8 Glasgow eateries named as finalists in prestigious awards
Over 1295 restaurants and takeaways from across the UK were nominated by diners for the coveted awards, which have been hailed as the 'Oscars of the curry industry'.
Eight venues from in and around Glasgow have been listed in both Scottish categories.
Regional restaurant of the year: Scotland
Firangi – Burn Place, Cambuslang
Masala Twist – Hope Street, Glasgow
Opium – Hope Street, Glasgow
Yakitori House – St Bryde Street, East Kilbride
Regional takeaway of the year: Scotland
Diamond Inn – Dumbarton Road, Glasgow
The Red Tiffin Inn – Duke Street, Glasgow
A Touch of Spice – Russell Street, Coatbridge
Real Spice – South Carbrain Road, Cumbernauld
READ NEXT: Popular bakery chain could take over vacant shop if plans are approved
The ARTA ceremony will take place at the London Hilton on Park Lane on Monday, October 6.
It will be hosted by Samantha Simmonds, a BBC journalist and broadcaster, and Paul Martin, a magician.
Mohammed Munim, Founder Member and CEO of ARTA, said: 'Asian restaurants and takeaways have long played a vital role in the UK's economy and culture.
'Their contribution through job creation, community impact, and culinary excellence deserves to be recognised.
'Especially in today's challenging climate, ARTA is proud to champion their achievements and support their continued success.
'Every nominee is a testament to the industry's resilience, and we look forward to celebrating them on October 6.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
44 minutes ago
- Metro
BrewDog's biggest controversies after beers dropped from 2,000 pubs
BrewDog's description of its trademark Punk IPA as 'reliably chaotic' could also be used for the company itself over the last 18 years. In the latest turbulence, the Scottish craft beer maker's tipples have reportedly been taken off the taps at around 1,860 pubs across the UK. The news comes after it announced the closure of 10 of its bars last month — including its flagship site in Aberdeen — citing 'ongoing industry challenges' such as rising costs. After the pub industry data for the last two years was disclosed by The Telegraph, BrewDog responded by saying 'every independent brewer has been affected' by economic pressures and that the 'exciting' business is benefiting from a shift to events. Chief operating officer Lauren Carroll said: 'We saw the trend coming, which is why we've shifted focus to high-impact channels like festivals, stadiums, and the independent free trade. 'We're seeing strong growth there, with recent collaborations at Lord's Cricket Ground and the London Stadium showing our ambition to be the world's most exciting beer business.' The brewery is no stranger to stormy weather. Founded in 2007 by James Watt and Martin Dickie, it once described itself as a 'post-punk, apocalyptic, motherf***** of a craft brewery'. Here are some previous controversies: In 2016, the brewer raised more than £19 million with a crowd-funding project by sending fans who invested more than $20,000 (£16,000) a bespoke bottle of its The End of History beer wrapped inside taxidermy stoats and squirrels. BrewDog said at the time: 'It is without doubt one of the most talked-about things we have ever done, probably due to the road kill taxidermy as much as the strength of the beer.' In 2011, the company drove a tank down Camden High Street to mark the company's move into England. Marking the wedding of Prince William to Kate Middleton later in the year, the brewery produced Royal Virility Performance, which contained herbal Viagra and Horny Goat Weed. BrewDog was founded in 2007 by James Watt and Martin Dickie. It took off in the 2010s as pub goers craved independent beers and brand gained a reputation for its bold marketing stunts, such as driving a tank through London and a creative approach to craft beer. Watt stepped down as BrewDog's CEO in May 2024 after 17 years, handing over to chief operating officer James Arrow. Arrow then stepped down from the role in March this year due to 'personal reasons', and James Taylor took over. Watt is still 'captain and co-founder' at BrewDog, according to his LinkedIn profile. One stunt which left a bitter taste for some was BrewDog's claims that 10 solid gold cans had been randomly hidden in cases of beer sold from its online store, and were worth £15,000 each. Some winners found that the tins were gold-plated brass worth just £500 after being independently valued. The advertising watchdog found that the claims had been misleading — leading to co-founder James Watt paying the 28 winners from his own pocket for 'my mistake'. Watt has waded into the political sphere, describing Brexit as an 'unmitigated disaster' and saying rail strikes in 2023 had a 'big negative impact' on trade. Earlier this year, he launched a 'shadow Doge' — inspired by Elon Musk's former department under Donald Trump — to take on the UK government. On LinkedIn, Watt said that the unofficial venture would be the 'underground cousin' of the US entity and would expose waste and inefficiency in Westminster. The 'punk' brewer has also been hit by negative allegations over the working environment at the company. In 2021, some 61 ex-members of staff signed a document alleging a 'culture of fear' and a further 45 were said to support its aims but did not want to include their names for fear of reprisals. The letter alleged the company was 'built on a cult of personality' and used 'lies, hypocrisy and deceit' as tools, including exaggerating claims made as part of its infamous PR campaigns. They said staff had been left with mental health issues, and bosses did little to address the problems within the business. Watt was singled out for criticism by his former employees, who accused him of being the driver of the 'toxic' attitudes among senior members of staff. The co-founder apologised and promised to take action in light of the revelations. In a statement at the time, he described the open letter as 'upsetting, but so important.' He said he wasn't going to 'contradict or contest' the claims but that his focus was to 'listen, learn and act.' In 2024, BrewDog dropped out of the real living wage scheme. More Trending The company had met the criteria since 2015, with the 'outrageous' move coming 'during the most acute cost of living crisis in a generation', according to the Unite union. BrewDog told workers at the time that the 'hard decision' to leave the voluntary scheme was about getting the business 'back to profitability and the financial stability that is needed.' The company said that despite 'unprecedented challenges in the hospitality sector', staff outside London would get a 4.95% rise in base pay and crew in London would be paid 4.5% above the national living wage. BrewDog said: 'We have always been fully committed to doing the best we can for our people, and our benefits package is far more generous than the industry average.' MORE: Last orders for BrewDog pints after hipster IPAs slashed from 2,000 pubs across UK MORE: How a 128-year-old pub has survived a £570,000,000 train station upgrade MORE: Britain's wonkiest pub still a 'heartbreaking' ruin targeted by thieves
The National
6 hours ago
- The National
Why Darren McGarvey wants out of the prison of his own persona
Given recent publicity, you might think this is a quote from Darren McGarvey's new book Trauma Industrial Complex – but not so. It's a tweet I sent in July 2021 in response to headlines that Prince Harry was to write another 'intimate and heartfelt memoir of his life'. At the time, the comment threw up a response from the Scottish rapper. 'Only if you are a one-trick pony,' he replied, perhaps a tad defensively. 'Confessional is just one facet. Every day I see healing from the identification people get hearing others share. You're right – it can be commodified sometimes cynically. But when done well for the right reasons, it's as legitimate and profound as any other meaningful writing. People are entitled to their privacy. Their stoicism. But that's not everyone's bag.' READ MORE: Israel in talks to resettle Palestinians in South Sudan, sources say Remembering this exchange, I was interested to discover that McGarvey's third book focuses on the dangers of over-disclosure. In essence, the book is a sustained reflection on McGarvey's experiences of going public and the consequences of becoming trapped in the story and the persona which shot him to fame. McGarvey has discovered he might be an unreliable narrator. He's tired of being described as honest and brave and authentic. He doesn't want to be led out onto stages again and again to tell pat, pre-packaged stories about his past. I don't love the title. A riff on Dwight D Eisenhower's famous reference to the 'military industrial complex' which criticised the unhealthy relationship between the defence industry and politics in the United States. For McGarvey, the 'Trauma Industrial Complex is the system in which the very real and urgent issue of mass unacknowledged untreated trauma is commodified, medicalised and repackaged for profit, validation and influence'. Like McGarvey, I worry our confessional culture is giving folk perverse incentives to expose more and more of themselves in public, as if confession is inevitably good for the soul. I'm not so sure. Learning to be honest with yourself is one thing. Telling Twitter, another. But then, I don't have a lifestyle built on telling strangers about my private life. And that must alter your perspective a bit, particularly if, like McGarvey, you've now reached the conclusion that you can't afford to live with one of the very things which made you a success in the first place. It sounds like a paradox, but I've often thought confessions can be excellent ways of avoiding responsibility. One of my earliest memories of hearing McGarvey on the radio was listening to an interview he was doing with Shereen Nanjiani. He told the interviewer he'd done things in his past which he wasn't proud of. People had been hurt along the way, he said. Nanjiani immediately responded to this admission by congratulating McGarvey on how brave and inspiring and searingly honest he was being. We progressed, without intermission, from an admission of badness into a patronising round of applause. The moment is emblematic of how McGarvey has often been treated by the media since Poverty Safari won the Orwell Prize in 2018. This dramatic mood shift wasn't McGarvey's fault. I suppose he could have piped up and forced the interviewer to challenge her vacuous transition from a recognition of wrongdoing to the transformation of that wrongdoing into the latest gritty and authentic confession – but why should he? It isn't his fault if people code him in this perverse way. In one striking story from the new book, McGarvey is confronted with a challenging question from a therapist during a more recent stint in rehab. 'You tell stories to protect yourself. Why is that?' he is asked. Over the years, it has been something I've noticed about him too. In December 2023, McGarvey published a startling post on Twitter. In it, he disclosed that he had 'been dealing with longstanding debt for over three years' but was finally free of its burden. In characteristic form, this was written as a triumph over adversity – but with a sting. The 'debt' in question was unpaid income tax. This could have been a dangerous moment for our young hero, but confession did its magic work once again. If one of the more hostile tabloids had got hold of the story first, you could have expected to read headlines along the lines of 'social justice warrior doesn't pay his taxes' – 'socialist boasts of big pig pay cheques but doesn't pay HMRC its due' – but instead, various social media correspondents suggested it was 'inspiring' to hear that this particular new occupant of the higher tax bracket had finally given the exchequer everything it was due. READ MORE: Far-right protest in Falkirk met by anti-racism counter-demo outside asylum hotel McGarvey's account of this debt in the book is given glancing reference – 'my financial illiteracy' – but nothing more is said. It takes real chutzpah to successfully rechart not paying your income tax on time into yet another inspiring redemption arc. I don't recommend anyone else try it, but for McGarvey, it worked because, as he says, he's good at telling stories. THIS book isn't primarily an attack on those who have been sceptical about McGarvey, but on the image of him held by his most uncritical fans. 'I was affirmed, validated and applauded until I literally could not function under the weight of my own bullshit,' he says. The metaphors he uses are striking. McGarvey characterises the persona he has developed for himself as 'a prison', feeling like 'an artist might do if they awakened one morning to find themselves trapped in their own drawing'. He speaks of his fears of 'conditional acceptance from a tribe that loves me only as long as I play my assigned role' – that role being the one with the unhappy childhood, addiction and good old-fashioned poverty that self-loathing, socially-conscious middle classes can gawp at in awed but remote fascination. In another passage, he says he feels 'like an animal caged in a zoo; aware I could overpower my handlers and flee if opportunity presented itself, though what I'd do, or where I'd go after, are unknowns yet too frightening to face'. As that final clause suggests, what is less obvious is whether McGarvey is really prepared to live with the consequences of breaking free of his handlers. In the book, he claims that his recent August Fringe run was 'already sold out' and concludes with a zen-like depiction of himself, reconsecrated to living a smaller and more sincere life, less in thrall to the need for external recognition and online validation, content to be setting up for recovery support sessions, putting on the kettle in draughty halls, setting out plastic chairs. His obvious agitation about waning interest in his output on social media suggests that he may not be quite as reconciled to the consequences of ripping the painting out of the frame as the concluding chapters suggest. I don't blame him. Writing and publishing this book must have been a terrifying experience. It is one of the most unstinting repudiations of a public self I've ever read, and if McGarvey is concerned about reactions to it, I can understand why, because this book assertively rejects key parts of his public appeal, activity and authority claims over the last five years. If it is taken seriously, it should have consequences, but I imagine an irritatingly large number of people will still say they find it brave, authentic and challenging – while ignoring the elements of it which are truly courageous, sincere and difficult. McGarvey writes with a combination of well-earned pride about his achievements and a degree of bitterness about how uninterested people are when he tries to escape his genre. 'Any time I've ever floated the idea of producing a piece of work that was not about my poverty, addiction, or some adjacent topic, it's been met with resistance or disinterest,' he says. 'I find myself continually drawn back to the same story. My audience, in many ways, won't let me move on from it. Or, at least, that's how it feels sometimes. Any work I produce which is not anchored in my own suffering in some way draws tangibly less interest from both audiences and, in some cases, commissioners – a problem when your whole career is based on you being the product. 'Without it,' he frets, 'people may lose interest in anything else I have to say.' But as other creative spirits have discovered, killing off the character who made them famous often has the consequence that people aren't interested in you at all any more. McGarvey is clearly conscious of this risk. And there's the big anxious, unanswered question underpinning this book. Without Loki, without the misery memoir appeal and the no-mean-city reminiscences, does anyone care what Darren McGarvey has to say? 'Will I ever just be accepted as a professional in my own right, like everyone else?' Time will tell, I suppose.
South Wales Guardian
9 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
ScotRail rolls with it in busiest 2025 week as Oasis fans flock to Edinburgh
Around 328,000 people travelled with ScotRail on Friday August 8, when Liam and Noel Gallagher and their band took to the stage for the first of three sellout gigs at Murrayfield Stadium in Edinburgh. That total was up by almost a fifth (19%) compared with the same day last year. THANK YOU EDINBURGH 🏴#OasisLive25 — Oasis (@oasis) August 14, 2025 Meanwhile, a total of 327,000 travellers took to the rails on Saturday, with passenger numbers for that day 12% higher than the same date in 2024, up 12% on 2024. ScotRail added that these days were the busiest its services had been since December 14 last year, when the festive season was in full swing. With the third Oasis concert taking place in the capital on Tuesday August 12, ScotRail said it had carried a total of 1,995,000 people over the week commencing Friday August 8. David Ross, chief operating officer at the rail operator said: 'This week once again confirms that ScotRail is increasingly the travel mode of choice for people going to large events in Scotland. 'The fact that we've just delivered the busiest week of 2025 so far shows how important large concerts and events are to our business and the Scottish economy. 'Our frontline staff once again delivered an excellent service for almost two million customers who chose to travel with ScotRail.'
