Families fear closure of Peterborough vulnerable adults hub
"I just can't understand why the council have picked on them," said Ms Haresign.
Julie Cyngier's 41-year-old son Richard has been working at the hub for the past seven years.She said he had been "crying every day" since hearing it could close."He attends four days a week. They do crafts, make bird tables [and] cheese boards to be sold for a small amount of money. It's a unique place," she said."I have never seen him so upset, ever. He can't imagine not being part of it."
'Far-reaching impact'
Hayley Janceski is Richard's sister and one of the campaigners calling for the hub to remain open.She said users and their families were "outraged" at the decision.Ms Janceski said: "We know there is no engaging service like this in the city... They [will lose] their community and then will start having changes in their behaviour."The impact is going to be far-reaching."
Stephen Taylor, executive director for adult services at Peterborough City Council, said: "A review with City College Peterborough's dedicated and skilled staff is now taking place to look at the Day Opportunities to see if it meets the needs of users, and if a different, more cost-effective model could be used that better reflects the modern world and our changing city."
Follow Peterborough news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
Dear Richard Madeley: My husband plundered our joint account for Oasis tickets
Dear Richard, I've just discovered that my husband dipped into our joint account, which we reserve for things such as household expenses and holidays, to the tune of nearly £1,000, to fund his place on a lads' weekend centred on a reunion concert of a certain 1990s northern rock band. He clearly had a brilliant time, which I don't begrudge him – he is still wearing the hat – but we're not in a position to pay much into this account, and most of it gets eaten up with mortgage and bills. It will mean that on the trip we have booked together in the autumn, we will need to be more frugal in terms of meals out and so on. I really wish he'd checked, or at least found some of the money from his account. But I don't want to have to be 'the sensible one'. Is there any point bringing this up now? – A, Clwyd Dear A, Let me get this straight. You have a joint account with your husband to pay for joint expenses – household bills, shared holidays, and so on. You both pay into it. You also both hold separate accounts to handle personal spending – bills that have nothing to do with the other person. Fine. So far, so normal. Millions of couples do much the same. Joint account: us. Personal account: me. Yet your husband – with absolutely no reference to you whatsoever – removes close on a grand from your joint account to pay for (come on, let's say it) his super-expensive Oasis reunion concert ticket, and all the associated jollies. From what you tell me in your letter, he doesn't even touch a penny of his 'own' money. And yet you ask me whether you should bring up this trifling matter with him?! Are you kidding, A? I don't think I can recall such a naked example of rank entitlement. He decides a precious cash fund intended exclusively for your joint benefit is, for some reason, now for only his, as and when he decides. Does he deign to share this sudden and remarkably convenient insight with you? No. He takes exactly what he wants from your joint account without a word. When he announced his plans, did you ask him how he was paying for it all? Obviously not. You trusted him. Clearly you assumed he'd dipped into his own bank account. You discovered the truth only after he had come home, wearing his precious bucket hat and reliving his precious memories. Well, I'm sorry, A, but this is unacceptable. If you allow him to get away with it, he'll do it again. Maybe next time it will be to see his football team play in a big fixture abroad, or perhaps he'll decide your joint savings are a suitable fund to pay for another special weekend away with the lads. Entitlement is a pernicious trait. Nail it, now. So yes, confront him, and don't feel guilty about taking the shine off his Oasis away-day. Ask him what the heck he was thinking of, spending a huge amount of your money on himself without asking first or even bothering to tell you afterwards. Insist he pays it back – every penny – from his own personal account. Sit behind him and watch over his shoulder as he makes the transfer on his phone. And tell him that if he ever does anything like this again, you won't roll with it. You won't even look back in anger. But there'll certainly be a supernova – and it won't be a champagne one.
Wales Online
8 hours ago
- Wales Online
250-year-old tree at centre of £70k legal battle in village
250-year-old tree at centre of £70k legal battle in village Richard and Melanie Gray were delivered a 'threatening' letter from their local church diocese Richard Gray pictured by the ancient sycamore tree in Warwickshire that he is trying to save (Image: SWNS) Residents beside a historic Cotswolds village church are confronting a £70,000 demand in a dispute with their diocese over a 250-year-old tree. Richard and Melanie Gray were stunned to receive a 'threatening' correspondence alleging their Sycamore tree had caused harm to the adjacent vicarage. The couple is now involved in a continuing disagreement over proposals to remove the landmark—recognised as the Four Shire Tree—in charming Lower Brailes, Warks. The Grays' property adjoins the Grade I-listed St George's Church in the verdant village and the tree stands 15 metres (49ft) from both their home and the vicarage. Their residence, which originates from the 1700s, served as the original vicarage before the church split the land to construct a new one and sold the former building, reports the Mirror. Mr Gray explained the magnificent tree had actually been promoted as an attractive feature for prospective purchasers when the couple acquired The Old Parsonage in 1982. However, the Diocese of Coventry is now insisting the tree be removed or a £70,000 root barrier constructed. Legal representatives acting for the 12th century church's insurers indicate it will attempt to recover the staggering sum from the pair, leaving them appalled. Grandfather-of-six Mr Gray, 76, a retired inventor, remarked: "The irony is unbelievable. Here's an organisation which is supposed to have pastoral care and love thy neighbour, and then they say take this tree down or we'll charge you £70,000. The sycamore has provoked a stand-off between the diocese that still owns the newer property and the owners of its near neighbour Article continues below "To have a threatening letter sent out of the blue by the church doesn't seem to fit into their Christian ethos for me when they are a spiritual organisation supposedly looking out for the local community. And then there's the environmental impact too, the tree is 250-years-old and a citadel of invertebrates, insects and animals. "It doesn't seem to fit with the church philosophy of 'All things bright and beautiful, all creatures great and small' if they are going to destroy a historic tree. There's been no knock at the door or anyone coming around to talk about this. "I think they've arranged one of the biggest solicitors in the country to act on their behalf, too. The vicar hasn't shown his face and is yet to say anything. I think they should adopt a positive attitude towards trees and their benefit to parishioners and do their utmost to save trees, not kill them. A row has broken out over this landmark tree in Warwickshire "So here we are locking horns with an organisation that's supposed to have the pastoral care of the community in their hands and its doing exactly the opposite. We're not going to pay and we're not going to take it down and the church are still threatening to send us this rather large bill." The Diocese of Coventry decided to divide the plot in the early 1980s to create space for the new-build vicarage. It sold the original home and its remaining garden into private ownership, and the pair, who separated but remain close friends, were the second people to privately own it. However, the diocese now alleges that the tree's roots have led to subsidence and is insisting it be felled—or they will put in a root barrier costing £69,768.88, plus VAT. Yet, in a separate report from January 2023, Mr Gray states that engineers working for the diocese did not blame the tree, instead attributing the subsidence to hot weather. At stake is a sycamore that is believed to have stood for 250 years in Lower Brailes Mr Gray said: "Their own engineers initial report said this large tree was not the cause, and that it was likely the hot weather. I said the report said it wasn't the tree, but they haven't acknowledged this fact. I've done a bit of research and it's a moderate risk tree, so it's not a high risk tree. "Sycamores reach their maximum mass after 100 years. So when they built the parsonage in their own garden it was already 100 years into its maturity and getting slightly smaller." The newly affected vicarage also experienced a burst mains pipe, which flooded the property with 13,000 gallons of water daily for three days. Mr Gray suggests that the damage maps are all focused around the water tank - and that it's the probable cause rather than the tree. He said: "The damage was right underneath the water tank and my friends in the church have pointed out that most of the damage is inside the new vicarage. And if you look at their engineers drawings it shows nothing on the outside which could have possibly been caused by this tree. "The old Reverend, Rev Morgan, noted that there were no cracks or major damage. The only place in the house that has cracks was on a wall the furthest away from the tree. They owned the tree when they built the new vicarage there. They sold it as part of the property, and even featured it as a benefit. "Our house has been there for 200-odd years and it has no damage at all. It's a stable part of a stable environment. All the walls cracked are the ones right underneath where the water tank had burst - 13,000 gallons a day for three days is significant. They want us to pay the cost of the repairs essentially. There's nobody living in it. It's been relatively unoccupied since 2016. "The garden is like a jungle, doors have gone rotten. It's neglected, a bit like they are now neglecting the community. There's talk of them selling it, so if they are also putting profit first that isn't very Christian-like either." The tree takes its name from the neighbouring Four Shire stone, which marks the boundaries of the four Cotswolds counties: Oxfordshire, Warwickshire, Worcestershire, and Gloucestershire. The church is recognised locally as the "Cathedral of the Feldon" due to being amongst the largest and "most beautiful" in Warwickshire. Mr Gray said: "The tree is unusual in that it has four trunks. It was in the centre of the vicarage garden. The tree was central to the fate celebrations, just up the road is the Four Shire stone. "It has a bit of an identity and it's a magnificent tree. I'll probably be dead before anything is enforced in law, I'm 76. But I care about the tree. Its absolutely splendid. hey'll need a court order, they can't just enforce this." Article continues below A spokesperson for Clyde and Co said: "We are confident that our work has been carried out professionally and fairly at all times."
Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Village neighbours face £70k bill in row over 250-year-old tree
The residents are embroiled in an ongoing dispute over plans to fell the landmark Neighbours of a historic Cotswolds village church face a £70,000 bill in a row with their diocese over a 250-year-old tree. Richard and Melanie Gray were shocked to receive a 'threatening' letter claiming their Sycamore tree had damaged the nearby vicarage. The pair are now embroiled in an ongoing dispute over plans to fell the landmark—known as the Four Shire Tree—in picturesque Lower Brailes, Warks. The Gray's land borders the Grade I -listed St George's Church in the leafy village and the tree is 15 metres (49ft) from both their property and the vicarage. Their home, which dates back to the 1700s, was the original vicarage before the church divided the land to build a new one and sold the old building. Mr Gray said the grand tree had even been billed as a selling point for potential buyers when the couple bought The Old Parsonage in 1982. But now the Diocese of Coventry is demanding the tree be chopped down or a £70,000 root barrier installed. Legal agents working for the 12th century church's insurers say it will seek to reclaim the eye-watering amount from the pair, leaving them disgusted. Grandfather-of-six Mr Gray, 76, a retired inventor, said: "The irony is unbelievable. Here's an organisation which is supposed to have pastoral care and love thy neighbour, and then they say take this tree down or we'll charge you £70,000. "To have a threatening letter sent out of the blue by the church doesn't seem to fit into their Christian ethos for me when they are a spiritual organisation supposedly looking out for the local community. And then there's the environmental impact too, the tree is 250-years-old and a citadel of invertebrates, insects and animals. "It doesn't seem to fit with the church philosophy of 'All things bright and beautiful, all creatures great and small' if they are going to destroy a historic tree. There's been no knock at the door or anyone coming around to talk about this. "I think they've arranged one of the biggest solicitors in the country to act on their behalf, too. The vicar hasn't shown his face and is yet to say anything. I think they should adopt a positive attitude towards trees and their benefit to parishioners and do their utmost to save trees, not kill them. "So here we are locking horns with an organisation that's supposed to have the pastoral care of the community in their hands and its doing exactly the opposite. We're not going to pay and we're not going to take it down and the church are still threatening to send us this rather large bill." The Diocese of Coventry decided to divide the plot in the early 1980s to create space for the new-build vicarage. It sold the original home and its remaining garden into private ownership, and the pair, who separated but remain close friends, were the second people to privately own it. But now the diocese claims the tree's roots have caused subsidence and are demanding it be chopped down – or it will install a root barrier costing £69,768.88, plus VAT. But in a separate report from January 2023, Mr Gray says engineers working for the diocese deemed the tree to not be at fault - blaming hot weather for the subsidence. Mr Gray added: 'Their own engineers initial report said this large tree was not the cause, and that it was likely the hot weather. I said the report said it wasn't the tree, but they haven't acknowledged this fact. I've done a bit of research and it's a moderate risk tree, so it's not a high risk tree. "Sycamores reach their maximum mass after 100 years. So when they built the parsonage in their own garden it was already 100 years into its maturity and getting slightly smaller." The affected new vicarage also suffered a burst mains pipe, which flooded the property with 13,000 gallons of water daily for three days. Mr Gray says the damage maps are all centred around the water tank - and that it's the likely culprit instead of the tree. He said: "The damage was right underneath the water tank and my friends in the church have pointed out that most of the damage is inside the new vicarage. And if you look at their engineers drawings it shows nothing on the outside which could have possibly been caused by this tree. 'The old Reverend, Rev Morgan, noted that there were no cracks or major damage. The only place in the house that has cracks was on a wall the furthest away from the tree. They owned the tree when they built the new vicarage there. They sold it as part of the property, and even featured it as a benefit. 'Our house has been there for 200-odd years and it has no damage at all. It's a stable part of a stable environment. All the walls cracked are the ones right underneath where the water tank had burst - 13,000 gallons a day for three days is significant. They want us to pay the cost of the repairs essentially. There's nobody living in it. It's been relatively unoccupied since 2016. "The garden is like a jungle, doors have gone rotten. It's neglected, a bit like they are now neglecting the community. There's talk of them selling it, so if they are also putting profit first that isn't very Christian-like either." The tree is named after the nearby Four Shire stone, which signifies the borders of the four Cotswolds counties: Oxfordshire, Warwickshire, Worcestershire, and Gloucestershire. The church itself is known locally as the "Cathedral of the Feldon" as one of the biggest and "most beautiful" in the county of Warwickshire. Mr Gray added: 'The tree is unusual in that it has four trunks. It was in the centre of the vicarage garden. The tree was central to the fate celebrations, just up the road is the Four Shire stone. It has a bit of an identity and it's a magnificent tree. I'll probably be dead before anything is enforced in law, I'm 76. But I care about the tree. Its absolutely splendid. hey'll need a court order, they can't just enforce this.' A Clyde and Co spokesperson said: 'We are confident that our work has been carried out professionally and fairly at all times.'
