Census overhaul sparks Pasifika 'invisibility' fears
Photo:
RNZ /Dom Thomas
Pacific data experts warn reforms to the way the New Zealand government collects community-level data will "fail Pasifika communities".
Last month, Stats NZ announced that it was
scrapping the five-yearly national census
, as it shifts to "targeted" surveys to fill in administrative data gaps.
However, the Pacific Data Sovereignty Network (PDSN), a committee of academics, business leaders and other experts, says that the move risks "locking in invisibility" for Pasifika communities if current data systems are not fixed.
The Cabinet set its sights on "modernising" the census in March 2024, with a focus on financial sustainability.
A
briefing
from October 2024 noted the 2023 Census cost "approximately $326 million over five years - a significant increase from the 2018 Census ($126m) and the 2013 Census ($104m)."
According to the briefing, Budget 2024 set aside less money for the next Census (in 2028), than what it did for 2023, even though costs are trending up.
To save money, the government will pursue an "administrative data-led approach" with a smaller annual survey and various "targeted surveys". Stats NZ said this would "increase the flexibility and responsiveness to meet data needs" and "improve data quality over time", while reducing costs.
Administrative data is made up of information government agencies collect when doing their normal work, such as health and education records.
Various data collection programmes, such as the
Household Economic Survey
, will fill in these gaps when further insights are needed.
That briefing noted that the reforms would carry "an initial reduction in the quality of some census data, particularly regarding some data for smaller population groups (e.g. Pacific people and disability communities)".
Last month, Stats NZ announced that it was scrapping the five-yearly national census.
Photo:
RNZ /Dom Thomas
As the government implements these reforms, data from
Census 2023
will be relied on until 2030, after which point the new "census" will be released annually.
PDSN member Dr Jacinta Fa'alili-Fidow told RNZ Pacific that this is the key flaw that makes Pacific populations "invisible" in the Census.
"Shifting to an admin-data first model risks locking that invisibility in for years to come. Unless there is radical improvement in how Pacific data is collected, governed and reported, this approach will fail our communities."
Dr Fa'alili-Fidow said other flaws include low trust levels among Pasifika communities, which causes low survey response levels.
This links back to the premise that data systems reflect mainstream worldviews, not Pacific models of wellbeing or identity, she said.
And due to those broad categorisations, and the fact that Pacific data with those key details are often aggregated, Dr Fa'alili-Fidow said that the approach is doomed to fail without input from Pacific stakeholders.
"There is no information being provided from Stats NZ about the surveys that will be needed to cover the flaws in administrative data.
"Pacific leadership must sit at the governance table for how this new census model is built and implemented, the social license for the use of administrative data in this way, and the ability to deliver the necessary surveys to cover the gaps."
A
regulatory impact statement
(RIS) from April 2025, shortly before the reforms were announced, stated that the current Census approach fails Pasifika and other minority communities, including Māori.
The current approach delivers low response levels from these populations, creating high-risk to data quality, the briefing argued.
"Stats NZ did not meet its target response rates for Māori, Pacific peoples, or younger adults in the 2023 Census," it stated.
While the new admin-led data approach would solve the timeliness problem, the RIS acknowledged it does not capture key details in its measure of smaller populations, due to the broad categorisations made at the point of collection.
"To provide accurate population data for small ethnic communities, including smaller groups of Pacific populations such as Kiribati or Pitcairn Islanders, government agencies would need to consistently collect more detailed ethnicity data."
The RIS warned that, without a solve for these issues, Māori and Pasifika populations would be "significantly disadvantaged compared to other groups" in terms of government policymaking.
Photo:
RNZ / Mark Papalii
Statistics Minister Dr Shane Reti told RNZ Pacific that once everything has shaped out, there will effectively be a census every year.
"My expectation is that while there may be a small downturn in the data quality initially, that over time builds up."
"All the communities, or as many as we can, that may not be well represented in administrative data, I'd like to see our best efforts at picking them up, both through the community attribute surveys and through the targeted surveys."
Reti said that those surveys are being worked through, but did not provide a timeline for when that information would be made public.
Labour's Statistics spokesperson Lemauga Lydia Sosene told RNZ Pacific that this is her key concern.
"Sometimes departments have a system of collecting data that may not necessarily reflect the voice of that community."
"They may not have had a resource allocation to allow officials to attend a community event... in terms of Pasifika communities, they will express levels of mistrust because there's only a certain amount of interaction that can take place."
Lemauga Lydia Sosene
Photo:
Johnny Blades
Sosene said that as a member of the Pasifika community, her way of collecting data is through attending community events and having deeper conversations.
"I'm going to be carefully watching, because the Minister has explained the change as a cost-cutting exercise."
Reti said that the Ministry for Pacific People's would be "significantly engaged" in building trust in data collection going forward.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
13 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Councils, builders pleased with liability changes, but insurers warn of challenges
Building and construction minister Chris Penk (R) and prime minister Christopher Luxon. Photo: RNZ / Samuel Rillstone Councils, builders, and the opposition are largely in favour of Building Act changes that would signal a move towards proportionate liability. But insurers say there could be "challenges" in the approach, and want further discussions with the government as the policy is developed. Under the status-quo, the building framework operates under a 'joint and several' liability, meaning liability is shared between all parties, regardless of the cost or responsibility. It has meant councils, and therefore ratepayers, have been left with an often disproportionate level of risk for any defects or repairs, as they are seen as the party with the deepest pockets. The government plans to replace the model with a proportionate system, with each party only liable for the share of work they carry out. It is something Local Government New Zealand (LGNZ) has long called for. "Councils have ultimately been holding the bag at the end of the process when things go wrong. If you were to have work done on your home or a house built, that hasn't really come top of mind for people because they know they can go to council," said LGNZ's vice president Campbell Barry. He said with lower risk exposure, councils could be more confident in their consenting processes. "It'll encourage not as much of the overly-cautious behaviour that maybe has developed over time, due to that liability falling on councils." LGNZ vice president and Lower Hutt mayor Campbell Barry. Photo: RNZ / Reece Baker Announcing the changes, building and construction minister Chris Penk said the "risk-averse" behaviour from councils had led to "frustrating" delays, and extra costs for builders and homeowners. "Once you reduce that delay, then you get better productivity, and costs will reduce." Penk said councils had paid out $330 million over 10 years for defects for which they were not responsible. Registered Master Builders said the "unfair" liability system was one of the biggest challenges the industry faced, and was pleased it was being addressed. "I think you always want a fair system," said chief executive Ankit Sharma. "You don't want a system where one party ends up taking an unfair burden of risk. If they do, then they put protections in place which then creates red tape, and slows everything down. It takes longer, and costs us more, to build houses." Legislation to change the liability settings will not be introduced to Parliament until early 2026, with a view of passing it by the middle of that year. Between now and then, the government would explore "supporting mechanisms" for proportionate liability, to protect homeowners under the new system. Professional indemnity insurance and home warranties were both mooted, but Penk wanted more time to work it through. He indicated the government would talk to councils, insurers, and consumers about what consumer protection measures would work best, and whether they would be compulsory or voluntary. "We don't want the problem of the empty chair, where there is a gap in terms of what the homeowner might be left with," he said. "But we also know that if we have a proportionate liability system, where all the key players in the system are either required to have the protections in place themselves, and are also motivated not to make the errors in the first place, then we'll have a more productive and efficient and better system overall." Labour was "broadly supportive" of the changes but wanted to see more detail around the consumer protections to ensure there was no repeat of the 'leaky homes' saga. "We want to see the detail around the extra support, or the extra, I guess, reassurance that's going to be available to first-home buyers, that they're not going to be left with a liability with no-one else willing to pay if something goes wrong," said Labour leader Chris Hipkins. "But we broadly think that the changes are heading in the right direction." Hipkins said there had been several reviews of the Building Act, and all had found that consumer protection was the key issue. Labour leader Chris Hipkins. Photo: RNZ / Marika Khabazi Master Builders, which was singled out by Penk as already offering a 10-year guarantee cover policy, was in favour of mandating warranties and insurance. Sharma also called for other consumer protection measures, such as tougher entry requirements for builders, a stronger licensing system with real enforcement, and a register of liquidations and penalties so homeowners could make informed decisions when choosing a builder. "The combination of all of that with the right insurance scheme, I think lifts the standard enough for consumer protection so that we can move to a proportional system." The Insurance Council of New Zealand said it had held discussions with the government about the "preliminary thinking" on the move to proportionate liability. "These included some of the challenges for insurers around this approach," a spokesperson said, adding ICNZ looked forward to further discussions with the government as the policy developed. Penk said there had been some appetite from the insurance sector, but acknowledged it was a "chicken and egg" situation, as everyone needed the comfort and certainty before they were willing to step up. Streamlining the Building Consent Authority (BCA) model has been long-signalled by the government, with Penk first announcing he was taking a look nearly a year ago. He said 66 different interpretations of the same Building Code had led to frustration in the sector, and added cost and delays. Sharma was in favour of the consolidation, saying over half of Registered Master Builder members had experienced delays and "consenting inefficiencies" due to working with multiple BCAs. "It's common, when you have different BCAs, they have different systems. So that creates, from a business owner perspective, inconsistency in the way different systems are operating. And also, in some cases, how different inspectors can interpret rules differently." Registered Master Builders chief executive Ankit Sharma. Photo: Supplied The government had looked at other options like a single point of contact or establishing large regional BCAs to replace the existing ones. Ultimately, it has landed on a voluntary model, allowing councils to pool resources like their accreditation processes or staff if they chose to. Barry, who is also Lower Hutt mayor, said councils in the Wellington region had already discussed creating consenting efficiencies across the region. He said the voluntary approach was preferable, as councils were already grappling with reforms like Local Water Done Well and other pressures. "I would say the proof will be in the pudding over the next 12 to 18 months, and how many councils actually take that up, and what it looks like," he said. "I suspect it's something that will be revisited later in the future, but at the same time I think a voluntary approach and encouraging councils and providing the right settings for them to work together is a good thing." Penk would not put a number on how many BCAs he would like to see. "Any number smaller than 66 would be a win. But I suspect at a regional level, we'll see perhaps as many as half a dozen moves made quite promptly," Penk said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Newsroom
an hour ago
- Newsroom
City of No Sales: What's wrong with Auckland?
Auckland's been labelled the City of Fails after its annual State of the City report which highlighted glaring issues with the city's economy, productivity, innovation, education and more. Its flagging GDP, city sprawl, reliance on cars, a lack of walkability … the condemnation goes on. But it wasn't just this one report. Other issues have been regularly highlighted this year – the sudden increase in homelessness; endless road works and construction from the City Rail Link development; gaping holes where CBD developments have just stopped, the cranes in cold storage. All this while the South Island and rural communities are showing sparks of coming out of recession in a post-Covid era. It's a tale of two different economic recoveries. The Detail looks at what's wrong with Auckland, what's right and what needs to be done to make it better. The CEO of the Auckland Business Chamber, Simon Bridges, has been pushing the Government to come to the aid of the city, where he's seeing the results of weak economic growth, a lack of investment and flagging retail trade. He says he's tried to put politics aside but yes, it's possible his former job as leader of the National Party has helped his advocacy. 'I think central government is listening,' he says. 'I think what we need to see now is just a bit of urgent action. If you think about Auckland, we've had several years of difficulty and you might say well, what's several more months? But the reality is even if things do get a bit better next year, there's a lot of pain out there. 'I've put forward some ideas of things that could be done, but I don't have a monopoly on the answers. Ultimately what we want to see happen is stuff that is going to improve the sentiment and get some spending happening, because if Auckland was a business it would be a business with a cashflow issue.' So far the Government hasn't raced in to help with any short-term stimulus. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon told RNZ he would 'keep looking at what we can do' but 'Auckland-specific stimulus thing is quite difficult to do … I don't know how you'd go about doing that.' Bridges has given him a bunch of ideas, including relaxing visa requirements for Asian tourists to make it easier for them to come here, encouraging international students and letting Mayor Wayne Brown have his bed levy as a way of increasing council income and bidding for more big events to come to the city. 'We're not rich enough that we don't need that money swilling around at a time when in Auckland at least, hotel rates – occupancy and so on – is very bad. Worse than last year actually.' There are some bright lights on the horizon, including the scheduled opening next year of the long-awaited City Rail Link, and the International Convention Centre. However the infrastructure pipeline behind that is looking bleak, especially with government moves to cap rates rises, block councils from using other methods to raise money, and now the introduction of some hasty rules telling councils what they should focus on and how they should behave. The Local Government (Systems Improvement) Amendment Bill, which councils have just four weeks to submit on, tells them to stick to core services like roads, rubbish and water, and get rid of nice-to-haves like spending on cultural, community and environmental things – things the city is measured on internationally. North Shore resident Hayden Donnell is a senior writer for the Spinoff. He thinks the city is improving, and can list a raft of places in the CBD where it's lively, pedestrian-friendly and full of great cafes and restaurants. Donnell talks to The Detail about the good and the bad, including beaches, buses and bad planning rules. 'I think we probably are a little bit negative about Auckland,' he says. 'Maybe we do undersell the fact that we have this beautiful natural environment, there's a lot of places that are going really well. 'At the same time I think it's true … there are lots of areas where we could improve, where the rest of the world has caught up with this thing called 'walkable areas' and 'pedestrian malls' … that kind of vibrant shopping that you can go to Europe and experience doesn't really happen here to the same extent. 'But we shouldn't lose sight of the fact that we're very fortunate.' Something Aucklanders do have is Auckland FC, which has lit the city up with it's nearly all-conquering ways this year breaking A-League crowd records in its debut season. The director of Auckland Football is Terry McFlynn, who grew up in a little village in south Derry, Northern Ireland. He's lived in Perth, Sydney and London. Now he lives in Auckland. 'There's a lot of people that take a lot of pride in Auckland as a city and want to see it progress, and want to see a vibrant city, which I believe it is. 'I think the restaurants and bars and that lifestyle that Auckland can give around the viaduct and down by the harbour … you know it's second to none in the whole world in my opinion.' Check out how to listen to and follow The Detail here. You can also stay up-to-date by liking us on Facebook or following us on Twitter.
NZ Herald
an hour ago
- NZ Herald
Nation of Debt: Higher taxes, deeper spending cuts inevitable as economy suffers from long Covid
Spending is at a fundamentally unsustainable level, even once you strip out the ups and downs associated with different parts of the economic cycle. The Government's finances aren't just suffering from a hangover that will pass. The chills run deeper. What's more, they are becoming harder to cure because the population is ageing. Barring something transformative, like energy prices plunging, it looks like strong economic growth won't be enough to get the Government's finances 'back on track'. New Zealand is not in trouble, but it does need to brace for deeper spending cuts and/or higher taxes. Debt still mounting Core Crown borrowings rose by 11% to $239 billion in the year to May – that's 156% higher than in May 2019. Net core Crown debt was worth nearly 42% of gross domestic product (GDP) by the end of May this year. Pre-Covid, this figure sat at 19%. Last year, Finance Minister Nicola Willis promised to put it on a downward trajectory back below 40%. But Treasury expects debt to peak at 46% of GDP in 2028 – a level slightly below the 50% limit it deems prudent for normal times. Because the Government's books are in the red, it's not repaying its Covid-era debt. Rather, it's refinancing this debt, while issuing new debt to pay for new commitments and mounting interest costs. The Government isn't getting on top of its fiscal deficit, because it isn't cutting spending aggressively enough. Economy spluttering While high inflation pushing income earners into higher tax brackets has been a saviour for Governments for some time, the sluggish economy has weighed on the tax take. GDP growth was weaker than expected through 2024, with the Reserve Bank downgrading its forecasts for growth through 2025. While high global dairy prices are supporting the agricultural sector, the US tariffs have created uncertainty, which has hampered sentiment. With the average interest rate paid on the country's stock of mortgage debt falling to 5.66% in June, many borrowers are also yet to really feel the impacts of lower interest rates. Meanwhile, they're still grappling with high living costs. Looking further down the track, healthcare and New Zealand Superannuation costs are expected to rise dramatically. The annual cost of superannuation rose by 39% between 2020 and 2024 and is expected to rise by another 28% by 2028, to nearly $28b (in nominal terms). Inland Revenue estimates that in 35 years' time, a quarter of the country's population will be over the age of 65 – up from about 16% today. Why the conservativism? One might look at the situation, and say: 'Well it isn't great, but why should we cut our cloth when other countries are more indebted than us, and face similar demographic challenges?' Treasury's response would be that the New Zealand Government needs to maintain extra-large buffers, because the country is heavily reliant on trade, indebted to offshore investors, susceptible to natural disasters and has high levels of household debt. The main thing is that the Government needs to be able to assure the domestic and foreign investors it borrows from that they will be repaid. If it struggles to provide this assurance, investors will demand higher returns. New Zealand Government Bonds are currently seen to be relatively low-risk. In 2021, S&P Global Ratings upgraded New Zealand's credit rating to AA+. It is now in the same tier as Australia, the US, Taiwan, Hong Kong, Finland and Austria. While the outlook for New Zealand is 'stable', S&P is wary of the fact New Zealand's deficit is among the deepest of its peers (as a percentage of GDP), so wants to see it shrink quickly. 'If it doesn't narrow in the next few years, we may start looking at the AA+ rating,' S&P analyst Anthony Walker told the Herald. If New Zealand's credit rating was downgraded with its peers, which face similar headwinds, it wouldn't be any less attractive, relatively speaking. However, New Zealand's geographic isolation means it's already on the back foot. The Government needs to offer investors higher returns than its counterparts in, for example, Europe that have weaker credit ratings, for investing offshore in a different currency. Bond vigilantes flex Some will argue New Zealand shouldn't be hamstrung by the threat of the so-called 'bond vigilantes'. However, they have proven to be quite successful recently, throwing tantrums when Governments in the US and UK have put unsustainable spending plans on the table. Longer-term US Government bond yields are currently relatively high, as investors are wary of the US's ability to repay its debt. This dynamic has put upward pressure on other government bond yields, including New Zealand Government Bonds. What's the upshot? New Zealand pays more interest on its debt. Core Crown finance costs are currently surpassing $8b a year, which is about 2.5 times the size of the country's defence budget. Cost to under-investment Parties from across the political spectrum agree the Government can't pull back from investing in healthcare, education and infrastructure. To varying degrees, they accept Governments can't be so fixated on debt that they lose sight of the cost of under-investment. Opposition parties argue the Government is cutting operational expenditure, like staffing costs and welfare, too much. Someone has to pay Nonetheless, ahead of the election the debate will likely turn to whether the big-ticket item – NZ Super – could be made more affordable. There are also calls from the likes of ANZ senior economist Miles Workman for more means-testing and targeted spending to those who really need it. His view is that there is still more fat that can be cut out of the system. Inland Revenue is looking at ways of increasing the Government's tax take, if expenses are insufficiently cut. It is supportive of hiking the GST rate, if need be. Calls for a capital gains tax continue to be made, including by those of the view the country's tax base needs to be broadened. Harbour Asset Management co-chief executive Andrew Bascand believes a small stamp duty on the sale of residential property could be an efficient way of generating more revenue. While the coalition Government opposes the introduction of new property taxes, it is looking at effectively hiking taxes by applying more of a user-pays model to public services. It wants to welcome private investment into public assets – a dynamic that could see the part-owners or operators of these assets charge for their use. Think about more toll roads, charges for using busy roads during peak hours, targeted levies for those who buy property in new developments and fees for those whose properties increase in value thanks to major public investments in their neighbourhoods. Ideally, New Zealand finds a way of boosting growth sustainably - becoming more productive, rather than inflating house prices and importing cheap labour, as has been done in the past. Otherwise, higher interest costs to compensate investors for taking on more risk lending to New Zealand, or deeper spending cuts and higher taxes, are inevitable. Some tough political choices will need to be made. 'She'll be right' is a good motto – until it isn't. Nation of Debt series Monday: NZ nears trillion-dollar debt burden Wednesday: Consumer debt: What are Kiwis borrowing for? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Jenée Tibshraeny is the Herald's Wellington business editor, based in the Parliamentary Press Gallery. She specialises in Government and Reserve Bank policymaking, economics and banking.
