Disney without the crowds? Teens thinking their parents are (kinda) cool? Yes, there is such a place.
This land exists — it's called
Advertisement
On select nights in Florida, from 10 p.m. to 1 a.m., Disney holds a special event at one park when only people with a special wristband can board rides at Magic Kingdom, EPCOT, or Hollywood Studios. You can officially enter at 7 p.m., but the perks begin later.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
I did this recently with my two teenage kids in Florida.
between $155 and $185, a tad more than a normal day ticket (prices vary by park and date). But the nighttime alternative is good bang for your buck.
Consider our experience with Disney's hot, newish
Advertisement
Around 8:30 p.m., when the park was still open for regular ticket holders, my kids and I saw the mass of humanity lined up and said no, thank you. When we came back at 11 p.m., we zipped through in minutes. The ride is way cooler at night, by the way.
The parks and attractions, including EPCOT's Spaceship Earth, look cool in the dark.
Jason Margolis
Another night, we hit EPCOT and the indoor roller coaster Guardians of the Galaxy: Cosmic Rewind, which opened in 2022. On a normal day, you can either wait up to a whopping two hours or pay about $20 for a Lighting Lane Single Pass, which reserves you a spot. (More on that process in a bit.)
During After Hours, we practically walked on, then hopped back in the queue for a second go.
Side note for roller coaster enthusiasts: My kids and I agreed that Guardians is hands down the coolest ride we've ever done. The train zips through the dark as a different disco or '80s pop song propels you along, a nice touch to make each time a bit different. I won't spoil the big surprise, but the ride has an unexpected twist, which blew our minds.
The special bracelets that got us on the Disney After Hours rides.
Jason Margolis
Overall, the longest we waited at night was about 20 minutes for the Rock 'n' Roller Coaster in Hollywood Studios, still much quicker than during the day.
Here's another small bonus of Disney After Hours: carts hand out unlimited popcorn, sodas and water, and ice cream bars, all for no charge. For a teenager, or anyone for that matter, is there anything better than free food?
Advertisement
Now, Disney After Hours is not for everyone. Most people there were young adults without kids, with some families sprinkled in the mix.
Parents with young children, this event is not for you. Or people who like to soak in the entire Disney vibe, I'd stick to the daytime. After dark, there are no shows, no parades, and very few places to eat or shop. Character sightings are sparse — we only spotted Pluto.
Disney After Hours events give guests three hours – after hours – to explore one of the Walt Disney World Theme Parks. Throughout Magic Kingdom, guests can enjoy more than 20 attractions and experiences including the new TRON Lightcycle / Run.
Steven Diaz/Steven Diaz, Photographer
Also, it's a rather late night. In one of my less-than-stellar parenting moves, when my 13-year-old daughter was just plain tuckered out and it wasn't even close to midnight, I gave her a 20-ounce Coke and some popcorn so my 16-year-old son and I could keep the good times rolling. (But hey, it was free!) And she POWERED through the rest of the night.
I also think my kids may have thought I was bordering on cool for just a brief moment as I obliterated all the rules. (My wife was stuck back in Boston preserving her vacation time, so all good there.) Further, my kids loved the perfect teenage schedule: sleep in as late as possible, hit the pool for a few hours, then slowly make our way to the parks by 7 p.m.
There was plenty to fill our days as well — Disney has lots to do outside the parks, from riding canoes or horses, taking a boat tour of the themed hotels, strolling 'Disney's Boardwalk' and playing games of chance, or just shooting some free billiards at a hotel. My daughter and I also took a cake-decorating class at the Disney Springs shopping area one day while killing a few hours.
Advertisement
Now, going back to that Lightning Lane, an After Hours ticket isn't entirely necessary to cut down on wait times if you're well prepared. Disney has its ride reservation system down to a science, and you can put in for up to five attractions in advance: three on a multi-pass and two additional single passes for bigger attractions.
When we went to the parks during the daytime, I had my morning laid out a week in advance, including passes for TRON and Guardians. And when Disney says Lightning Lane, they mean it — we never waited more than 5-10 minutes for a ride.
But reserving those rides tacks on another $60 or so per person; pretty quickly that late-night ticket starts looking like a sweet deal. Also, the Lightning Lane can only be used for a specific ride once, unless you're willing to purchase an unlimited 'premier pass,' which can run north of $400 per person at Magic Kingdom, a bridge too far for me.
With the regular Lightning Lane, once you check in for a ride, you can immediately select a new one on Disney's app. It's a fun system to navigate, but the ride choices become slim pickings as the day goes on. You also quickly become even more tethered to your phone than usual.
During the After Hours event, you just go where you want, when you want.
After arriving at a park around 7 p.m., we'd hop on a few of the smaller rides with short lines, grab a nice sit-down meal in the park, then wait impatiently for the clock to strike 10 p.m. From that moment on, we were all focus.
Advertisement
The author's son and daughter headed toward the last ride of their late-night adventure.
Jason Margolis
Our last night, as the hour approached 1 a.m, we decided to make our last ride
When we got off the ride, we realized it was only 12:57 a.m., and we still had three minutes of fun to go. (Also, my daughter needed to burn off the caffeine somehow.) So we ran through the exit, did a U-turn into the entrance, and were back on our rat-shaped vehicle for one more spin with a solid minute to spare.
Jason Margolis can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Box Office: ‘Fantastic Four' Craters by 66% in Second Weekend, ‘Naked Gun' Debuts to $17 Million
Marvel's First Family might not save the day after all. 'The Fantastic Four: First Steps' is quickly losing steam in its second weekend, signaling the comic book adventure isn't connecting at the box office beyond the film's core demographic of superhero fans. After a healthy $117.6 million debut, 'The Fantastic Four' suffered a hefty 66% drop in its sophomore outing with $40 million from 4,125 theaters. Heading into the weekend, box office analysts anticipated a decline of 55% to 60% from its opening. (By comparison, 'Superman' dropped by 53% in its second weekend after launching to $125 million earlier in July.) This painful fall is surprising because the Marvel tentpole has the benefit of positive reviews and word-of-mouth, as well as a clear runway in terms of competition. More from Variety 'Together' Stars Dave Franco and Alison Brie Relive Their Off-Screen Wedding: Weed Pens, Pizzeria Mozza and a Party Crasher Liam Neeson Jokes His Death as Qui-Gon Jinn in 'The Phantom Menace' Was 'A Bit Namby-Pamby': 'Please, Hardly a Master Jedi' 'Bad Guys 2' Director on Spoofing Elon Musk's SpaceX and How the Cold Open Was Influenced by 'Skyfall' and 'Mission: Impossible' Although those ticket sales were enough to rank as No. 1 on North American charts, 'The First Steps' endured one of the steeper second-weekend drops for Disney's Marvel Cinematic Universe, better than 'The Marvels' (down 78%) but in the company of February's 'Captain America: Brave New World' (down 68%), 2023's 'Ant Man and the Wasp: Quantumania' (down 70%) and 2022's 'Thor: Love and Thunder' (down 67%). So far, 'Fantastic Four' has generated $198 million domestically and $368 million globally. Luckily for Marvel, whose output has been wildly inconsistent in post-pandemic times, 'The First Steps' is pacing to outgross this year's prior theatrical disappointments of 'Captain America: Brave New World' ($415 million globally) and 'Thunderbolts' ($382 million globally). The final tally for 'Fantastic Four' won't be disastrous, à la 'The Marvels' ($206 million) or 'Thunderbolts,' but it's not yet a return to box office glory for Marvel. However, the MCU should officially regain its box office stride with its next three films — 2026's 'Spider-Man: Brand New Day' and 'Avengers: Doomsday' and 2027's 'Avengers: Secret Wars.' ''Fantastic Four' is not a top-tier Marvel franchise. Never has been,' says analyst Jeff Bock of Exhibitor Relations. 'Remember, this ramps up into 'Avengers.' That's the real payoff.' Three new movies opened nationwide, but none were competing for the same audience as 'Fantastic Four.' Among new releases, Universal and DreamWorks Animation's heist comedy 'The Bad Guys 2' enjoyed the strongest start with $22.8 million from 3,852 venues. That's directly even with the first film, which opened to $23 million in 2022 at a time when cinemas were majorly struggling to recover from COVID and studios were barely releasing any movies. The original film eventually powered to $250 million worldwide. 'The Bad Guys 2,' which cost $80 million and follows a group of reformed criminals who relapse for one final con job, was embraced by audiences with an 'A' grade on CinemaScore exit polls. Overseas, 'The Bad Guys 2' landed with $16.3 million for a global total of $44.5 million. 'This is a good opening for an animation sequel,' says analyst David A. Gross of Franchise Entertainment Research. 'With this kind of business, the movie is doing what it's supposed to do.' At No. 3, Paramount's slapstick comedy 'The Naked Gun' debuted to $17 million from 3,344 theaters, right in line with projections. The film earned another $11.5 million at the international box office, bringing its global tally to $28.5 million. It's a promising start given the dearth of theatrical comedies. Akiva Schaffer of the Lonely Island fame directed the film, which carries a $42 million price tag. Critics and moviegoers dug 'The Naked Gun,' in which Liam Neeson stars as bumbling L.A. detective Frank Drebin Jr. (son of the late Leslie Nielsen's Frank Drebin, his predecessor in the 'Naked Gun' trilogy) alongside Pamela Anderson and Paul Walter Hauser. The movie scored an 'A-' grade on CinemaScore and boasts a 90% average on Rotten Tomatoes, both of which should bode well for the remainder of its theatrical run. 'The Naked Gun' appealed almost squarely to older white men; 62% of initial crowds were male, 50% were above 35 years old and 70% were Caucasian. This weekend's final newcomer, Neon's body-horror nightmare 'Together' landed in sixth place with $6.8 million over the traditional weekend and an encouraging $10.8 million during its first five days of release. Real-life husband and wife Dave Franco and Alison Brie star in 'Together' as a co-dependent couple who become frighteningly close after a mysterious force causes horrific body changes. Audiences gave the film a 'C+' on CinemaScore, though that harsh a grade isn't surprising since they likely left the theater feeling very disturbed. In fact, Neon has been leaning into the on-screen trauma to promote the movie, offering free couples therapy for partners who see 'Together' during opening weekend. Neon shelled out $17 million to buy the movie at Sundance, marking one of the richest deals in the festival's history. 'A lukewarm audience score is typical of these films and generally has little effect on how they play out,' Gross says. 'It's [a] smart horror production that's going to be profitable when it's finished.' Elsewhere at the box office, 'Superman' descended to fourth place with $13.9 million in its fourth weekend of release. The Warner Bros. and DC Studios adaptation has generated $316.2 million domestically and $551.2 million globally to date. Universal's 'Jurassic World Rebirth' rounded out the top five with $8.4 million in its fifth weekend of release. The dinosaur epic, which rebooted the long-running property with Scarlett Johansson, Jonathan Bailey and Mahershala Ali, has grossed $317 million in North America and $766 million globally. Overall, the box office is 9.5% ahead of last year but 23% behind 2019, the last pre-pandemic year, according to Comscore. Summer revenues just hit $3 billion from May through early August, so it's a question of whether this could be the second summer in post-COVID times — the year of 'Barbenheimer' was the first — to cross the $4 billion milestone. 'A solid home stretch of the summer is in the cards,' predicts senior Comscore analyst Paul Dergarabedian. 'The $4 billion benchmark is still about a $1 billion away, which is no cake walk but potentially in play.' Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
Elaine Hendrix reveals the 2 ‘Parent Trap' deleted scenes she was ‘really sad to see go'
Not even Meredith Blake clicking sticks could fend off the chopping block. 'The Parent Trap' star Elaine Hendrix revealed two scenes from the 1998 Disney classic that didn't make the final cut. In the film, a remake of the 1961 original, twins Hallie Parker and Annie James (Lindsay Lohan) scheme to reunite their divorced parents. Hendrix plays Meredith Blake, the gold-digging fiancée of the girls' father, Nick Parker (Dennis Quaid). 6 Hendrix as Meredith Blake and Lindsay Lohan as Hallie Parker and Annie James in 'The Parent Trap.' Disney 6 Meredith is the gold-digging fiancée of the twins' father, Nick Parker, played by Dennis Quaid. Walt Disney With a runtime of 2 hours and 8 minutes, Hendrix, 54, said she was surprised any scenes were trimmed at all, noting the movie is already 'pretty long, especially for a little bit older of a film.' 'Nowadays, it's like, 'Oh, it's a short movie, in comparison,'' she exclusively told The Post. 'But there were two scenes that I was really sad to see go that I remember.' Among the cut footage, Hendrix said there was a scene of Meredith and Nick shopping for her engagement ring — a moment she called 'very near and dear to [her] heart' in a 2020 Vulture interview. 6 Hendrix as Meredith Blake and Quaid as Nick Parker in 'The Parent Trap.' Walt Disney 'We shut down Rodeo Drive to shoot it,' she told The Post. 'That was a really big deal.' The 'Dynasty' actress also recalled that the late Variety columnist Army Archerd visited the set while they were filming the scene and later wrote about 'The Parent Trap.' '[He] really singled me out and called me a young Carole Lombard,' she told Vulture. 'He mentioned how only a group of pros would really be worthy of shutting down Rodeo Drive.' 6 Elaine Hendrix during her interview with The Post. Page Six Because of that moment, Hendrix told The Post, 'I was like, 'Oh, I really wanted that scene in the movie.'' The second deleted scene Hendrix was disappointed to see cut put a twist on one that actually did make the final cut. While on a camping trip with Nick and the twins, Meredith starts clicking sticks on her way to the tent. 6 Hendrix, as Meredith, clicks sticks on her way to the tent in 'The Parent Trap.' Walt Disney Quaid, as Nick, asks, 'Meredith, what are you doing?' She replies, 'I don't want the mountain lions to —' but stops short when she notices Hallie and Annie giggling. 'There are no mountain lions up here, are there?' she asks. In the deleted version, Hendrix told The Post that she followed the line with a 'pratfall, a trip out of screen, like I fell down.' 6 Hendrix did most of her own stunts in 'The Parent Trap.' Walt Disney A classically trained dancer, Hendrix tries to do as many of her own stunts as possible — and 'The Parent Trap' was no exception. 'That one in particular, I was so proud of,' she explained. '[It] felt like it harked back to the Vaudeville days — like, 'Watch me be so talented.' And then it got cut, so nobody got to see it.' She concluded to Vulture, 'I was like, 'Damn, that was a good fall.''
Gizmodo
2 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Report: Disney's Attempts to Experiment With Generative AI Have Already Hit Major Hurdles
As Silicon Valley has pushed the world more and more into trying to make the generative AI boom sustain itself, Hollywood is still standing on the precipice of a transformative moment. Studios are grappling with the purported potential (and demands for cost savings) artificial intelligence models may bring, weighed against the legal minefields exploiting such technologies can represent—and an increasing public backlash to the technology. Disney is certainly no exception, as the company is already familiar with both the legal headaches and the PR nightmare generative AI can represent. But a new report from the Wall Street Journal claims that there've been even more attempts behind the scenes at Disney's studio to try and utilize generative AI technologies… neither of which purportedly went very far or well, for very different reasons. Two upcoming productions that tried to navigate potential use of generative AI mentioned in the WSJ report are the upcoming live-action Moana remake and Tron: Ares. For the former, Disney reportedly planned to work with an AI company called Metaphysic to create a digital deepfake of actor Dwayne Johnson, set to reprise his role as the demigod Maui in the remake. In an attempt to reduce the number of days Johnson would be required on set for production, the alleged plan was to have Johnson's cousin, Tanoai Reed, act as a stand-in who would have Johnson's deepfaked face put over his performance in post-production. Although the plan was for a 'small number of shots,' according to WSJ's report, after 18 months of negotiation and work between Disney and Metaphysic, none of the shots using Reed's performance will be in the final movie when it releases in July 2026. WSJ's report cited concerns over data security on Disney's end, as well as the legal question that lingers over any broader embrace of generative AI technology in Hollywood: who, exactly, owns the end product when generative AI models are used to create even a part of it? That thorny question of ownership has already seen Disney take legal action against AI companies over claims of illegal misuse of copyrighted material to train their models. In June this year, Disney teamed up with Universal to sue Midjourney over what the suit described as a 'bottomless pit of plagiarism,' accusing the AI company's image generator of breaching copyright laws to distribute and create images trained on the studios' library of characters and franchises. But copyright is not the only concern Disney faces when it comes to ideas around generative AI: the studio is also increasingly navigating potential publicity nightmares as social backlash to the use of the technology increases. In another example in WSJ's report, it's alleged that Disney executives pitched creatives on the set of Tron: Ares on including a generative AI character in the film, which itself is already about artificial intelligences escaping the digital world of 'The Grid' to be exploited as military contractors in the real world. According to WSJ, the character would've been called 'Bit' and acted as a potential companion to Jeff Bridges' returning Kevin Flynn, and built off of context provided by a writer, the generated character would then be recorded and deliver lines performed by an actor, responding as if the model itself were Bit. The report claims that similarly the idea was stymied again by legal discussions at the time, amid negotiations with unions, as well as the fact that Disney executives were purportedly told to drop the idea internally because 'the company couldn't risk the bad publicity.' Disney is, of course, no stranger to public embarrassment when it comes to its properties and AI, either. Marvel was lambasted for the use of generative AI to create the opening title sequence to its Disney+ series Secret Invasion in 2023, and found itself defending itself from accusations of its use once more for the early marketing campaign for Fantastic Four: First Steps. Earlier this summer, Disney's investment into Epic Games was touted through the arrival of a generative-AI-enhanced Darth Vader avatar in Fortnite to promote the battle royale video game's then-ongoing Star Wars event, 'Galactic Battle', where Darth Vader could be recruited by players, using a deepfake model of the late James Earl Jones' voice to interact with players in real time. Players promptly figured out ways to get around Epic's content restrictions and get the generative Vader to swear and use slurs. Although Epic managed to fix the bugs within 30 minutes of the Vader character's appearance going live in Fortnite, several videos of the exploits went viral on social media. SAG-AFTRA also filed an unfair labor practice charge against Epic over the use of generative AI denying a human actor the chance to voice the role (Jones' estate had already sold the rights to his voice to the Ukrainian tech company Respeecher in 2022 before his passing), but rumors recently swirled that the union dropped the charges in the wake of signing a new contract last month. The legal outcome of Disney and Universal's lawsuit is still to be decided, but what is seemingly clear is that the potential AI takeover of Hollywood that has been feared with the proliferation of generative AI may not be as close as some people (and some companies) expect. Want more io9 news? Check out when to expect the latest Marvel, Star Wars, and Star Trek releases, what's next for the DC Universe on film and TV, and everything you need to know about the future of Doctor Who.
