
Trump, Carney faceoff in Oval Office leaves gaping differences on tariffs, 51st state
WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney faced off in the Oval Office on Tuesday and showed no signs of retreating from their gaping differences in an ongoing trade war that has shattered decades of trust between the two countries.
The two kept it civil, but as for Trump's calls to make Canada the 51st state, Carney insisted his nation was 'not for sale' and Trump shot back, 'time will tell.'
Asked by a reporter if there was anything Carney could tell him to lift his tariffs of as much as 25% on Canada, Trump bluntly said: 'No.'
The U.S. president added for emphasis, 'Just the way it is.'
Carney acknowledged that no bit of rhetoric on tariffs would be enough to sway Trump, saying that 'this is a bigger discussion."
'There are much bigger forces involved,' the Canadian leader continued. 'And this will take some time and some discussions. And that's why we're here, to have those discussions."
The meeting between the two leaders showcased the full spectrum of Trump's unique mix of aggression, hospitality and stubbornness.
Shortly before Carney's arrival, Trump insulted Canada by posting on social media that the United States didn't need 'ANYTHING' from its northern neighbor, only to then turn on the charm and praise Carney's election win in person before showing his obstinance on matters of policy substance.
Carney won the job of prime minister by promising to confront the increased aggression shown by Trump, even as he has preserved the calm demeanor of an economist who has led the central banks of both Canada and the United Kingdom.
At times, Carney struggled to interject his views and raised his hand to talk as Trump held forth at length and veered between topics, touching on California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, Carney's predecessor, Justin Trudeau, and teasing a 'great' upcoming announcement that's 'not necessarily on trade.'
Trump offended Canada's sense of pride and friendship by saying he wants to make Canada the 51st U.S. state and levying steep tariffs against an essential partner in the manufacturing of autos and the supply of oil, electricity and other goods. The outrage provoked by Trump enabled Carney's Liberal Party to score a stunning comeback victory last month as the trade war and attacks on Canadian sovereignty have outraged voters.
Trump said the two would not discuss making Canada part of the U.S., even as he insisted the idea would lead to lower taxes for Canadians.
'It's not for sale,' Carney said. 'It won't be for sale. Ever. But the opportunity is in the partnership and what we can build together.'
Trump persisted by saying that the United States did not want to buy autos from Canada, even if the vehicles were also assembled in America. The U.S. leader insisted that the $63 billion trade deficit in goods — which he inflated to $200 billion — was a subsidy that needed to come an end.
The meeting never devolved into the outburst that the public saw in Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, who was berated by the U.S. president and his team for not being sufficiently deferential. Nor did it have the ease of Trump's sit down with the United Kingdom's Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who invited Trump for a visit provided by King Charles III.
Carney later described his conversation with Trump as 'wide ranging' and 'constructive,' telling reporters that the prospect is there for positive negotiations but there would be 'zigs and zags.' Carney said he stressed the value that Canadian companies and factories created for U.S. automakers while stressing that it was unfair to assume one meeting could resolve any differences.
'I wouldn't have expected white smoke coming out of this meeting,' Carney said after the Tuesday meeting, referencing the signal that a new pope has been selected.
Carney said that he privately asked Trump to stop calling Canada the 51st state during their meeting. But when pressed on how Trump responded, the Canadian prime minister said: 'He's the president. He's his own person.'
The stakes of the meeting were high and the messages beforehand mixed. Trump told reporters on Monday that he wasn't quite sure why Carney was visiting.
'I'm not sure what he wants to see me about,' Trump said. 'But I guess he wants to make a deal.'
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick further stoked doubts about their interest in repairing the relationship with Canada in a Monday interview on Fox Business Network's 'Kudlow' show.
Asked if the U.S. could make a deal with Canada, Lutnick called the country a 'socialist regime' that has been 'basically feeding off America." Lutnick said Tuesday's meeting would be 'fascinating.'
Carney, at a Friday news conference ahead of his trip, said the talks would focus on immediate trade pressures and the broader economic and national security relationships. He said his 'government would fight to get the best deal for Canada' and 'take all the time necessary' to do so, even as Canada pursues a parallel set of talks to deepen relations with other allies and lessen its commitments with the U.S.
Trump has maintained that the U.S. doesn't need anything from Canada. He is actively going after a Canadian auto sector built largely by U.S. companies, saying, 'They're stopping work in Mexico, and they're stopping work in Canada, and they're all moving here.' He also said the U.S. doesn't need Canada's energy — though nearly one-fourth of the oil that the U.S. consumes daily comes from the province of Alberta.
The president has also disparaged Canada's military commitments despite a partnership that ranges from the beaches of Normandy in World War II to remote stretches of Afghanistan. He said on Tuesday with Carney that the U.S. would continue to provide national security support to Canada.
Trump has imposed 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum and tariffs on other products outside the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, in some cases ostensibly to address relatively low volumes of fentanyl intercepted at the northern border. That has jeopardized a closely entwined trade relationship as Canada sees an increasing need to build relations with the European Union and other nations.
Canada is the top export destination for 36 U.S. states. Nearly $3.6 billion Canadian (US$2.7 billion) worth of goods and services cross the border each day. About 60% of U.S. crude oil imports are from Canada, and 85% of U.S. electricity imports are from Canada.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Associated Press
7 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Supreme Court agrees to hear appeal from New Jersey faith-based pregnancy center
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court said Monday it will hear from a faith-based pregnancy center in New Jersey challenging a state investigation alleging it misled people into thinking its services included referrals for abortion. The justices agreed to consider an appeal from First Choice Women's Resource Centers, which wants to block a 2023 subpoena from New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin seeking information about donors, advertisements and medical personnel. It has not yet been served. Attorneys for First Choice Women's Resource Centers describe the organization as a 'faith-based, pro-life pregnancy center.' The organization generally seek to women facing an unwanted pregnancy away from choosing an abortion. The group challenged the subpoena in federal court, but a judge found that the case wasn't yet far enough along to weigh in. An appeals court agreed. First Choice Women's Resource Centers appealed to the Supreme Court, saying the push for donor information had chilled its First Amendment rights. 'State attorneys general on both sides of the political aisle have been accused of misusing this authority to issue demands against their ideological and political opponents,' its lawyers wrote. 'Even if these accusations turn out to be false, it is important that a federal forum exists for suits challenging those investigative demands.'. Meanwhile, Platkin has sought to enforce the subpoena in state court, but the judge there has so far refused the state's push to require the group to turn over documents and told the two sides to negotiate instead. The state asked the justices to pass on the case, saying the it doesn't present the kind of significant lower-court controversy that requires the justices to step in. 'The decision below is correct and does not have the impacts petitioner alleges,' state attorneys wrote.


Newsweek
11 minutes ago
- Newsweek
MAGA Splitting Over Israel's Strikes on Iran Poses 'Dilemma' for Trump
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The United States will back Israel's strikes against Iran, according to President Donald Trump, who faces criticism from his supporters that this stance opposes his "America First" policy. Trump's comments on Sunday came as he rebuffed criticism from conservative TV host Tucker Carlson about his support for Israel, a sentiment expressed by MAGA (Make America Great Again) Republicans. Trump supporter Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Georgia Republican, posted on social media that those pushing for the U.S. to become fully involved in the escalating conflict in the Middle East cannot also say they back MAGA or any policy of America First. U.S. foreign policy expert Jonathan Monten told Newsweek that Trump faces a "dilemma" in balancing his desire to appear strong on the world stage with his constituency's reluctance to engage in foreign conflicts. "He's trying to have it both ways," he said. Newsweek reached out to the White House, Greene, and Carlson for comment. Why It Matters Israel launched strikes on Iran as part of "Operation Rising Lion" in response to intelligence it said showed Tehran could produce up to 15 nuclear bombs. But Trump's backing for Israel's actions has raised concerns that the U.S. could be pulled into the war via attacks by Iran or its proxy forces on U.S. personnel in the region. This is causing a rift between the president's advisers and political base over the prospect of yet further American engagement in foreign wars, possibly mirroring the splits in the Democratic Party over the previous administration's response to the October 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. The spat comes as Trump rejected Israel's proposal to assassinate Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, according to U.S. officials, cited by the Associated Press and Reuters, which noted how such a plan could destabilize the region. President Donald Trump speaks on the South Lawn of the White House on June 15, 2025. President Donald Trump speaks on the South Lawn of the White House on June 15, 2025. Tasos Katopodis What To Know While leaving for the Group of Seven (G7) summit in Canada, Trump told reporters Sunday that the U.S. would keep supporting Israel's airstrikes on Iran. He also batted away a question over whether he had called on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to stop the attacks, but praised their relationship. During an interview with ABC News, Trump had raised the possibility of U.S. involvement in the conflict, a position which has been criticized by some of his biggest supporters. Greene posted on X (formerly Twitter) that "we are sick and tired of foreign wars and that "Real America First/MAGA wants world peace for all people." Her post did not mention Trump by name but also said "everyone is finding out who are real America First/MAGA and who were fake." Carlson, a Trump ally, wrote in a newsletter to subscribers, "politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it." He accused Trump of being "complicit" in Israel's "act of war," although the U.S. president has denied that the U.S. had any involvement in the attack on Iran. When asked about the comments by the former Fox News anchor, Trump told The Atlantic that "America First" means whatever he says it does and that Iran cannot be allowed to get a nuclear bomb. Monten, director of the International Public Policy Program at University College London (UCL), told Newsweek that Trump "wants to be seen as a player on the world stage." However, he has "cultivated a constituency of support around non-involvement in foreign conflicts." "The dilemma he faces is that he's trying to play both roles at the same time," he said. This is the same dilemma he has faced in other foreign policy issues involving the potential use of force, such as his pronouncements on acquiring Greenland, the Panama Canal, and Canada, Monten said. Avi Melamed, a former Israeli intelligence official, told Newsweek that from Trump's perspective, as long as the U.S. is not directly militarily involved, there is an advantage to Israel's military action aimed at forcing Tehran back to negotiations over its nuclear program from a significantly weaker position. Dialogue between the U.S. and Iran over Tehran's nuclear program was shelved following Israel's attacks. But Melamed added that Trump acts according to considerations that do not necessarily align with those of the Israeli government. The U.S. president's declarations and policy can change quickly, like the sudden halt of the American offensive against the Houthis in Yemen, he said. Smoke billows for the second day from the Shahran oil depot, northwest of Tehran, on June 16, 2025. Smoke billows for the second day from the Shahran oil depot, northwest of Tehran, on June 16, an analysis published Sunday, Trita Parsi, co-founder of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, said Israel's seeking Trump's approval is easier than requesting direct American involvement. But Parsi also said Trump likes winners, and by asking him to intervene, Israel is signaling that it's losing, having as of the weekend, not eliminated Iran's regime or cripple its nuclear program "Why would Trump risk American lives, endanger his presidency, and join a war he didn't start?" Parsi wrote. "Trump prefers to take credit for victories, not inherit blame for someone else's potential fiasco." What People Are Saying Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, on X: "Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA." Tucker Carlson, to newsletter subscribers: "Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep." President Donald Trump told The Atlantic: "Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb, very simple. Regardless—Israel or not Israel—Iran cannot have a nuclear bomb." What Happens Next Iranian missiles again penetrated Israel's Iron Dome defense system overnight Sunday, and Iran's state media reported there were new Israeli strikes in the west of the country on Monday. Hamidreza Azizi, an expert on Iran and visiting fellow at the German Institute for International and Security Affairs, told Newsweek that Tehran is trying to influence Israel's calculations by demonstrating that it will not hesitate to escalate and will go as far as necessary. Much depends on Iran's actual capabilities—what it has already destroyed and what it may target, but Tehran's regime views Israel's strikes as existential, which is why it appears willing to use whatever resources it has, he added.


CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Supreme Court to hear arguments over whether states may subpoena faith-based pregnancy centers
The Supreme Court agreed Monday to take up a First Amendment appeal from a faith-based nonprofit that runs five 'crisis pregnancy centers' in New Jersey and that is fighting a subpoena from the state's Democratic attorney general. First Choice Women's Resources Centers had urged the conservative court to throw out a decision from the Philadelphia-based 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals siding with the state. That decision required the nonprofit to continue litigating its objections to the subpoena in state court. New Jersey officials subpoenaed the center in 2023 as part of investigation into whether the organization violated consumer fraud laws. Pregnancy centers are opposed to abortion, but New Jersey officials said their marketing may have left some patients with the impression that they could receive abortions at the facilities. The subpoena was aimed at evaluating whether the center 'or its staff engaged in misrepresentations and other prohibited conduct,' according to the state. It sought advertisements, donor solicitations, and the identification of licensed medical personnel. The center framed the subpoena as a demand for donor names. If that view of the subpoena prevails, then New Jersey's actions may be in conflict with a 2021 Supreme Court decision in which a majority found unconstitutional a California law requiring the conservative Americans for Prosperity Foundation to disclose its donors. A divided 3rd Circuit ruled in December that the center's claims were not yet ripe because state courts had not yet enforced the subpoena against them.