additional $4.4 to $10.8 billion.
"The changes being seen in grocery stores are the result of people making better choices about food –less ultra-processed food and possibly less food overall," David Navazio, CEO of health care product company Gentell, told Newsweek.
Several types of products have seen their purchase rates go down, from cereal and soft drinks to lunch meats.
Currently, an estimated 11.2 percent of U.S. adults are on GLP-1 medications, but roughly 20 percent could soon be on the medication in just 12 months.
"It's one of the fascinating business 'side effects' of medications like Ozempic that grocery stores are seeing a dip in business," Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.
"The idea is these medications suppress hunger, which is causing consumers to purchase food less. And while there is certainly some truth to this, it's too soon to call it a long-term trend. Financially, it can be seen as a good thing for money-strapped customers who can reduce their grocery bills along with their waistlines. Whether or not this economic impact is a lasting one remains to be seen."
So far, the medications have triggered grocery volume losses of 1.2 to 2.9 percent, with dollar sales dropping between 0.9 and 2.3 percent, depending on the category, according to the report.
GLP-1 users were 65 percent more likely to buy smaller packs of cereal and 48 percent more likely to purchase smaller packs of lunch meats. This extended to soft drinks as well, with those on the medication 36 percent more likely to opt for the smaller sizes.
"The opportunity for grocery brands is twofold: A continued migration toward better-for-you products—plus an emphasis on smaller pack sizes—are ways CPG brands can adapt to these changing consumer demands for volume," Rick Miller, partner and marketing effectiveness practice lead at Big Chalk, told Newsweek.
What People Are Saying
Rick Miller, partner and marketing effectiveness practice lead at Big Chalk, said in a statement: "GLP-1s have crossed the household-penetration threshold where their impact on grocery volumes and dollar sales can no longer be ignored. We're past anecdotes. This is measurable, structural change. Brands and retailers must rethink assortment, pricing, and promotion for a shopper who is literally consuming less."
David Navazio, CEO of health care product company Gentell, told Newsweek: "We will see changes in product selection as a result of the changes in people's buying habits, with an emphasis on whole foods, produce, lean meats."
For grocery stores, it may take time to adapt. But the change is undoubtedly good for the country as a whole that our population is becoming healthier."
Kevin Thompson, the CEO of 9i Capital Group and the host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "Like anything else, this comes down to supply and demand. If grocery stores are seeing a drop in volume, the next step would usually be lower prices. That's not what we're seeing. Grocery prices were up another 0.3 percent in June, according to the latest CPI data. So if grocers are losing, I'm not quite sure who's winning yet."
Drew Powers, the founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek: "At any given point in time, there is one part of the economy that is booming at the expense of another. This is just the normal oscillation around economic equilibrium. In very general terms, being less obese is healthier, and I think it is a good thing overall to having a healthier population. Grocery stores will slowly adapt to new eating and shopping habits, which will have knockoff effects in other sectors, while some parts of the economy will see increased spending that can be attributed to GLP-1 use."
What Happens Next
Beyond the economic impacts, the long-term implications of GLP-1 medications on health are still being studied.
A recent study discovered a new link between taking GLP-1 drugs and elevated risk of pancreatitis and kidney conditions, including kidney stones.
GLP-1 medications are also tied to a higher risk of digestive problems, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and even stomach paralysis in rare cases.
For the business economics of grocers reacting to the uptick in GLP-1 usage, prices have not adequately shifted yet, Thompson said.
"America has an obesity problem. If these drugs are helping people eat less and live healthier lives, that's a net positive," Thompson said.
"But in a capitalist economy—if Adam Smith's invisible hand is really at work—we should be seeing food prices and health care costs fall also. That's not happening. Health care continues to rise at an alarming rate, and food prices are still climbing. Long term, we might expect some price relief, but we're not there yet."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
9 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Millennials and Gen Zers Think They're the Loneliest Moms
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A new study has found that moms today feel more lonely and isolated than previous generations. According to the report released by Peanut, an app which connects moms, 75 percent of mothers feel they have "less of a village" than their mothers, and 77 percent feel they have less than their grandmothers did — statistics which underscore growing concerns around loneliness and isolation in modern motherhood. The report, titled "Where Did the Village Go?", surveyed over 3,000 women, including mothers, grandmothers and non-parents. Young suffering woman sitting on couch, holding head in hands, little crying baby lying near. Young suffering woman sitting on couch, holding head in hands, little crying baby lying near. LanaStock It examined how modern support systems fail and their impact on families, workplaces and culture. Key findings included 82 percent of mothers reported feeling lonely, half of respondents admitted to crying weekly due to lack of support and nearly 90 percent of moms said they rely more on digital communities than in-person ones for parenting advice and emotional connection. The concept of "the village"—once a reliable mix of relatives, neighbors and community members who collectively helped raise children—appears to be fading fast. Modern parenting, it seems, has become an increasingly isolating journey. "For someone to have checked in on me fresh postpartum—that would have made all the difference," any anonymous Peanut user shared. The report also touched on societal factors fueling this shift: geographical mobility, demanding work schedules, delayed parenthood and the lingering effects of the pandemic all contribute to fragmented support systems. Interestingly, while 65 percent of respondents said they wished they had more intergenerational support, only 14 percent actually live close to extended family. Meanwhile, 67 percent of moms say they turn to online platforms like Peanut to fill that gap —searching for everything from parenting advice to emotional validation. Despite the sobering statistics, the report offers hope in its final pages. Peanut asked mothers what they think is really missing from their village. "One mom friend. Just one who I could text to say 'this is hard' without shame," an anonymous user from Australia shared. Lauren, from the U.S., wrote, "Someone to check in. A real human, not a blog." Peanut also outlined the next steps for what needs to be done to help women feel supported in their motherhood journey. It said asking for help should be normalized, workplaces should be transformed to honor parenting as a real and valued responsibility and governments need to step in to ensure the message is getting through: caregiving matters.
The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
ObamaCare insurance costs expected to spike next year: Analysis
People who buy health insurance through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) could see a major spike in their premiums next year, at the same time enhanced subsidies that most people rely on are set to expire. According to an analysis of preliminary filings by KFF released Friday, insurers are planning an average premium increase of 15 percent in 2026, the largest hike since 2018. The analysis is based on filings from more than 100 insurers in 19 states and Washington, D.C. That's a sharp rise from recent years. For the 2025 plan year, for example, KFF found that the median proposed increase was 7 percent. Most ACA insurers are proposing premium increases of 10 to 20 percent for 2026. But more than a quarter are proposing premium increases of 20 percent or more, KFF found. No insurers have requested rate decreases for 2026, whereas in recent years at least some insurers did decrease premiums. Insurers said they wanted higher premiums to cover rising health care costs, like hospitalizations and physician care, as well as prescription drug costs. But they are also adding in higher increases due to changes being made by the Trump administration and Republicans in Congress. For instance, KFF found many insurers cited the likely expiration of enhanced premium tax credits as a reason for increased premiums. Those subsidies, put in place during the COVID-19 pandemic, are set to expire at the end of the year, and there are few signs that Republicans are interested in tackling the issue at all. If Congress takes no action, premiums for subsidized enrollees are projected to increase by over 75 percent starting in January 2026, according to KFF. Companies said they will raise premiums by an additional 4 percent more than they would have if the enhanced tax credits were renewed. More than 24 million Americans are enrolled in the insurance marketplace this year, and about 90 percent — more than 22 million people — are receiving enhanced subsidies. According to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), 4.2 million people are projected to lose insurance by 2034 if the subsidies aren't renewed. According to federal data, the average monthly premium was $113 last year due to the subsidies, compared with $162 in 2020. When premiums become less affordable, the first people to drop out of the market are those that are healthier. With fewer people enrolled, experts have said insurers would have to spread the costs among a smaller group of sicker people, meaning premiums will be higher.
39 minutes ago
Georgia shows rough road ahead for states as Medicaid work requirements loom
This is a KFF Health News story. Every time Ashton Alexander sees an ad for Georgia Pathways to Coverage, it feels like a "kick in the face." Alexander tried signing up for Pathways, the state's limited Medicaid expansion, multiple times and got denied each time, he said, even though he met the qualifying terms because he's a full-time student. Georgia is one of 10 states that haven't expanded Medicaid health coverage to a broader pool of low-income adults. Instead, it offers coverage to those who can prove they're working or completing 80 hours a month of other qualifying activities, like going to school or volunteering. And it is the only state currently doing so. "Why is this marketing out here?" said the 20-year-old, who lives in Conyers, east of Atlanta. "It's truly not accessible." Each denial used the same boilerplate language, Alexander said, and his calls to caseworkers were not returned. State offices couldn't connect him with caseworkers assigned to him from the same state agency. And when he requested contact information for a supervisor to appeal his denial, he said, the number rang to a fax machine. "It's impenetrable," Alexander said. "I've literally tried everything, and there's no way." Millions of Americans trying to access Medicaid benefits could soon find themselves navigating similar byzantine state systems and work rules. Legislation signed into law by President Donald Trump on July 4 allocates $200 million to help states that expanded Medicaid create systems by the end of next year to verify whether some enrollees are meeting the requirements. Conservative lawmakers have long argued that public benefits should go only to those actively working to get off of government assistance. But the nation's only Medicaid work requirement program shows they can be costly for states to run, frustrating for enrollees to navigate, and disruptive to other public benefit systems. Georgia's budget for marketing is nearly as much as it has spent on health benefits. Meanwhile, most enrollees under age 65 are already working or have a barrier that prevents them from doing so. What Georgia shows is "just how costly setting up these administrative systems of red tape can be," said Joan Alker, executive director of Georgetown University's Center for Children and Families. Over the past two years, KFF Health News has documented the issues riddling Georgia's Pathways program, launched in July 2023. More than 100,000 Georgians have applied to the program through March. Just over 8,000 were enrolled at the end of June, though about 300,000 would be eligible if the state fully expanded Medicaid under the terms of the Affordable Care Act. The program has cost more than $100 million, with only $26 million spent on health benefits and more than $20 million allocated to marketing contracts, according to a KFF Health News analysis of state reports. "That was truly a pretty shocking waste of taxpayer dollars," Alker said. The Government Accountability Office is investigating the costs of the program after a group of Democratic senators -- including both members of the Georgia delegation -- asked the government watchdog to look into the program. Findings are expected this fall. A state report to the federal government from March said Georgia couldn't effectively determine if applicants meet the qualifying activities criteria. The report also said the state hadn't suspended anyone for failing to work, a key philosophical pillar of the program. Meanwhile, as of March, more than 5,000 people were waiting to have their eligibility verified for Pathways. The Pathways program has strained Georgia's eligibility system for other public benefits, such as food stamps and cash assistance. In April, the state applied to the federal government to renew Pathways. In its application, officials scaled back key elements, such as the requirement that enrollees document work every month. Critics of the program also say the red tape doesn't help enrollees find jobs. "Georgia's experience shows that administrative complexity is the primary outcome, not job readiness," said Natalie Crawford, executive director of Georgia First, which advocates for fiscal responsibility and access to affordable health care. Despite the struggles, Garrison Douglas, a spokesperson for Georgia's Republican governor, Brian Kemp, defended the program. "Georgia Pathways is doing what it was designed to do: provide free healthcare coverage to low-income, able-bodied Georgians who are willing to engage in one of our many qualifying activities," he said in an emailed statement. New federal requirements in the tax and spending legislation mean that the 40 states (plus Washington, D.C.) that expanded Medicaid will need to prepare technology to process the documentation some Medicaid recipients will now have to regularly file. The federal law includes exemptions for people with disabilities, in addiction treatment, or caring for kids under 14, among others. The Trump administration said other states won't face a bumpy rollout like Georgia's. "We are fully confident that technology already exists that could enable all parties involved to implement work and community engagement requirements," said Mehmet Oz, head of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, in an emailed statement. In a written public comment on Georgia's application to extend the program, Yvonne Taylor of Austell detailed the difficulties she faced trying to enroll. She said she tried to sign up several times but that her application was not accepted. "Not once, not twice, but three times. With no response from customer service," she wrote in February. "So now I am without coverage." Victoria Helmly of Marietta wrote in a January comment that she and her family members take care of their dad, but the state law doesn't exempt caregivers of older adults. "Georgia should recognize their sacrifices by supporting them with health insurance," she wrote. "Let's simplify this system and in the end, save money and lives."
