Rafizi backs PKR disciplinary board's fair campaign call, warns against selective enforcement
Rafizi, who is also the Economy Minister, said the board's guidelines are capable of promoting healthy competition within the party, but they must be implemented consistently.
"If people recall the personal attacks against me, they happened suddenly, with statement after statement being issued, including claims of rejection by the grassroots.
"Later, statements emerged accusing me of neglecting the grassroots. These are baseless allegations, and the PKR disciplinary board must take action against all parties responsible for creating this situation.
"In addition, I have also been targeted by irresponsible groups on social media, which should not occur.
"However, I view this as part of the challenges during the campaign period," he said at a press conference after the Hidupkan Idealisme Reformasi dalam Ujian Kuasa (HIRUK) tour programme at the state National Department for Culture and Arts (JKKN) Complex in Tanjong Chat last night.
Also present were PKR vice-president Nik Nazmi Nik Ahmad and Negri Sembilan Menteri Besar and PKR vice-president Datuk Seri Aminuddin Harun.
Rafizi expressed his hope that his opponents would not "throw stones and hide their hands" by attacking him and then reporting him to the disciplinary board when he responds, as if they had done nothing wrong.
"The process is straightforward. If anyone feels that a candidate has violated party protocols, they can lodge a complaint, and the disciplinary board can then conduct a fair investigation.
"As for me, if there is a desire to debate and determine who is better, I will highlight my opponent's weaknesses, and you can do the same. I don't go around making complaints or reports," he said.
Previously, the media reported that the PKR disciplinary board had reminded all candidates and their supporters not to tarnish the party's image and to refrain from personal attacks and baseless accusations during the final stage of the party elections.
Its chairperson, Datin Paduka Dr Tan Yee Kew, said candidates should instead focus their campaigns on policy discussions and ideas.
She said actions involving personal attacks, open conflict, and making derogatory public statements against party members are inappropriate, unacceptable, and would only harm party unity.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
15 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
7 PKR MPs urge govt to delay Urban Renewal Bill
Ampang MP Rodziah Ismail speaking at a press conference in Parliament, joined by fellow PKR MPs Wong Chen (left) and Tan Kar Hing. PETALING JAYA : Seven PKR MPs have called for the second reading of the Urban Renewal Bill in the Dewan Rakyat to be postponed due to concerns over the consent threshold under the proposed law. Ampang MP Rodziah Ismail led the MPs in calling for the bill to be reviewed and only tabled when the Dewan Rakyat convenes in October, Berita Harian reported. She expressed fears that the bill in its current form would be a 'major political mistake', affecting support for the unity government among urban voters residing in public housing. 'We support the principles of this bill but with a fairer consent threshold for the redevelopment of old homes,' she said, after the bill was tabled for its first reading in the Dewan Rakyat today. Rodziah had read out a statement, co-signed by Subang MP Wong Chen, Gopeng MP Tan Kar Hing, Wangsa Maju MP Zahir Hassan, Ledang MP Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh, Balik Pulau MP Bakhtiar Wan Chik and Petaling Jaya MP Lee Chean Chung. Rodziah said the bill should not be modelled after the likes of Hong Kong and Singapore as Malaysia had far more land at its disposal, necessitating a higher consent threshold of 85-90% to be set. 'This is to protect the rights of homeowners and also those renting public housing. 'We should not support this 75% threshold,' she added. The bill's second and third readings are scheduled for next Wednesday. The proposed Urban Renewal Act seeks to replace outdated legislation and regulations governing the redevelopment of dilapidated urban areas. However, critics have pointed to the lowered consent threshold, saying it may undermine the rights of residents in the minority by forcing them to comply with the majority of residents who wish to have their areas redeveloped. The government, on the other hand, has repeatedly said that residents' rights would remain safeguarded through fair compensation and protective measures.
Free Malaysia Today
18 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Can Muhyiddin-led coalition win GE16, asks Rafizi
Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli said it was difficult to determine whether the coalition would succeed in rallying enough public support to win GE16. PETALING JAYA : Former PKR deputy president Rafizi Ramli says the real test of the loose coalition recently announced by Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin is whether it can win the next general election (GE16) and form the government. In a post on X, the Pandan MP said the parties would have to agree on a prime ministerial candidate and Cabinet members, as well as the distribution of positions and key appointments among themselves, if they won enough seats at GE16. However, he noted that there was little ideological similarity holding the parties together. He also said they had a history of attacking one another. 'Governments formed from coalitions of mismatched parties often fail to introduce new policies to help the public as each proposal faces objections from other coalition members,' said the former economy minister. 'In the end, such governments continue with 'business as usual', as long as party leaders within the coalition secure their own rewards.' Rafizi also said it was difficult to determine whether the coalition would succeed in rallying enough public support to win GE16 as most of the parties – apart from PAS, Bersatu, and Gerakan – lacked a significant presence at the national level. Muhyiddin said on Monday that 11 opposition parties had agreed to form a loose coalition aimed at holding the government accountable and pressing Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim on reform pledges they claimed had remained unfulfilled. According to Muhyiddin, the coalition will comprise Bersatu, PAS, Gerakan, Pejuang, Muda, the Malaysian Indian People's Party, Putra, Berjasa, Urimai, the Malaysian Advancement Party, and the National Indian Muslim Alliance Party.
Malaysiakini
18 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
No hope for loose opposition pact of strange bedfellows
YOURSAY | 'Good luck with their matrimony.' 12 opposition parties agree to form loose coalition against govt Just: Strange bedfellows. Some are overdue for retirement, and just a waste of time to reap more benefits from Malaysia's lucrative politics. Some non-Malays are there just for the leftovers that come with the verbal support of Perikatan Nasional. Some dream of being elected and given ministerial jobs in the next election. To win, they will be harping on racism and all things for the majority. Coward: This coalition is loose, as in any Tom, Tim, and Harry can join. In fact, so loose that they feel they can rope in PSM before they complete the formalities. As a coalition, they did not come up with a plan but rather fluffy ideas of working on the ground. Anyone digging further will see they have no solid takeover plan, and expect them to disintegrate into chaos if they manage to unseat the government. Citi Zen 75: The strongest party in this coalition is PAS. The rest of the group will have to fight amongst themselves for the scraps (the remaining seats). With one husband and 11 wives, such a marriage will not last long. Good luck with their matrimony. OrangePanther1466: This is not the sort of third force I had in mind. This loose coalition is being led by recycled disgraced politicians. They are the same racist, bigoted and clueless people, no better than the Madani. I do not have much hope for this loose group. IndigoGoat3056: If PSM were to join PN, it would be political suicide. PSM will not join PN, as it is not a seasonal election party. The party had genuinely sought to become part of Pakatan Harapan, but Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim, Pandan MP Rafizi Ramli, and Home Minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail rejected the proposal under pressure from DAP. In Sungai Siput, PSM chairperson Dr Jeyakumar Devaraj was denied the chance to contest for the third time on the party's ticket because of Rafizi. Yet today, the politics of Anwar and Rafizi are uncertain and unstable. Despite this, PSM continues to chart its independent course and will never align with PN. VioletOrca0545: I am quite confused about what the opposition wants. They claim that this government has a lot of problems, but haven't discussed what the specific problems are. They claim the cost of living is high because of the targeted fuel subsidy, but that hasn't been launched yet. Then they blame it on sales and service tax (SST), but don't mention anything about how to improve the economy. Then they say they're going to talk to entrepreneurs, traders and specific groups to understand the problem, so that means they don't know what the problem is but claim there is a problem. The funniest thing is that they claim the government has failed to perform according to the promised manifesto, but ain't that what they, as an opposition, have been opposing? So what is the opposition's agenda? To form a government, and then everything will be great? Plato: We need to understand history. Umno, with its 13 coalition (including Sabah and Sarawak) parties, ruled until 2004. Then came Hindraf and Bersih rallies in 2007, where the loose coalition of Pakatan Rakyat (PKR, DAP and PAS) rode the tide and captured five states in 2008. Then in 2013, the then prime minister, Najib Abdul Razak, roped in Hindraf and won the election with 133 seats and Pakatan Rakyat with 89 seats. In 2018, Hindraf aligned with Pakatan Harapan (PKR, DAP and Bersatu together with Warisan) and created history. After that, all we have been 'pisang goreng' coalitions until now. So if Bersatu is really serious about forming a proper coalition, then make sure you have the political will and heed the voice of your coalition partners. If not, it will be just a pit stop. Anwar's coalition is a failure, but the citizenry is sceptical about how effective this new coalition is. They would rather deal with a known devil like Anwar rather than an unknown one like you. If Bersatu is spearheading and has the political will to work in consensus with their intended coalition partners in good faith for the well-being of the nation, then I am sure the citizens will support them. No use just issuing a statement; come out with a plan with your coalition partners on how you will make it better for the nation. Open mind: For these 12 loose cannons to be effective, they must agree on a common set of narratives to push the government. They have to stop the racial and religious agenda, especially PAS. Unfortunately, there is no one outstanding leader who is acceptable to the 12 cannons. Thus, they have adopted and agreed to a common agenda to counter the government. OA: PSM is the one sticking out. I wonder why a party of better integrity, like PSM, bowed down to Bersatu president Muhyiddin Yassin. Glad they did not, and again, lie by Muhyiddin. The rest of the parties are all friends of former prime minister Dr Mahathir Mohamad, and this even includes Muda. Muda has gone way down from an urban youth movement to being merely followers. Platypus: Those mosquito parties are salivating at the possibility of being given at least one seat each. With the backing of PAS and Bersatu, they can probably retain their deposit. Final analysis, it'll be a free ride for them, so why not join? The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now. These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.
