logo
10 Features That Would Make Me Buy the Apple Watch Series 11

10 Features That Would Make Me Buy the Apple Watch Series 11

CNET7 hours ago
With WatchOS 26 now in public beta, we're getting a telling preview of what's coming to Apple Watches this fall. But for those of us eyeing the next model (likely the Apple Watch Series 11, and possibly an Ultra or SE), the real question is: How will Apple one-up itself from last year's Series 10? Better yet, how will it compete with newer flagships vying for your wrist this year?
Some of these requests are grounded in rumors, while others are mere wishful thinking. Here's everything I hope Apple brings to its next smartwatch.
This wishlist is focused on the Series 11, because it's the flagship model and the one that usually sets the tone for where the platform is headed next.
1. Smarter Siri
After using Gemini AI on the Galaxy Watch 8, it's painfully clear just how far Siri is lagging. Gemini isn't just more conversational; it's actually useful on the wrist. It handles complex prompts in one go, summarizes aloud and spares you from dead-end results or clunky app handoffs. On a smartwatch, where time and screen space are limited, that makes a huge difference.
If Apple wants to compete, it needs to bring more "intelligence" to the Apple Watch. Right now, the few AI features that are available on the watch in the beta of WatchOS 26 (live translations in text messages and Workout Buddy) require an Apple Intelligence-enabled iPhone to do the heavy lifting. Siri needs a serious upgrade across the board, along with more standalone processing power on the watch.
Apple's Siri needs and overhaul across the board to keep up with the competition.
CNET
2. More powerful processor
This brings us to the chip that runs everything. The Ultra 2 and Series 10 already made strides by enabling on-device Siri for tasks like starting or stopping workouts without needing a phone nearby.
For the smarter Siri Apple envisions, the Series 11 will need more on-watch processing. The rumored S11 chip will have to bring real gains in speed and efficiency to support features like Workout Buddy directly on the watch, without leaning on the iPhone.
3. Two-day battery life
For me, battery life is one of the biggest deterrents to using the Apple Watch to its full potential. I get about 26 hours on the smaller Series 10 -- barely enough to make it through a full day and night -- which means constantly choosing between sleep tracking and starting my day with a full charge.
Most days, because I'm rushing out the door, I pick a full day over sleep tracking. That creates gaps in my Vitals app, throwing off the outlier alerts that could help flag onset illness, or the retroactive ovulation predictions that require overnight temperature tracking. And when I do manage a quick top-up, I often run out of juice midday (usually before my workout) so I don't get the satisfaction of closing my rings.
The Ultra line has already shown what's possible, pushing up to two days of battery life at full throttle (or 72 hours in low power mode). And while this may be far-fetched, I wish the regular Series would catch up. Apple hasn't mentioned any efficiency gains in WatchOS 26, and so far, battery life rumors for the Series 11 are scarce. But if Apple can get us to a reliable 48 hours (even in low power mode), it would eliminate a major pain point for anyone serious about sleep tracking.
The Series 10 charges faster than earlier Apple Watches but battery life still remains an issue.
Celso Bulgatti/CNET
4. A surprise health/fitness metric
Blood pressure monitoring might be the most requested health feature I see (based on my very unscientific comment section data). Apple is reportedly testing it, but it may still be a year or more away. Noninvasive glucose tracking is another wishlist item but that's even further out.
Still, there's room for a novel feature that hasn't leaked yet. Samsung's Antioxidant Index was a pleasant surprise: a first-of-its-kind skin analysis that detects carotenoids. The feature hasn't received FDA approval so it's mostly categorized as a "wellness" tool and it's questionable whether it will prove helpful long-term. But it sets the watch apart -- and honestly, it was just fun to be surprised for once. It's also been a neat little add-on that's helped me stay more mindful of what I eat and how I manage stress by giving me something measurable to work on.
Apple is rumored to be working on a blood pressure feature for future Apple Watch models beyond 2025.
CNET
5. Clearer signals when you're getting sick
The Apple Watch Vitals app already alerts you when multiple metrics are off but it doesn't connect the dots for you. I'd love to see a feature like the Oura Ring's Symptom Radar, which interprets those shifts and gently nudges you to take it easy, letting you pause your activity goals until your numbers are back to normal.
Apple does let you pause activity rings manually but when you're dazed and sniffling, you're probably not thinking about toggling settings. It should do that heavy lifting for you.
6. Circular design or rotating
This is veering deep into the realm of deranged wishful thinking but if Apple ever released a circular version of the Apple Watch -- or better yet, added a rotating bezel like Samsung's Classic series -- I would be first in line. The rectangular design is iconic, but circular watches will always hold a special aesthetic place in my heart. And the beze l… that tactile cherry on top of a very elegant, albeit far-fetched, sundae.
The Samsung Galaxy Watch 8 Classic shines with its circular display and rotating bezel.
Vanessa Hand Orellana/CNET
7. UV exposure alerts
As someone who loves being outdoors, I never even considered I'd have issues getting enough Vitamin D in my day until I wore the Ultrahuman smart ring and realized my marathon office sessions were taking their toll. And I imagine this rings true for a lot of us. The ring would alert me when I hadn't met my daily UV minimum -- a surprisingly helpful nudge that made me rethink how much time I spend indoors.
The Apple Watch does have a UV Index complication option on some of its watchfaces but it's passive and easy to ignore. I'd love proactive alerts that track your cumulative exposure and warn you when you've had too much -- or not enough.
8. Dual frequency GPS, standard
The Ultra already includes precision dual-frequency GPS, but the regular Series 10 still doesn't. Apple should make this standard across the board, just like Samsung did with its Galaxy Watch 8 lineup. It's a feature you don't realize you're missing until you experience it, as it significantly improves location accuracy, especially in dense urban areas.
9. More app functionality
Now we're crossing into software wishlist territory but I'd love to see full-fledged apps like WhatsApp on the watch with full call and message capabilities. The Notes app is finally arriving in WatchOS 26 (better late than never) and it's a good reminder that there's still a lot of untapped potential in bringing more everyday phone tools to the wrist.
You can customize gestures on the Apple Watch to dismiss notifications.
Nelson Aguilar/CNET
10. More gesture customization
Apple introduced the double-tap gesture in 2023 and WatchOS 26 adds a flick gesture for quick controls. But gestures still feel underused (at least by this reviewer), mainly because you can't customize them much beyond the limited list that Apple provides.
The default actions like silencing alarms or calls are fine but I'd love to assign gestures to things like pinging my phone or launching specific apps. Also, a small on-screen reminder flagging gesture shortcuts could go a long way in retraining that muscle memory.
Bottom line
Apple doesn't need to reinvent the wheel with the Series 11 (although a rotating bezel would be nice) but with Gemini AI pushing Android forward, it does need to make some moves. Smarter Siri, more contextual health insights and a battery that can actually keep up … that's the Apple Watch I'm waiting for.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Figma sheds $11 billion in market value days after blockbuster IPO
Figma sheds $11 billion in market value days after blockbuster IPO

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Figma sheds $11 billion in market value days after blockbuster IPO

By Chibuike Oguh NEW YORK (Reuters) -Shares of Figma slumped 23% on profit taking on Monday, as euphoria over the design software firm waned days after its blockbuster initial public offering. San Francisco, California-based Figma shares had scored a massive 250% gain during their market debut on Thursday when they were priced at $33 but finished at $115.50, giving the company a market capitalization of about $56.3 billion. Figma's market value closed at $59.5 billion on Friday after its shares rose 5.6% to $122. The shares traded as low as $92.75 on Monday, down 23%, reducing its market value to about $45.2 billion. "The excitement for Figma's business is not over, but the euphoria that's gone into its heady stock pricing seems to be deflating as those that wanted an early piece of the action bought in during market hours while some IPO recipients are probably taking sweet profits," said Michael Ashley Schulman, chief investment officer at Running Point Capital in Los Angeles. Founded in 2012 and led by CEO Dylan Field, Figma provides cloud-based collaborative design tools, with a roster of marquee clients including Alphabet, Microsoft, Netflix and Uber. Field owns about 54.2 million Figma shares worth about $5 billion after selling 2.35 million shares in the IPO. As is common in many Silicon Valley startups, Field retains 74.1% voting power over Figma given his holdings of Class B shares. Adobe had abandoned a $20 billion deal to acquire Figma in 2023 following antitrust pushback from regulators in Europe and the UK. "With Figma at a $46 billion market capitalization, Adobe's failed buyout offer must now seem like a distant memory," Schulman added. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Musk's $29B award, Figma nosedives, OpenAI nears 700M users
Musk's $29B award, Figma nosedives, OpenAI nears 700M users

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Musk's $29B award, Figma nosedives, OpenAI nears 700M users

Yahoo Finance's John Hyland dives into some of the trending headlines on Wall Street during Monday's trading session. Tesla (TSLA) approved a stock award valued at roughly $29 billion for CEO Elon Musk. Figma (FIG) stock is nosediving after the company's strong trading debut. ChatGPT maker OpenAI ( nears 700 million weekly active users. Stay up to date on the latest market action, minute-by-minute, with Yahoo Finance's Market Minute. It's time for Yahoo Finance's Market Minute. US stocks rebounding today as traders increase bets. The Federal Reserve will cut rates in September as the labor market continues to weaken. Most recent payrolls report coming in weaker than economists estimated with major downward revisions to the May and June data. Meanwhile, Tesla has approved a $30 billion pay package for CEO Elon Musk. The new agreement includes 96 million shares of the automaker that will vest if Musk continues to serve in the top post for another two years. And Figma shares sliding today as the newly public company sees volatility following its IPO. The stock closing out a 250% gain on its first day of trading, today shares falling more than 20%. And OpenAI says Chat GPT is set to hit 700 million weekly active users, a fourfold increase from this time last year. OpenAI now counts 5 million paying business users up from 3 million in June as enterprises and educators embrace AI tools. That's Yahoo Finance's Market Minute. Scan the QR code below to track the best and worst performing stocks of the trading session. Related Videos Why Berkshire Hathaway may face 'pressure' to pay cash dividend Elon Musk's $29B award may raise board independence concerns Wilbur Ross–backed BPGC taking iRocket public via $400M SPAC Tesla needs Elon Musk: Why investors awarded Musk $29B in stock Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Are Stablecoins Actually Safe? What Every Crypto Investor Should Know in 2025
Are Stablecoins Actually Safe? What Every Crypto Investor Should Know in 2025

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Are Stablecoins Actually Safe? What Every Crypto Investor Should Know in 2025

Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. Stablecoins were supposed to be the calm in crypto's storm — a digital answer to cash that wouldn't tank when markets got shaky. Pegged to fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar, they were designed to offer price stability in a world of wild volatility. But the truth is more complicated. From the collapse of TerraUSD to temporary de-pegs of USDC, stablecoins have had their share of headline-making failures. And while many investors still rely on them to park funds between trades or earn yield in DeFi, the idea that they're "safe" by default is misleading. In 2025, stablecoins still play a vital role in the crypto economy, but how safe they are depends entirely on how they're built, how they're backed, and who's in control. The Four Types of Stablecoins To understand the risk, you first need to understand the design. Not all stablecoins work the same way, and the method they use to maintain their peg makes a huge difference in how safe they are. Most fall into four categories: fiat-collateralized, crypto-collateralized, algorithmic, and hybrid or semi-centralized models. Fiat-collateralized stablecoins like USDC and USDT are backed by traditional assets — cash, treasuries, or commercial paper — and issued by centralized companies. These are among the most widely used, and while they carry counterparty risk (you're trusting the issuer to actually hold those reserves), they tend to offer the strongest peg in normal market conditions. Crypto-collateralized options like DAI and LUSD take a different approach, locking up excess amounts of digital assets like ETH into smart contracts to maintain the peg. This design is more decentralized and trustless, but still vulnerable to rapid price moves or smart contract bugs. Algorithmic stablecoins — which try to keep their price steady by automatically adjusting supply — are generally considered the riskiest. UST's collapse in 2022 wiped out $60 billion in value and permanently damaged confidence in the model. Some newer projects have tried to reintroduce algorithmic systems with guardrails, but few investors forget how quickly the original experiment failed. Don't Miss: New to crypto? Get up to $400 in rewards for successfully completing short educational courses and making your first qualifying trade on Coinbase. A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: Sign up for the Gemini Credit Card today and earn rewards on Bitcoin Ether, or 60+ other tokens, with every purchase. Stablecoins Aren't Entirely Risk-Free Stablecoins may seem straightforward, but the risks go beyond simply whether or not they stay at $1. There's reserve transparency, for one. Not every issuer is clear about what's backing their tokens. Tether (USDT), for example, spent years dodging full audits before being fined by regulators — and it still doesn't publish the kind of granular reserve breakdowns many critics would like to see. Then there's the issue of regulatory exposure. In the U.S. and Europe, stablecoin issuers are facing growing scrutiny, with new laws aimed at treating them more like banks or money market funds. That could add compliance costs — or shut down certain coins altogether. Even coins like USDC, which are relatively well-regulated and transparent, have shown cracks under pressure. When Silicon Valley Bank collapsed in 2023, $3.3 billion of Circle's reserves were tied up there, and USDC briefly dropped below $0.90 before recovering. These events show that even the "safe" stablecoins can wobble under stress. Not All Pegs Are Created Equal One of the biggest misconceptions about stablecoins is that being "pegged" to the U.S. dollar guarantees stability. It doesn't. Pegs are maintained through mechanisms — and those mechanisms can fail. In fiat-backed coins like USDC and TUSD, the peg holds as long as people believe they can redeem the coin 1:1 for real dollars. If that trust erodes, the peg breaks. In crypto-backed coins like DAI and LUSD, the peg is enforced through collateralization ratios and liquidations. But during market crashes, collateral values can drop faster than the protocol can respond. And with algorithmic coins, it's often just a confidence game. If users stop believing the peg will hold, they rush for the exits — and the mechanism collapses in a death spiral. The lesson is simple: the peg is only as strong as the system backing it. And when that system is opaque, poorly collateralized, or overly reliant on user confidence, the risks grow exponentially. What Makes a Stablecoin Safer in 2025? If you're holding stablecoins, you're probably doing it for a reason — easier trading, access to DeFi yields, or as a crypto-native store of value. So what makes one coin safer than another today? The big three factors are collateral quality, transparency, and decentralization. USDC, managed by Circle and Coinbase, remains the most transparent fiat-backed coin on the market. It's fully audited, backed mostly by short-term U.S. Treasuries, and subject to regulatory oversight. DAI, meanwhile, has proven itself as a decentralized alternative. It's overcollateralized, battle-tested, and operates through a transparent, on-chain system. LUSD, from the Liquity protocol, is another favorite among DeFi purists. It only accepts ETH as collateral and removes governance risk entirely — once the protocol was deployed, it became immutable. Coins like USDT and TUSD are still widely used due to their deep liquidity, but they're considered less safe by some due to weaker transparency and a history of regulatory run-ins. If safety is your goal, stick with coins that are well-collateralized, well-audited, and ideally decentralized — or at least highly regulated. Trending Now: This Jeff Bezos-backed startup will allow you to become a landlord in just 10 minutes, with minimum investments as low as $100. $100k+ in investable assets? Match with a fiduciary advisor for free to learn how you can maximize your retirement and save on taxes – no cost, no obligation. The Dangers of Algorithmic Stablecoins No discussion of stablecoin safety is complete without a warning about algorithmic designs. TerraUSD (UST) was supposed to be the future — a clever blend of incentives and supply controls that could keep a stable peg without backing reserves. But when confidence wavered and too many holders rushed to exit, the algorithm failed. The peg collapsed, the coin crashed, and billions in value disappeared almost overnight. The fallout was so severe that most algorithmic stablecoins have since been abandoned or restructured. Even FRAX, which once used a partial algorithmic model, moved toward full collateralization after the UST collapse. While newer experiments are still cropping up, they're typically smaller and carry warnings from nearly every major research firm. If you see a coin offering high returns and promising a "self-regulating peg," take a closer look. If it's relying on unproven mechanisms and has no collateral backing, the risk may not be worth the reward. Stablecoin Hacks and Wallet Risks Even if the coin itself is solid, how you store it matters. Stablecoins live on blockchains — and blockchain wallets can be hacked. That includes browser extensions, mobile apps, and even exchanges. In 2025, phishing scams remain a major threat. Clicking a fake MetaMask link or approving a malicious contract can drain your stablecoins in seconds. That's why many long-term holders choose hardware wallets like Ledger or Trezor, which store your keys offline and are much harder to compromise. Stablecoins themselves don't get hacked, but the smart contracts that issue or manage them sometimes do — especially on newer platforms. Always make sure the coin you're using has been independently audited and battle-tested in live market conditions. And never, ever share your seed phrase — no real crypto platform will ask you for it. Are Stablecoins a Good Investment? That depends on what you're using them for. If you're trying to earn a few percent interest in a DeFi yield farm, the reward may justify the risk — especially with coins like USDC or DAI. But if you're just trying to park cash in a stable asset, there may be safer options. Some investors now use tokenized Treasuries (like BlackRock's BUIDL or Ondo Finance's OUSG) for short-term parking, since they offer yield and regulatory protections. Others keep a mix — stablecoins for speed and on-chain activity, traditional banking for safety. Just remember: stablecoins are not FDIC insured. If the issuer fails or the protocol breaks, you could lose some or all of your holdings. Do your homework. Read the audits. Understand what's backing the coin. And don't confuse convenience with security. See Next: Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – unlock the power of alternative investments including a Crypto IRA within your retirement account. Trade crypto futures on Plus500 with up to $200 in bonuses — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. This article Are Stablecoins Actually Safe? What Every Crypto Investor Should Know in 2025 originally appeared on Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store