Jackson official, LGBTQ group respond to Supreme Court denial of TN drag law case
Passed in 2023, House Bill 9 makes it an offense to host "adult-oriented entertainment," like cabaret performances and drag shows, in public spaces where minors could potentially view them.
Supporters of the legislation say it ensures the protection of children from sexually explicit performances, while opponents, such as in the case of Friends of George's v. Mulroy, argue it violates free speech.
Per Monday's decision, the case will not be heard by the Supreme Court.
More: First Jackson drag show held since state's limiting legislation
More: Music, festivity, and drag shows: Jackson TN Pride events return for fifth year
More: Tennessee legislators try to halt Jackson Pride drag show, raising First Amendment concerns
FOG filed an injunction on Mar. 27, 2023, shortly after Gov. Bill Lee signed HB9 into law, pushing back on the constitutionality of the legislation's encroachment on free speech.
FOG, an LGBTQ+ theatre company in Memphis, has featured "drag-centric" entertainment since 2011. The troupe also works to raise money for organizations and charities that support the LGBTQ+ community.
A district court ruled in favor of FOG and prohibited the legislation from being enforced in Shelby County.
The case, which names Shelby County District Attorney Steven Mulroy as the respondent, was taken to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit where it was dismissed on July 18, 2024.
On Dec. 19, 2024, Mulroy filed a petition for the Supreme Court to review the lower court's decision. That petition was denied on Monday and upholds Tennessee's HB9.
In response to the Supreme Court's decision, the theatre company posted on its website that "this ruling does not define us."
"Friends of George's Theatre Company will continue exercising our First Amendment right to bring joyful, LGBTQ+ inclusive art into our community while raising thousands for charities that uphold dignity and respect for all," the post said. "We extend our deepest gratitude to our legal team for their valiant effort in representing us over the past two years. We are forever grateful for their advocacy, dedication and unwavering belief in our constitutional right to free expression."
In 2022, Jackson was at the forefront of the conversation concerning the parameters of adult entertainment.
Controversy concerning a drag show deemed "family friendly" was the diving board for the introduction of the legislation, sponsored by Rep. Chris Todd, R-Madison County.
Todd, along with other local legislators, spearheaded the campaign to legally object to the drag show, scheduled to be hosted at the Carl Perkins Civic Center.
Jackson Pride, a local grassroots group striving to promote inclusivity and support among the LGBTQ+ community, organized the event.
Originally set to be held in Conger Park, the event was quickly contested by local pastor and legislator outrage, and thus, prompting its relocation to the Civic Center with an age requirement.
The annual drag performance has since returned to the Civic Center with no pushback, drawing a large crowd, and is restricted to those above the age of 18.
Following the Supreme Court decision, Todd shared the following statement on Wednesday.
'I'm grateful to the United States Supreme Court for allowing the Sixth Circuit's ruling to stand, a major victory for morality and basic protections for children,' Todd said. 'Tennessee will continue to be a passionate advocate for families by supporting parental rights and protecting the innocence of minors. I continue to be proud of our state and Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti as we fight for common sense in our nation.'
Though Jackson Pride declined to comment on the Supreme Court decision, a representative from the organization said "we don't host adult entertainment for minors."
Sarah Best is a reporter for The Jackson Sun. To support local journalism, subscribe to the Daily Briefing here.
This article originally appeared on Jackson Sun: Jackson official, Pride group react to Supreme Court drag case denial
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
UPI
a day ago
- UPI
Famous birthdays for Aug. 15: Princess Anne, Tess Harper
1 of 3 | Princess Anne attends the 150th Open Championship at St Andrews on July 13, 2022. The British royal turns 75 on August 15. File Photo by Hugo Philpott/UPI | License Photo Aug. 15 (UPI) -- Those born on this date are under the sign of Leo. They include: -- French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte in 1769 -- U.S. first lady Florence Harding in 1860 -- Musician Samuel Coleridge-Taylor in 1875 -- Actor Ethel Barrymore in 1879 -- Chef Julia Child in 1912 File Photo by Bill Hormell/UPI -- Conservative activist Phyllis Schlafly in 1924 -- Actor Mike Connors in 1925 -- Actor Jim Dale in 1935 (age 90) -- Civil rights leader Vernon Jordan Jr. in 1935 -- Actor Pat Priest in 1936 (age 89) -- Former U.S. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer in 1938 (age 87) -- Journalist Linda Ellerbee in 1944 (age 81) File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI -- Football Hall of Fame member Gene Upshaw in 1945 -- Musician Jimmy Webb in 1946 (age 79) -- Musician Tom Johnston (Doobie Brothers) in 1948 (age 77) -- Actor Phyllis Smith in 1949 (age 76) -- Actor Tess Harper in 1950 (age 75) File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI -- Britain's Princess Anne in 1950 (age 75) -- Writer Stieg Larsson in 1954 -- Actor Željko Ivanek in 1957 (age 68) -- Vietnamese President Lương Cường in 1957 (age 68) -- Musician Tim Farriss (INXS) in 1957 (age 68) -- Actor Rondell Sheridan in 1958 (age 67) -- Musician Matt Johnson (The The/Marc and the Mambas) in 1961 (age 64) -- Chef Tom Colicchio in 1962 (age 63) File Photo by Christine Chew/UPI -- Actor David Zayas in 1962 (age 63) -- Philanthropist Melinda French Gates in 1964 (age 61) -- Actor Debra Messing in 1968 (age 57) -- Actor Anthony Anderson in 1970 (age 55) -- Actor Ben Affleck in 1972 (age 53) -- Actor Natasha Henstridge in 1974 (age 51) -- Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed in 1976 (age 49) -- International Volleyball Hall of Fame member Kerri Walsh Jennings in 1978 (age 47) File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI -- Musician Tim Foreman (Switchfoot) in 1978 (age 47) -- Actor Emily Kinney in 1985 (age 40) -- Musician Nipsey Hussle in 1985 -- Actor/musician Carlos PenaVega in 1989 (age 36) -- Musician Joe Jonas (Jonas Brothers) in 1989 (age 36) -- Actor Jennifer Lawrence in 1990 (age 35) File Photo by Jim Ruymen/UPI
UPI
2 days ago
- UPI
South Korea's Pinkfong wins 'Baby Shark' copyright fight
South Korea's Supreme Court on Thursday upheld lower court rulings against plagiarism claims by a U.S. songwriter who accused Pinkfong of plagiarizing a version of the "Baby Shark" song that became an international sensation, as evidenced by a Baby Shark balloon's appearance in the 2023 Macy's Thanksgiving Day parade in New York City. File Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo Aug. 14 (UPI) -- A popular "Baby Shark" song that South Korea's young children adore and their parents often find annoying is not plagiarized, South Korea's highest court ruled on Thursday. The South Korean Supreme Court ruled the Pinkfong Co. did not plagiarize the song, as claimed in 2019 by U.S. children's songwriter Johnathan Wright, aka Johnny Only. Wright accused Pinkfong of plagiarizing an earlier version of "Baby Shark" that he penned, but the South Korean court ruled his was just another version of several other existing songs. The court said Wright is not the original composer and his version does not qualify as a "creative work" that is protected by intellectual property laws. Wright allegedly penned the song's "doo doo doo doo doo doo" chorus and uploaded his version to the internet in 2011. Pinkfong uploaded its version of the "Baby Shark" song in 2015 and again in 2016. That version became an international hit by setting a YouTube record with more than 10 billion views by 2022, which since has topped 16 billion. Wright sought $21,600 in compensation when accusing Pinkfong of plagiarism in a Seoul court. Pinkfong officials argued their version is a unique arrangement of an existing folk song that is in the public domain. Two South Korean courts agreed with Pinkfong and ruled against Wright's claim, which led to Thursday's final ruling by that nation's top court. The Supreme Court ruled Wright's 2011 version "had not reached the level of substantial alteration" of a folk song that had existed for years. The song's origins are in question, but it likely was created in the United States during the 1970s and became a popular summer camp song, the BBC reported. Some have suggested it was created after filmmaker Steven Spielberg's "Jaws" became a global sensation in 1975. Other versions of the song were recorded in France and Germany, among others. Pinkfong's version became the most successful of all and attained the No. 32 spot on the Billboard Hot 100 in January 2019. Its success spurred the creation of TV shows, movies, apps and Baby Shark-themed products that have generated millions in revenue for Pinkfong.
Buzz Feed
2 days ago
- Buzz Feed
Kim Davis End Of Same-Sex Marriage Jokes
The internet is collectively roasting Kim Davis. A little context: Kim was the Kentucky county clerk who made headlines for refusing to give marriage licenses to LGBTQ+ couples after same-sex marriage was legalized in 2015. The courts ordered her to cut the crap, but she refused, citing her Christian faith, and was thrown in jail. Memes and jokes abounded, and it become a whole thing. She was even mocked by SNL in a parody film trailer called God Is a Boob Man. So, why is Kim trending again? Well, a decade after making a fool of herself in front of the whole country, she's back for more. According to ABC News, she's appealing the jury verdict that ordered her to pay $100,000 for emotional damages and $260,000 for attorneys' fees. Additionally, Kim argues that the First Amendment — which protects the right to practice your religion — means she shouldn't face any consequences for denying those marriage licenses back in 2015. Furthermore, she wants the Supreme Court's Obergefell v. Hodges decision overturned and called it "egregiously wrong." In the fall, the Supreme Court justices will privately choose which cases to take on, and they'll review Kim's case at that time, per ABC News. That's already a lot, but the internet is really coming so hard for Kim because of her personal marital history. Naturally, people had a lot to say about all this: Note: The photo of Kim in the original tweet was replaced here due to photo rights. And finally: Note: The photo of Kim in the original tweet was replaced here due to photo rights. What do you think about all this? LMK in the comments below!
