Epstein furor upends House for second week in row
The trouble started as soon as lawmakers returned to Washington on Monday, when the House Rules Committee, which sets up action for bills on the floor, met to tee up votes to rescind Biden-era rules and on an immigration bill.
But Democrats, who had forced Republicans on the panel into a number of politically difficult votes on the Epstein matter last week, threatened to do so again. They planned to stage a vote on bringing legislation to the floor that would compel the release of the Epstein files.
Rather than face those votes, Republicans are opting to simply not tee up any votes at all, according to multiple members of the panel — leaving the House with no floor business in the days ahead of August recess beyond noncontroversial suspension bills, fast-track measures that need two-thirds support to pass.
'Democrats keep putting all these amendments up. They want to make Epstein — and, you know, we're all for transparency, and we're going to do that, but what they want to do is grandstand. They said they'll be there all night, we'll be there all night,' Rep. Ralph Norman (R-S.C.), a member of the Rules Committee, told reporters. He added that the committee was not expected to return, and the House would only deal with suspension votes.
Rep. Jim McGovern (Mass.), the top Democrat on the Rules Committee, confirmed that the panel would not reconvene for the rest of the week.
'We're done,' McGovern told The Hill. 'Not reporting out a rule, we're done for the night, we're done for the week. … There's some issues going on within the Republican conference, I think around the Epstein stuff, that they can't seem to get under control. So we'll do probably suspensions for the remainder of the week.'
It is the second time in as many weeks the so-called Epstein files saga has thwarted GOP leadership's plans for the House floor.
Republicans on the Rules Committee last week had tried to address the Epstein matter after being lambasted by the public over rejecting a Democratic amendment, an effort that delayed action on a bill to codify Department of Government Efficiency cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid for hours.
The GOP members on the panel came up with a nonbinding resolution calling for the release of more files and teed it up for floor action. But GOP leadership has no plans to bring the matter for a vote.
Johnson said earlier Monday that the House would not vote on the legislation before the August recess — which is scheduled to begin after votes on Thursday.
Instead, Johnson said he wanted to give the administration time to act on the matter on its own.
'Here's what I would say about the Epstein files: There is no daylight between the House Republicans, the House, and the president on maximum transparency,' Johnson said in the Capitol on Monday. 'He has said that he wants all the credible files related to Epstein to be released. He's asked the attorney general to request the grand jury files of the court. All of that is in process right now.'
'My belief is we need the administration to have the space to do what it is doing, and if further congressional action is necessary or appropriate, then we'll look at that,' he added. 'But I don't think we're at that point right now because we agree with the president.'
One source said that holding a floor vote on the nonbinding resolution was suggested to leadership as a way to avoid the headaches over votes forced by Democrats, and that was not the favored option by leadership.
The dilemma for Republicans came up in a meeting with leadership and other top House leaders on Monday, two sources told The Hill. Rep. Erin Houchin (R-Ind.), who sits on the Rules Committee, raised concerns with having to vote on the Democratic-led amendment — which has key differences from the GOP-crafted one — in the panel meeting and instead advocated for voting on the Republican resolution or a different measure for transparency, one of the sources said.
A competing Epstein measure from Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) — one that would, if passed by both chambers and signed by the president, have more teeth — is further complicating the Epstein dynamic.
Massie and Khanna have pledged to force a vote on their Epstein-release bill through the discharge petition process, if they can get 218 House members to sign on. If all Democrats in the House and all the Republicans who have already co-sponsored the resolution do so, they can back GOP leadership into a corner.
Due to procedural rules, any vote wouldn't take place until at least after the House returns from August recess in September — by which time many Republicans hope the Epstein furor will have died down.
But Massie — carrying a binder that read 'The Epstein Files: Phase 2' in reference to the notorious 'Phase 1' binders that Attorney General Pam Bondi distributed to MAGA influencers earlier this year — expects there will still be an appetite for that forced vote.
'This is not going away,' Massie said Monday.
Johnson defended the decision Monday night, contending that Republicans would not play into the Democrats' 'political games.' He also said there was no time-sensitive legislation that had to be dealt with under a rule this week.
'There was nothing else that was time-sensitive this week that we needed to handle by way of a rule so the work of the House will continue all week, we'll be here doing our work, and we won't have the Democrats, we won't we won't allow them a platform to try and engage in political games,' Johnson said. 'So that's all it was.'
House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) downplayed the significance of the logjam, saying the House this week can still vote on suspensions and focus on committee meetings and hearings.
'We still have a lot of other work to do,' he told reporters.
Updated at 10:24 p.m. EDT
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Boston Globe
19 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump escalates attacks on Obama and Clinton as questions swirl about Epstein
'Obama was trying to lead a coup,' Trump said. 'And it was with Hillary Clinton.' Trump's extended digression, which came during a visit with President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. of the Philippines, was a stark example of his campaign of retribution against an ever-growing list of enemies that has little analogue in American history. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up It even prompted a rare response from Obama's office. Advertisement 'These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' said Patrick Rodenbush, a spokesperson for Obama. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes.' After Trump's attack on Obama, reports continued to surface about his relationship with Epstein. CNN published photos of Epstein at Trump's 1993 wedding to Marla Maples, the president's second wife. Gabbard's report, which claimed there was a 'treasonous conspiracy' by top Obama officials, contradicted a lengthy study by the Senate Intelligence Committee that was signed by all Republican members of the committee, including Marco Rubio, now the secretary of state. Advertisement The Obama administration never contended that the Russians had manipulated votes; instead, the administration, and the Democrats and Republicans on the Senate Intelligence Committee, concluded that Russia mounted a major effort to influence voters. Still, in his remarks Tuesday, Trump claimed that he could have sent Clinton, the former secretary of state and another of his political rivals, to prison but chose not to. He said he would show no such leniency to Obama. 'I let her off the hook, and I'm very happy I did, but it's time to start after what they did to me,' Trump said. 'Whether it's right or wrong, it's time to go after people. Obama's been caught directly.' The president then listed even more enemies he wanted his Justice Department to target, including his former FBI director, James Comey and James Clapper, the former director of national intelligence, and former President Joe Biden. 'It would be President Obama,' Trump said. 'He started it, and Biden was there with him, and Comey was there, and Clapper, the whole group was there.' 'He's guilty,' he said of Obama. 'This was treason. This was every word you can think of.' Trump's campaign to exact revenge against his perceived enemies has taken many forms. Over the past six months, he has pulled protective details from former colleagues facing death threats from Iran. He has revoked or threatened to revoke the security clearances of Biden, members of his administration and dozens of others. His administration has taken steps to target members of the media seen as unfriendly, taken the hatchet to entire agencies perceived as too liberal, and fired or investigated government workers deemed disloyal. Advertisement The re-examination of the intelligence around the 2016 election began with John Ratcliffe, the CIA director, ordering a review of the agency's tradecraft that went into the intelligence community assessment in December of that year. The review was deeply critical of the Obama administration and the former CIA director, John Brennan. CIA analysts took issue with the speed of the assessment and accused Brennan of allowing an unverified dossier prepared by a former British intelligence officer to influence the assessment. But Brennan has long denied that the so-called Steele dossier had any impact on the assessment, and other former officials said that the analysts working on the report paid no attention to it, maintaining that it was unverifiable rumor. Ratcliffe wrote on social media that the review had shown that the process was corrupt, and then he made a criminal referral to the FBI. Last week, Gabbard issued another report that criticized the findings of the intelligence assessment even more directly. Gabbard's report suggested that in the winter of 2016, intelligence officials under pressure from the White House changed their assessment from one that Russia had failed to mount a significant effort to hack election infrastructure to one that the Kremlin was trying to boost Trump and denigrate Clinton, the Democratic nominee. But Gabbard's report conflated two different intelligence findings. Intelligence officials had concluded that Russia had not engaged in any major effort to hack election systems and change votes. But they also believed that Russia had tried to influence the election in various ways by releasing hacked documents to harm Clinton and sow dissent. Advertisement Gabbard has also called for several Obama officials to face criminal investigation, without naming them. This article originally appeared in


CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump Struggles To Divert Attention From Epstein Story - The Source with Kaitlan Collins - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Trump Struggles To Divert Attention From Epstein Story The Source with Kaitlan Collins 47 mins Newly discovered pictures and video of Donald Trump and Jeffery Epstein in the 1990's as lawmakers head home early to completely avoid the topic.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Among the trove of new photos is one showing Epstein with Trump and his young children, Eric and Ivanka.
New photos and footage of Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein have been unearthed offering fresh insight into the pair's relationship despite the president's repeated attempts to distance himself. Epstein and Trump appear in a number of pictures surfaced by CNN and aired Tuesday night. Among them are images showing Epstein as a guest at the president's wedding to Marla Maples. CNN's KFILE uncovered two photos showing the disgraced financier at Trump's December 1993 wedding at the Plaza Hotel in New York. It also obtained footage from a 1999 Victoria's Secret runway event in New York, showing Trump, accompanied by his future wife Melania Trump, chatting to Epstein.