Dollar weakens as rate cut odds rise, tariff uncertainties linger
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel
The U.S. dollar wavered on Tuesday as the rising odds of Federal Reserve rate cuts weighed on sentiment, while investors assessed the broader economic impact of U.S. tariffs unleashed last week.The dollar remained under pressure following Friday's U.S. jobs report that showed cracks in the labour market, prompting traders to swiftly price in rate cuts next month.U.S. President Donald Trump's firing of a top statistics official and the resignation of Federal Reserve Governor Adriana Kugler also exacerbated market unease, leading to a sharp dive in the dollar on Friday.The U.S. currency found its footing on Monday but was weaker in early trading on Tuesday. The euro last bought $1.1579 while sterling stood at $1.3298.The dollar index, which measures the U.S. currency against six other units, was at 98.688 after touching a one-week low earlier in the session.Traders are now pricing in a 94.4% chance of the Fed cutting rates in its next meeting in September, compared to 63% a week earlier, CME FedWatch tool showed.Goldman Sachs expects the Fed to deliver three consecutive 25 basis point cuts starting in September, with a 50 basis point move possible if the unemployment rate climbs further in the next report.San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank President Mary Daly said on Monday that given mounting evidence that the U.S. jobs market is softening and no signs of persistent tariff-driven inflation, the time is nearing for rate cuts."I was willing to wait another cycle, but I can't wait forever," Daly said.Meanwhile, the focus remains on tariff uncertainties after the latest duties imposed on scores of countries last week by Trump, stoked worries about the health of the global economy.The Japanese yen firmed slightly to 146.95 per dollar after minutes of its June policy meeting showed a few Bank of Japan board members said the central bank would consider resuming interest rate increases if trade frictions de-escalate.The Swiss franc was steady at 0.8081 per dollar after dropping 0.5% in the previous session as Switzerland geared up to make a "more attractive offer" in trade talks with Washington to avert a 39% U.S. import tariff on Swiss goods that threatens to hammer its export-driven economy.The long-term impact of the tariffs though remains uncertain, with traders bracing for volatility."This is going to be like the pandemic, we all expect to see the transitory impact on supply chains to happen very quickly," said Rodrigo Catril, currency strategist at National Australia Bank in Sydney."It'll probably take six months to a year to see exactly where we land and who's going to be winners and losers from all this."In other currencies, the Australian dollar was 0.11% higher at $0.64736, while the New Zealand dollar rose 0.11% to $0.5914."We're still of a view that the big dollar is heading down," Catril said, referring to the U.S. dollar."While global growth means pro-growth currencies like Asian currencies and the AUD should struggle, we've other structural dynamics in the USD, where policies are dollar-negative."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
a minute ago
- Mint
Bain-backed Japanese firm Proterial looks to India for rare earth magnet manufacturing
Bain Capital-backed Japanese firm Proterial Ltd is looking to manufacture rare earth magnets in India at a time when the country is battling the restrictions imposed by China on the exports of the critical component required in automobiles and electronic products. According to two people aware of the matter, the Japanese company wants to manufacture its flagship Neodymium Ferrite Boron (NdFeB) permanent magnets in the country as part of its NEOMAX brand, with multiple companies in India already looking for alternative supply chains. 'The company is exploring a plant in India where it can make the magnets. The rare earth oxides can be sourced from within India and outside," one of the persons aware of the matter said, adding that the Japanese leadership is currently discussing the proposal said. Currently, it has two plants in Japan and China, where it primarily manufactures rare earth magnets. While its Japan unit capacity details are not available publicly, the Chinese plant produces more than 2,000 tonnes of permanent magnets. In response to Mint's queries, Proterial said that its policy does not allow it to disclose investment considerations. 'Regardless of the project, Proterial, Ltd. has a policy of not disclosing the status of investment considerations, including whether or not there is a project," the company said in an email. In the fiscal year ended 31 March 2025, Proterial posted revenue of ¥768.6 billion (about $5.2 billion). While most of the processing of rare earth elements like neodymium takes place in China, India also holds reserves of neodymium, which it currently exports to Japan for processing. Being a light rare earth, neodymium's presence is more diversified, with the US, Australia and Myanmar also holding some reserves. Magnet attraction NdFeB magnets are light rare earths which, when combined with heavy rare earth elements like dysprosium and terbium, can produce a powerful magnetic force which is good for high-powered motors used in cars and bikes. While China has not restricted exports of neodymium, it has put a restriction on exports of heavy rare earth elements. Indian players have started working on solutions that can use light rare-earth magnets in the motors they use in their vehicles. Sona Comstar, the country's eighth largest component maker, said on Monday that it has started using light rare-earth magnets in the traction motors it makes, and the volume of production is back to the level in April, which was before the crisis started. Two-wheeler player Ather Energy Ltd has also expressed willingness to use light rare-earth magnets in its vehicles. The interest of the Japanese firm, a former unit of conglomerate Hitachi, also comes at a time when the government is finalising a ₹1,365 crore scheme to promote the manufacturing of rare earth magnets in India. 'A scheme has been circulated to give subsidies for manufacturers [magnet]. It is under inter-ministerial consultation," Union heavy industry minister H.D. Kumaraswamy said last month. The Japanese firm's interest comes at a time when several mining players in the country, including Hindustan Zinc and Gujarat Mineral Development Corporation, have expressed interest in exploring and scaling up the extraction of rare earth elements. While the interest of the Japanese players has accelerated in the past few months, investment decisions are being carefully mulled over as the firms also have exposure to China, which is a larger market than India. Cautious approach 'Firms are cautious in proceeding with investment plans as they have exposure in China and they don't want to be seen taking away capacity from the country," an investment advisor to foreign firms said on the condition of anonymity. Moreover, the first person cited above said that magnet manufacturers are also cautious about proceeding with their plans because they are afraid China will resume exports, which could make their magnets uncompetitive in terms of pricing. 'They will have to sign some captive deals before they fully invest because China can open the gates for exports at any time," the person said. Proterial's India exploration comes a month after more than a dozen major Japanese players from the EV battery and critical mineral supply chain, including Panasonic, Mitsubishi Chemicals, Sumitomo Metals and Mining, Asahi Kasei and Nichia, among others, were in India to explore partnerships with Indian companies as part of a Japanese delegation. All these companies are part of Japan's industry body, Battery Association of Supply Chain. Experts suggest that India's low cost of production and local captive demand can boost international players' interest in manufacturing magnets there. 'Rising domestic demand from sectors like electric vehicles, renewable energy, electronics, and defence adds urgency and commercial viability to developing this ecosystem. Combined with a skilled technical workforce, lower manufacturing costs and proximity to key global markets, India presents a compelling case as the next centre for rare earth magnet production," Anurag Singh, advisor, Primus Partners.
Economic Times
a minute ago
- Economic Times
Trump escalates threat level, says more tariff in 24 hours
Synopsis President Trump threatened to substantially increase tariffs on Indian imports due to continued Russian oil purchases, despite India's strong response and accusations of unfair targeting by the US and EU. India defends its actions as safeguarding national interests and economic security, highlighting its growing economy amid global uncertainty. Trade negotiations continue with scheduled talks in August. AP New Delhi: US President Donald Trump Tuesday threatened to 'very substantially' increase the 25% tariff on imports from India over continued purchases of Russian oil, maintaining his aggressive posture. This comes a day after New Delhi's strong response to comments by him in a similar vein over the past week or so. 'India has not been a good trading partner because they do a lot of business with us, but we don't do business with them. So we settled on 25%, but I think I'm going to raise that rate quite substantially in the next 24 hours,' Trump said in an interview to CNBC that was aired on Tuesday evening in India. The US President reiterated his claim that India has the highest tariffs. 'They're buying Russian oil and fuelling the war machine. If they are going to do that, I'm not going to be happy,' he said, adding that the main sticking point remained that India's tariffs were too high. 'With India, what people don't like to say is, they have the highest tariffs of anybody.' On Monday, India reacted strongly after Trump threatened substantial tariffs for purchasing Russian oil and 'selling it in the open market for big profits.'This is helping to fund Russia's war against Ukraine, according to Trump. India had accused the US and the European Union of unfairly 'targeting' India when they themselves were importing essential material from Russia. 'The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable,' the ministry of external affairs had said. 'Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security.' India also pointed out that the US had initially backed India's purchases from Russia 'for strengthening global energy markets stability.'Trump had last week announced a 25% duty on all Indian goods, in addition to a penalty for buying a 'vast majority' of Russian military equipment and crude oil. The US President has targeted India and Russia for their close ties and said the two can take their 'dead economies down together.' India had responded by reiterating that it will take all necessary steps to safeguard its national interest, besides pointing out that its economy — the fastest-growing major one — was a bright spot amid global uncertainty. Trump had earlier threatened an additional 10% tariff on BRICS members, which he said were aligning themselves against the US. His threats come amid the two sides negotiating a bilateral trade agreement (BTA), the first part of which is planned to be concluded by October. American trade negotiators are scheduled to visit India for the sixth round of talks on August 25-30. The US was India's largest export destination in FY25 with shipments valued at $87 billion, accounting for about a fifth of the $437 billion total.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
The ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' is reshaping student loans at the University of Michigan: Pell Grants, caps, and repayment changes explained
On July 4, President Donald Trump signed into law the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (H.R.1), a wide-ranging federal budget reconciliation package that has already sparked a wave of policy debates across the country. Among its many provisions, including tax reforms and defense spending increases, the bill introduces substantial changes to federal student loan programs. For students, alumni, and faculty at the University of Michigan, these shifts are not just administrative, they may directly alter access to funding, repayment pathways, and career choices. The legislation's education provisions draw heavily from prior proposals, including the Bipartisan Workforce Pell Act , and reflect a renewed push by lawmakers to limit long-term federal loan exposure while expanding short-term job-oriented training options. As reported by The Michigan Daily , members of the U-M community are closely watching how these adjustments may reshape student opportunity and financial planning in both undergraduate and professional education. Pell Grants : Expanded eligibility, limited certainty One of the more widely welcomed changes under H.R.1 is the expansion of Pell Grant eligibility. Originally targeted towards low-income students enrolled in degree-granting programs, Pell Grants can now be used for shorter-term certificate programs, including many offered by trade schools and community colleges. Jeremy Wright-Kim, an assistant professor at the University of Michigan's Center for the Study of Higher and Postsecondary Education, told The Michigan Daily that this extension may benefit working adults and those seeking fast, career-aligned skills. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Treatment That Might Help You Against Knee Pain (Search Here) Kneepain | Search Search Now Undo 'These shorter-term certificate programs are good if your local labor market needs to fill that need,' Wright-Kim said. 'There are also students who are more likely to be attracted to those programs, like working adults who maybe can't attend a full-time, longer-term credential program.' While this change is intended to strengthen workforce pipelines, education policy researchers have cautioned that outcomes for such programs vary widely. Certificate programs can offer a quick return in certain technical fields but may lead to minimal wage gains in others. Students are encouraged to review completion rates and post-program earnings data through the College Scorecard before enrolling. Repayment plans: Fewer options, more questions Beginning July 1, 2026, the number of federal student loan repayment plans for new borrowers will be reduced from seven to two. These will include a standard plan with fixed monthly payments and a new income-based plan requiring a minimum of ten dollars per month. Existing borrowers who took out loans before that date will retain access to current income-based plans until they are phased out by mid-2028. Michigan Law alumnus Ryan Jansen described the decision to consolidate plans as reasonable in theory but frustrating in execution. 'The new repayment plans, compared to some of the changes, aren't as bad as they may seem at first glance,' he said. 'I don't think the idea of trying to consolidate plans is inherently bad.' However, Jansen noted that accessing reliable information about how these changes will be implemented has been a challenge. He expressed concern about communication gaps from the Department of Education and federal loan servicers, especially following recent layoffs within the department. 'I haven't had any information from the Department of Education, from FAFSA or from my third-party loan servicer, explaining these changes and what I may or may not need to do,' Jansen told The Daily . 'There are fewer people working and more people trying to get information.' The University of Michigan's Office of Financial Aid has acknowledged the current lack of detailed guidance. On its official website, the office states it is actively monitoring updates and will inform students once formal directions are issued by the US Department of Education. Borrowing caps: Professional education under pressure Perhaps the most contentious component of the bill for U-M students is the imposition of new borrowing caps. Starting in 2026, a lifetime limit of 257,500 dollars will apply to all federal student loans. Annual caps will also be introduced: 20,500 dollars for graduate students, 50,000 dollars for students pursuing professional degrees such as law or medicine, and 20,000 dollars per year for Parent PLUS loans, with a 65,000-dollar lifetime cap. These caps mark a sharp departure from the previous system, where graduate and professional students could borrow up to the full cost of attendance through Grad PLUS loans. The implications are especially concerning for students at institutions like Michigan Law or Michigan Medicine, where annual costs can exceed 100,000 dollars. Jansen noted that while Michigan Law offers competitive merit scholarships, most students still borrow more than 50,000 dollars annually. 'If you took out money in undergrad, you're going to maybe hit that lifetime cap much sooner,' he said. 'I don't think 50,000 dollars a year makes law school accessible for most people.' Alex Braun, a rising junior in the College of Literature, Science, and the Arts and officer-at-large for the College Democrats at U-M, voiced similar concerns. Speaking with The Michigan Daily , Braun said the new limits may deter students from lower-income backgrounds from entering critical professions, particularly in healthcare and law. 'We already have a shortage of doctors in the US,' Braun said. 'These changes are going to make it worse and create more barriers to those higher educations.' Will tuition costs adjust? Proponents of borrowing limits argue that by capping how much students can borrow, colleges will face pressure to rein in tuition growth. However, higher education experts, including Wright-Kim, remain skeptical. 'It's very hard for institutions to lower their tuition rates because education is an expensive enterprise,' he said. 'We would be more likely to see different groups of students not being able to attend, as opposed to colleges saying, 'We're going to make it cheaper for you.'' Most tuition increases are driven by rising operational costs, such as faculty salaries, technology upgrades, and student services. Without substantial state or federal subsidies, institutions have limited flexibility to lower costs without compromising quality. A moment of reckoning For a university deeply invested in public service, research, and academic excellence, the changes introduced through H.R.1 are being met with a mix of concern and cautious optimism. While expanding access to short-term credentials may align with workforce needs, reduced flexibility in repayment and tighter borrowing limits could create unintended barriers for many students pursuing advanced degrees. Braun summed up the sentiment felt by many on campus. 'I'm so used to being in a community where everyone supports and encourages higher education,' he said. 'To see a divestment in higher education from the federal government is alarming and a little shocking to me.' As students return to campus for the fall semester, many will be looking to university financial aid offices, policymakers, and advocacy groups for clarity and support. Until more guidance is issued by the Department of Education, the impact of the One Big Beautiful Bill will remain a subject of both speculation and serious concern. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
