logo
DeepSeek: Smarter Software Vs. More Compute

DeepSeek: Smarter Software Vs. More Compute

Forbes07-05-2025

Daniel A. Keller, CEO and President of InFlux Technologies Limited. Cofounder of Flux.
Getty Images
When ChatGPT was released by OpenAI in 2022, it was the peak expression of AI chatbots built on large language models (LLMs). With an accessible interface and absolutely no need for external gadgets, it was the power of interactive AI in the palms of users, literally!
Barely five days after its launch, ChatGPT broke the 1 million download milestone. (For context, that took Facebook 10 months to achieve.) Of course, there were a few problems, like the occasional lags and hallucinations, but version after version, ChatGPT continued to expand its frontiers.
There were also apprehensions about the development cost of ChatGPT-4, somewhere between $48 to $71 million. But it was all completely justifiable. Sixteen thousand H100s GPUs don't come cheap, and salaries have to be paid.
Or was it?
Rise Of The Deep
On January 20, 2025, the world woke up to news that would change the trajectory of AI technology. A little-known Chinese company had launched DeepSeek R1, an AI with capabilities comparable to OpenAI's ChatGPT.
And the shocker?
The initial reports claimed it did it with fewer, cheaper and older GPUs at a development cost of only $5.6 million. The ripple effect sent shock waves across the markets. By Monday, Nvidia, the biggest supplier of AI GPU chips, lost almost $600 billion in market value as investors started reconsidering their options. Indexes and corporations like Nasdaq, Microsoft and Alphabet also plummeted. Within a week, Deepseek had overtaken ChatGPT to become the most downloaded application on the Apple App Store.
But since then, DeepSeek has come under scrutiny, with the head of Google's DeepMind calling its claims "exaggerated" and one critic suggesting it actually cost DeepSeek over $1 billion to create its AI model.
Nevertheless, DeepSeek's arrival has caused a shift. The investment rationale for the supply chain had been quite simple: more spending and better outcomes for AI.
Until now.
The Paradigm Shift
Deepseek's story is exceptional for several reasons. First, due to the United States' efforts to stem the flow of advanced AI technology to competing nations, the Biden administration restricted the export of GPUs to China, limiting the availability of advanced AI GPUs like the A100s and the H100s. As a result, Deepseek presumably had to rely on less sophisticated but more available GPUs like the H800.
The ability of Deepseek to turn this crippling limitation into one of the marvels of AI innovation highlights a very critical question: Is ingenuity and better software architecture a more sustainable alternative to advanced but expensive GPUs?
GPU availability (significantly advanced chips like the H100s) is one of the rate-limiting steps for AI research and development; even in the U.S., Nvidia, the top producer of GPUs globally, continues to grapple with meeting its high demand. A breakthrough that demonstrates that companies and research labs can maximize their computing power and cut down costs is a game-changer for the entire industry, but how exactly did DeepSeek achieve this?
Flipping The Game
Before Deepseek's emergence in AI, it had always been a game of who was bigger. Bigger financial investments translate into bigger LLM Models, which in turn require more compute resources and, hopefully, bigger innovative strides.
However, DeepSeek's approach was counterintuitive. Instead of slapping on more compute and developing bigger models, the Chinese company focused on optimizing for a more efficient use of available resources. This included enhancing its model abilities through reinforcement learning, leveraging improved software architecture and optimizing its algorithm.
Rather than dwarfing prevailing challenges with sheer brute power, Deepseek turned the game on its head. Early benchmarks showed it was 20 times more efficient and far less compute-intensive than its more pronounced competitors.
Since it relied on reinforcement learning, Deepseek-R1 also eliminated the need for large teams of human reviewers and supervised fine-tuning, keeping operating costs to a minimum.
Another important paradigm that Deepseek adopted was its incorporation of MOE (mixture of experts) architecture. MOE leverages multiple expert sub-models and uses selective gating to activate only the most relevant parameters for each input. For context, the Deepseek MoE framework comprises around 671 billion parameters; however, less than 0.5% of these parameters are used during any input.
Picture a diverse team of seasoned experts across different disciplines. When needed, the gating mechanism dynamically selects the best combination of experts to solve the problem.
The result?
Dynamic routing and allocation lowers the amount of computation the model requires by reducing unnecessary computation. This approach also improves efficiency, promotes seamless scalability and supports progressive fine-tuning of different expert system components for specific problems.
Implications For The Broader AI Industry
Compute-efficient AI solutions encourage democratization, allowing for dynamic innovations from different quarters. This could, in turn, promote cheaper access to AI resources, breaking Big Tech's monopoly on AI innovation.
Deepseek's open-source nature provides a level playing field for researchers to engage in deep R&D without breaking the bank. Its lower energy requirements and smaller carbon footprint can also positively drive environmentally sustainable designs for data centers in the near future.
However, as revolutionary as the emergence of Deepseek has been, there are also a few drawbacks (on top of the dubiousness of its claims).
First, while DeepSeek's open-source nature encourages technology sharing and participation, it also means malicious actors can repurpose it, raising fresh concerns about heightened misinformation, deepfakes and other sinister possibilities.
Another danger hinges on data sovereignty and the possibility of the Chinese government mining users' data.
Rounding Off
While DeepSeek has demonstrated capabilities that are comparable to OpenAI ChatGPT in many ways, its long-term effect on repositioning AI technology, compute and market dynamics still remains to be seen.
Whatever the future might hold, Deepseek's successful deployment of a powerful open-source model has introduced a new level playing field for innovation in the AI industry. As this distills into the mainstream, its ripple effect could determine the face of the next iteration of artificial intelligence.
Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Rise Of Six-Figure Faceless AI Video Creators
The Rise Of Six-Figure Faceless AI Video Creators

Forbes

time13 minutes ago

  • Forbes

The Rise Of Six-Figure Faceless AI Video Creators

A new kind of entrepreneur is emerging — faceless, AI-powered and quietly building six-figure ... More businesses behind the scenes. In early 2024, Gregory Cooke, then 27, had no intention of becoming the face of anything. Cooke had already experienced the highs and lows of entrepreneurship. A few years earlier, he had successfully run a digital agency with 42 employees, designing websites for clients across the UK. While the business was profitable, the pressure took a toll on him. Meetings bled into weekends and client calls hijacked dinner hours. Eventually, burnout forced him to shut it all down. So when Cooke returned to entrepreneurship in 2024, he did things differently. He created a digital product — a simple PDF built using ChatGPT and Canva — bundled it with an automated funnel and sold it online. Cooke told me he didn't get on any Zoom calls or create a YouTube channel with his face, but by May 2024, he had already generated over $700,000 in revenue, all without showing his face. He's part of a growing wave of creators — or, more precisely, solo digital entrepreneurs — building businesses powered by generative AI and automation, but with no public persona or personal brand and often, no large following. Their model is sometimes called 'faceless automation,' but Cooke prefers a different term: 'AI asset farming' — the idea that anyone can turn their knowledge into a suite of AI-generated, income-producing assets without ever going on camera. 'I used to think building a team and putting yourself out there was the only path,' he said. 'Now, I think simplicity scales better.' Faceless And Profitable Cooke's not alone in this new world of faceless AI-generated videos. Ashley Kemp, a British Army veteran who deployed to Afghanistan at 18, had spent years chasing traditional business ideas and watching most of them fail. In 2024, he launched his first faceless product — a digital guide on affiliate marketing, created entirely with AI tools and promoted through short-form content using an avatar generator. Within three months, he said in an interview, it was generating six figures in net monthly income. Gregory Cooke- Solo entrepreneur Together, Cooke and Kemp have helped popularize a style of business that feels like the opposite of the influencer economy, where lifestyle vlogs are rife and creators often have to show charisma. And they're far from being the only ones. Across Reddit forums like Passive Income and YouTube automation communities, there are many similar stories of faceless finance channels pulling ad revenue from AI-voiced videos; digital storefronts selling AI-built Notion templates; side-hustlers earning thousands of U.S. dollars from faceless TikTok accounts that never feature a real person. How do they do it? While individual strategies differ, the model tends to follow a familiar pattern. First, they use tools like ChatGPT, Canva and Tome to create products like ebooks, scripts and presentations. Then they plug those products into platforms like Gumroad, Stan Store, or Kajabi. Finally, they drive traffic using short-form content, often generated by AI avatars from platforms like Synthesia. The economics of this growing ecosystem are starting to turn heads. Goldman Sachs projects the global creator economy will reach $480 billion by 2027, largely fueled by monetization models outside the traditional influencer playbook. Meanwhile, a 2024 forecast by Research and Markets estimates the digital education sector will surpass $80 billion by 2030, driven by microlearning and online skill monetization. Even more striking is how little it costs to get started. Most of the tools Cooke and Kemp use — including ChatGPT, Canva and Stan Store — are free or under $30 a month. That means no investors, no overhead, no gatekeepers and, perhaps most importantly, no burnout. A Shift In What Work Looks Like To understand why this matters, let's zoom out a bit further. The modern workplace is currently in a flux. Layoffs in tech topped 260,000 in 2023, according to Layoffs. 43 million Americans hold student loan debt, according to figures from the U.S. Department of EDucation, with average monthly payments near $350. And despite rising degrees, 52% of recent graduates remain underemployed, according to a report by Strada Institute for the Future of Work and the Burning Glass Institute. At the same time, AI is changing what's possible for solo workers. A July 2023 McKinsey report estimated that 'up to 30% of hours worked in the U.S. could be automated by 2030.' While many of these jobs may not get totally eliminated, they are getting reorganized, reimagined and redistributed. Some are using that shift to reinvent their careers entirely. 'People think you need to have a massive audience or be great on camera,' said Kemp. 'But there are thousands of people quietly making a living from AI tools. They're not influencers. They're digital workers.' But Is It Sustainable? While several creators are touting this as the next big thing, not everyone is convinced that it's a sustainable model. Critics especially worry that the business model depends too heavily on third-party platforms and AI-generated content that's often recycled, shallow, or misleading. TikTok and Meta have both rolled out new disclosure policies for AI-generated media. And marketplaces like Etsy have begun cracking down on AI-crafted products labeled as handmade. There's also the question of trust. Can faceless products build credibility? Can anonymous creators handle customer support, iterate meaningfully, or respond to negative feedback? 'The risk is that faceless creation becomes faceless responsibility,' said one startup investor who asked not to be named. 'When no one's accountable, quality suffers. And when the platforms change their rules — and they will — a lot of these businesses will vanish overnight.' Kemp acknowledges these risks. But for him and many other faceless video creators, the tradeoffs are intentional. 'Many of these creators aren't exactly trying to build the next SaaS unicorn. They're just trying to build a sustainable income stream without sacrificing autonomy,' he said. Whether this model can weather future algorithm changes or platform crackdowns remains to be seen. But for now, it's clear that AI has lowered the barrier to entrepreneurship and raised new questions about what creative work really means. There was a time when entrepreneurship meant a pitch deck, a product demo and a room full of largely skeptical investors. Then it meant a personal brand, an audience and a relentless feed of content. Now, for a new generation of digital workers, it might just mean no large following or office or even a team — just an idea, internet connection and a stack of AI-powered tools that help ordinary people build extraordinary businesses that generate six-figure income.

Is Now The Time To Put CEPS (LON:CEPS) On Your Watchlist?
Is Now The Time To Put CEPS (LON:CEPS) On Your Watchlist?

Yahoo

time15 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Now The Time To Put CEPS (LON:CEPS) On Your Watchlist?

For beginners, it can seem like a good idea (and an exciting prospect) to buy a company that tells a good story to investors, even if it currently lacks a track record of revenue and profit. But as Peter Lynch said in One Up On Wall Street, 'Long shots almost never pay off.' Loss-making companies are always racing against time to reach financial sustainability, so investors in these companies may be taking on more risk than they should. In contrast to all that, many investors prefer to focus on companies like CEPS (LON:CEPS), which has not only revenues, but also profits. While this doesn't necessarily speak to whether it's undervalued, the profitability of the business is enough to warrant some appreciation - especially if its growing. AI is about to change healthcare. These 20 stocks are working on everything from early diagnostics to drug discovery. The best part - they are all under $10bn in marketcap - there is still time to get in early. If you believe that markets are even vaguely efficient, then over the long term you'd expect a company's share price to follow its earnings per share (EPS) outcomes. So it makes sense that experienced investors pay close attention to company EPS when undertaking investment research. Impressively, CEPS has grown EPS by 19% per year, compound, in the last three years. As a general rule, we'd say that if a company can keep up that sort of growth, shareholders will be beaming. Careful consideration of revenue growth and earnings before interest and taxation (EBIT) margins can help inform a view on the sustainability of the recent profit growth. EBIT margins for CEPS remained fairly unchanged over the last year, however the company should be pleased to report its revenue growth for the period of 6.3% to UK£32m. That's progress. You can take a look at the company's revenue and earnings growth trend, in the chart below. Click on the chart to see the exact numbers. View our latest analysis for CEPS CEPS isn't a huge company, given its market capitalisation of UK£4.5m. That makes it extra important to check on its balance sheet strength. Many consider high insider ownership to be a strong sign of alignment between the leaders of a company and the ordinary shareholders. So those who are interested in CEPS will be delighted to know that insiders have shown their belief, holding a large proportion of the company's shares. Owning 42% of the company, insiders have plenty riding on the performance of the the share price. This should be a welcoming sign for investors because it suggests that the people making the decisions are also impacted by their choices. Valued at only UK£4.5m CEPS is really small for a listed company. So despite a large proportional holding, insiders only have UK£1.9m worth of stock. That's not a huge stake in absolute terms, but it should help keep insiders aligned with other shareholders. You can't deny that CEPS has grown its earnings per share at a very impressive rate. That's attractive. This EPS growth rate is something the company should be proud of, and so it's no surprise that insiders are holding on to a considerable chunk of shares. The growth and insider confidence is looked upon well and so it's worthwhile to investigate further with a view to discern the stock's true value. However, before you get too excited we've discovered 2 warning signs for CEPS (1 doesn't sit too well with us!) that you should be aware of. Although CEPS certainly looks good, it may appeal to more investors if insiders were buying up shares. If you like to see companies with more skin in the game, then check out this handpicked selection of British companies that not only boast of strong growth but have strong insider backing. Please note the insider transactions discussed in this article refer to reportable transactions in the relevant jurisdiction. — Investing narratives with Fair Values A case for TSXV:USA to reach USD $5.00 - $9.00 (CAD $7.30–$12.29) by 2029. By Agricola – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: CA$12.29 · 0.9% Overvalued DLocal's Future Growth Fueled by 35% Revenue and Profit Margin Boosts By WynnLevi – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: $195.39 · 0.9% Overvalued Historically Cheap, but the Margin of Safety Is Still Thin By Mandelman – Community Contributor Fair Value Estimated: SEK232.58 · 0.2% Overvalued View more featured narratives — Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

China Opens First Offshore Gold Vault in Hong Kong
China Opens First Offshore Gold Vault in Hong Kong

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

China Opens First Offshore Gold Vault in Hong Kong

(Bloomberg) -- The Shanghai Gold Exchange has expanded outside mainland China for the first time, with the rollout of two new contracts and a bullion vault in Hong Kong. US Renters Face Storm of Rising Costs US State Budget Wounds Intensify From Trump, DOGE Policy Shifts Commuters Are Caught in Johannesburg's Taxi Feuds as Transit Lags Mapping the Architectural History of New York's Chinatown The launch serves a number of purposes, from broadening the Shanghai bourse's international reach, to strengthening China's clout in commodity and currency markets and Hong Kong's status as a financial center. Trading will be conducted in yuan and settled by cash or physical delivery, including to the new vault operated by Bank of China Ltd.'s Hong Kong unit, the SGE said in a statement. The two contracts covering different purity levels will debut on Thursday. To attract traders, the exchange said it'll waive fees at the vault through the end of the year. As the world's top producer and consumer of gold, China wants to wield greater influence in pricing the commodity. The denomination of the SGE's new contracts is particularly important given Beijing's ambition to reduce reliance on the US dollar and promote wider use of the yuan in international trade. 'The buying and selling of gold at the new vault will also significantly improve the transaction volume of offshore yuan,' said Doris Bao, the founder of Gold Harvest Consulting. 'The vault also means that China can now import gold in yuan rather than dollars,' further supporting de-dollarization, said Bao, who is also a consultant for London Bullion Market Association. The SGE was established in 2002 by the People's Bank of China as the country's primary platform for trading bullion. In 2014, it set up the International Board to allow foreigners to participate directly in China's market. That effort is now accelerating for other commodities. The Shanghai Futures Exchange, the country's top venue for trading raw materials, recently unveiled a proposal to enhance access to overseas investors. Although the SGE is the single largest exchange for physical gold, London remains the market's undisputed center. Other hubs including Singapore are also trying to wrest some of the action away from the centuries-old UK market. Interest has only grown after the precious metal staged a massive rally to record levels, with prices more than doubling since the turn of the decade. Much of gold's appeal is its reputation as a reliable store of value, and China's central bank has been a major buyer over the past three years, in part to diversify reserves away from the dollar. Hong Kong, meanwhile, is a well-established banking center that's seeking to keep pace with the expansion of other financial hubs in the region. The former British colony has a plan to bolster its presence in commodities, from warehousing to trading and logistical services across markets, including bullion. 'It'll bring, if anything, more comfort for new players to enter the game,' said Joshua Rotbart the founder and managing partner at gold dealer J. Rotbart & Co. However, there are still some questions that could pose potential hurdles for the exchange to become truly global, he said. 'Limiting the access to the Hong Kong facility, in the same manner international players are limited in terms of being able to operate in the mainland, will definitely undermine the project,' Rotbart said. --With assistance from Alfred Cang. (Updates with quotes from the fifth paragraph) Inside Gap's Last-Ditch, Tariff-Addled Turnaround Push How to Steal a House Luxury Counterfeiters Keep Outsmarting the Makers of $10,000 Handbags Apple Test-Drives Big-Screen Movie Strategy With F1 Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store