Indonesia's military once called all the shots. It may again under Prabowo
Advertisement
Rights and pro-democracy activists fear the practice, referred to as military dual-function or dwifungsi, could potentially return as lawmakers are pushing to revise a 2004 law on the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI).
Under Suharto's 32-year rule, the military permeated national politics, as well as domestic affairs, as it helped Suharto cling to power and maintain order during various crises.
Military chief General Agus Subiyanto has said the current law is 'outdated' as it has not been amended for more than 20 years.
The 2004 military law 'is considered no longer relevant' to address various problems 'in implementing the fundamental norms of state policies and political decisions', Agus said at a meeting with the House of Representatives on Thursday.
Advertisement
The revision bill was included by lawmakers in this year's legislative priority bills. Defence Minister Sjafrie Sjamsoeddin had earlier last week revealed the government's focus on the legal amendment, including an article that restricts military personnel from holding civilian posts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AllAfrica
07-08-2025
- AllAfrica
Anti-Chinese 'Ali Baba' legacy still divides Indonesia
The Dutch presence in the Indonesian archipelago—first brought about by the decision of the Dutch East India Company in the 17th century to establish a spice monopoly in the region—has now influenced many of the institutions, norms, and educational practices within the modern Republic of Indonesia. The colony of the 'Dutch East Indies' that makes up modern-day Indonesia was also marked by racial violence and discrimination that lasted even shortly after Indonesia gained independence from the Dutch. In a few extreme cases, native Indonesians were brutally killed and had their villages destroyed by Dutch colonizers, such as in the 1621 Banda massacre. But more subtly, discrimination mainly came in the form of a system the Dutch had implemented: one of racial stratification that continues to shape Indonesian politics through present-day ethnic hostilities. During Indonesia's colonial period, which ended at the conclusion of World War II, the Dutch frequently employed the strategy of divide et impera ('divide-and-conquer') in order to assert their dominance and prevent the possibility of organized resistance or joining of forces between ethnic groups against them. The white Dutch settlers became the ruling class, while ethnic Chinese and Arab-Indonesian minorities were positioned above native Indonesians as 'Foreign Orientals,' with native Indonesians, or the pribumi , occupying the lowest position. The Dutch maintained that the Arab- and Chinese-Indonesians, who had descended from merchant classes, were more adept at trade and economic matters. While Arab-Indonesians were able to more easily assimilate with native Indonesians after the formation of an independent Indonesia, due to shared religious ties in Islam, Chinese-Indonesians remained more socially separated. Furthermore, zoning and pass systems carried out by the Dutch in the mid-1800s prevented Chinese-Indonesians from living among the native population, as they were forced to live in restricted areas and were only allowed to leave with a pass, once again to prevent the two groups from uniting against the Dutch colonizers. University of Malaya professor Chong Wu Ling writes that Chinese-Indonesians during the colonial period were 'indispensable' to the functioning of the colonial economy. She asserts that the Chinese-Indonesian minority was favored by the colonial government in the distribution of licenses to all sorts of businesses like pawnshops and gambling establishments. When Indonesia finally gained independence, 'Ali Baba' policies (officially, the 'Benteng program') were introduced by the then-newly established Sukarno government. These affirmative-action policies, intended to encourage native Indonesians to participate in the economy, led native Indonesians, referred to as 'Ali,' to serve as the 'frontmen' for businesses, with Chinese-Indonesians, 'Baba,' operating in the background. The end result of these discriminatory 'Ali Baba' policies, however, was not a post-colonial transformation; rather, it was the continuation and perpetuation of old colonial ethnic divisions. The Dutch succeeded in entrenching a heightened racial and ethnic consciousness between native Indonesians ('Ali') and the Chinese minority ('Baba') that persisted long after colonialism. While Sukarno-era 'Ali Baba' policies ended in the latter half of the 1950s, their legacy persists in present-day Indonesia, where native Indonesians continue to occupy more public-facing roles, and Chinese-Indonesian contributions tend to be more concentrated in commercial sectors. This has thus formed a sharp divide in Indonesia between those who wield economic power and those who command political authority. While Chinese-Indonesians largely dominate the private economy—holding '70–75% of medium and large-scale private companies' in Indonesia, a figure that has unfortunately often been exploited for demagogic purposes, they continue to remain underrepresented in public-facing roles in politics and the civil service. The underrepresentation of Chinese-Indonesians in contemporary Indonesian politics reflects the legacy of the Ali Baba policies from the Sukarno era, which were themselves influenced by the racial and ethnic divisions established during Dutch colonial rule—despite the strong anti-colonial sentiments of that time. A 2017 study from the ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute even reported that the majority of native Indonesians (from a sample taken from 34 provinces) were 'uncomfortable' with the notion of a Chinese-Indonesian being in a position of political leadership. However, Al Jazeera found that Chinese-Indonesians are participating in politics today at a higher rate than during Indonesia's New Order era, with candidates emerging from various political parties. Indonesia needs to rise above the ethnic divisions inherited from Dutch colonization. It is important to understand that many of the ethnic tensions seen today can be traced back to the divide et impera strategies employed by the Dutch to ensure control over what was then the Dutch East Indies. The 'othering' of Chinese-Indonesians is a product of this division, and it is hoped that a more united Indonesia will soon emerge once the colonial attitudes that were ingrained are finally overcome. Rinzen Widjaja is an Australia-based Indonesian writer and cultural critic with bylines in the The Hill , Merion West, Modern Age periodical, and RealClearEducation .
South China Morning Post
30-07-2025
- South China Morning Post
Why Indonesians behaving badly in Japan fuels official concerns
A string of controversial incidents involving Indonesian nationals in Japan has fuelled talk of a looming ban on workers from the Southeast Asian nation, prompting officials in Jakarta to dismiss the speculation. A robbery in Ibaraki prefecture, viral footage of unruly behaviour by an Indonesian group in Osaka and social media posts purporting to reflect the concerns of Japanese employers have stirred debate about Indonesian migrant workers' ability to adapt to Japanese norms and what Jakarta can do about it. Indonesian officials warn that much of the backlash – and resulting panic – has been stoked by misinformation, with potentially serious repercussions for Indonesians seeking work overseas. 'Don't let just three people cause hundreds of thousands of potential [Indonesian] migrant workers to become victims,' said Abdul Kadir Karding, Indonesia 's minister for the protection of migrant workers, on July 16, as quoted by state news agency Antara. 'This is made worse by posts containing inaccurate data.' The minister was referring to the arrest of three Indonesian nationals in connection with a robbery in the city of Hokota, Ibaraki prefecture – a case that drew widespread media attention after Japanese police made arrests on June 30, nearly six months after the break-in.
South China Morning Post
29-07-2025
- South China Morning Post
Malaysia, Indonesia unite to protect palm oil industry, migrant workers
Indonesia and Malaysia have agreed to work together to counter negative campaigns against their vital palm oil exports and bolster protection for migrant labour, as the Southeast Asian neighbours brace themselves for slowing growth under looming US tariffs. Advertisement Southeast Asia 's export-reliant economies have launched multipronged attempts at boosting trade with existing and new partners, as they scramble to secure trade deals with Washington in a bid to soften the blow from punishing tariffs scheduled to kick in on August 1. Indonesia and Malaysia are the world's two largest producers of palm oil, accounting for about 85 per cent of global supply for the ubiquitous ingredient used in everything from chocolate spreads to cosmetics and pharmaceuticals. But demand has largely been limited to traditional markets like India and China, as environmental lobbyists – particularly in the West – accuse palm oil plantations of driving deforestation and biodiversity loss. Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim (right) with Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto at the Presidential Palace in Jakarta on Monday. Photo: EPA 'Both countries agreed to continue to collaborate on promoting sustainable palm oil and counter negative campaigns against palm oil,' Indonesia's President Prabowo Subianto and Malaysia's Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim said in a joint statement on Tuesday after their annual bilateral consultation in Jakarta.
