Snoop Dogg slams Trump inauguration haters, tells them ‘get your life right'
Rapper Snoop Dogg is unphased by those who criticized his pre-inauguration performance as he shows his support for President Donald Trump.
Earlier this week, the "Gin and Juice" rapper shared a video of himself as he gave a blunt response to the backlash.
Snoop, 53, was listening to gospel music as he appeared to be smoking marijuana in a car.
"It's Sunday, I got gospel in my heart," he said in the video clip posted on Instagram. "For all the hate I'm going to answer with love, I love too much."
"Get your life right, stop worrying about mine. I'm cool. I'm together. Still a Black man. Still 100% Black. All out 'til you ball out or 'til you fall out."
"The Next Episode" rapper additionally spoke out about how he has previously dealt with negative responses on the heels of his pre-inauguration performance.
"For all the hate I'm going to answer with love, I love too much. Get your life right, stop worrying about mine. I'm cool. I'm together. Still a Black man. Still 100% Black."
"You 'gon deal with hate when you get to the top, no matter who you are… Me, personally, I answer it with success and love. That's my answer to any hate and negativity that comes my way, 'cause it's the strongest force that can beat it," he shared on the "R&B Money Podcast," Saturday.
Snoop's comments came after he performed at the Crypto Ball as he hyped up Trump supporters and sent a positive and inspirational message through music.
Snoop performed at the event and played fan favorites from Journey's "Don't Stop Believin'" to Bob Marley's "Three Little Birds (Don't Worry About a Thing)." He also performed a few of his own hits, including, "Drop It Like It's Hot."
Other high-profiled guests who attended the Crypto Ball included rapper Rick Ross and UFC star Colby Covington, who both posted about hanging with Snoop.
"Nuthin' but a 'G' Thang," Covington shared on X.
The "Young, Wild and Free" rapper performed after he recently changed his tune about President Trump.
Years after Snoop appeared on "The Apprentice" in 2007, he called Trump a clown and mocked him in a music video. In his video for his song "Lavender" in 2017, Snoop depicted Trump as a clown and shot the president in the head.
Snoop also delivered laughs during a Trump roast in 2011.
In 2020, during an appearance on Big Boy's radio show, Snoop argued Trump should not be in office at the time.
"I ain't never voted a day in my life, but this year I think I'm going to get out and vote because I can't stand to see this punk in office one more year," the rapper said on "Big Boy's Neighborhood on Real 92.3."
The 53-year-old rapper explained he did not believe he was allowed to vote at the time due to his criminal record. Snoop was convicted of felonies in 1990 and 2007.
However, after a long history of condemning the president and his supporters, Snoop praised Trump in January 2024.
"Donald Trump? … He ain't done nothing wrong to me. He has done only great things for me. He pardoned Michael Harris," Snoop told The Sunday Times.
"So, I have nothing but love and respect for Donald Trump."
Michael "Harry-O" Harris, an associate of Death Row Records co-founder Suge Knight and the founder of the label's parent company, Godfather Entertainment, was pardoned in 2021 as one of Trump's final decisions before leaving office. Snoop Dogg was famously signed by the label only to leave later in his career. Snoop acquired Death Row Records in 2022.
Harris was imprisoned on charges of conspiracy and attempted murder for over three decades. Snoop Dogg praised Trump at the time for his commutation of Harris.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dana White: 'Jon Jones was offered the deal and accepted the deal' to fight Tom Aspinall
There may be some hope left after all in never-ending saga between UFC heavyweight champions Jon Jones and Tom Aspinall. The MMA community at large has seemingly grown tired of the lengthy wait for Jones and Aspinall to have their long-awaited title unification clash, so much so that a online petition to strip Jones of his UFC heavyweight title has been created and signed by nearly 200,000 people, just to finally move on from the teased bout. Advertisement To make matters more frustrating, Jones has continued to troll the situation relentlessly on social media over recent weeks. But speaking Saturday following UFC 316 in Newark, New Jersey, UFC CEO Dana White indicated that he remains hopeful for the current heavyweight situation to work itself out. 'I've been saying [the Aspinall fight will happen] since the beginning, and Jon Jones agreed to do the fight [against Aspinall]," White said. "Jon Jones was offered the deal and accepted the deal. "Unless you hear it come from [my mouth] or we put out a press release, don't believe any of this bulls***. Unless we come out and say something, it's all bulls***. ... But yes, Jon agreed to fight Tom, fact.' Advertisement Jones' absence is becoming so prolonged that he's is closing in on making bizarre history as the longest reigning UFC heavyweight champion of all time, despite only defending the title once since winning it against Ciryl Gane in March 2023. Among his latest social media posts have been comments about not caring if he's stripped of the title and criticizing interim titlist Aspinall. Jones, 37, has even gone so far as to suggest he's more interested in a previously failed fight with PFL's Francis Ngannou than Aspinall. White admitted to having been forwarded the aforementioned petition to strip Jones of the belt by "every human on Earth," but hasn't kept up with Jones' latest ventings. "F***ing crazy," White reacted. "I've been busy, I haven't been keeping up with the gossip. [Jones] comes back either today or came back yesterday — he was in Thailand, so he's home [now]. We'll be home tonight, and Tuesday, we'll figure this out. Tom Aspinall's the guy. Advertisement "Listen, if the guy wants to retire and doesn't want to fight, [there's] nothing you can do. I didn't want Khabib (Nurmagomedov) to retire. I thought [Daniel Cormier] should have stuck around longer. It's none of my business. I'll do what I can to make the fight if we can. If he's talking that crazy s***, I didn't realize that." Regarding Ngannou, that's a door White has seemingly slammed shut in the years since Ngannou departed the UFC as its heavyweight champion in 2023. The UFC boss remains unreceptive to even entertaining the concept of Jones vs. Ngannou, stating that it's England's finest or no one at all for Jones. "It's Aspinall's fight. We've been talking to this kid forever about it," White said. "You can't make people fight. If Jon doesn't want to fight, we can't make him fight. We can try to make him fight. We can throw things at him that inspire him to want to fight. But we'll figure it out.'
Hypebeast
20 minutes ago
- Hypebeast
The Trilogy Tapes Returns With More Abstract Summer Statements
London-based labelThe Trilogy Tapesis heralded for its avant-garde graphic streetwear statements, and for Summer 2025, the brand is leaning into its cult's favorites with a suite of abstract sweaters, tops, trousers, and more. Key pieces in the collection include the Overdye Crew in 'Grey/Blue,' which boasts an aqua glow around the perimeter of its oversized silhouette, and the TTT Cross Head T-shirt, which dons enlarged iterations of the brand's artistic emblems in black and red hues. Elsewhere, glow-in-the-dark shirts appear next to tops with all sorts of geometric patterns, and a series of shorts feature the same Cross Head design all over the body. Accessories include packable ripstop couriers, heart-shaped logo totes, TTT bucket hats, six-panel trail caps, 'Pain' trucker hats, 'Come Down' socks, and more logomanic items. Notably, the line arrives alongside a kaleidoscopic video campaign directed by Studio Info, which you can watch on Instagram below. The Trilogy Tapes' Summer 2025 collection is now available to shop on the label's brand newwebsiteand at Palace brick-and-mortar locations, with prices ranging from £17 GBP to £166 GBP. Take a look at the lineup in the gallery above.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why do concert tickets cost so much these days? And is it all Ticketmaster's fault?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Concert ticket prices have risen sharply in recent years. Arena gig tickets have more than doubled, in real terms, since the turn of the century. For the biggest artists, increases have been bigger still. A basic standing ticket to see Oasis at Wembley Stadium on their last tour, in 2009, cost £44 (around £70 adjusted for inflation). The official price, when tickets for the Wembley gig in July went on sale, was £151. The average ticket for Taylor Swift's Eras tour in the UK was £206. This has become a political issue, and at the centre of the debate is the role of the world's largest ticket sales company, Ticketmaster, responsible for both these tours. The UK competition regulator launched an investigation into its sale of Oasis tickets, in particular into the use of "dynamic pricing". In March, President Trump signed an executive order promising "to bring common-sense reforms" to ticket sellers in America's live entertainment industry. If not a monopoly player, it's a near-monopoly, controlling more than 75% of concert ticket sales at major venues in the US, and about 60% in the UK. In 2010 it merged with the world's largest live events company, Live Nation, which controls more than 265 concert venues in the US; and owns or part-owns the Academy Music Group chain of venues, and festivals from Reading to Latitude, in the UK. Live Nation, now Ticketmaster's parent company, is also a major promoter (organising, funding and publicising music events), which promoted 54,000 events last year. It manages artists, too; and it's a big player in advertising and sponsorship, event parking, food and drink sales, merchandise and security. The US Department of Justice describes it as a "live entertainment ecosystem"; Liam Byrne MP, chair of the Commons Business Committee, says it has "more arms than an octopus". Live Nation "has faced allegations of predatory pricing, misleading fees, restrictive contracts, technical blunders, suppressing or colluding with competitors and generally abusing its monopolistic power", said Dorian Lynskey in The Guardian. Fans struggle to get tickets for big events, often facing technical problems, and long online queues; its app is notoriously awful and glitchy. Pricing is opaque. Which? has complained about the "drip pricing" of extra fees – on a £45 ticket, you might get a £6.10 service charge, a £1.75 facility charge, and a £2.75 order processing fee – making it hard to estimate the final price. As a result, Ticketmaster is very unpopular among fans. The country musician Zach Bryan released a live album called "All My Homies Hate Ticketmaster". A poll for More in Common found that 58% of Britons would like to see it nationalised. Michael Rapino, chief executive of Live Nation, claims that big concerts are still "massively underpriced". He may have a point. Demand is often high, and supply is limited. An estimated ten million fans wanted tickets for Oasis, so they could have been priced much higher, and still sold out. A live concert is a special experience; people, even on modest incomes, will pay large sums to see acts they love. And many forces have contributed to price rises. The internet has reduced music sales, so artists now depend on concert fees for nearly all of their income; big artists insist on a high proportion of the revenue from ticket sales. Shows have become more spectacular and expensive to stage. Inflation has been high, and VAT is 20%. The ticket price is shared between, in rough order: artist (including crew, transport etc.), venue, VAT, promoter and ticket seller. Ticketmaster – or a rival such as AEG – might pick up 10% of the total price. Live Nation says its ticket profit margins are less than 2%. Finally, "scalping" can also drive up prices. In the early 2000s, sites such as StubHub launched as legitimate platforms for fans to resell unwanted tickets. But many have been exploited by touts, who buy large numbers of tickets to resell at inflated prices. The problem has been made worse by scalper "bots", which bombard ticketing sites with purchases destined for resale. Such bots are illegal in the UK, but are hard to police. No. Last May, the US Justice Department filed an anti-monopoly suit against Live Nation; the then assistant attorney general, Doha Mekki, claimed that Ticketmaster is rife with "abuse, exploitation and self-dealing". The case is ongoing; it has been reported that it may try to break up the company. The UK Competition and Markets Authority found that Ticketmaster and Live Nation may have breached consumer laws by selling Oasis tickets at almost 2.5 times the standard price, without explaining that they came with no additional benefits, and by demanding a higher price than initially quoted after a lengthy queuing process. Many artists – Bruce Springsteen, Taylor Swift, Neil Young – have complained publicly about Ticketmaster. As far back as the 1990s, the US rock band Pearl Jam tried to organise a tour without using the company, but concluded that it was nearly impossible. There are, though, things that artists with substantial followings can do. They can reject dynamic pricing, as Coldplay and Neil Young have done. Or they can go further, like The Cure's Robert Smith. On The Cure's last tour, not only was dynamic pricing rejected, but tickets were priced at as little as £16, and resale was prohibited. Arguably, says Dorian Lynksey, Smith "made things awkward for artists by proving that they set the prices and dictate the conditions" – though they are happy for Ticketmaster to take the blame.
