Trump ‘very aware, supportive' of Aukus, says Pete Hegseth as Australia pays down $800m on submarine deal
The US defense secretary, Pete Hegseth, said Donald Trump supports the Aukus nuclear submarine deal, after Australia on Friday confirmed its first $800m (US$500m) payment under the defence pact.
'The president is very aware, supportive of Aukus, recognises the importance of the defence industrial base,' Hegseth said in opening remarks at a meeting in Washington with the Australian defence minister, Richard Marles, according to a transcript.
Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email
Under Aukus, Australia will pay the US $4.78bn to boost the capacity of the US submarine industry, and Washington will sell several Virginia-class nuclear-powered submarines to Australia in the early 2030s, while Britain and Australia will later build a new Aukus-class submarine.
Australia transferred the first $800m payment after a call between Marles and Hegseth on 29 January, Marles said on Friday.
When asked at the meeting with Marles if the US would deliver the nuclear submarines to Australia on time, Hegseth said: 'We sure hope so.
'Part of what president Trump is committed to doing is cutting red tape, investing in the defence industrial base, ensuring that we stand by our allies and partners,' he said.
Marles said Australia was 'pleased with the progress that we're seeing in terms of the rate of production, both in terms of construction and sustainment,' referring to the Virginia-class submarines.
Marles is the first foreign counterpart hosted by Hegseth since his confirmation in the role. The pair is expected to discuss security in the Indo-Pacific region and the growing US military presence in Australia in addition to talks on Aukus.
Formed in 2021, Aukus is aimed at addressing shared worries about China's growing power and is designed to allow Australia to acquire the nuclear-powered attack submarines and other advanced weapons, such as hypersonic missiles.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Democrats have a dirty secret - they actually like some of the tax cuts in Trump's ‘big beautiful bill'
Some of the sweeping tax cuts proposed in President Donald Trump 's massive spending package have found support among Democrats — even as they are expected to oppose the legislation over proposed cuts to Medicaid and other government services when it comes up for debate in the Senate later this month, according to a new report. The gargantuan budget package, which House Republicans and the White House have dubbed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, passed the House by a single vote last month and is now drawing heat from fiscal hawks in both chambers as well as Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was fresh off his months-long stint as a special government employee when he began threatening to back challengers to any legislator who votes for the bill. Still, there are facets of the proposal that have appeal for some Democrats, the New York Times reports. Virginia Rep. Don Beyer, a Democrat who is also a wealthy car dealership owner, told the Times his party is 'in general very much in favor of reducing taxes on working people and the working poor' when asked about Trump's plan to end taxes on service workers' tips. 'Those people are living on tips,' he added. Trump's tip tax cut plan has also attracted attention from Sen. Jacky Rosen of Nevada, a state where service workers make up a large and powerful voting bloc that has traditionally supported Democrats but shifted to Trump in large numbers during the 2024 presidential election, handing him the Silver State's electoral votes. Rosen, a Democrat, took to the Senate floor last month to advance a bill approving Trump's 'no tax on tips' plan. It passed unanimously even though the measure was largely symbolic because the U.S. constitution requires tax laws to originate in the House 'I am not afraid to embrace a good idea, wherever it comes from,'. she said at the time in remarks on the Senate floor. Yet despite the support for some of the individual tax provisions in the plan, it's highly unlikely that it will be able to muster enough if any Democrats to ease the way to Trump's desk, even under a Senate procedure known as budget reconciliation, which fast-tracks some types of spending legislation without subjecting it to the upper chamber's de facto 60-vote threshold for passage. Democrats are expected to unanimously vote against the legislation in the upper chamber, where it has also attracted opposition from some Republicans who've complained that the cuts to spending in the package don't go far enough to offset the reduced revenue caused by provisions meant to enact Trump campaign promises to end taxes on tips for service workers, as well as taxes on overtime pay for hourly workers and on social security benefits for seniors. Nonpartisan experts such as those at the Congressional Budget Office have warned that the reduced tax receipts would blow a massive hole in the federal budget and jeopardize America's long-term fiscal outlook, but that hasn't stopped some prominent Democrats from getting behind the individuals tax cuts. Trump and his allies hope the prominent tax cut proposals will blunt Democrats' efforts to paint the One Big Beautiful Bill Act as a giveaway to wealthy GOP donors that will gut government services while only providing limited relief for working-class voters. To that end, the president and others in his camp have routinely taken to social media to argue that anyone who votes against the bill is effectively voting for tax increases because the legislation makes permanent a number of temporary tax cuts enacted in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which Trump signed into law during his first term. Democrats, meanwhile, remain opposed to the bill's massive cuts to Medicare and other measures that make it harder for people to claim tax credits meant to boost lower-income Americans' bottom lines. Rep. Brad Schneider, an Illnois Democrat, told the Times that the whole bill had to be considered rather than any individual provision or provisiosn. 'Any one thing — a tax credit or a tax cut — might make sense, but you've got to take a look at the whole picture,' he said.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Should young Australians be worried about Labor's superannuation tax changes?
As debate rages over the Labor government's tax changes for large superannuation accounts, some young workers have asked their financial advisers whether they will be caught by the reforms. Advisers have told Guardian Australia that some young workers have even questioned whether they should stop making additional contributions. Experts say it's unlikely that younger Australians will get caught by the changes, with older, high-income earners the most exposed to the reforms. Here's what young Australians need to know about the changes. Most workers are legally entitled to be paid a guaranteed 11.5% of their wages into their superannuation fund, or 12% from July this year. The government levies a tax of 15% on the earnings on super balances of workers yet to retire and of retirees with more than $2m. Labor has proposed to lift that 15% tax to 30%, but only for the earnings from the portion of the balances over $3m. Earnings on the first $3m in an account would still be taxed at 15%. The tax would be levied each year. You can read a broader breakdown here. Economists expect most young people currently working will not hit $3m balances, though higher-income earners will have a higher chance at getting there. By the 2050s, when millennials will be looking at retirement and gen Z and Alpha will dominate the workforce, one in 10 people will have $3m balances, Treasury and Grattan Institute modelling shows. That could rise to three or four in every 10 people in the 2060s according to Diana Mousina, an AMP economist. But she says it is unlikely that 'half of gen Z' will reach $3m in super balances, contrary to some media reporting of her analysis. Mousina's modelling shows a worker earning more than $90,000 a year who works for 40 years consecutively with a 3% pay rise every year would probably achieve a $3m balance. This means a worker in their 20s who reaches $90,000 or over soon, then maintains it for the rest of their working life, could one day be affected. Workers on lower incomes who made no extra contributions and took time off work, for example to have a child, would be unlikely to reach $3m, according to Harry Chemay, a superannuation and wealth management consultant. The Financial Services Council, meanwhile, expects about 500,000 people of 14.6 million currently employed would earn enough to see their top-range tax breaks reduced slightly under the new proposal. While the reform would increase tax rates on big balances, superannuation would still be an effective way for high-income earners to reduce the tax they pay. The average superannuation balance in mid-2022 was $164,000, so most Australians are nowhere near balances over $3m. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The proposed 30% tax rate is still lower than the top income tax rate of 45%, meaning superannuation contributions would continue to offer a tax break for well-paid workers. Public debate over the tax illuminated how lightly superannuation is taxed, according to Jonathan Philpot, a wealth management partner at accounting firm HLB Mann Judd in Sydney. 'It actually highlights that super actually has much lower tax rates than virtually any other structure you can have in your retirement years,' he says. 'I wouldn't want people changing their super plans.' Experts believe it is likely the threshold for the new tax would be lifted above $3m at some point in the future, so some young people who hit the $3m figure may not end up paying extra. Mousina is among those who agree the $3m benchmark for the new extra rate will probably rise but she suggests the increase could be baked into the new laws for the tax, which need the Greens' support to pass. 'We should think about indexing it, rather than just having no legislation around when it's going to cap out,' she says. The lack of assurance on whether the tax threshold will be lifted above $3m has attracted some media outcry, despite expert consensus that the figure would have to rise. Debate has also focused on the proposal to tax a type of investment return called unrealised gains, which would see high earners pay tax on a rise in value of some assets on paper while leaving them unable to get that money back if the asset value falls in the future. Most super accounts would have limited exposure to unrealised gains, according to Chemay. Australians with self-managed super funds are more likely to struggle with this type of investment. However, self-managed super funds only make up about 1 million of the 20 million or so super savers – and just 15% of them are under the age of 45. For perspective, four million Australians have more than one super account. The government in 2018 estimated the resulting extra fees would leave the average worker about $50,000 worse off by the time they retired.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Australia regulator trials faster IPO process as listings hit decade low
SYDNEY, June 10 (Reuters) - Australia's securities regulator said on Tuesday it would trial changes to speed up initial public offerings that are at a decade low by implementing recommendations from earlier reviews and allowing faster access for retail investors. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said the changes could shave as much as one week off the typical 20-week IPO process and reduce deal execution risk. The trial will begin on Tuesday and last for two years, the regulator said. "Creating a more streamlined IPO process underscores our commitment to ensuring our public markets remain attractive to companies and investors," ASIC Chairman Joe Longo said in a statement. Longo said the funds raised through IPOs were at the lowest level in more than a decade, with only A$4.2 billion ($2.74 billion) raised last year compared to A$22.9 billion in 2014. ASIC's new measures come just days after Virgin Australia ( opens new tab launched a closely watched A$685 million IPO that attracted strong investor demand. ASIC said the changes applied to companies seeking to list on the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) ( opens new tab through "fast-track" status, with a projected market capitalisation above A$100 million and no ASX-imposed escrow. Most Australian IPOs are carried out through a front-end book-building process, which means the price is set and investor bids are taken ahead of the prospectus being reviewed and approved by Australian regulators. ASIC and the ASX have been under pressure to speed up the IPO vetting process, to reduce the time investors are exposed to market fluctuations while a prospectus is under review. Under the planned changes, companies would be able to submit a confidential prospectus or product disclosure statement at least 14 days before formal lodgement for ASIC review. ASIC said it would also adopt a "no action" position allowing eligible companies to begin accepting retail investor applications during the standard seven-day exposure period. Typically, retail investor orders are taken after the prospectus becomes public following the regulator's reviews. The trial was also a part of a broader review of regulatory settings around IPOs, ASIC said. "While we do not see regulatory settings as the silver bullet, we have received lots of ideas and are considering further regulatory adjustments to support a strong and well-functioning market," Longo said. ($1 = 1.5354 Australian dollars)
