Journey Mappers launches UAE Assist - an assistance app for travellers
As the UAE continues solidifying its position as a premier global travel destination, UAE Assist serves as a game-changer in responsible tourism, ensuring that every traveller receives instant support in moments of distress and when in need. The service is designed to provide 24/7 emergency assistance, real-time GPS tracking, and direct call support for incidents related to medical emergencies, theft, baggage loss, police support, emergency transit, and many more.
'We are delighted with this association with UAE Assist as this platform provides all support to the visitors visiting UAE, who have been one of the major factors for the economic growth of this country. We stand committed to providing the best service support,' said Sheikh Ahmed bin Faisal Al Qassimi.
Pioneering a new era in travel assistance
UAE Assist is a cutting-edge travel assistance platform, integrating technology with on-ground support to create a seamless experience for visitors. The mobile application will be available on Android and Apple Play Stores, offering an intuitive touch-button interface that will instantly connect travellers to verified support services. This initiative is designed to provide:
Round-the-clock emergency assistance: Immediate support for medical crises, lost belongings, legal issues, and other unforeseen incidents.
Seamless crisis management: Collaborations with local authorities ensure rapid response and resolution.
Real-time location tracking: Auto-activated GPS for precise assistance to travellers in need.
Trust and security: Verified and professional assistance to enhance the UAE's reputation as a safe and welcoming travel destination.
Reliable and authentic travel information: Authentic and verified information related to travel inquiries of travellers.
'At UAE Assist, we aim to set new benchmarks in travel assistance. Our partnership with Satguru Travels and the Royal office of Sheikh Ahmed bin Faisal Al Qassimi is a testament to our commitment to ensuring that every traveler can explore the UAE with confidence, knowing that help is just a touch away,' said Harish Khatri, founder and MD of India Assist and UAE Assist.
The launch of UAE Assist aligns with the vision of bolstering tourism safety and establishing the nation as a leader in tech-led hospitality services. The initiative aims to enhance traveler security, expand reach and accessibility, drive technological innovation, and boost economic growth. As a global leader in travel solutions, Satguru Travels brings its extensive network and expertise to UAE Assist, ensuring a seamless and efficient implementation of the service.
Anil Chandirani, Chairman and CEO of Satguru Travels commented: 'At Satguru Travels, we are committed to elevating the global travel experience through seamless and efficient implementation of the service. Our partnership with UAE Assist aligns perfectly with our mission to provide travellers with reliability, comfort, and peace of mind. Together, we are setting a new benchmark in responsible tourism by ensuring that every visitor to the UAE has access to real-time assistance whenever they need it.
With its patented technology and extensive operational expertise, UAE Assist will help position the UAE as a global role model for travel safety and assistance services. This initiative is set to inspire similar models worldwide, reinforcing the UAE's leadership in the tourism and travel security sector.
Dunston Pereira, CEO to the Royal Office of HH Sheikh Ahmed bin Faisal Al Qassimi added that in a technology-enabled era that we are all living in today, this platform will deliver the best services using AI and real data. Travelers will be able to spend their valuable time in this country without worrying about anything as UAE Assist is there for all assistance.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
16 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Google agrees $36 million fine for anti-competitive deals with Australia telcos
Google agreed on Monday (August 18) to pay a A$55 million ($35.8 million) fine in Australia after the consumer watchdog found it had hurt competition by paying the country's two largest telcos to pre-install its search application on Android phones, excluding rival search engines. The fine extends a bumpy period for the Alphabet-owned GOOGL.O internet giant in Australia, where last week a court mostly ruled against it in a lawsuit brought by Fortnite maker Epic Games accusing Google and Apple AAPL.O of preventing rival application stores in their operating systems. Google's YouTube was also last month added to an Australian ban on social media platforms admitting users aged under 16, reversing an earlier decision to exempt the video-sharing site. On anti-competitive tie-ups with Australian telcos, the country's consumer watchdog on Monday said Google struck deals with Telstra and Optus, under which the tech giant shared with them advertising revenue generated from Google Search on Android devices between late 2019 and early 2021. Google admitted the arrangement had a substantial impact on competition from rival search engines, and has stopped signing similar deals while also agreeing to the fine, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) added. "Today's outcome ... created the potential for millions of Australians to have greater search choice in the future, and for competing search providers to gain meaningful exposure to Australian consumers," ACCC Chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said. Google and the ACCC have jointly submitted to the Federal Court that Google should pay the A$55 million fine. The court must still decide if the penalty is appropriate, the ACCC said, but the cooperation between the regulator and Google has helped avoid lengthy litigation. A Google spokesperson said the company was pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns which involved "provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time". "We are committed to providing Android device makers more flexibility to pre-load browsers and search apps, while preserving the offerings and features that help them innovate, compete with Apple, and keep costs low," the spokesperson added. Google owns Android. A Telstra spokesperson referred Reuters to an earlier statement saying it and Optus, owned by Singapore Telecommunications had fully cooperated with the ACCC and promised not to sign agreements with Google to pre-install its search product since 2024.
Emirates 24/7
a day ago
- Emirates 24/7
THE GHOST OF NOKIA HAUNTS INTEL: CAN THE CHIP GIANT AVOID A SIMILAR FATE?
In a rapidly changing economic landscape, there is no room for stasis. Even technology giants are not immune to the harsh reality of change. Innovation is the only ticket to survival. But what happens when a behemoth like Intel stumbles? Is the company destined to repeat the tragic story of Nokia, the one-time king of mobile phones that collapsed almost overnight? At its peak, Nokia dominated the global mobile phone market, controlling half of it. However, its refusal to embrace the nascent Android operating system, its stubborn adherence to its own Symbian OS, and its later pivot to Windows Mobile revealed a pattern of inflexibility and a failure to adapt to fundamental market shifts. Between 2007 and 2013, Nokia lost almost everything. The company ignored the rise of touchscreen smartphones and underestimated the crucial role of third-party apps in attracting users. Despite being widely considered "too big to fail," Nokia's fall was spectacular. While the Nokia name still exists today through a limited number of Android-based devices, it has never recovered its former glory. It serves as a stark reminder that arrogance and stagnation can bring down any entity, no matter its size. Intel on a Perilous Path Intel's history is filled with success; for decades, it has been the bedrock of the processor industry. However, recent years have shown signs of decline. The company has suffered from a series of misguided technical decisions, such as the flawed Netburst architecture in its Pentium 4 processors, which was plagued by performance and overheating issues. This was followed by the failed Itanium project and the Larrabee graphics card initiative, which was shuttered before it ever saw the light of day. According to tech analyst Sydney Butler, Intel has not learned from its past failures. Instead, it has become overly cautious, trying to avoid mistakes by avoiding risk altogether. Butler considers this 'the greatest mistake' on its current trajectory. The Severest Blow Intel's failure to rapidly update its architectural structure led to Apple's strategic decision to develop its own ARM-based processors. With that move, Intel lost one of its most critical clients. Now, Intel faces the risk of losing its customers in the PC market as well. Microsoft has partnered with Qualcomm to produce ARM-based processors for laptops. If Qualcomm can improve its performance to rival Apple's chips, other PC manufacturers may abandon Intel. ARM processors are known for their lower power consumption and reduced heat generation, which minimizes the need for expensive cooling technologies. However, this transition would require extensive efforts from developers to re-engineer applications for the new architecture, moving away from the x86 architecture that Intel provides development kits for. Similarly, Windows itself would need to adopt Intel's new architectures as expected. A Leadership Crisis A new crisis has been added to Intel's woes: this time, a leadership one involving its new CEO, Lip-Bu Tan. In March, Tan took the helm, but he was soon accused of having ties to Chinese military-affiliated companies, a matter that has caused widespread concern among U.S. politicians. Republican Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board, alleging that Tan holds stakes in companies with Chinese military ties and accusing him of participating in a breach of U.S. export controls during his time leading Cadence Design Systems. This was followed by a direct call from President Donald Trump on his Truth Social platform for Tan's immediate dismissal. The company's stock subsequently dropped by 3% in a single day, despite a positive performance by other technology stocks. Is There Salvation? Between erratic technical decisions, a lack of innovation, client loss, and leadership crises, Intel stands at a critical crossroads. It must either reinvent itself and reclaim its leadership role in the processor sector or join Nokia in the ranks of fallen giants. The question is no longer whether Intel can fall, but whether it can survive the final blow. The tech world is unforgiving. It operates like a high-speed train, crushing anyone who fails to keep up. Will Intel manage to survive beneath its wheels?
Sharjah 24
5 days ago
- Sharjah 24
Perplexity AI offers Google $34.5 bn for Chrome browser
The whopping sum proposed in a letter of intent by Perplexity is nearly double the value of the startup, which was reportedly $18 billion in a recent funding round. "This proposal is designed to satisfy an antitrust remedy in highest public interest by placing Chrome with a capable, independent operator focused on continuity, openness, and consumer protection," Perplexity chief executive Aravind Srinivas said in the letter, a copy of which was seen by AFP. Google is awaiting US District Court Judge Amit Mehta's ruling on what "remedies" to impose, following a landmark decision last year that said the tech titan maintained an illegal monopoly in online search. US government attorneys have called for Google to divest itself of the Chrome browser, contending that artificial intelligence is poised to ramp up the tech giant's dominance as the go-to window into the internet. Google has urged Mehta to reject the divestment, and his decision is expected by the end of the month. Google did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Perplexity's offer vastly undervalues Chrome and "should not be taken seriously," Baird Equity Research analysts said in a note to investors. Given that Perplexity already has a browser that competes with Chrome, the San Francisco-based startup could be trying to spark others to bid or "influence the pending decision" in the antitrust case, Baird analysts theorized. "Either way, we believe Perplexity would view an independent Chrome -- or one no longer affiliated with Google -- as an advantage as it attempts to take browser share," Baird analysts told investors. Google contends that the United States has gone way beyond the scope of the suit by recommending a spinoff of Chrome, and holding open the option to force a sale of its Android mobile operating system. "Forcing the sale of Chrome or banning default agreements wouldn't foster competition," said Cato Institute senior fellow in technology policy Jennifer Huddleston. "It would hobble innovation, hurt smaller players, and leave users with worse products." Google attorney John Schmidtlein noted in court that more than 80 percent of Chrome users are outside the United States, meaning divestiture would have global ramifications. "Any divested Chrome would be a shadow of the current Chrome," he contended. "And once we are in that world, I don't see how you can say anybody is better off." The potential of Chrome being weakened or spun off comes as rivals such as Microsoft, ChatGPT and Perplexity put generative artificial intelligence (AI) to work fetching information from the internet in response to user queries. Google is among the tech companies investing heavily to be a leader in AI, and is weaving the technology into search and other online offerings.
