Sabah man gets 16 years, 10 strokes for raping daughter over eight-year period; court confirms DNA link to victim's child
KOTA KINABALU, May 17 — An elderly man was sentenced to 16 years' jail plus 10 strokes of the cane by a Sessions Court here today for raping his biological daughter since she was eight years old and gave birth to his child.
The 64-year-old accused had raped the victim until she was 16. She is now 26 and the child resulted from the rape is now aged 10.
The accused pleaded guilty before judge Amir Shah Amir Hassan to committing the offence at the end of 2014 at an unnumbered house in Tuaran.
He was convicted under Section 376(3) of the Penal Code which carries a jail term of up to 30 years and whipping, upon conviction.
The court heard that he victim lodged a police report on February 4 which led to the arrest of the accused on the same day.
A DNA test result revealed the accused is the biological father of the victim's child.
The accused was unrepresented. — The Borneo Post
* If you are experiencing sexual violence, the following hotlines offer free and confidential support: Talian Kasih at 15999 or WhatsApp 019-2615999 (24/7); All Women's Action Society at 016-2374221/016-2284221 (9.30am-5.30pm); and Women's Aid Organisation (WAO) at 03-30008858 or SMS/WhatsApp TINA 018-9888058 (24/7)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
31 minutes ago
- The Star
Local trio, foreign woman detained for holding three men against their will
GEORGE TOWN: Three local men and a foreign woman have been arrested in connection with wrongfully confining three Indonesian men. George Town deputy OCPD Supt Lee Swee Sake said the three men, aged 40 to 56, and the woman, aged 40, have been remanded for four days from Wednesday (June 11) to June 14. "We acted upon the case after a foreign man made a police report on Tuesday (June 10) saying his friend had been 'locked up' at an apartment in George Town. "We raided the apartment and rescued three foreign men aged between 28 and 52. "They were okay and healthy," he said in a statement on Wednesday (June 11). Supt Lee said during the raid, they arrested three men and a woman who were involved in the case. "Their role was to look after the victims at the apartment. "The case is being investigated under Section 344 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement for a period of ten days or more. "The suspect has been remanded to assist with further investigations," he said. Supt Lee urged the public not to make any speculations about the case as it could affect investigations. A news portal previously reported that the three victims did not know one another, and their passports were held by a suspect under the pretext of securing jobs for them. The trio are believed to have had their feet chained to the window grilles of the apartment.
Malay Mail
32 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Court sets July 2 for decision on shipping company's pre-trial discovery application against RHB
KUALA LUMPUR, June 11— The High Court here today fixed July 2 to decide on a pre-trial discovery application filed by Maritime Network Sdn Bhd against RHB Bank Berhad concerning the financial institution's internal guidelines and due diligence procedures governing foreign-exchange transactions. Judge Leong Wai Hong fixed the date after hearing submissions by both parties in chambers last Friday. This was confirmed by the shipping company's counsel, P. Taneswaran, and the bank's counsel, Gan Khong Aik, when contacted. According to them, the proceeding is scheduled at 9 am on the said date. Maritime Network filed an originating summons on March 3 this year, seeking a court order to compel the bank to disclose the financial institution's internal guidelines and due diligence procedures governing foreign-exchange transactions. The action was initiated by the company's director, Datuk Seri through Messrs Tanes, Khoo & Paulraj at the High Court here, naming the RHB Bank Berhad as the defendant. Maritime Network, established in 2002, commenced the action after discovering that several international fund transfers into its multi-currency USD account had been returned without prior notice or adequate justification. According to the affidavit, these transfers, though originating from previously unfamiliar senders, made explicit reference to valid invoices issued by the company. Despite Maritime Network's request that the bank withhold any reversal pending a thorough review, the funds were unilaterally returned. Meanwhile, the bank claimed that it has complied with the required financial standard known as Minimum Due Diligence (MDD). The company is therefore demanding a sight of the MDD guidelines used by the bank through pre-trial discovery to determine if it has breached its duty of care. — Bernama
Malay Mail
32 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Appeals court to decide Aug 19 on activist's challenge to online speech law under Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
PUTRAJAYA, June 11 — The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In September 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective. — Bernama
