Venture Taranaki Releases Latest Economic Figures
The data shows that the Taranaki economy provisionally contracted by 3.1% in the year to March 2025, compared to a national decline of 1.1%.
The latest Quarterly Economic Monitor report commissioned by Te Puna Umanga Venture Taranaki, the regional development agency, has been released offering an evidence-based view of how Taranaki is faring amid ongoing national economic uncertainty.
Developed by Infometrics, the report provides a clear, objective snapshot – presenting both the strengths and the challenges shaping the region's economic landscape.
'This report is something we specifically commission for Taranaki because it's vital that our region has access to independent, timely data,' says Anne Probert, Director of Strategic and Sector Partnerships at Te Puna Umanga Venture Taranaki. 'It's about being informed, realistic, and proactive about the trajectory of the region.'
The data shows that the Taranaki economy provisionally contracted by 3.1% in the year to March 2025, compared to a national decline of 1.1%. Employment has also fallen by 1.8%, and consumer spending is down 1.9%. These figures reflect the broader pressures felt across Aotearoa, as cautious spending patterns continue to influence business and household behaviour.
However, Taranaki is also experiencing more localised impacts. 'We're at the pointy end of the accelerated decline in gas production, and that's flowing through many of our industry sectors, particularly engineering and specialist supply chains, adding a further dimension to our economic situation,' says Probert.
Amid these pressures, the region's primary sector is showing significant strength. The dairy payout for Taranaki is forecast to reach $1.807 billion this season, a 31% increase from last year, thanks to rising global commodity prices and a lower exchange rate boosting export returns.
'This is a much-needed boost for our rural communities, who have been contending with the impacts of drought and other challenges,' Probert explains. 'Given the critical role that farming plays across our entire economy, from the farm gate to support services, manufacturing, logistics and retail, this upturn has flow-on benefits for the whole region.'
Adding further momentum to the sector, Fonterra has announced significant investments in Taranaki, including the electrification of its Whareroa plant and the development of new cool store facilities demonstrating long-term confidence in the region's agri-food future.
The economic report also highlights early signs of a turnaround in the housing market. House sales are up 13.2% over the year in the region, and the number of residential building consents have jumped nearly 23%. While house prices have remained steady, the increase in sales and listings points to renewed interest, driven in part by the region's lifestyle appeal and comparative affordability.
'It's clear that there are challenges but there are also positive areas and momentum for the region,' says Kelvin Wright, Chief Executive of Te Puna Umanga Venture Taranaki. 'The report highlights the importance of having the regional economic development strategy in place, Tapuae Roa, to ensure we're making the most of our region's strengths and capitalising on emerging opportunities.'
Taranaki Economic Snapshot (Year to March 2025)
Regional GDP: Provisionally down 3.1% compared to the national decline of 1.1%.
Employment: Fell 1.8%, with job losses concentrated in construction, metal manufacturing, and utilities.
Unemployment Rate: 4.5%, still lower than the national average of 4.9%.
Consumer Spending: Down 1.9%, reflecting cautious household behaviour amid economic uncertainty.
Dairy Payout: Forecast at $1.807 billion for the 2024/25 season – a 31% increase from the previous year.
House Sales: Up 13.2%, pointing to renewed market interest.
Residential Consents: Increased by 22.9%, signalling growing development confidence.
Tourism Spend: Down 6.3%, with both domestic and international visitor nights falling.
Business Units: Slight decline of 0.1%, compared to national growth of 1.2%.
Jobseeker Support: Recipient numbers rose 7.2%, below the national increase of 12.6%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
1News
an hour ago
- 1News
How bad is the tariff news for NZ, really?
New Zealand has been hit with a higher tariff rate than Australia on exports to the US – but economists say the situation could have been worse. It was revealed today that New Zealand exports would have a 15% tariff applied, up from 10% announced earlier. Australia remains at 10%. Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics, said that was a clear challenge for New Zealand. "There is now a wedge between us and Australia." ADVERTISEMENT There were other parts of the world that previously had a higher tariff rate that were now on the same level as New Zealand, such as Europe. "Wine, for example, under the original tariffs, we might have had a slight advantage. Now we don't." But he said it was not necessarily true that the country would have been better off had it negotiated a deal. He said New Zealand did not have a lot to "give up" in those negotiations, and it could have ended up being costly. "I'm a little bit surprised by comments, including from the opposition's trade spokesperson, that the Government failed to achieve a lower tariff rate. "The comments seem to make the implication that New Zealand could have found a way to come up with a trade agreement that might have given us a lower tariff rate. "That might be true, but we have no idea what we would have had to give up to achieve that… some of what had to be given up by other countries to get a 15% tariffs rate is consequential – Japan and other countries had to give up to half a trillion dollars of further investment into the US." ADVERTISEMENT US President signs an executive order for new tariffs on a wide swath of US trading partners to go into effect in seven days. (Source: 1News) He said the impact on New Zealand's trading partners might not be as bad as had been expected, which should prove positive for the economy. "It will be slightly more challenging to export to the US from a New Zealand point of view, but our trading partner activity might not be hit as bad as was feared in April. That's probably a net benefit for us." Mike Jones, chief economist at BNZ, said the increase was not unexpected given indications of the past few weeks. "It's obviously unhelpful for NZ exports into the US, particularly how we line up with those coming from Australia and the UK, given the lower 10% baseline tariff rate for those countries. "Beef and wine exports could be affected. It's interesting in this context that we've seen the NZD/AUD exchange rate fall a little today in the wake of the announcements." 'Quite myopic' ADVERTISEMENT Cranes and shipping containers are seen at a port in Busan, South Korea, Thursday, July 31, 2025. (Source: Associated Press) Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said he thought New Zealand was in roughly the same position as in April. "On one hand, the tariff is higher, so there is a bigger direct cost, but it's a bit lower for a lot of our trading partners, so it's better for the economy than would otherwise be the case." He said how the lingering elements of uncertainty played out over the coming weeks would be important. "The legal basis of these tariffs, whether they're going to be able to continue or need to be replaced with a different type of tariff, is an issue. And the sectoral tariffs have not yet really been negotiated. "While I don't think these things affect the sort of goods New Zealand trades with the US, there may be some impact on our trading partners." He said it seemed strange that the US was calculating tariffs based on which countries exported more than they imported. ADVERTISEMENT "The concept that US authorities have had of countries ripping them off by selling more stuff to America than they're been buying is quite myopic. "We're only talking about goods trade here, we buy a lot of services from the US. "In large part, the trade imbalance is a cyclical rather than a structural story. "In the last few years, the economy has been relatively weak compared to the US. We're not sucking in as many imports, and the exchange rate has been lower than would normally be the case, which has encouraged export revenues. "I would have thought trade policy metrics like tariffs would be determined on the basis of structural, not cyclical factors. "All those things could easily be the other way around in a few years' time."
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
How bad is the tariff news for NZ, really?
Photo: ARNE DEDERT / AFP New Zealand has been hit with a higher tariff rate than Australia on exports to the US - but economists say the situation could have been worse. It was revealed on Friday that New Zealand exports would have a 15 percent tariff applied, up from 10 percent announced earlier. Australia remains at 10 percent. Brad Olsen, chief executive at Infometrics, said that was a clear challenge for New Zealand. "There is now a wedge between us and Australia." There were other parts of the world that previously had a higher tariff rate that were now on the same level as New Zealand, such as Europe. "Wine, for example, under the original tariffs, we might have had a slight advantage. Now we don't." But he said it was not necessarily true that the country would have been better off had it negotiated a deal. He said New Zealand did not have a lot to "give up" in those negotiations, and it could have ended up being costly . "I'm a little bit surprised by comments, including from the opposition's trade spokesperson, that the government failed to achieve a lower tariff rate. "The comments seem to make the implication that New Zealand could have found a way to come up with a trade agreement that might have given us a lower tariff rate. "That might be true, but we have no idea what we would have had to give up to achieve that… some of what had to be given up by other countries to get a 15 percent tariffs rate is consequential - Japan and other countries had to give up to half a trillion dollars of further investment into the US." He said the impact on New Zealand's trading partners might not be as bad as had been expected, which should prove positive for the economy. "It will be slightly more challenging to export to the US from a New Zealand point of view, but our trading partner activity might not be hit as bad as was feared in April. That's probably a net benefit for us." Mike Jones, chief economist at BNZ, said the increase was not unexpected given indications of the past few weeks. "It's obviously unhelpful for NZ exports into the US, particularly how we line up with those coming from Australia and the UK, given the lower 10 percent baseline tariff rate for those countries. "Beef and wine exports could be affected. It's interesting in this context that we've seen the NZD/AUD exchange rate fall a little today in the wake of the announcements." Kelly Eckhold, chief economist at Westpac, said he thought New Zealand was in roughly the same position as in April. "On one hand, the tariff is higher, so there is a bigger direct cost, but it's a bit lower for a lot of our trading partners, so it's better for the economy than would otherwise be the case." He said how the lingering elements of uncertainty played out over the coming weeks would be important. "The legal basis of these tariffs, whether they're going to be able to continue or need to be replaced with a different type of tariff, is an issue. And the sectoral tariffs have not yet really been negotiated. "While I don't think these things affect the sort of goods New Zealand trades with the US, there may be some impact on our trading partners." He said it seemed strange that the US was calculating tariffs based on which countries exported more than they imported. "The concept that US authorities have had of countries ripping them off by selling more stuff to America than they're been buying is quite myopic. "We're only talking about goods trade here, we buy a lot of services from the US. "In large part, the trade imbalance is a cyclical rather than a structural story. "In the last few years, the economy has been relatively weak compared to the US. We're not sucking in as many imports, and the exchange rate has been lower than would normally be the case, which has encouraged export revenues. "I would have thought trade policy metrics like tariffs would be determined on the basis of structural, not cyclical factors. "All those things could easily be the other way around in a few years' time." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 days ago
- RNZ News
Who's really to blame for our economic troubles?
Photo: RNZ New Zealand's economic downturn is proving hard to shake - but economists say when it comes to identifying the cause, it's not as simple as pointing the finger at government spending cutbacks or the Reserve Bank's interest rate hikes. Although conditions are expected to improve as the year progresses, the economy remains sluggish. The primary sector is providing one of the few bright spots. Last weekend, when issuing an annual update, Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr blamed the Reserve Bank's decision to thrust the economy into recession to tamp down problem inflation . Some readers contacted RNZ saying that was too simplistic and letting the government off the hook for the impact its spending cutbacks and public sector job cuts were having. "My wife's MPI office in Christchurch reduced headcount by about 10 percent," one wrote. "For each public service worker cut, two to three private sector jobs went with it. The cancellation or freezing of so many infrastructure projects saw my industry (engineering) lay off a quarter to a third of the workforce." So who's to blame? "The overstimulus of the economy from both the government and the Reserve Bank in 2020 and 2021 meant the economy was unsustainably overheated," said chief forecaster at Infometrics Gareth Kiernan. "The government and the Reserve Bank got us into the mess we were in, in the first place, and therefore had to get is out again." While normally monetary and fiscal policy would work to smooth the economic cycle, that was not the case this time, which made the upswing hotter and the downturn bleaker. "Normally, if the economy is going hot, they tend to pull things back. And if the economy is slowing down and we're heading to recession, you typically get more government spending and lower interest rates and that sort of thing. That's not what we've had over the last five years because they pumped things up too much and had to cool the jets on the other side. "Both the government and Reserve Bank needed to, they had no choice. "Government spending decisions have exacerbated the recession but they had no choice because they also exacerbated the boom before that." He said, in December 2022, government consumption spending was 13.5 percent higher than had been forecast before the pandemic hit. "It's still 7.5 percent larger than we were forecasting now… so they've pulled it back in line but it's still larger than it would otherwise have been expected. "Government investments - infrastructure, schools, hospitals, whatever else - by mid-2024, that's 18 percent larger than we were forecasting." Spending was still 13 percent higher, he said. "That puts some context around the fact that yeah, government has been tight but we still haven't undone or unwound all of the massive government-related Covid boom. "That's also reflective of the fact that fiscal numbers over for the next five years are only just getting back into surplus if you're lucky." Gareth Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household and government spending, business investment and exports and imports. Photo: Kiernan looked at GDP broken down into household spending, government spending, business investment and exports and imports. He compared the current situation and the experience of the past two years to what normal growth might have been if it had kept going from the 2022 base at a 10-year average rate. "Government investment grew through 2023 and early 2024. It's done its fair share of contribution to how the economy has gone in a positive sense. "If I attribute all of the private sector investment and household spending and the slow growth there to interest rates and in Reserve Bank policy… then you put around about two-thirds of the underperformance of the economy over the last two years down to interest rates, 20 to 25 percent on to the government side of things when you take consumption and investment together and the other 10 percent or so is exports underperforming." Senior economist at ANZ Miles Workman said it was a question of how the Reserve Bank responded to the government's fiscal policies. "The faster the government gets the books back into the black, by restraining spending or increasing taxes, the more likely the RBNZ will need to lower the OCR, which would offset lower demand from fiscal policy settings by shoring up demand from households and businesses. "In other words, it's not as simple as saying government policy has caused X percent of the slowdown and the RBNZ has caused Y percent. The RBNZ's policy stance is a function of fiscal policy settings." Robert MacCulloch Photo: Supplied Economics professor at the University of Auckland Robert MacCulloch said there had been mishandling of the economy by governments on both sides in recent years. "The narrative the parties are using, that the other party is to blame for our problems… I'm past it now, that all the problems we've got are because of [Jacinda] Ardern and [Grant] Robertson and Labour messed it up, then Labour say the same about National. I think it's a con job on the people of the country. The country hasn't been doing great now for quite a long time under both major political parties." He said the wage subsidy had been a significant source of debt, but while it was introduced by the Labour government, National had put pressure on to extend it for bigger firms, which increased the cost. "Luxon's getting angry saying we inherited a shambles. I mean, what's he talking about? His party voted in favour of the all the fiscal and monetary policy. They were wildly enthusiastic about the wage subsidy scheme." He said the cuts the government were enacting were immaterial in the scheme of the fiscal pressures looming from the ageing population. "The cuts in bureaucracy they've done are just a couple of percent of those increased pressures on health and pensions. They're going to have to grapple with how you deal with those huge outflows with the ageing population… the Nats don't have a plan to rein in the cost of those major programmes." Photo: RNZ Eric Crampton Photo: Supplied The chief economist at the NZ Initiative, Eric Crampton, said the labour market was "certainly in worse shape" than it had been from mid-2021 to mid-2023. "But employment rates during that period were the result of substantial overheating from debt-fuelled spending and substantial monetary stimulus. They could not be sustained without severe inflationary consequence. It is wrong to blame anyone for labour markets not looking now like they did in 2022." He said monetary policy would always be expected to move last. "That doesn't mean monetary policy is slow. It means that whatever the bank does in monetary policy takes into account what everyone else has done and is expected to do. So if the fiscal authority announces a track - a Budget, Budget policy statement - monetary policy adjusts to take that into account. The Reserve Bank moves last - it makes its move after seeing what everyone else is doing. "Governments can be more and less helpful with all of that. But a bank following an inflation target ought to be taking account of what Parliament is doing. " He said the Reserve Bank had a tough job at present. "While the employment statistics are comparable to where they were around 2016-2017, government estimates still suggest that there is a remaining output gap - that the economy is running a bit below potential. However, there are inflationary pressures both in the non-traded sector and in tradeables. The bank's failure to keep inflation within bounds over the Covid period should have it sensitive to the risks of going above-target again. So I wouldn't want to blame them too much for current unemployment except to the extent that the bank's errors during the Covid period makes things a bit harder now. " He said keeping inflation within its target was the best thing the Reserve Bank could do to ensure long-term stable employment. "Given inflation risks, the bank would likely need to act to offset fiscal stimulus, if Parliament decided to provide further fiscal stimulus - we are still running a substantial deficit as well." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
