I'm A Gender Researcher. This Is The Real Reason Women Are Stepping Away From Dating And Relationships.
She'd been dating Max for a few months when it struck her — mid-conversation with a friend — that she had no idea what he felt about her or their future.
So she stopped asking.
There was a time, she said, when she would've tried harder.
Sara, 21, recalled sitting on her bed while her boyfriend begged her to hear him out. He wasn't remorseful for cheating; he just no longer wanted to sit with his shame.
'I was done,' she said. And yet, he expected her to comfort him. 'I had to help him find the words for his feelings, not his actions,' — long silences, teasing through shame and self-hatred. 'He didn't know what he wanted to say,' she said. 'And then I made him feel OK about it."
These stories reflect a shift among young women in which more and more of them are 'quiet-quitting' these relationships. Women are now 23% less likely to want to date than men, not because they don't care, but because they feel they've invested too much emotional labor without support in return.
The Other Side Of The Masculinity Crisis? The Exhausting Emotional Intelligence Gap.
In intimate relationships, young women are taking on a disproportionate load of invisible emotional labor, often supporting men through intense feelings of failure and isolation from friends. Many men described feeling 'weird or like a waste of time' when opening up to male friends, instead reserving vulnerability for their relationships with women.
While men consider this unburdening to women a 'natural part' of their relationships, those same women describe it as work— what researchers at Stanford University call 'mankeeping.'
Over the past two years, I've interviewed dozens of young men and women about their relationships. What's emerged is a sense that women are absorbing the emotional fallout of a crisis they didn't create. The anxieties surrounding what it means to be a man in 2025 should matter to everyone. They're reshaping not just our politics, but the very fabric of how women and men interact — shaping how we love, how we vote, and whether we can build a future together at all. Telling the other side of the 'masculinity crisis' is key to solving it.
The crisis is especially acute for younger men — with two-thirds reporting that 'no one really knows them.' Christopher Pepper, co-author of Talk To Your Boys, notes that Gen Z is the first generation to rely mostly on their phones to communicate.
'There's no responsibility for what's on the receiving end [of online communication],' he said, with online spaces often devolving into slurs and death threats 'that wouldn't be acceptable in other situations.'
For the 60% of men who engage with masculinity influencers, friendship itself is evolving: ambition, wealth and popularity are prioritized over trust. In individualist countries like the U.K. and U.S., this shift is more pronounced — perhaps owed to the glamorization of lone-wolf masculinity, in which vulnerability is discouraged.
When 'The Costs Of Caring' Are Too Much
Meanwhile, young women are rejecting patriarchal expectations that previous generations internalized. Once expected to shoulder emotional labor as a normal part of relationships, they are now more aware of the 'costs of caring,' including suppressing their own needs. They're less inclined to date, with 56% saying 'it's hard to find someone who meets their expectations,' compared to 35% of men.
From 'I'm Not Your Therapist' to 'I'm literally Joan Baez,' Gen Z women are resisting the notion of offering up too much to men. While some women told me that men without emotional fluency are unattractive, others hesitate to expect it, fearing they'll be labelled 'controlling'.
Several women I spoke with expressed concern over how dating men affects their economic futures. The role of women as invisible drivers of men's success isn't new, but with young people struggling to find jobs at unprecedented rates, it's taken a new form. From job hunting to burnout, 'women tend to provide increased emotional support to men who do not have it elsewhere.'
Mankeeping is typically tied to thinner social networks, but for Gen Z, it's more about men's inability to share their struggles with other men. All men I spoke with felt they couldn't be as honest about their jobs with their male friends.
In contrast, most young women I interviewed described how stepping in during 'unsettled times' negatively impacted their work and well-being. This labor has become an invisible workplace obstacle, as instant communication has erased the natural boundaries that once separated work and emotional caregiving. COVID-19 only exacerbated these dynamics, with many surprised by how quickly they 'played house' during lockdown — over-focusing on their partner's needs instead of their own. A default response learned in their teens and early 20s, it's been challenging to unlearn.
Some have gone further: writing partner's college essays, preparing scholarship presentations, coaching them on job interviews. In some cases, their partners actively diminished their career success.
'When he heard where I worked, he looked at me predatorily,' one woman said. He later pressured her to refer him to her company, convincing her it would be best for their relationship. Some men seek proximity to success without realizing the toll it takes on their self-esteem.
A Job Women Didn't Sign Up For
Broader beliefs about gender equity are shaping how much support partners expect — and feel entitled to — from each other. Women feel as though men aren't doing enough to support gender equality, whereas 60% of men believe they're expected to do too much.
The stereotype suggests that women require more support in relationships, but Gen Z's 'emotion work' — the labor required to bridge the gap between expectations and reality — is especially stark in a generation that expects so much of young men while providing them limited support. Across hundreds of hours of interviews, distinct forms of emotional labor have emerged — confirming what researchers have long observed: Women are more often expected to carry this emotional load in relationships.
Like Ava, many women are stepping back from this distinct form of work, from dating, and from committed relationships. They report that dating is harder than 10 years ago, and are twice as likely as men to cite physical and emotional risk as reasons why dating has become more challenging — 62% of single women report they're not looking to date at all, compared to 37% of men.
Even before entering relationships, a young woman is likely to have experienced emotional and physical abuse. Among teenage girls, 80% report that sexual assault is 'normal and common' in their friendship groups — before they even finish high school. About half of Gen Z women report feeling disrespected by men, compared to 18% of men; 42% of women report being pressured into sex on a date, and intimate partner abuse has now been cited as an indicator of attitudes that underpin extreme violence.
Both these realities might partially explain why young men are dating less than previous generations. Gen Z men are more than twice as likely as Boomers to report that they didn't have a significant other as teenagers, and women are increasingly opting to date older men to avoid having to 'mother' their significant other.
'Unless you're really in love,' one Gen Z woman told me, 'then it's not your problem if they're not emotionally available.'
Millennials have a different lens: 'It's a feminism thing,' Becca, 31, told me. 'But also a way of processing the outsized support we gave them' — a kind of paying it forward to another woman's future boyfriend.
The more women are left to shoulder the burden of the masculinity crisis, the more likely they are to withdraw. But the more they do, the more boys feel rejected. Loneliness leaves boys vulnerable to voices that reframe their abandonment. One in six boys aged 6-15 have a positive impression of Andrew Tate, and across 30 countries, Gen Z men are 30% more conservative than women. No other generation has a gender divergence — social and political — at this scale.
If we want to interrupt this spiral, we must stop asking women to keep absorbing the damage. We need to offer boys a healthier model of masculinity that speaks to their needs — but doesn't come at girls' expense. That means listening to why women are pulling away and creating pathways for boys to grow without leaning on women.
A recent survey exploring young men's health in a digital world, 55% of the young men who watch masculinity influencers believe that women don't care about men. My research shows that women do care. They just want relationships that don't lean on traditional gender roles. Meanwhile, boys deserve better than a culture that mocks their confusion without showing them a path through it.
That path begins with both sides recognizing what the other is carrying — and letting go of narratives that cast boys as aggressors before they even reach adolescence. Instead, as Pepper puts it, it's 'fine to give boys and men some homework.' This homework begins with fostering self-awareness, emotional literacy and responsibility for your actions.
A Model For Modern Masculinity
Men often lack these emotional skills precisely because they've rarely been expected — or permitted — to develop them. Instead, young women have been tasked with practicing and perfecting emotional labor. Traditional masculine norms like pride often keep men from extending their expressions of vulnerability beyond the comfort of romantic relationships. Many fear that admitting they're overwhelmed will diminish their self-worth. Emotional fluency will take practice. And because expectations of manhood haven't evolved as quickly as those for women, that practice must be met with patience.
Our understanding of masculinity must also shift to make space for emotional connection between men. Vulnerability is often taught by women and associated with intimacy — leaving little room to express it in male friendships. But men need friendships grounded in trust, mutual honesty and shared vulnerability.
Nearly every man I spoke to said his male friendships left him feeling worse about himself. This not only deprives men of the full range of support they need in tough times, but limits nuance in emotionally complex situations. As several male interviewees pointed out, their friends were often quick to 'hate' or 'blame' women after breakups. Instead of emotional language that deepens the gender divide, it can instead be used to bridge it, helping men move through hurt with reflection and toward growth.
Finally, we need to redefine what it means for men to be a 'provider.' Caring for others should be central to what masculinity can mean. We must also rethink what it means to 'protect,' as many men I spoke to believed withholding their emotions was a form of care.
Dating teaches us many things: how to take emotional risks, how to fail, how to communicate. Above all, relationships teach us how to be vulnerable. But with 29% more men than women in Gen Z currently single, a gender skills gap will only continue to widen. As more women step back from relationships, many men may never get the chance to learn.
Those who took on this homework — who shared their burdens with friends, practiced self-awareness and showed up with emotional fluency — weren't just more attractive to the women they dated. They also became better partners. If we are to love each other, masculinity has to evolve to hold that vulnerability, for everyone's sake.This article originally appeared on HuffPost.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As a mom, society expects me to be the default parent. My husband is just as capable as I am.
When my daughter was a newborn, people would ask me who was taking care of her when I was out. It made me realize that mothers are universally assumed to be the default parent. Parental leave still tends to be better for the birthing person, signaling that the other parent is secondary. When my daughter was a newborn, almost every time I left my New York City building, someone would ask, "Who's taking care of the baby?" Without missing a beat, I'd nonchalantly say, "Oh, I left her with a clean diaper and a bottle of milk. She should be good for a few hours." The not-so-surprising reality was that her dad was with her. But for some reason, no one assumed that, because, apparently, fathers are mythical creatures when it comes to childcare. Small interactions like the ones I had during my daughter's first year reveal a much more pervasive societal problem: mothers are universally assumed, if not expected, to be the default parent. Even when dads are fully capable, present, and kicking butt at the whole parenting thing. Moms are often the default parent The default parent phenomenon in heterosexual relationships is embedded in every aspect of life. It's how schools call mothers first when a child is sick, or only follow up with the mom via email for administrative tasks. It's in the pediatrician's office, where questions are directed to mom even when both parents are present. It's in the well-meaning people who ask, "Is Dad babysitting?" as if dads are temporary caregivers who swoop in like superheroes when needed. It's not called babysitting when it's your own kid. I'm not giving my husband pizza money and paying for his Uber ride to another home at the end of the night. All of this is interesting (exaggerated for effect) and moderately comical, but it's also important because default parent status creates an uneven distribution of responsibilities and reinforces unhealthy mentalities toward childcare and family life. Mothers, regardless of employment status outside the home, shoulder the majority of childcare responsibilities. Even in households where both parents work full-time, mothers spend significantly more time on childcare and are more likely to adjust their careers to accommodate family needs. Moms are not better than dads There's a powerful, albeit completely incorrect, narrative that mothers have some biological ability to parent that fathers lack. We absolutely don't. I, personally, had a much harder time adapting to parenthood than my husband. This narrative ignores the reality that parenting skills are learned, not instinctually programmed by gender. My husband didn't emerge from his mother's cozy womb knowing how to change diapers any more than I did. We both figured it out through the time-honored tradition of trial, error, and the absolute horror of getting peed and pooped on, sometimes at the same time. Workplace policies and societal structures continue to reinforce traditional gender roles. Paternity leave continues to be limited in the US, sending the clear message that fathers are secondary parents. Flexible work arrangements are marketed primarily toward mothers, not parents. Even family restrooms and changing tables in men's restrooms are inconsistent, physically reinforcing that childcare happens in women's spaces. It's 2025, men can handle a diaper change without oversight and without the world blowing up. Third, and perhaps most insidiously, we as a society have internalized these expectations. I catch myself "gatekeeping" parenting tasks, swooping in to change an outfit my husband picked out for our 15-month-old because it doesn't "match." I've had to recognize my own role in perpetuating the default parent problem and acknowledge that "my way" isn't the only right way to parent. As it turns out, children survive (and thrive) just fine with slightly crooked ponytails and mismatched socks. Both parents need to be recognized equally Breaking free from the default parent trap requires multidimensional action. On a personal level, parents need to have direct and frequent conversations about how society places uneven expectations on mothers and fathers. This means challenging these assumptions not just within the household but also in the wild. For dads, it means fully embracing parenthood without waiting to be asked or directed. It means becoming the parent who knows the pediatrician's phone number, remembers that Wednesday is show-and-tell day, and notices when the children's pants are getting too short. And we mothers are not off the hook. This means letting go of the idea that we need to control everything to prove our maternal worth. It means stepping back and allowing our partners to develop their own parenting approaches and styles, even when they differ from ours. We also need policies that recognize both parents as equally capable and responsible. This includes robust parental leave for all parents, workplace flexibility for all parents, and a conscious effort to shift how we talk about and portray parenthood in media and daily conversations. Companies marketing to families need to recognize fathers as legitimate consumers of baby, kid, and family products, not bumbling idiots who need "mom-approved" items. Dads can also tell if a diaper is absorbent or if a stroller is easy to fold. The default parent problem won't disappear overnight. But by recognizing it, naming it, and actively working to dismantle it just as swiftly as my daughter demolishes her Magnatile castles, we can create a more equitable parenting ecosystem. My hope is that by the time my daughter becomes a parent, if she chooses to, no one will ask her who's watching her baby when she's not around. People will assume what should be obvious: her child has two capable parents, both equally responsible for their care. Read the original article on Business Insider Solve the daily Crossword


CBS News
41 minutes ago
- CBS News
Cherry Creek School District hopes to improve teacher shortage with program to recruit and train aspiring educators
Cherry Creek Schools in the southern part of the Denver metro area is finding a way to address the national teacher shortage by growing and training their own teachers. Through a program, aspiring teachers get hands-on experience with the support of district teachers, while still attending college. The Aspiring Educator Pathway program is now in its second year and has more than doubled in size since starting. The program has grown from 16 apprentice and aspiring teachers last year to now nearly 60 this year. All the apprentice teachers have been paired with mentor teachers at 15 schools across the district. For the past couple weeks, they've also met to prepare for the start of the school year. Shae Brock worked in a 5th grade classroom last year as part of the aspiring educator pathway program. "It was something that was super exciting for me, and I knew it could be super life changing," said Brock. Brock attends the Community College of Aurora, which has a partnership with Cherry Creek School District for the program. While students take college classes, they also work full-time in a classroom and will become licensed teachers when they graduate. Melissa Klemenz, is the assistant director of the program, and said in traditional teacher-prep programs, students go to school for 3 ½ years and then during their last semester, they begin student teaching. She added that's why the district's superintendent worked to come up with a better way to prepare teachers. She said the goal is to recruit and retain teachers in the district and also provide the best education to students. "We really believe that educators need better preparation to in order to be the best for their students in the classroom," said Klemenz. "There is a teacher shortage, and so the more that we can have teachers that are prepared and feel comfortable in the classroom, as well as growing our own pathway to become teachers, will really help students benefit." In the first year of the program, Klemenz said there was improved student assessment and more positive classroom environments. For mentor teachers like Katrina Shroyer, she's also seen the growth in her students. "They have another person that cares about them, that wants them to be successful, that is there to impact their growth," said Shroyer. "We were a team and because they (apprentice teachers) were there every day, they knew the kids just like I knew them. As part of the four-year-program, mentees get more than 4,500 hours of experience inside the classroom, compared to 700 hours through a traditional pathway or regular student teaching. "I was in kindergarten as a student teacher, but it wasn't as intense as this program. I would go to school about two days a week and only be at the school part time," said Brock. "I think during student teaching, I was missing so many key opportunities that was Important for my journey as a teacher." The program also addresses student debt. While apprentice teachers are working at the district, their costs for college classes each year drops down to $15,000. Not only is Brock working a full-time job and getting a paycheck, but she's also getting a jumpstart in her career. "I really have been immersed in a school and school environment and working alongside with a teacher in their classroom, and what it's like to co-teach," said Brock. "I've learned a lot about how to build relationships with students, lesson planning, and, you know, really knowing what it takes to become a teacher," said Brock. This year as part of the program, the district also launched a Special Education Aspiring Educator Pathway. With special education position hard to fill, people are not going into that field of education as often. More than 20 teacher apprentices have signed up are focused in special education. Cherry Creek School District teachers will return to their classrooms this week and the apprentice teachers will also be joining them to get classrooms prepared and ready to welcome students back next week.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: How Well Do Middle Schools Prepare Students for HS? Here's a New Way to Find Out
Education savings accounts in Texas. Open enrollment in Missouri. Each week seems to bring a new story and more education options for American students. But to make the most of these new opportunities, families need the full picture. So, what information do they have currently? And what additional data would it make sense for them to have? Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter When it comes to public schools, whether neighborhood schools, magnets, or charters, the most common data points are academic achievement and year-to-year growth in math and reading, as measured on standardized tests. Although this information is crucial — something is very wrong if the kids can't pass the tests — critics from both sides of the aisle rightly note that it doesn't capture everything that families should want to know about a school's academics. For example, what about subjects like history and science, which are tested less frequently than reading and math? What about foreign languages, the arts and other subjects that aren't tested at all? And what about all the stuff that good schools impart that tests don't capture, like critical thinking, teamwork, self-discipline and respect for others? Related For years, education reformers who believe that data are critical to improving America's schools but recognize the limitations of standardized tests have struggled to answer these questions. That's why a recent analysis that explores a new and potentially powerful measure of school quality called high school readiness is so exciting. As the name suggests, the basic idea is to capture how well a middle school prepares its students for the next stage of their education by quantifying its effects on high school grades—or to be more precise, ninth-grade grade-point averages. The report finds that middle schools have a significant impact on students' future grades. For example, in North Carolina and Maryland, attending a middle school with a strong high school readiness score boosted a student's ninth-grade GPA by approximately one-tenth of a grade point. Effect of Attending a Middle School with a Higher High School Readiness Score on Ninth-Grade GPA One-tenth of a grade point may not sound like much, but it's enough to keep a marginal student out of the University of California or Texas A&M. And that increase is fairly impressive when you consider the number of factors that can affect GPA, from the quality of a student's elementary school to his or her socioeconomic circumstances and home life. Related Importantly, schools' influences on GPAs aren't necessarily the same as their effects on test scores. In fact, the two are only weakly correlated. Middle Schools That Boost Students' Test Scores Don't Necessarily Boost Their High School GPAs In other words, analyzing middle schools' effects on grades reveals something new and different about how schools serve students — which the many families who don't care exclusively about test scores might want to consider when choosing a school. While it may seem strange to suggest evaluating middle schools based on their students' high school readiness, many states already do something similar at the high school level, where indicators of college and career readiness have long been an accepted part of school report cards. And while there are technical challenges associated with isolating middle schools' effects on high school grades, most states already provide publicly available school report cards, and most already collect data on students' high school GPAs. So, with a bit of number-crunching and some clear messaging, a new high school readiness indicator could give families the information they're looking for — and begin to move America's education system away from its obsession with standardized tests and toward a broader concept of student success. As educational options expand, so should the information available to families. Test scores alone will never paint a complete picture of school quality or student success. But in the age of big data, there is no shortage of paint. Solve the daily Crossword