Ukrainian drone hits a plant deep inside Russia after record Russian drone attacks in June
Both sides in the more than three-year war following Russia's February 2022 invasion of its neighbor have raced to improve drone technology and enhance their use on the battlefield. They have deployed increasingly sophisticated and deadlier drones, turning the war into a testing ground for the new weaponry.
Ukraine is under severe strain from a Russian push at places on the roughly 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, but analysts say its defenses are largely holding firm. With recent direct peace talks delivering no progress on U.S.-led international efforts to halt the fighting, Russia and Ukraine are bulking up their arsenals.
Russia last month launched 5,438 drones at Ukraine, a new monthly record, according to official data collated by The Associated Press.
Ukraine is stepping up drone production
Meanwhile, a Ukrainian drone hit an industrial plant in Izhevsk, about 1,000 kilometers (620 miles) east of Moscow, injuring several people and starting a fire, Alexander Brechalov, head of the Udmurtia region, said. The plant's workers were evacuated, he said.
The drone struck the Kupol Electromechanical Plant, which produces air defense systems and drones for the Russian military, according to an official with Ukraine's Security Service, the SBU.
At least two direct hits were recorded on the plant's buildings, the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.
Ukraine has for months been using domestically produced long-range drones to strike plants, storage sites and logistical hubs deep inside Russian territory. In May last year, a Ukrainian drone hit an early-warning radar in the Russian city of Orsk, some 1,800 kilometers (1,120 miles) from the Ukrainian border, Kyiv officials claimed.
Zelenskyy said Ukraine's domestic production of drones is about to increase in response to Russia's expanded barrages.
'The priority is drones, interceptor drones and long-range strike drones,' he said on Telegram late Monday.
'This is extremely important,' he added. 'Russia is investing in its unmanned capabilities, Russia is planning to increase the number of drones used in strikes against our state. We are preparing our countermeasures.'
Russia's Defense Ministry said that 60 Ukrainian drones were downed overnight over several regions, including 17 over Crimea, 16 over the Rostov region and four over the Saratov region.
At the same time, four Russian Shahed drones struck the southern Ukraine city of Zaporizhzia during the night, leaving more than 1,600 households without power, according to authorities.
Ukraine's air force said Tuesday that Russia fired 52 Shahed and decoy drones at the country overnight.
US envoy criticizes Russian attacks
U.S. President Donald Trump's special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, rebuked Russia for continuing to strike civilian areas of Ukraine while effectively rejecting a ceasefire and dragging its feet on a peace settlement.
'We urge an immediate ceasefire and a move to trilateral talks to end the war,' Kellogg said on the social platform X late Monday. 'Russia cannot continue to stall for time while it bombs civilian targets in Ukraine.'
Ukraine is developing its own defense industry as uncertainty remains over whether the Trump administration will continue to provide crucial military aid.
Between March and April, the United States allocated no new aid to Ukraine, according to Germany's Kiel Institute, which tracks such support.
Europe its support and for the first time since June 2022 surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros ($85 billion) compared with 65 billion euros ($77 billion) from the U.S., the institute said last month.
___
Follow AP's coverage of the war in Ukraine at https://apnews.com/hub/russia-ukraine
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
21 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Zelenskyy to discuss halt in US weapon deliveries with Trump
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is likely to hold a phone call with Donald Trump on Friday to discuss the U.S. decision to pause the transfer of artillery rounds and air defenses to Ukraine, a person familiar with the matter said. The decision by Washington earlier this week caught Kyiv and its allies off guard and came just days after Russia hit Ukraine with a record air strike since the full-scale invasion began nearly three-and-half years ago. Preparations for a call between the two presidents were already underway before the latest U.S. action in order to follow up on their meeting at a NATO summit in The Hague last week, said the person, who spoke on condition of anonymity as the talks are private. The White House didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The halt to deliveries came after a review of U.S. munitions stockpiles and amid concerns they had fallen too low, the White House said earlier. Among the weapons that are being paused are 155mm artillery shells and Patriot air-defense batteries, which are key for Ukraine as it seeks to repel increasingly deadly Russian drone and missile strikes. All details about the supply of military assistance are being clarified at the working level between Ukraine and the U.S., Zelenskyy said in his daily video address on Wednesday. Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha also invited acting U.S. Charge d'Affairs John Ginkel to discuss military aid with his deputy. Trump said only last week that he'd look at sending more Patriots to Ukraine following 'a good' meeting with Zelenskyy on the sidelines of the NATO summit. Current U.S. funding for military aid to Ukraine that was approved under former President Joe Biden is due to run out in the summer. Trump has indicated he won't renew the funding support for Ukraine, which needs weapons including Patriots that only the U.S. can supply. Zelenskyy is seeking to persuade the U.S. president to allow Kyiv to buy weapons instead. He has also appealed to Trump to ramp up sanctions on Russia, arguing that it's the only way to persuade Russian President Vladimir Putin to engage seriously with peace talks. The Financial Times first reported the plans for a phone call earlier on Thursday. ------------- -With assistance from Catherine Lucey. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Fox News
25 minutes ago
- Fox News
BRYAN DEAN WRIGHT: John Brennan was my boss at the CIA. He belongs in prison
Former CIA Director John Brennan was once my boss. Given what we just learned in a shocking new report about his role in the Trump Russia hysteria, he should be in prison. Here's why. The CIA released fresh details yesterday about the creation nearly 10 years ago of the agency's Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) of Russia's influence campaign in the 2016 U.S. presidential election. It found that Russian President Vladimir Putin "aspired" to help then-candidate Donald Trump win the election. That assessment – ordered by then-President Barack Obama and executed by Brennan – ignited the Trump-Russia hoax that would haunt Trump's presidency for four years. We're now learning five key details Brennan used to cook the books to ensure maximum damage to Trump. He told The Wall Street Journal in January of 2017 he never read it and gave it no particular credence. He was lying. As his former staffers now admit, Brennan specifically pushed for the inclusion of the dossier in the ICA despite explicit warnings from his top operational and analytical management that the dossier "didn't meet the most basic [of] tradecraft standards." Brennan said he didn't care. As we're now learning, he said he wanted it included because it "fit narrative consistency" — aka Trump Russia collusion — and that then-FBI Director James Comey was demanding the same. That's shocking, because both Comey and Brennan's agencies had investigated its allegations in the fall of 2016 and found them not to be credible. But both Comey and Brennan still wanted it in, simply and clearly to destroy President Trump. As we're now learning, Brennan demanded that his agency take the lead in drafting the ICA, intentionally blocking out other intel agencies and the National Intelligence Council. As the new report confirms, that decision "depart[ed] significantly from standard procedures for formal IC assessments." But why would Brennan do that? As a former CIA officer, I know why: He wanted to control the authors (his employees), their assessment, any dissent, and their careers if they crossed him. As the new report confirms, "Direct engagement in the ICA's development [by agency head Brennan] was highly unusual in both scope and intensity. This exceptional level of senior involvement likely influenced participants, altered normal review processes, and ultimately compromised analytic rigor." In other words, Brennan knew he could make or break the careers of his analysts. And so he did — ensuring that he got the exact ICA he wanted, which included the junk dossier and a single-source intel report on fabricated "Trump-Russia Collusion." As we're now learning, CIA analysts felt "jammed" by Brennan's timeline to produce the ICA by late December 2016 — despite the fact that "the election had concluded, and the ICA was essentially a post-mortem analysis." The highly compressed timeline was "atypical" for an ICA, which "ordinarily can take months to prepare, especially for assessments of such length, complexity, and political sensitivity." But Brennan didn't care. He wanted this ICA done by the time Trump got into office. The new report confirms that Brennan and Comey shared the ICA with "more than 200 U.S. officials. This is unusually high for such a highly compartmented product…" In other words, they briefed it to leak it — to destroy Trump. In fact, that's what The New York Times suspected, too. As they asked their readers in January of 2017, why would Brennan and Comey have briefed and shared the discredited dossier "to multiple people in Congress and the executive branch, virtually assuring it would be leaked?" The answer: Brennan and Comey spread the ICA (and dossier) far and wide to ensure it all leaked and hobbled Donald Trump — and destroyed his presidency. Bottom line: John Brennan, James Comey, and their fellow anti-Trumpers in the U.S. intel community intentionally tried to destroy the presidency of Donald Trump — with a tightly controlled, scripted, rushed, and poorly sourced ICA (and dossier). In doing so, they tried to destroy not just President Trump, but also the Republic itself. And that's why this still matters. These men thought they knew what was best for America, and they didn't give a damn what voters like you thought. It was their country – not yours – and they were willing to act with their profound powers to destroy a politician they didn't like. That's why these men deserve to rot in prison, along with anyone in the Obama White House or Clinton campaign who colluded with them.
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Colby's China-focused Pentagon playbook sparks Ukraine arms freeze
A recent pause in the U.S. sending Patriot missiles and ammunition to Ukraine is part of a wider, global review of military aid driven in part by the Pentagon's China-leery policy chief, Elbridge Colby. "A capability review is being conducted to ensure U.S. military aid aligns with our defense priorities," Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell told reporters this week. That review is part of a plan championed by Colby to conserve U.S. resources that may be needed for war in the Indo-Pacific. Upon first news of the pause, Pentagon officials said it was due to concerns about the U.S.' stockpile of munitions, which came after the U.S. and Iran traded strikes on each other in the Middle East. However, Parnell wrote on X that it was "flat out wrong" to suggest Colby caught other administration officials off-guard with the aid pause. Colby "routinely provides policy recommendations to the Secretary of Defense and the President," but they have the ultimate say, he said. A White House official confirmed to Fox News Digital they were "aware of the pause ahead of time." "The President and top officials expect the DOD to regularly review aid allocations to ensure they are in line with the America First agenda," the official said. Colby has long advocated for limiting resources in Europe and the Middle East in case they're needed in a war over Taiwan. "What I have been trying to shoot a signal flare over is that it is vital for us to focus and enable our own forces for an effective and reasonable defense of Taiwan and for the Taiwanese, as well as the Japanese, to do more," Colby said during his confirmation hearing. "A Europe first policy is not what America needs in this exceptionally dangerous time. We need to focus on China and Asia - clearly," he wrote on X. last year. The weapons put on pause, including missile interceptors and 155 mm ammunition shells, were already on their way to Ukraine, U.S. officials told Fox News. Since Russia's 2022 invasion, the U.S. has provided Ukraine with nearly $66 billion in security assistance, the Pentagon noted. "Part of our job is to give the president a framework that he can use to evaluate how many munitions we have and where we're sending them," Parnell added. "We can't give weapons to everybody all around the world." Still, critics like former GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger claimed Colby had "blood on his hands" over the halt. Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., requested an "emergency briefing" from the White House and the Defense Department to "review our nation's weapons and munitions stockpiles, and ensure the United States remains fully committed to providing Ukraine with the resources it urgently needs." Dan Caldwell, a former Pentagon official who worked with Colby on policy, defended his past colleague on X. "The incentives at DoD favor maintaining the status quo: Keep troops in Syria, keep sending weapons to Ukraine that we need for our defense, etc. That is why when patriots like @ElbridgeColby put the interests of their own country and own troops first, they are viciously smeared." Six months into President Donald Trump's second term, U.S. military prowess has largely focused back on the Middle East: an offensive campaign against the Houthis in Yemen, hitting Iran's nuclear sites and boosting defenses in the region. Air Force Gen. Daniel Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said defending the Al-Udeid base from an Iranian counterattack was the largest Patriot missile salvo in history.
