Frequent transfers of higher education secretaries i Tamil Nadu cause concern
In July 2023, D. Karthikeyan was transferred from the department and replaced by A. Karthik. Subsequently, the School Education Secretary held additional charge for a few days. Pradeep Yadav followed, and then K. Gopal was appointed, succeeded by Mr. Samayamoorthy. Now, within months, Mr. Samayamoorthy has been replaced by Mr. Shankar.
The frequent change of leadership has left teachers' associations discontented. S. Suresh, president of the Tamil Nadu Government College Teachers Association, said a secretary should serve for at least a year to effectively address issues.
K. Raja, general secretary of the Association of University Teachers, noted that the government has made no progress in streamlining fees charged by aided colleges, despite forming a committee for the purpose four years ago. 'None of the secretaries have made any effort,' he said. 'A secretary should stay at least a year to understand and address the issues.'
He pointed out the Higher Education Secretary also serves as the convenor committee chairman for several universities in the absence of appointed Vice-Chancellors. 'In the past five years, none of the Higher Education Secretaries have functioned effectively. Many have held the position, but few have served the department meaningfully.'
He added that the Career Advancement Scheme (CAS) benefits have not been disbursed since 2021. 'The problem is not a lack of awareness, but lack of execution,' he said.
The fee fixation committee, chaired by retired judge K.N. Basha and formed in 2021, has yet to see its recommendations implemented. The government is also yet to release course fee details for the 2025–26 academic year. 'We have submitted several amendments to the Tamil Nadu Private Colleges Regulation Act, but they have not been taken up,' Mr. Raja added.
C. Murugan, president of the Madras University Teachers Association, said successive secretaries have failed to secure grants for the university. Retirement benefits for university employees have been pending since 2017. 'Both teaching and non-teaching staff are under pressure,' he said.
He also raised concerns about delays in the university's free education scheme. 'Around 900 students have applied. We were asked to conduct online interviews, but the meeting scheduled for Monday was postponed. Students are expected to join by the end of June. It's disheartening to see their hopes dashed,' he said. 'I am a member of the committee, and seeing their dejected faces is painful.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
3 days ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala govt opposes governor's directive to observe August 14 as 'Partition Horror Day'
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: The state government will issue instructions to colleges not to implement Governor Rajendra Arlekar's directive to observe August 14 as 'Partition Horror Day'. Higher Education Minister R Bindu told reporters on Wednesday that the state government's position is that campuses in Kerala need not observe the day on the eve of Independence Day, as doing so could lead to 'communal polarisation.' The Minister stated that she has instructed the Director of Collegiate Education and the Director of Technical Education, both under the Higher Education Department, to convey the government's stance to all colleges under their respective jurisdictions. A circular issued by the Raj Bhavan last week had directed universities to organise seminars and commemorative events, including street plays and dramas, highlighting the 'trauma' of India's Partition. Vice-Chancellors were also asked to submit action plans for the observance.
India Today
4 days ago
- India Today
Crystal Palace hit out at Europa League demotion: Merit is rendered meaningless
Premier League side Crystal Palace said on Tuesday that sporting merit had been "rendered meaningless" by UEFA's decision to relegate them from the Europa League. In a strongly worded statement on Tuesday, the FA Cup winners said they were seeking legal advice on possible next steps following Monday's ruling, accusing European football's governing body of stripping their qualification of any decision was centered on multi-club ownership rules. At the time of the assessment on 1 March, U.S. businessman John Textor's Eagle Football Group were majority owners of Olympique Lyonnais—who had also qualified for the Europa League—and held shares in Crystal Palace. UEFA ruled that this arrangement breached competition regulations designed to prevent conflicts of Eagle Football sold their stake in Palace last month, CAS upheld the original decision and dismissed Palace's claims of unfair treatment, which had cited the cases of Lyon and Nottingham Forest. Forest, who had finished lower than Palace in domestic competition, have now taken their Europa League place. "The decision by UEFA and followed by the Court of Arbitration for Sport shows that sporting merit is rendered meaningless," Palace said. "It appears that certain clubs, organisations and individuals have a unique privilege and power while we respect the CAS tribunal members, the process is designed to severely restrict and, in our case, make it almost impossible to receive a fair hearing."UEFA's decision has wider implications for the governance of the sport. A combination of poorly conceived regulations and their unequal application means our brilliant fans will be deprived of the chance to watch this team compete in the Europa League for the first time in our history."Palace also referenced a recent European Court of Justice ruling, which allows national courts to conduct in-depth reviews of CAS awards for compliance with EU law, insisting it could ensure greater scrutiny and fairness in future."Only then will fairness and due process be granted to every team," the club added. "Although we continue to take legal advice on the next steps, we will compete in the Conference League."The Eagles, who lifted the Community Shield on Sunday by beating Premier League champions Liverpool on penalties, will enter the Conference League qualifying play-off round later this month.- Ends
Time of India
4 days ago
- Time of India
National Anti-Doping Bill Explained: From tougher testing to WADA alignment, here's how it will redefine Indian sports
The Parliament on Tuesday passed the National Anti-Doping (Amendment) Bill, 2025, along with the National Sports Governance Bill, both awaiting presidential assent. The anti-doping amendment bill strengthens the National Anti-Doping Act, 2022, granting NADA greater autonomy in line with WADA norms and UNESCO standards. Key changes include shifting appeal panel authority to the Centre, limiting appeals to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) to select bodies, mandating WADA-accredited labs, and adopting World Anti-Doping Code definitions into Indian law. What is National Anti Doping Bill 2025 The anti-doping amendment, introduced on July 23, 2025, seeks to strengthen the National Anti-Doping Act, 2022, granting the National Anti-Doping Agency (NADA) greater autonomy in line with World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) requirements. The changes also bring India's framework closer to global standards under the UNESCO Convention against Doping in Sport. Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Doping — the use of prohibited substances to gain an unfair edge in competition — has long been a persistent challenge in sports. The original 2022 Act had set up NADA to conduct testing and enforcement, while establishing the National Board for Anti-Doping in Sports to oversee the agency and advise the government on policy. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like No annual fees for life UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Key Amendments in the 2025 Bill Central Government Gains Appeal Panel Authority: The power to constitute the Appeal Panel and prescribe appeal procedures has shifted from the National Board to the central government. Enhanced Autonomy for Anti-Doping Bodies: Oversight powers of the National Board over the Disciplinary and Appeal Panels have been removed, granting NADA's leadership operational independence from sports federations, Olympic committees, government departments, and related agencies. Limited Right to Appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sports (CAS): Only select bodies like WADA, IOC, IPC, and international sports federations can now appeal to CAS, restricting the previous open right. Direct Appeal to CAS in Specific Cases: For international-level cases, affected parties including athletes and key agencies may directly appeal CAS. WADA can also file a direct appeal if no one else has challenged a final NADA decision domestically. Other Significant Changes The Bill adopts the World Anti-Doping Code's definitions and schedules, giving them the force of law in India. It makes WADA accreditation mandatory for all doping testing laboratories in the country. NADA is now required to verify if any lab or testing procedural lapses contributed to adverse doping test results during its reviews.
