Russian, Ukrainian delegations to hold talks in Turkey
The Kremlin played down expectations of any breakthrough at the Wednesday evening meeting, which Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said this week should focus in part on preparing a summit between himself and Russian President Vladimir Putin.
"Naturally, no one expects an easy road. Naturally, this will be a very difficult conversation. The projects (of the two sides) are diametrically opposed," Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters.
A Ukrainian diplomatic source said the country would view a Putin-Zelenskiy meeting as the key requirement for a breakthrough.
"The Ukrainian delegation has come to Turkey prepared to take significant steps toward peace and a full ceasefire but everything will depend on whether the Russian side is willing to take a constructive approach," the source said.
A Turkish foreign ministry source said the meeting at the Ciragan Palace was expected to start with opening remarks to the two delegations by Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan.
Previous talks on May 16 and June 2 led to the exchange of thousands of prisoners of war and the remains of dead soldiers.
But those meetings lasted less than three hours in total and made no breakthrough towards ending the war that started with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.
US President Donald Trump has patched up relations with Zelenskiy after a public row with him at the White House in February, and has lately expressed growing frustration with Putin.
Last week he threatened heavy new sanctions on Russia and countries that buy its exports unless a peace deal was reached within 50 days, although reaction on financial markets suggested investors were sceptical that he would follow through.
On Wednesday, Russia said its forces had captured the settlement of Varachyne in Ukraine's Sumy region, where Putin has ordered his troops to create a buffer zone after Ukraine mounted a shock incursion into Russia last year and held onto a chunk of its territory for months.
Reuters could not independently confirm the battlefield report.
In recent weeks, Russian forces have launched some of their heaviest air attacks of the war, focusing especially on the Ukrainian capital Kyiv.
Ukraine has hit back with attacks of its own, and last month inflicted serious damage on Russia's nuclear-capable strategic bomber fleet by smuggling drones close to air bases deep inside the country.
Zelenskiy said earlier this week that the agenda for talks was clear: the return of prisoners of war and of children abducted by Russian forces, and the preparation of a meeting between himself and Putin.
Putin turned down a previous challenge from Zelenskiy to meet him in person and has said he does not see him as a legitimate leader because Ukraine, which is under martial law, did not hold new elections when Zelenskiy's five-year mandate expired last year.
Russia also denies abducting children.
The Kremlin said this week it was unrealistic to expect "miracles" from the talks.
At the last meeting on June 2, Russia handed Ukraine a memorandum setting out its key demands, including: full withdrawal of Ukrainian forces from four regions of the country that Russia has claimed as its own; limits on the size of Ukraine's military; enhanced rights for Russian-speakers in Ukraine; and acceptance by Ukraine of neutral status, outside NATO or any other alliance.
Ukraine sees those terms as tantamount to surrender, and Zelenskiy described the Russian stance as an ultimatum.
Ukraine wants an immediate ceasefire, reparations, international security guarantees and no restrictions on its military strength.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Trump dealt a blow as the world is flooded with oil
Even without that next tranche of capacity, OPEC+'s increase in output this year will hit a market that is expected to be over-supplied by as much as 2 million barrels a day in the fourth quarter of this year The current Brent oil price is about $US68 a barrel but analysts from major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have forecast oil prices of around $US60 a barrel by the end of the year. The shift in OPEC+ strategy could be regarded as self-destructive. The key Middle Eastern producers have very low production costs (the Saudi's are less than $US15 a barrel) but need prices ranging from about $US65 a barrel (United Arab Emirates) to $US80 to $US85 a barrel (Saudi Arabia) to balance their budgets. Flooding the market with more oil will almost inevitably push prices down. Having accepted reality, however, the cartel is now trying, again, to implement a strategy it has attempted twice before – first between 2014 and 2016 and then in 2020 – where it tried to take market share away from the US shale producers by driving the price below their production costs. It underestimated the dynamic nature of the shale producers who, after an initial drop in their production, cut their costs and increased their productivity at a startling rate. Will OPEC+ be any more successful this time? Loading The US producers are more returns-focused than they were during those earlier episodes and, with some of the major basins' reserves depleting, more likely to respond to a lower oil price by mothballing their wells. Already, with West Texas Intermediate prices around $US66 a barrel, there are about 46 fewer rigs operating onshore in the US than there were a year ago. Trump might want the US companies to 'drill, baby, drill,' but a recent Dallas Federal Reserve Bank survey showed most would reduce their drilling if the US price fell towards $US60 a barrel. Breakeven costs for US producers average around the mid-$US60 dollars a barrel. There could be something of a safety valve for both the core OPEC producers and the US shale oil sector. This Friday is the deadline Trump has set for Russia to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine, with Trump threatening secondary tariffs of 100 per cent on Russia's oil customers if it doesn't comply. India which, with China and Turkey, has been one of the major buyers of Russian oil during the conflict, has been specifically targeted by Trump. Russia's new production target will be 9.45 million barrels a day next month. Any material reduction its oil sales would create space for the increased production of other OPEC+ members and take some of the pressure off oil prices. Absent the withdrawal of Russian supply, even if Russia is eventually able to find a workaround (as it has throughout the war in Ukraine and the sanctions regime the G7 has imposed), the outlook for demand in the near term isn't great. China's economy has been spluttering and is further threatened by Trump's trade wars. The US economy has weakened sharply because of, initially, the uncertainty Trump's trade and immigration policies and his assault on government agencies have created and now the reality and increasing economic impacts of his tariffs. The global economy will slow as a result of Trump's assault on global trade. Some of the faster-growing economies, and those most dependent on imported energy – the Asian, South American and African developing economies – are, perversely, among those facing the most punitive tariffs. Having accepted reality, OPEC+ is now opening the spigots. While lower oil prices might help keep a lid on inflation rates, particularly the US inflation rate, and provide some offset for those import-dependent economies from the effects of Trump's tariffs, the trade-off will be reduced economic growth. The longer-term outlook for oil is clouded. OPEC believes demand, fuelled by developing economies, will continue to grow through to 2050, rising from just over 100 million barrels a day to 123 million barrels a day. The International Energy Agency believes demand, impacted by electric vehicles and electrification more widely, will peak at about 105 million barrels a day in 2030. Loading While the long-term outcome matters for the members of the cartel, who are still overly reliant on oil revenue despite increasingly urgent attempts to diversify their economies, it's the near term outlook for oil prices that matters for an increasingly messy and threatened global economy. It also matters for Trump's economic strategy, as articulated by his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent. Bessent's '3-3-3' strategy has three major components. He aims to reduce the federal deficit to 3 per cent of gross domestic product, raise GDP growth to 3 per cent per year and add 3 million barrels per day of domestic oil production. Thanks to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which could increase US deficits by about $US3.4 trillion over the next decade, the impact of his tariffs on US inflation and growth (already running at less than half the rate achieved last year) and OPEC+'s flooding of the market with increased oil supply, each of those objectives (which never looked likely or added up to a coherent strategy) now seem wildly unrealistic.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Trump dealt a blow as the world is flooded with oil
Even without that next tranche of capacity, OPEC+'s increase in output this year will hit a market that is expected to be over-supplied by as much as 2 million barrels a day in the fourth quarter of this year The current Brent oil price is about $US68 a barrel but analysts from major banks like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs have forecast oil prices of around $US60 a barrel by the end of the year. The shift in OPEC+ strategy could be regarded as self-destructive. The key Middle Eastern producers have very low production costs (the Saudi's are less than $US15 a barrel) but need prices ranging from about $US65 a barrel (United Arab Emirates) to $US80 to $US85 a barrel (Saudi Arabia) to balance their budgets. Flooding the market with more oil will almost inevitably push prices down. Having accepted reality, however, the cartel is now trying, again, to implement a strategy it has attempted twice before – first between 2014 and 2016 and then in 2020 – where it tried to take market share away from the US shale producers by driving the price below their production costs. It underestimated the dynamic nature of the shale producers who, after an initial drop in their production, cut their costs and increased their productivity at a startling rate. Will OPEC+ be any more successful this time? Loading The US producers are more returns-focused than they were during those earlier episodes and, with some of the major basins' reserves depleting, more likely to respond to a lower oil price by mothballing their wells. Already, with West Texas Intermediate prices around $US66 a barrel, there are about 46 fewer rigs operating onshore in the US than there were a year ago. Trump might want the US companies to 'drill, baby, drill,' but a recent Dallas Federal Reserve Bank survey showed most would reduce their drilling if the US price fell towards $US60 a barrel. Breakeven costs for US producers average around the mid-$US60 dollars a barrel. There could be something of a safety valve for both the core OPEC producers and the US shale oil sector. This Friday is the deadline Trump has set for Russia to agree a ceasefire in Ukraine, with Trump threatening secondary tariffs of 100 per cent on Russia's oil customers if it doesn't comply. India which, with China and Turkey, has been one of the major buyers of Russian oil during the conflict, has been specifically targeted by Trump. Russia's new production target will be 9.45 million barrels a day next month. Any material reduction its oil sales would create space for the increased production of other OPEC+ members and take some of the pressure off oil prices. Absent the withdrawal of Russian supply, even if Russia is eventually able to find a workaround (as it has throughout the war in Ukraine and the sanctions regime the G7 has imposed), the outlook for demand in the near term isn't great. China's economy has been spluttering and is further threatened by Trump's trade wars. The US economy has weakened sharply because of, initially, the uncertainty Trump's trade and immigration policies and his assault on government agencies have created and now the reality and increasing economic impacts of his tariffs. The global economy will slow as a result of Trump's assault on global trade. Some of the faster-growing economies, and those most dependent on imported energy – the Asian, South American and African developing economies – are, perversely, among those facing the most punitive tariffs. Having accepted reality, OPEC+ is now opening the spigots. While lower oil prices might help keep a lid on inflation rates, particularly the US inflation rate, and provide some offset for those import-dependent economies from the effects of Trump's tariffs, the trade-off will be reduced economic growth. The longer-term outlook for oil is clouded. OPEC believes demand, fuelled by developing economies, will continue to grow through to 2050, rising from just over 100 million barrels a day to 123 million barrels a day. The International Energy Agency believes demand, impacted by electric vehicles and electrification more widely, will peak at about 105 million barrels a day in 2030. Loading While the long-term outcome matters for the members of the cartel, who are still overly reliant on oil revenue despite increasingly urgent attempts to diversify their economies, it's the near term outlook for oil prices that matters for an increasingly messy and threatened global economy. It also matters for Trump's economic strategy, as articulated by his Treasury Secretary, Scott Bessent. Bessent's '3-3-3' strategy has three major components. He aims to reduce the federal deficit to 3 per cent of gross domestic product, raise GDP growth to 3 per cent per year and add 3 million barrels per day of domestic oil production. Thanks to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which could increase US deficits by about $US3.4 trillion over the next decade, the impact of his tariffs on US inflation and growth (already running at less than half the rate achieved last year) and OPEC+'s flooding of the market with increased oil supply, each of those objectives (which never looked likely or added up to a coherent strategy) now seem wildly unrealistic.
Perth Now
2 hours ago
- Perth Now
Shares in Asia rally, dollar lower against yen
Shares in Asia rose for a second consecutive session and the US dollar held most of its losses on Tuesday as investors increased bets the Federal Reserve will act to prop up the world's largest economy. US shares rallied on Monday on generally positive earnings reports and increasing bets for a September rate cut from the Fed after disappointing jobs data on Friday. Oil remained lower after output increases by OPEC+ and threats by US President Donald Trump to raise tariffs on India over its Russian petroleum purchases. Japan's Nikkei rallied, with data showing a jump in the nation's service sector activity in July. "There are signs of weakness in parts of the US economy, that plays to the view that maybe not in September, but certainly this year that the Fed's still on course to ease potentially twice," said Rodrigo Catril, senior currency strategist at National Australia Bank. MSCI's broadest index of Asia-Pacific shares outside Japan was up 0.6 per cent in early trade. The Nikkei climbed 0.5 per cent after falling by the most in two months on Monday. The dollar dropped 0.1 per cent to 146.96 yen. The euro was unchanged at $US1.1572 ($A1.7904), while the dollar index, which tracks the greenback against a basket of major peers, edged up 0.1 per cent after a two-day slide. Odds for a September rate cut now stand at about 94 per cent, according to CME Fedwatch, from a 63 per cent chance seen on July 28. Market participants see at least two quarter-point cuts by the end of this year. The disappointing nonfarm payrolls data on Friday added to the case for a cut by the Fed, and took on another layer of drama with Trump's decision to fire the head of labour statistics responsible for the figures. News that Trump would get to fill a governorship position at the Fed early also added to worries about politicisation of interest rate policy. Trump again threatened to raise tariffs on goods from India from the 25 per cent level announced last month, over its Russian oil purchases, while New Delhi called his attack "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests. Second-quarter US earnings season is winding down, but investors are still looking forward to reports this week from companies including Walt Disney and Caterpillar. Tech heavyweights Nvidia, Alphabet and Meta surged overnight, and Palantir Technologies raised its revenue forecast for the second time this year on expectations of sustained demand for its artificial intelligence services. "Company earnings announcements continue to spur market moves," Moomoo Australia market strategist Michael McCarthy said in a note. In Japan, the S&P Global final services purchasing managers' index climbed to 53.6 in July from 51.7 in June, marking the strongest expansion since February. Oil prices were little changed after three days of declines on mounting oversupply concerns, with the potential for more Russian supply disruptions providing support. Brent crude futures were flat at $US68.76 ($A106.38) per barrel, while US crude futures dipped 0.02 per cent to $US66.28 ($A102.55) a barrel. Spot gold was slightly higher at $US3,381.4 ($A5,231.6) per ounce. The pan-region Euro Stoxx 50 futures were up 0.2 per cent, while German DAX futures were up 0.3 per cent and FTSE futures rose 0.4 per cent. US stock futures, the S&P 500 e-minis , were up 0.2 per cent. Bitcoin was little changed at $US114,866.06 ($A177,716.35) after a two-day rally.
