logo
Our Best Look At China's New J-15DT Carrier-Based Electronic Warfare Jet

Our Best Look At China's New J-15DT Carrier-Based Electronic Warfare Jet

Yahoo2 days ago
A new image provides our best view of the latest addition to China's growing family of Shenyang J-15 carrier-based fighter series, the J-15DT electronic warfare version. There is also some indication that it may have entered operational service, or got very close to it. Crucially, this electronic attack Flanker is outfitted for operations aboard catapult-equipped aircraft carriers like the Fujian. Evidence emerged recently suggesting this carrier may have begun to host fixed-wing aircraft trials.
Overall, progress with the J-15DT program points not only to the scope of China's carrier aviation ambitions, but also the growing focus on catapult-assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) operations, which offer many advantages.
The recently emerged photo, seen at the top of this story, shows an airborne J-15DT seen with at least three external electronic warfare pods, two on the pylons under the engine intake ducts and one (likely two) on the wingtips. It wears the low-visibility national and unit insignia and individual two-digit code number (in this case '23') associated with operational J-15s, which suggests that the aircraft could be a part of the frontline People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) inventory. At the same time, we shouldn't rule out the possibility of image manipulation by official sources or otherwise.
Although the catapult launch bar is not visible, the aircraft can be confirmed as the CATOBAR version since it has gray tailfin caps and slightly different wingtip pods associated with this aircraft. Most likely, it also has a two-part front landing gear door. Some reports suggest the J-15DT also has the dorsal airbrake removed.
The differences between the PLAN catapult-capable J-15DT and the ski-jump J-15DH. pic.twitter.com/F5dAYGC45X
— Fay (@FaySue6) August 2, 2025
It remains possible that the aircraft seen here is a renumbered prototype J-15DT, examples of which have been seen in the past. At the very least, however, it appears indicative of this variant's march toward becoming part of the air wing of the Fujian, and potentially the PLAN's two earlier carriers.
First-ever official footage of flight operations aboard China's newest, soon-to-be commissioned aircraft carrier, CNS Fujian (18)On the eve of the PLA's 98th anniversary, PRC media released video showcasing another major milestone: integration tests between the electromagnetic… pic.twitter.com/wIrU4hxFi6
— Ian Ellis (@ianellisjones) July 31, 2025
The pace of development for the CATOBAR J-15DT — which is broadly similar to the U.S. Navy's EA-18G Growler, but likely also possessing a secondary strike mission — has been impressive.
Only last October did evidence emerge of the J-15DH undergoing carrier trials. With their distinctive tandem two-seat cockpits and humped forward fuselages, these aircraft were noted aboard the carrier Shandong. This vessel, like the Liaoning before it, is equipped for short takeoff but assisted recovery (STOBAR) operations.
Most critically, CATOBAR operations allow fixed-wing aircraft to take off with much heavier fuel and weapons loads. This has been a persistent shortcoming of the original J-15 versions operated from the Liaoning and Shandong. It would be a particular problem launching and recovering a J-15 electronic warfare variant from these vessels, due to their requirement to carry heavy external jamming pods as well as a large fuel load for escort missions.
Furthermore, the Fujian is equipped with electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) type catapults — three in total — rather than the traditional steam-powered ones. While tricky to master, EMALS offers a range of advantages. These include increased sortie-generation rates due to lower reset times and the ability to better fine-tune the forces they exert on aircraft during launch, meaning that a wider range of aircraft types can be supported, including smaller and more fragile types, such as drones. At the same time, wear and tear on individual aircraft is reduced.
As for the electronic warfare version of China's carrier-based Flanker, this is equally important for the PLAN's burgeoning carrier air wing.
Reportedly, the prototype J-15DH first flew in late 2016 but was, at that time, still being STOBAR-configured. Like the land-based J-16D, this variant is characterized by large wingtip electronic warfare pods, a revised radome profile, and it has the standard infrared search and track (IRST) sensor and cannon removed. Additional conformal and blade antennas are located around the airframe, and further electronic warfare pods can be carried under the wings and below the fuselage.
As we've discussed in the past, the J-15D series opens up a whole new range of missions for China's carriers. A key mission will be providing jamming support while directly escorting aircraft penetrating hostile territory, as well as while operating from a standoff distance.
At the same time, there have been suggestions that the J-15D series could be a lot more than simply an escort jammer type, too. Some accounts suggest the J-15D series, like the land-based J-16D, is also intended for offensive operations, using anti-radiation missiles and perhaps other weapons.
There are some questions about how powerful and effective the J-15DT's pods can be as they rely on internal power from the jet instead of an independent ram-air turbine. This could limit their power output and the potential to maximize the use of all pods at any given time.
Pods are getting their power from the jet? Hmmm. https://t.co/r8xDI1ix2Z
— Tyler Rogoway (@Aviation_Intel) December 19, 2024
Meanwhile, the J-15DT is just one of an expanding inventory of carrier-based aircraft, some of which have been tailored specifically for the Fujian and subsequent CATOBAR carriers, while others will be able to operate from the earlier STOBAR vessels as well.
Chief among these is the PLAN's next carrier fighter, the stealthy J-35. While this was designed from the ground up for CATOBAR operations, there are also signs that it might also eventually embark on the Liaoning and Shandong.
The PLAN is looking forward to introducing the KJ-600 carrier-based radar plane, which will play a role analogous to the E-2 Hawkeye as a critical force-multiplying airborne early warning and control and networking node aboard CATOBAR carriers.
Then there is a growing portfolio of advanced uncrewed combat air vehicles (UCAVs) and other types of drones that China is developing for launch from carriers and big-deck amphibious warfare ships.
Recently, imagery of a new jet trainer, apparently based on the existing JL-10, also emerged. There are indications that this could be designed with carrier training in mind, something that will become more important as more carriers enter service and CATOBAR operations become more routine.
Here a better one via Huitong's CMA-Blog@HarpiaP pic.twitter.com/OaklmeU6DK
— @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) August 1, 2025
At the same time, development of the J-15 series continues, with versions equipped for either CATOBAR or STOBAR operations.
The upgraded, CATOBAR-capable J-15T single-seat multirole fighter was more or less confirmed to be in operational service last year, when a dozen of them were noted operating from the Shandong. The J-15T has a new active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar and a more modern cockpit.
There is also a two-seat J-15S, the airframe of which was used as the basis for the J-15D. The ultimate objective behind the two-seat J-15S remains unknown, with conflicting reports that it is intended as a carrier trainer, a multirole strike fighter, or simply as a testbed. Meanwhile, it appears to have entered PLAN service in a land-based role, although carrier-based service could well follow, in one form or another.
With the Fujian reportedly expected to enter operational service by the end of this year, we can expect to learn much more about the carrier and its capabilities, including its all-important air wing.
Contact the author: thomas@thewarzone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fuel Tech Reports 2025 Second Quarter Financial Results
Fuel Tech Reports 2025 Second Quarter Financial Results

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Fuel Tech Reports 2025 Second Quarter Financial Results

WARRENVILLE, Ill., Aug. 05, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Fuel Tech, Inc. (NASDAQ: FTEK), a technology company using advanced engineering processes to provide emissions control systems and water treatment technologies in utility and industrial applications, today reported financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025. 'Our second quarter results, along with ongoing developments across our two business segments and our Dissolved Gas Infusion business, strengthen our confidence in delivering improved overall performance in the second half of the year,' said Vincent J. Arnone, President and CEO. 'We are actively pursuing new contract opportunities across our APC and FUEL CHEM® business segments. For the APC segment, in particular, we are addressing both traditional end markets and the significant prospects offered by the rising demand for data centers. We have multiple bids outstanding for our SCR technology to address the emissions control requirements of AI-related data centers to be built in the U.S. over the next several years. We remain closely engaged with these potential partners and are excited about the opportunities that lie ahead.' He concluded, 'We are supported in our efforts by a strong financial position. At June 30, 2025, our balance sheet included nearly $31 million in cash, cash equivalents and investments and no long-term debt.' Business Segment Performance Overview Performance within our FUEL CHEM® segment was steady compared to last year's second quarter reflecting seasonal weather transition from spring to summer. Based on FUEL CHEM's strong performance in the early part of the third quarter, the Company anticipates robust segment results for the full third quarter of 2025 and full-year segment revenue to reach its highest level since 2022. The Company is continuing to pursue the expansion of its client base and expects that a demonstration of its TIFI® Targeted In-Furnace Injection™ technology will commence in the fourth quarter of this year at a coal-fired unit in the Midwest. Segment revenue within Air Pollution Control ('APC') declined due primarily to timing of project execution on existing contracts. Before the end of the month of August, we are confident that we will be awarded between $2.5 and $3.0 million in additional contracts from new and existing U.S. and international customers. These new awards would increase our effective APC backlog. In July, the Company commenced an extended demonstration of its Dissolved Gas Infusion (DGI®) technology at a fish hatchery in the Western U.S. The demonstration is expected to last until the second quarter of 2026 and is designed to evaluate the benefits of delivering consistent and precise levels of dissolved oxygen on the raising of gamefish in a controlled environment. Second Quarter 2025 ('Q2 2025') Consolidated Results Overview. Consolidated revenues for Q2 2025 declined to $5.6 million from $7.0 million, primarily driven by lower APC revenues associated with timing of project execution on existing contracts. Consolidated gross margin for Q2 2025 expanded to 45.5% of revenues from 41.9% of revenues, reflecting an increase in both APC and FUEL CHEM segment gross margins. SG&A expenses rose slightly to $3.3 million from $3.2 million. As a percentage of revenues, SG&A expenses rose to 60.2% in Q2 2025 from 46.1%, reflecting lower revenues in Q2 2025. Interest income rose to $0.5 million from $0.3 million, related primarily to the inclusion of $0.3 million related to the one-time collection of the Employee Retention Credit ('ERC') benefit under the CARES Act. Net loss in Q2 2025 was $(689,000), or $(0.02) per share, compared to net loss of $(421,000), or $(0.02) per share. Consolidated APC segment backlog at June 30, 2025 was $7.8 million compared to $10.3 million at March 31, 2025 and $6.2 million at December 31, 2024. APC segment revenue decreased to $2.5 million from $3.9 million, primarily related to timing of project execution on existing contracts. Segment gross margin expanded to 43.9% from 39.1%, primarily due to product and project mix. FUEL CHEM segment revenue was flat at $3.1 million. Segment gross margin expanded to 46.8% from 45.5%, reflecting an increased volume of sales activity combined with relatively flat segment administrative expenses. Adjusted EBITDA loss was $(0.9) million in Q2 2025 compared to an Adjusted EBITDA loss of $(0.5) million. Financial Condition At June 30, 2025, cash and cash equivalents were $10.6 million, short-term investments were $12.4 million, and long-term investments totaled $7.9 million. Stockholders' equity at June 30, 2025 was $40.6 million, or $1.32 per share, and the Company had no debt. Conference Call Management will host a conference call on Wednesday, August 6, 2025 at 10:00 am ET / 9:00 am CT to discuss the results and business activities. Interested parties may participate in the call by dialing: (877) 423-9820 (Domestic) or (201) 493-6749 (International) The conference call will also be accessible via the Upcoming Events section of the Company's web site at Following management's opening remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. About Fuel Tech Fuel Tech develops and commercializes state-of-the-art proprietary technologies for air pollution control, process optimization, water treatment, and advanced engineering services. These technologies enable customers to operate in a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable manner. Fuel Tech is a leader in nitrogen oxide (NOx) reduction and particulate control technologies and its solutions have been installed on over 1,300 utility, industrial and municipal units worldwide. The Company's FUEL CHEM® technology improves the efficiency, reliability, fuel flexibility, boiler heat rate, and environmental status of combustion units by controlling slagging, fouling, corrosion and opacity. Water treatment technologies include DGI® Dissolved Gas Infusion Systems which utilize a patented saturator and a patent-pending channel injector to deliver supersaturated oxygen solutions and other gas-water combinations to target process applications or environmental issues. This infusion process has a variety of applications in the water and wastewater industries, including remediation, aeration, biological treatment and wastewater odor management. Many of Fuel Tech's products and services rely heavily on the Company's exceptional Computational Fluid Dynamics modeling capabilities, which are enhanced by internally developed, high-end visualization software. For more information, visit Fuel Tech's web site at NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This press release contains 'forward-looking statements' as defined in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and reflect Fuel Tech's current expectations regarding future growth, results of operations, cash flows, performance and business prospects, and opportunities, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, our management. Fuel Tech has tried to identify forward-looking statements by using words such as 'anticipate,' 'believe,' 'plan,' 'expect,' 'estimate,' 'intend,' 'will,' and similar expressions, but these words are not the exclusive means of identifying forward-looking statements. These statements are based on information currently available to Fuel Tech and are subject to various risks, uncertainties, and other factors, including, but not limited to, contracts being awarded to competitors offering different or lower-priced technologies, projects being suspended, delayed or cancelled and other risks discussed in Fuel Tech's Annual Report on Form 10-K in Item 1A under the caption 'Risk Factors,' and subsequent filings under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which could cause Fuel Tech's actual growth, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows, performance and business prospects and opportunities to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these statements. Fuel Tech undertakes no obligation to update such factors or to publicly announce the results of any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, or changed circumstances or for any other reason. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in Fuel Tech's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. CONTACT: Vince ArnonePresident and CEO (630) 845-4500 Devin SullivanManaging DirectorThe Equity Group FUEL TECH, CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(in thousands, except share and per share data) June 30, December 31, 2025 2024 ASSETS Current assets: Cash and cash equivalents $ 10,589 $ 8,510 Short-term investments 12,420 10,184 Accounts receivable, less current expected credit loss of $108 and $106, respectively 6,293 9,368 Inventories, net 616 397 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,093 1,160 Total current assets 31,011 29,619 Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $19,155 and $18,958, respectively 4,853 5,084 Goodwill 2,116 2,116 Other intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $543 and $525 respectively 315 327 Right-of-use operating lease assets, net 578 585 Long-term investments 7,925 10,875 Other assets 205 191 Total assets $ 47,003 $ 48,797 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities: Accounts payable $ 2,124 $ 2,915 Accrued liabilities: Operating lease liabilities - current 84 77 Employee compensation 743 1,248 Other accrued liabilities 2,375 1,615 Total current liabilities 5,326 5,855 Operating lease liabilities - non-current 536 548 Deferred income taxes, net 176 176 Other liabilities 301 263 Total liabilities 6,339 6,842 Stockholders' equity: Common stock, $.01 par value, 40,000,000 shares authorized, 32,281,179 and 31,767,329 shares issued, and 31,074,438 and 30,708,273 shares outstanding, respectively 322 317 Additional paid-in capital 165,503 165,295 Accumulated deficit (120,900 ) (119,472 ) Accumulated other comprehensive loss (1,769 ) (1,915 ) Nil coupon perpetual loan notes 76 76 Treasury stock, at cost (2,568 ) (2,346 ) Total stockholders' equity 40,664 41,955 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 47,003 $ 48,797 See notes to condensed consolidated financial TECH, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(in thousands, except share and per share data) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2025 2024 2025 2024 Revenues $ 5,558 $ 7,042 $ 11,940 $ 11,999 Costs and expenses: Cost of sales 3,029 4,090 6,452 7,018 Selling, general and administrative 3,347 3,245 6,688 6,590 Research and development 490 422 1,060 798 6,866 7,757 14,200 14,406 Operating loss (1,308 ) (715 ) (2,260 ) (2,407 ) Interest income 537 334 816 645 Other income (expense), net 86 (34 ) 20 1,639 Loss before income taxes (685 ) (415 ) (1,424 ) (123 ) Income tax expense (4 ) (6 ) (4 ) (17 ) Net loss $ (689 ) $ (421 ) $ (1,428 ) $ (140 ) Net loss per common share: Basic net loss per common share $ (0.02 ) $ (0.01 ) $ (0.05 ) $ (0.00 ) Diluted net loss per common share $ (0.02 ) $ (0.01 ) $ (0.05 ) $ (0.00 ) Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding: Basic 30,868,000 30,482,000 30,796,000 30,434,000 Diluted 30,868,000 30,482,000 30,796,000 30,434,000 See notes to condensed consolidated financial TECH, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(in thousands) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2025 2024 2025 2024 Net loss $ (689 ) $ (421 ) $ (1,428 ) $ (140 ) Other comprehensive loss: Foreign currency translation adjustments 11 5 146 (138 ) Comprehensive loss $ (678 ) $ (416 ) $ (1,282 ) $ (278 ) See notes to condensed consolidated financial TECH, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(in thousands) Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 2024 Operating Activities Net loss $ (1,428 ) $ (140 ) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation 327 161 Amortization 18 31 Non-cash interest income on held-to-maturity securities (90 ) (72 ) Stock-based compensation, net of forfeitures 212 228 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 1,987 (334 ) Employee retention credit receivable 1,232 (1,677 ) Inventory (218 ) (24 ) Prepaid expenses, other current assets and other non-current assets 77 367 Accounts payable (833 ) 524 Accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities 203 (1,728 ) Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities 1,487 (2,664 ) Investing Activities Purchases of equipment and patents (101 ) (204 ) Purchases of debt securities (4,949 ) (11,107 ) Maturities of debt securities 5,750 7,000 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 700 (4,311 ) Financing Activities Taxes paid on behalf of award participants (222 ) (95 ) Net cash used in financing activities (222 ) (95 ) Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash 114 (104 ) Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents 2,079 (7,174 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 8,510 17,578 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 10,589 $ 10,404 See notes to condensed consolidated financial TECH, Data- Reporting Segments(in thousands) Information about reporting segment net sales and gross margin from operations is provided below: Air Pollution FUEL CHEM Three months ended June 30, 2025 Control Segment Segment Other Total Revenues from external customers $ 2,505 $ 3,053 $ — $ 5,558 Cost of sales (1,406 ) (1,623 ) — (3,029 ) Gross margin 1,099 1,430 — 2,529 Selling, general and administrative — — (3,347 ) (3,347 ) Research and development — — (490 ) (490 ) Operating income (loss) from operations $ 1,099 $ 1,430 $ (3,837 ) $ (1,308 ) Air Pollution FUEL CHEM Three months ended June 30, 2024 Control Segment Segment Other Total Revenues from external customers $ 3,949 $ 3,093 $ — $ 7,042 Cost of sales (2,405 ) (1,685 ) — (4,090 ) Gross margin 1,544 1,408 — 2,952 Selling, general and administrative — — (3,245 ) (3,245 ) Research and development — — (422 ) (422 ) Operating income (loss) from operations $ 1,544 $ 1,408 $ (3,667 ) $ (715 ) Air Pollution FUEL CHEM Six months ended June 30, 2025 Control Segment Segment Other Total Revenues from external customers $ 3,808 $ 8,132 $ — $ 11,940 Cost of sales (2,284 ) (4,168 ) — (6,452 ) Gross margin 1,524 3,964 — 5,488 Selling, general and administrative — — (6,688 ) (6,688 ) Research and development — — (1,060 ) (1,060 ) Operating income (loss) from operations $ 1,524 $ 3,964 $ (7,748 ) $ (2,260 ) Air Pollution FUEL CHEM Six months ended June 30, 2024 Control Segment Segment Other Total Revenues from external customers $ 6,267 $ 5,732 $ — $ 11,999 Cost of sales (3,833 ) (3,185 ) — (7,018 ) Gross margin 2,434 2,547 — 4,981 Selling, general and administrative — — (6,590 ) (6,590 ) Research and development $ — — (798 ) (798 ) Operating income (loss) from operations $ 2,434 $ 2,547 $ (7,388 ) $ (2,407 ) FUEL TECH, Segment Financial Data(in thousands) Information concerning our operations by geographic area is provided below. Revenues are attributed to countries based on the location of the end-user. Assets are those directly associated with operations of the geographic area. Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2025 2024 2025 2024 Revenues: United States $ 4,442 $ 4,471 $ 9,801 $ 8,066 Foreign 1,116 2,571 2,139 3,933 $ 5,558 $ 7,042 $ 11,940 $ 11,999 June 30, December 31, 2025 2024 Assets: United States $ 44,130 $ 44,430 Foreign 2,873 4,367 $ 47,003 $ 48,797 FUEL TECH, OF GAAP NET LOSS TO EBITDA AND ADJUSTED EBITDA (in thousands) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2025 2024 2025 2024 Net Loss $ (689 ) $ (421 ) $ (1,428 ) $ (140 ) Interest income (537 ) (334 ) (816 ) (645 ) Income tax expense 4 6 4 17 Depreciation expense 163 81 327 161 Amortization expense 9 15 18 31 EBITDA (1,050 ) (653 ) (1,895 ) (576 ) Stock compensation expense 102 124 212 228 Gain on employee retention credit - - - (1,677 ) Adjusted EBITDA $ (948 ) $ (529 ) $ (1,683 ) $ (2,025 )Adjusted EBITDA To supplement the Company's consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (GAAP), the Company has provided an Adjusted EBITDA disclosure as a measure of financial performance. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income (loss) before interest expense, income tax expense (benefit), depreciation expense, amortization expense, stock compensation expense and gain on employee retention credit. The Company's reference to these non-GAAP measures should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP standards, but are not a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. Adjusted EBITDA is provided to enhance investors' overall understanding of the Company's current financial performance and ability to generate cash flow, which we believe is a meaningful measure for our investor and analyst communities. In many cases non-GAAP financial measures are utilized by these individuals to evaluate Company performance and ultimately determine a reasonable valuation for our common stock. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the nearest GAAP measure of net income (loss) has been included in the above financial while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Our Best Look At China's New J-15DT Carrier-Based Electronic Warfare Jet
Our Best Look At China's New J-15DT Carrier-Based Electronic Warfare Jet

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Our Best Look At China's New J-15DT Carrier-Based Electronic Warfare Jet

A new image provides our best view of the latest addition to China's growing family of Shenyang J-15 carrier-based fighter series, the J-15DT electronic warfare version. There is also some indication that it may have entered operational service, or got very close to it. Crucially, this electronic attack Flanker is outfitted for operations aboard catapult-equipped aircraft carriers like the Fujian. Evidence emerged recently suggesting this carrier may have begun to host fixed-wing aircraft trials. Overall, progress with the J-15DT program points not only to the scope of China's carrier aviation ambitions, but also the growing focus on catapult-assisted takeoff but arrested recovery (CATOBAR) operations, which offer many advantages. The recently emerged photo, seen at the top of this story, shows an airborne J-15DT seen with at least three external electronic warfare pods, two on the pylons under the engine intake ducts and one (likely two) on the wingtips. It wears the low-visibility national and unit insignia and individual two-digit code number (in this case '23') associated with operational J-15s, which suggests that the aircraft could be a part of the frontline People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) inventory. At the same time, we shouldn't rule out the possibility of image manipulation by official sources or otherwise. Although the catapult launch bar is not visible, the aircraft can be confirmed as the CATOBAR version since it has gray tailfin caps and slightly different wingtip pods associated with this aircraft. Most likely, it also has a two-part front landing gear door. Some reports suggest the J-15DT also has the dorsal airbrake removed. The differences between the PLAN catapult-capable J-15DT and the ski-jump J-15DH. — Fay (@FaySue6) August 2, 2025 It remains possible that the aircraft seen here is a renumbered prototype J-15DT, examples of which have been seen in the past. At the very least, however, it appears indicative of this variant's march toward becoming part of the air wing of the Fujian, and potentially the PLAN's two earlier carriers. First-ever official footage of flight operations aboard China's newest, soon-to-be commissioned aircraft carrier, CNS Fujian (18)On the eve of the PLA's 98th anniversary, PRC media released video showcasing another major milestone: integration tests between the electromagnetic… — Ian Ellis (@ianellisjones) July 31, 2025 The pace of development for the CATOBAR J-15DT — which is broadly similar to the U.S. Navy's EA-18G Growler, but likely also possessing a secondary strike mission — has been impressive. Only last October did evidence emerge of the J-15DH undergoing carrier trials. With their distinctive tandem two-seat cockpits and humped forward fuselages, these aircraft were noted aboard the carrier Shandong. This vessel, like the Liaoning before it, is equipped for short takeoff but assisted recovery (STOBAR) operations. Most critically, CATOBAR operations allow fixed-wing aircraft to take off with much heavier fuel and weapons loads. This has been a persistent shortcoming of the original J-15 versions operated from the Liaoning and Shandong. It would be a particular problem launching and recovering a J-15 electronic warfare variant from these vessels, due to their requirement to carry heavy external jamming pods as well as a large fuel load for escort missions. Furthermore, the Fujian is equipped with electromagnetic aircraft launch system (EMALS) type catapults — three in total — rather than the traditional steam-powered ones. While tricky to master, EMALS offers a range of advantages. These include increased sortie-generation rates due to lower reset times and the ability to better fine-tune the forces they exert on aircraft during launch, meaning that a wider range of aircraft types can be supported, including smaller and more fragile types, such as drones. At the same time, wear and tear on individual aircraft is reduced. As for the electronic warfare version of China's carrier-based Flanker, this is equally important for the PLAN's burgeoning carrier air wing. Reportedly, the prototype J-15DH first flew in late 2016 but was, at that time, still being STOBAR-configured. Like the land-based J-16D, this variant is characterized by large wingtip electronic warfare pods, a revised radome profile, and it has the standard infrared search and track (IRST) sensor and cannon removed. Additional conformal and blade antennas are located around the airframe, and further electronic warfare pods can be carried under the wings and below the fuselage. As we've discussed in the past, the J-15D series opens up a whole new range of missions for China's carriers. A key mission will be providing jamming support while directly escorting aircraft penetrating hostile territory, as well as while operating from a standoff distance. At the same time, there have been suggestions that the J-15D series could be a lot more than simply an escort jammer type, too. Some accounts suggest the J-15D series, like the land-based J-16D, is also intended for offensive operations, using anti-radiation missiles and perhaps other weapons. There are some questions about how powerful and effective the J-15DT's pods can be as they rely on internal power from the jet instead of an independent ram-air turbine. This could limit their power output and the potential to maximize the use of all pods at any given time. Pods are getting their power from the jet? Hmmm. — Tyler Rogoway (@Aviation_Intel) December 19, 2024 Meanwhile, the J-15DT is just one of an expanding inventory of carrier-based aircraft, some of which have been tailored specifically for the Fujian and subsequent CATOBAR carriers, while others will be able to operate from the earlier STOBAR vessels as well. Chief among these is the PLAN's next carrier fighter, the stealthy J-35. While this was designed from the ground up for CATOBAR operations, there are also signs that it might also eventually embark on the Liaoning and Shandong. The PLAN is looking forward to introducing the KJ-600 carrier-based radar plane, which will play a role analogous to the E-2 Hawkeye as a critical force-multiplying airborne early warning and control and networking node aboard CATOBAR carriers. Then there is a growing portfolio of advanced uncrewed combat air vehicles (UCAVs) and other types of drones that China is developing for launch from carriers and big-deck amphibious warfare ships. Recently, imagery of a new jet trainer, apparently based on the existing JL-10, also emerged. There are indications that this could be designed with carrier training in mind, something that will become more important as more carriers enter service and CATOBAR operations become more routine. Here a better one via Huitong's CMA-Blog@HarpiaP — @Rupprecht_A (@RupprechtDeino) August 1, 2025 At the same time, development of the J-15 series continues, with versions equipped for either CATOBAR or STOBAR operations. The upgraded, CATOBAR-capable J-15T single-seat multirole fighter was more or less confirmed to be in operational service last year, when a dozen of them were noted operating from the Shandong. The J-15T has a new active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar and a more modern cockpit. There is also a two-seat J-15S, the airframe of which was used as the basis for the J-15D. The ultimate objective behind the two-seat J-15S remains unknown, with conflicting reports that it is intended as a carrier trainer, a multirole strike fighter, or simply as a testbed. Meanwhile, it appears to have entered PLAN service in a land-based role, although carrier-based service could well follow, in one form or another. With the Fujian reportedly expected to enter operational service by the end of this year, we can expect to learn much more about the carrier and its capabilities, including its all-important air wing. Contact the author: thomas@

Uptime's 15 th Annual Global Data Center Survey Results Show Both Commitment and Hesitancy as Industry Plans for Wider AI Usage, Climate Change Reporting, and the NVIDIA Revolution to Come
Uptime's 15 th Annual Global Data Center Survey Results Show Both Commitment and Hesitancy as Industry Plans for Wider AI Usage, Climate Change Reporting, and the NVIDIA Revolution to Come

Business Wire

time30-07-2025

  • Business Wire

Uptime's 15 th Annual Global Data Center Survey Results Show Both Commitment and Hesitancy as Industry Plans for Wider AI Usage, Climate Change Reporting, and the NVIDIA Revolution to Come

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Uptime Institute today announced the release of its 15 th Annual Global Data Center Survey 2025 revealing an innovative and resilient industry – one that is also facing rising costs, worsening power constraints, and challenges in meeting the demands for AI. As operators expand and modernize to meet power and density requirements, they must address availability, efficiency, staffing challenges, supply chain delays, and unpredictable technological advances. Our data shows operators managing big strategic challenges, these include anticipating multiple technological changes, planning for expansion in spite of major constraints on power availability, and preparing to support unpredictable AI workload demand. 'Our data shows operators are tasked with managing a lot of big strategic challenges at the same time. These include anticipating multiple technological changes, planning for expansion in spite of major constraints on power availability, and preparing for and supporting unpredictable AI workload demand,' said Andy Lawrence, Executive Director of Research, Uptime Institute. 'This is a time where senior level experience is critical. But for the first time, more operators are finding it harder to recruit and retain senior people than people at an earlier stage of their career. There is a management shortage, with many experienced leaders retiring just as another phase of dramatic growth gets underway.' Roughly one-third of data center owners and operators currently perform some AI training or inference, and a significantly greater proportion plan to do so in the future. But much of this is early stage and cautious. Uncertainty over the appropriate or likely venues for AI workloads, and apprehension over the power demands of projected NVIDIA GPU systems, is likely contributing to capacity concerns. Now in its 15 th year, Uptime Institute's annual survey is the most comprehensive and longest-running study of its kind. The findings of this report highlight the practices and experiences of data center owners and operators in the areas of resiliency, sustainability, efficiency, staffing, cloud, and artificial intelligence. Key findings from the 2025 report include: Cost issues remain the top concern for digital infrastructure management teams in 2025 — but worries around forecasting future capacity requirements have grown significantly. Average PUE levels show little change for the sixth consecutive year, with improvements constrained by legacy infrastructure and some climate specific limitations to efficient cooling. Average server rack power densities continue to rise, with greater adoption of racks in the 10–30 kW range. Few facilities exceed 30 kW, and extreme densities are as yet rare. The collection and reporting of key sustainability metrics have not improved in 2025, which is likely due in part to commercial pressures to support AI, and easing regulatory pressure in some regions. Trust in AI for data center operations depends on the use case: most would allow its use for analyzing sensor data and predictive maintenance tasks, but not configuration changes, controlling equipment, or staffing issues. Impactful data center outages are gradually becoming less frequent — but one in ten still cause serious or severe disruption, underscoring the need for continued investment. Enterprises continue to adopt hybrid IT strategies, spanning cloud, colocation on-premises data centers. On-premises data centers remain foundational for those with large, mission critical processing needs, with 45% of IT workloads still residing in corporate facilities. Staffing challenges persist in 2025. Nearly two-thirds of operators report difficulty retaining staff, finding qualified candidates, or both. About the Survey: Uptime conducted this year's Annual Global Data Center Survey online and via email from April to May 2025 and collected responses from more than 800 data center owners and operators. For the third consecutive year, Uptime's survey asked data center operators to identify their management team's top concerns related to digital infrastructure. In 2025, new response options were added to reflect the evolving challenges surrounding power availability, supply chain disruptions, and demand for AI. The survey participants represent a wide range of industry verticals in multiple countries. Nearly half (43%) are located in North America and Europe. Approximately one in five respondents work for professional IT / data center service providers — that is, staff with operational or executive responsibilities for a third-party data center, such as those offering colocation, wholesale, software, or cloud computing services. Learn More: Download the executive summary report here and register for the webinar here covering key trends and takeaways from the survey results on July 30 th at 9:00 AM PDT (9:00 AM PDT, 12:00 PM EDT, and 5:00 PM BST). To join our Uptime Institute Bright Talk Channel, go to About Uptime Institute Uptime Institute is the Global Digital Infrastructure Authority. With over 3,500 awards issued in over 118 countries around the globe, and over 1,100 currently active projects in 80+ countries, Uptime has helped tens of thousands of companies optimize critical IT assets while managing costs, resources, and efficiency. For over 30 years, the company has established industry-leading benchmarks for data center performance, resilience, sustainability, and efficiency, which provide customers assurance that their digital infrastructure can perform across a wide array of operating conditions at a level consistent with their individual business needs. Uptime's Tier Standard is the IT industry's most trusted and adopted global standard for the design, construction, and operation of data centers. Offerings include the organization's Tier Standard and Certifications, Management & Operations reviews and assessments including SCIRA-FSI financial sector risk assessment, the Sustainability Assessment, and a broad range of additional risk management, performance, availability, and related offerings. Uptime Education training programs have been successfully completed by over 90,000 data center professionals, such as the much-valued ATD (Accredited Tier Designer) and AOS (Accredited Operations Specialist). The Uptime Education curriculum has been expanded by the acquisition of CNet Training Ltd. in 2023. Uptime Institute is headquartered in New York, NY, with offices in London, Sao Paulo, Dubai, Riyadh, and Singapore, and full-time Uptime professionals based in over thirty-four countries around the world. For more information, visit

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store