The FTC Risks Chilling Speech With Its Advertising Boycott Investigation
In November 2023, X Corp. filed a lawsuit against Media Matters in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas accusing the nonprofit of making false and malicious statements disparaging the quality of X, which led to the subsequent loss of advertising contracts. In its complaint, X Corp. accuses Media Matters of publicly smearing the company by "knowingly and maliciously manufactur[ing] side-by-side images [of] advertisers' posts…beside Neo-Nazi and white-nationalist fringe content." X Corp. cites "99% of [its] measured ad placement in 2023 [appearing] adjacent to content scoring above the Global Alliance for Responsible Media's [GARM] brand safety floor" as contradicting Media Matter's portrayal of the platform.
X Corp. filed an antitrust lawsuit against GARM's parent organization, the WFA, in August 2024. After Musk acquired Twitter (now X) in November 2022, members contacted GARM for advice on whether to continue advertising on the platform. At this time, the suit alleges, GARM "conveyed to its members its concerns about Twitter's compliance with GARM's standards"—concerns exacerbated by critical coverage from progressive nonprofits like Media Matters—prompting a boycott that caused revenues to dip 80 percent below forecasts. X Corp. alleges that WFA members violated the Sherman Antitrust Act's prohibition of conspiracies in restraint of trade by "withholding purchases of digital advertising from Twitter."
Supreme Court precedent strongly suggests this allegation is meritless.
Vikram David Amar and Ashutosh Bhagwat, both professors at the University of California, Davis School of Law, cite NAACP v. Claiborne (1982) as evidence that the First Amendment applies to politically motivated boycotts. Amar and Bhagwat explain that, in Claiborne, "the Court insulated the boycotters from liability under state laws seeking to protect fair economic competition and held that 'the nonviolent elements of [the boycotters'] activities [were] entitled to the protection of the First Amendment.'"
Amar and Bhagwat also invoke 303 Creative v. Elenis (2023), where the Court ruled that "a seller of inherently expressive services…can't be compelled [by a consumer] to provide speech." It stands to reason that consumers (like advertisers) may not be forced to buy expressive services they disagree with. Forcing companies to pay for speech with which they disagree is unconstitutional.
The FTC's advertising boycott investigation is a waste of the commission's time and taxpayers' money because, even if advocacy groups and advertisers colluded to boycott X, the First Amendment forecloses antitrust prosecution given the expressive nature of the X platform and its advertising service.
The post The FTC Risks Chilling Speech With Its Advertising Boycott Investigation appeared first on Reason.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
Judge blocks Trump FTC's ‘retaliation' against liberal media watchdog
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration's investigation of a liberal advocacy group known for its campaigns against Rupert Murdoch's Fox News and Elon Musk's X. Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan cited evidence that the investigation, which was opened by the Federal Trade Commission last spring, was an act of retaliation against the advocacy group, Media Matters for America. The judge granted a preliminary injunction because, she wrote, 'Media Matters is likely to succeed in its First Amendment retaliation claim, which is all it needs at this stage.' Media Matters has been a thorn in the side of Musk and his X social network for years. The group has published numerous reports about the prevalence of violent and hateful posts on X, leading Musk to call them an 'evil propaganda machine' hellbent on harming his business by turning off advertisers. Musk sued Media Matters in response; the group has countersued, and some Republican elected officials have backed Musk. The overarching charge is that liberal activists have colluded with advertisers to hurt conservative platforms and chill speech. Some of the advertisers Musk has sued have fought back, arguing that he has resorted to legal and political maneuvers 'to win back the business X lost in the free market when it disrupted its own business and alienated many of its customers.' With President Trump back in power, Musk and other Media Matters opponents have felt emboldened. Media Matters alleged 'retribution' when the FTC said it was probing possible collusion. Media Matters filed suit against the FTC seeking legal relief, which is what Sooknanan delivered on Friday, though the court battle is likely to continue. An FTC spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment about the court order. Media Matters, which has been seriously hampered by Musk and company, said the injunction is a symbol of effective resistance to the Trump administration. 'The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration,' Media Matters president Angelo Carusone said in a statement. 'This case is not just about the campaign to punish and silence Media Matters, however,' he said. 'It is a critical test for whether the courts will allow any administration — from any political party — to bully media and non-profit organizations through illegal abuses of power.'
Engadget
3 hours ago
- Engadget
Court blocks FTC investigation into Media Matters' alleged scheme against X
The court has blocked the Federal Trade Commission's investigation into Media Matters, the media nonprofit that previously published research showing that ads appeared on X alongside neo-Nazi and other antisemitic content. In 2023, Elon Musk's X filed a lawsuit against the media watchdog following an advertiser exodus. It accused Media Matters of "knowingly and maliciously manufactur[ing] side-by-side images depicting advertisers' posts on X Corp.'s social media platform beside Neo-Nazi and white national fringe content." Just this May, the FTC started looking into whether the nonprofit violated antitrust laws by allegedly colluding with advertising and advocacy groups to boycott X. In June, Media Matters sued the FTC, accusing it of unfairly targeting the group in retaliation for past criticisms of X. "The Federal Trade Commission seeks to punish Media Matters for its journalism and speech in exposing matters of substantial public concern — including how has enabled and profited from extremist content that proliferated after Elon Musk took over the platform formerly known as Twitter," the group said at the time. Now, Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan has granted a preliminary injunction in the nonprofit's favor. Sooknanan has agreed with the group that the FTC's investigation is "a retaliatory act" and has noted that it is "likely to succeed on its First Amendment retaliation claim." She wrote in her decision that such probes would deter other reporters from speaking again. "Indeed, the FTC's [investigation] has had its intended effect." Apparently, because of the probe, Media Matters has "decided against pursuing certain stories about the FTC, Chairman Ferguson, and Mr. Musk." "The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration," Angelo Carusone, the president of Media Matters, told The New York Times . "We will continue to stand up and fight for the First Amendment rights that protect every American." As the publication notes, courts had also blocked investigations into the group by the attorneys general in Texas and Missouri. Musk's lawsuits against the nonprofit, however, are still ongoing.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Americana is less of an indie homage than it is an annoying imitation
Americana is very much the brainchild of the showrunner of Poker Face. Both Poker Face and Americana wear their influences proudly on their sleeves: Serialized crime dramas like Columbo paved the way for Natasha Lyonne's Charlie Cale, just as the impact of '90s neo-noir can be felt blatantly on Americana. The feature debut of writer-director Tony Tost, about five character threads all brought chaotically together by a single crime and the priceless artifact at the center of it, simultaneously embraces its status as a copy of a copy while also attempting to satirize that very product—the kind of movies made by countless young filmmakers who want to be the next Tarantino while only possessing the ability and desire to emulate. The irony is that Tost doesn't have the finesse to execute such an endeavor either, so Americana falls in the mundane middle between satire and sincerity. The neo-Western kicks off with a chapter title and a non-chronological opening sequence (both very Pulp Fiction), in which abusive father and career criminal Dillon MacIntosh (Eric Dane) is knocked unconscious by his much younger wife Mandy (Halsey), who then peels off in their car knowingly carrying stolen goods while promising their young son Cal (Gavin Maddox Bergman), that she's doing what's best for the two of them. After Mandy disappears and Dillon wakes up enraged, Cal, a classic Western obsessive who believes he's the reincarnation of Sitting Bull, shoots his father in the neck with a toy bow and arrow, killing him. There's no real reason for this scene to be presented out of sequence, other than to jumpstart Americana with a narrative jolt—more confusingly, the scene is eventually repeated verbatim, as if to remind feeble-minded viewers of what happened 40 minutes prior. Aside from this, Americana plays out entirely chronologically, following disparate factions who are all connected by one central crime—a narrative layout more aligned with Fargo the TV show than Fargo the film. Penny Jo (Sydney Sweeney) and Lefty Ledbetter (Paul Walter Hauser), a stuttering waitress and her mawkish patron who eyes marriage with his girlfriend after three dates, forge a friendship through shared feelings of alienation. After he murders his father and is abandoned by his mother, Cal gets kidnapped by a militant group of Native American revolutionaries led by Ghost Eye (Zahn McClarnon), who are bemused by Cal's Native 'minstrelsy.' Mandy seeks shelter at the home of her estranged, violently traditionalist, Mormon-adjacent family. All of this is incited by Roy Lee Dean (Simon Rex), a crooked artifacts dealer, who employs Dillon to steal a priceless Native American 'ghost shirt' from the home of a wealthy art collector. Every faction has its own reason for wanting to get their hands on the shirt, whether it's for money (Roy), freedom (Mandy, Penny Jo), or a genuine claim to cultural ownership (Ghost Eye). But Americana's rote, underwhelming screenplay doesn't earn any emotional investment in its story or characters. Rather, viewers are supposed to buy into what it's selling on the basis that it's copying recognizable hallmarks. If the film is trying to lampoon them, it doesn't do a very good job. Instead, everything old is supposedly new again: A heist gone awry, half-baked plans, and a gaggle of eclectic characters—all leading to a climactic shootout and bargain for money that doesn't quite go as planned. Penny Jo and Lefty Ledbetter are basically Kirsten Dunst and Jesse Plemons from Season 2 of Fargo. The film is explicitly inauthentic, attempting to coast on a superficiality which couldn't be more aptly visualized than by Sweeney's Party City wig and fake freckles. Like its spiritual predecessors, Americana is more of a character actors' film anyway. The only problem is, this great ensemble—including Hauser, McClarnon, Rex, and a criminally underused Harriet Sansom Harris—is not given much to work with. Distractingly bad dialogue and milquetoast characterizations make for forgettable performances, and giving Sweeney a schoolgirl stutter doesn't count as giving her genuine color. If anything, Americana firmly finds the limits of Sweeney's range. Her showing as the meek Penny Jo is laughably insincere; despite not being particularly exceptional herself, pop star Halsey, in only her second live-action venture, manages to out-act Sweeney. Much like its cast filled with solid bit players left to their own devices, Americana's delicate dance with neo-Western tropes also requires a better film in order to actually work. Cal's appropriation of Native American stereotypes seems meant to convey the film's metatextual self-awareness, but like most of the film's other elements, its potential satire is lost in a muddy haze of genre repetition. Besides, isn't satire supposed to be funny? Americana isn't funny, and it's also not engaging or exciting. It certainly isn't unique. The clichéd, forgettable work neither succeeds as a spoof nor as an earnest genre exercise by a wannabe indie-phenom wannabe. Director: Tony Tost Writer:: Tony Tost Starring: Sydney Sweeney, Paul Walter Hauser, Halsey, Zahn McClarnon, Gavin Maddox Bergman, Simon Rex Release Date: August 15, 2025 More from A.V. Club 3 new songs and 3 new albums to check out this weekend Americana is less of an indie homage than it is an annoying imitation Nearly 800 Looney Tunes shorts have now landed, free, at Tubi Solve the daily Crossword
