US stock market predictions today: Market up as Dow Jones gains 170 points, S&P 500 hits 5,604, Nasdaq climbs 1.5% — Why is market rising ahead of the April jobs report and tech earnings boost? Here's
US stock market predictions today show a strong start as the Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq head higher ahead of key April jobs data. With big names like Meta, Microsoft, and Reddit posting solid earnings, tech stocks are leading the rally. Meanwhile, Apple and Amazon face pressure from rising tariffs. Investors are closely watching stock futures, economic signals, and what the labor report might mean for future Fed rate moves.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What's the latest movement in the US stock market today?
How are stock futures reacting to all this market data?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Dow Jones Futures: Up 0.4%
S&P 500 Futures: Up 0.4%
Nasdaq Futures: Up 0.2%
Why is the April jobs report so important for today's trading?
How did tech earnings influence the stock market today?
What's the outlook for Amazon and other retail giants?
Are Reddit shares rising after its recent results?
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
What sectors are leading the market gains today?
Who are the top gainers and losers in the stock market today?
Meta Platforms (META): +9%
Microsoft (MSFT): +7.6%
Reddit (RDDT): +7%
Autodesk (ADSK): +4.16%
eBay (EBAY): +3.81%
Apple (AAPL): -4%
IBM (IBM): -3.96%
Amazon (AMZN): -2%
Dow Inc (DOW): -1.1%
Intel (INTC): -0.75%
What should investors keep an eye on going forward?
US stock market predictions today are looking optimistic as futures pointed higher early Friday, May 2, 2025. Investors are gearing up for the release of the highly anticipated April jobs report, which is expected to offer clues on the Federal Reserve's next move. Major indexes, including the Dow Jones, S&P 500, and Nasdaq, were all trading in the green, signaling a positive start to the trading day.Tech stocks were once again in focus after major earnings reports from companies like Apple, Amazon, and Meta Platforms. Meanwhile, concerns over rising tariffs and their potential impact on corporate profits are still lingering in the background.As of early Friday, Dow Jones futures were up by 0.4%, while S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures climbed 0.4% and 0.2%, respectively. On Thursday, the S&P 500 closed at 5,604.14, rising 0.6%—its eighth straight day of gains. The Nasdaq Composite saw a strong jump of 1.5%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average continued its winning streak, now on pace for a ninth consecutive day of gains.This momentum is largely fueled by stronger-than-expected tech earnings and hopes for improved U.S.-China trade relations.Stock futures are staying positive as the market digests earnings results and awaits the jobs report. Here's where things stand:Investors seem hopeful that the job numbers will confirm a stable economic outlook without putting too much pressure on the Fed to keep interest rates high.The April nonfarm payrolls report is one of the most awaited data points this week. Analysts expect it to shed light on how strong the labor market really is. A strong jobs number could increase pressure on the Federal Reserve to hold off on rate cuts. On the other hand, a weaker number may support the case for monetary easing later this year.Investors are watching closely. The labor data will influence everything from stock prices to bond yields and Fed policy outlook.Big tech has once again taken center stage. Meta Platforms (META) reported Q1 earnings of $6.43 per share, beating estimates by 23%, sending the stock up over 9%. Microsoft (MSFT) also impressed, reporting $3.46 EPS, above expectations, with shares rising 7.6%.However, Apple (AAPL) took a hit, falling 4%, after CEO Tim Cook warned of an expected $900 million hit due to tariffs. Despite reporting strong Q2 earnings, the market was clearly worried about forward-looking risks.Amazon (AMZN) reported strong Q1 revenue, which rose by 9%, but its stock slipped 2% after issuing a weaker profit outlook for Q2. CEO Andy Jassy said that while demand was stable, cost pressures and global uncertainty made it difficult to provide a stronger forecast.This mixed reaction is typical during earnings season, especially when future guidance doesn't align with market expectations.Yes, Reddit became one of the unexpected winners this morning. The social media company reported a massive 60% jump in Q1 revenue and gave a Q2 outlook that beat consensus. As a result, the stock soared 7% in pre-market trading. This marks a sharp turnaround since its IPO earlier this year, signaling investor confidence in its monetization strategy.Technology continues to drive the rally, with names like Meta, Microsoft, and AMD showing strong gains. Healthcare stocks also gained, while industrial and energy names lagged behind due to mixed earnings.The strong movement in tech has helped the Nasdaq outperform the other indexes this week. Investors are clearly rewarding companies that beat expectations and offer confident guidance.Here are some of the top gainers as of this morning:And these are the top losers:The main focus now is the April jobs report. Beyond that, attention will turn to Fed officials' statements, inflation readings, and how tariff tensions with China evolve. With big earnings mostly behind us, economic data will drive the next wave of market direction.Investors should also keep watching Treasury yields, crypto movements (Bitcoin is trading around $97,000), and commodity prices like oil and gold, which can influence broader risk sentiment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
When China jailed three people for leaking details of soon-to-be launched Apple gadget
Three Foxconn R&D employees in China were sentenced to prison for leaking details about the iPad 2 before its launch. The employees received sentences ranging from one year to 18 months and were fined between $4,500 and $23,000 for violating trade secrets. The arrests, which took place in December 2010, highlight Apple's aggressive stance on protecting its product secrecy. It also shows how importamt it is for the largest manufacturer of Apple's product to ensure this secrecy around the company's products. The three Foxconn employees reportedly provided digital images of the iPad 2's design to Shenzhen MacTop Electronics, an Apple-compatible accessory manufacturer founded in 2004. In exchange, MacTop paid the employees 20,000 yuan (approximately $3,000) and offered discounts on its products. This allowed MacTop to produce iPad 2 cases ahead of competitors, gaining a market edge. According to Cult of Mac, 'The leaked information gave MacTop a significant head start, showcasing how valuable Apple's trade secrets are in the competitive accessory market.' Apple's strict secrecy policy for its products Despite this high-profile case, leaks of Apple products persist, given the thousands of workers involved in its supply chain, many earning low wages. 'It's actually surprising that more Apple leaks don't surface, considering the scale of their manufacturing operations,' Cult of Mac noted. Apple's secrecy measures have since intensified, including deploying undercover security teams and imposing multimillion-dollar fines on suppliers who fail to safeguard confidential information. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Eat 1 Teaspoon Every Night, See What Happens A Week Later [Video] getfittoday Undo While Apple CEO Tim Cook has been slightly more forthcoming about future plans than Steve Jobs, the company remains fiercely protective of its hardware details. A leaked internal memo a few years ago underscored the severe consequences for employees who disclose sensitive information. With billions at stake in product launches, Apple's ongoing battle against leaks shows no signs of slowing down. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Apple Paper questions path to AGI, sparks division in GenAI group
New Delhi: A recent research paper from Apple focusing on the limitations of large reasoning models in artificial intelligence has left the generative AI community divided, sparking significant debate whether the current path taken by AI companies towards artificial general intelligence is the right one to take. The paper, titled The Illusion of Thinking, published earlier this week, demonstrates that even the most sophisticated large reasoning models do not genuinely think or reason in a human-like way. Instead, they excel at pattern recognition and mimicry, generating responses that only appear intelligent, but lack true comprehension or conceptual understanding. The study used controlled puzzle environments, such as the popular Tower of Hanoi puzzle, to systematically test reasoning abilities across varying complexities by large reasoning models such as OpenAI's o3 Mini, DeepSeek's R1, Anthropic's Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Google Gemini Flash. The findings show that while large reasoning and language models may handle simple or moderately complex tasks, they experience total failure when faced with high-complexity problems, which occur despite having sufficient computational resources. Gary Marcus, a cognitive scientist and a known sceptic of the claims surrounding large language models, views Apple's work as providing compelling empirical evidence that today's models primarily repeat patterns learned during training from vast datasets without genuine understanding or true reasoning capabilities. "If you can't use a billion-dollar AI system to solve a problem that Herb Simon (one of the actual godfathers of AI, current hype aside) solved with AI in 1957, and that first semester AI students solve routinely, the chances that models like Claude or o3 are going to reach AGI seem truly remote," Marcus wrote in his blog. Marcus' arguments are also echoed in earlier comments of Meta's chief AI scientist Yann LeCun, who has argued that current AI systems are mainly sophisticated pattern recognition tools rather than true thinkers. The release of Apple's paper ignited a polarised debate across the broader AI community, with many panning the design of the study than its findings.A published critique of the paper by researchers from Anthropic and San-Francisco based Open Philanthropy said the study has issues in the experimental design, that it overlooks output an alternate demonstration, the researchers tested the models on the same problems but allowed them to use code, resulting in high accuracy across all the tested models. The critique around the study's failure to take in the output limits and the limitations in coding by the models have also been highlighted by other AI commentators and researchers including Matthew Berman, a popular AI commentator and researcher."SOTA models failed The Tower of Hanoi puzzle at a complexity threshold of >8 discs when using natural language alone to solve it. However, ask it to write code to solve it, and it flawlessly does up to seemingly unlimited complexity," Berman wrote in a post on X (formerly Twitter).The study highlights Apple's more cautious approach to AI compared to rivals like Google and Samsung, who have aggressively integrated AI into their products. Apple's research explains its hesitancy to fully commit to AI, contrasting with the industry's prevailing narrative of rapid questioned the timing of the release of the study, coinciding with Apple's annual WWDC event where it announces its next software across online forums said the study was more about managing expectations in light of Apple's own struggles with said, practitioners and business users argue that the findings do not change the immediate utility of AI tools for everyday applications.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
3 hours ago
- Business Standard
AI experts divided over Apple's research on large reasoning model accuracy
A recent study by tech giant Apple claiming that the accuracy of frontier large reasoning models (LRMs) declines as task complexity increases, and eventually collapses altogether, has led to differing views among experts in the artificial intelligence (AI) world. The paper titled 'The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem Complexity' was published by Apple last week. Apple, in its paper, said it conducted experiments across diverse puzzles which show that such LRMs face a complete accuracy collapse beyond certain complexities. While their reasoning efforts increase with the complexity of a problem till a point, it then declines despite having an adequate token budget. A token budget for large language models (LLM) refers to the practice of setting a limit on the number of tokens an LLM can use for a specific task. The paper is co-authored by Samy Bengio, senior director, AI and ML research at Apple who is also the brother of Yoshua Bengio, often referred to as the godfather of AI. Meanwhile, AI company Anthropic, backed by Amazon, countered Apple's claims in a separate paper, saying that the 'findings primarily reflect experimental design limitations rather than fundamental reasoning failures.' 'Their central finding has significant implications for AI reasoning research. However, our analysis reveals that these apparent failures stem from experimental design choices rather than inherent model limitations,' it said. Mayank Gupta, founder of Swift Anytime, currently building an AI product on stealth, told Business Standard that both sides have equally important points. 'What this tells me is that we're still figuring out how to measure reasoning in LRMs the right way. The models are improving rapidly, but our evaluation tools haven't caught up. We need tools that separate how well an LRM reasons from how well it generates output and that's where the real breakthrough lies,' he said. Gary Marcus, a US academic, who has become a voice of caution on the capabilities of AI models, said in a best case scenario, these models can write python code, supplementing their own weaknesses with outside symbolic code, but even this is not reliable. 'What this means for business and society is that you can't simply drop o3 or Claude into some complex problem and expect it to work reliably,' he wrote in his blog, Marcus on AI. The Apple researchers conducted experiments comparing thinking and non-thinking model pairs across controlled puzzle environments. 'The most interesting regime is the third regime where problem complexity is higher and the performance of both models have collapsed to zero. Results show that while thinking models delay this collapse, they also ultimately encounter the same fundamental limitations as their non-thinking counterparts,' they wrote. Apple's observations in the paper perhaps can explain why the iPhone maker has been slow to embed AI across its products or operating systems, a point on which it was criticised at the Worldwide Developers Conference (WWDC) last week. This approach is opposite to the ones adopted by Microsoft-backed OpenAI, Meta, and Google, who are spending billions to build more sophisticated frontier models to solve more complex tasks. However, there are other voices too who believe that Apple's paper has its limitations. Ethan Mollick, associate professor at the Wharton School who studies the effects of AI on work, entrepreneurship, and education, mentioned on X that while the limits of reasoning models are useful, it is premature to say that LLMs are hitting a wall.
