
Retired Bay Area colonel concerned if Marines are deployed in Los Angeles
A retired Marine colonel in the Bay Area said he is concerned about the possibility of Marines being deployed on Los Angeles streets.
Retired Marine Corps Colonel Brendan Kearny was once an officer with the 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, the same unit that has been mobilized to go to Los Angeles. The Marines are not yet in the city, but underdoing training at the nearby Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station.
"A mixture that's pride and regret. Regret that we even have to face this situation as a nation. I'm proud of those Marines. They're no different than the Marines that I served with over 50 years ago," Kearny told CBS News Bay Area.
He said during his time in the service, he can only remember a handful of times active-duty Marines were called upon to deploy within the U.S., and only once where they were off federal property, during the riots after the Rodney King verdict.
"In 1992, during the riots in Southern California, Marines from Camp Pendleton, they got in their vehicles and drove up into LA and had to participate in that conflagration that was going on there," said Col. Kearny.
As of Wednesday, 4,000 California National Guard troops and 700 active-duty Marines are assigned to be in Los Angeles.
"Our mission is to protect federal agencies, their personnel as they conduct their federal mission, and then also to protect all federal assets and federal facilities," said Major General Scott Sherman, who is the Deputy Commander Army North.
Protecting federal employees and property is the only action the Armed Forces are allowed do under the Posse Comitatus Act. It was signed into law back in 1878 during the Reconstruction period after the Civil War. It says the military cannot be used for civilian law enforcement unless authorized by Congress.
"Those Marines really cannot touch an American citizen, only the exception would be basically to prevent the injury to themselves, a fellow service member or a citizen that's being assaulted right in front of them," said Kearny.
"They're allowed to temporarily detain and wait for law enforcement to come and arrest them," said Major General Sherman.
From Kearny's point of view, this isn't a situation any member of the military wants to be in. He said no Marine wants to be deployed within our own borders. He said it was sad it was happening, but the Marines are perfectly trained to handle this type of situation.
"There are no winners in this type of thing. It's a series of losers and the country doesn't prosper because of it," said Kearny.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
U.S. military won't perform law enforcement at LA protests, Pentagon says
The U.S. military will not be responsible for law enforcement at Los Angeles protests, the Pentagon said on Friday. Why it matters: Nearly 5,000 National Guard members and Marines were deployed by the Trump administration in response to anti-immigration raid protests, despite disapproval from a plurality of Americans. "As of today, we have had no soldier or Marine detain anyone," Maj. Gen. Thomas Sherman said during a Friday press briefing. "They have watched federal law enforcement arrest personnel as they were protecting. They have not had to detain anyone at this point." Yes, but: The Department of Homeland Security previously said National Guard troops have the authority to make temporary arrests in certain conditions at the protests. Zoom in: Starting today, Second Battalion, Seventh Marines will be responsible for protecting federal property and personnel, Sherman said. Those previously performing those duties will transition to providing protection to federal law enforcement officers as they conduct their responsibilities. The National Guard members and Marines are trained in deescalation techniques and crowd control, he said. What we're watching: An appeals court on Thursday night allowed Trump's deployment of California's National Guard to continue by pausing U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's previous ruling.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Second judge blocks parts of Trump order overhauling elections
A federal judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from implementing parts of President Trump's executive order seeking to overhaul elections. U.S. District Judge Denise Casper granted a request from a group of Democratic attorneys general to halt five sections of the executive order, most focused on Trump's new requirements for proof of citizenship to register to vote in U.S. elections. Casper is the second judge to block portions of Trump's directive. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., granted a preliminary injunction in April in three consolidated cases, which also focused on the new proof of citizenship requirements. 'There is no dispute (nor could there be) that U.S. citizenship is required to vote in federal elections and the federal voter registration forms require attestation of citizenship,' wrote Casper, an appointee of former President Obama. 'The issue here is whether the President can require documentary proof of citizenship where the authority for election requirements is in the hands of Congress, its statutes … do not require it, and the statutorily created [Election Assistance Commission (EAC)] is required to go through a notice and comment period and consult with the States before implementing any changes to the federal forms for voter registration,' she continued. Casper enjoined the administration from implementing new rules mandating documentary proof of citizenship in federal voter registration forms. She also blocked conditioning any funding for states from the EAC — an independent election administration agency — on their adoption of a ballot receipt deadline of Election Day. She also blocked a directive to Attorney General Pam Bondi to take civil or criminal action against states that violate any provisions by counting absentee or mail-in ballots received after Election Day in the final tabulation of votes for president or members of Congress. The portions of the order relating to ballots received after Election Day apply to 13 of the 19 states that filed the challenge, she ruled. 'There is nothing in the text of the Election Day statutes that bars the Ballot Receipt States from counting ballots received in accordance with their ballot receipt laws or that provides for civil enforcement or criminal action by the Attorney General against the Ballot Receipt States,' the judge wrote in her 44-page opinion. Trump's executive order, signed in March, said it was his administration's policy to enforce federal law and 'to protect the integrity of our election process.' The president has repeatedly questioned the legitimacy of American elections, most notably the 2020 election won by former President Biden. 'The Constitution does not grant the President any specific powers over elections,' Casper wrote. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


CNN
28 minutes ago
- CNN
The human suffering of Sudan's brutal civil war
Christiane Amanpour speaks with photojournalist Giles Clarke about his recent visits to Sudan and his photographs documenting the devastation wrought by an ongoing civil war.