The indirect impact of Trump's tariff war
[MILAN] An overwhelming majority of economists are convinced that, contrary to what US President Donald Trump apparently believes, tariffs cannot mitigate a current-account deficit. But there is little recent evidence for this position, for the simple reason that tariffs have been running at very low levels globally, with most developed economies maintaining average tariff rates in the low single digits. So, what explains the consensus?
For starters, high tariffs did prevail during the interwar period, in the 1920s and 1930s, and there was no evidence that tariffs improved a country's current account. The US was running a trade surplus when president Herbert Hoover enacted the infamous Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930. While global trade subsequently plummeted, America's trade balance did not improve.
But even without first-hand evidence of the impact of high tariffs on current-account balances, economists can reach credible conclusions, because we know what determines those balances: the difference between an economy's aggregate savings and investment. In the US, the national savings rate amounts to 17 per cent of gross domestic product. In the European Union, that rate is about seven percentage points higher, at 24 per cent of GDP. Since these two continent-sized developed economies share very similar investment rates, the difference in savings is reflected almost directly in the current-account balance, with the US posting a deficit of nearly 4 per cent of GDP in 2024, and the EU achieving a surplus of 2.7 per cent of GDP.
To be sure, the Trump administration's tariffs – particularly the 'reciprocal' tariffs that were announced on Apr 2, and 'paused' on Apr 9 – focus primarily on the balance of trade in goods, which is only one component of the current-account balance. But the other factors that influence the current account – the services balance and investment income – tend to be much smaller and more stable.
In any case, two developments could cause a rapid improvement in an economy's current-account balance: a sharp increase in savings, or a significant decline in investment. Trump's tariffs could achieve this if they continue undermining confidence, especially if they induce a recession. Persistent uncertainty could undermine investment, and rising import prices could cause consumers to reduce their spending, pending more information about the cost and availability of goods.
But that information will soon arrive – probably within a few months. After all, the Trump administration is already announcing trade deals – starting with an agreement with the United Kingdom, following only a few days of negotiations – and has temporarily suspended its massive tariffs on Chinese imports. Given Trump's voracious appetite for dealmaking and lack of commitment to delivering particularly radical results, many more trade agreements will likely be concluded before Trump's three-month suspension of his 'reciprocal' tariffs ends.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
As policy uncertainty declines, the US will probably return to the low-savings, high-investment pattern of the past, especially given American firms' continued AI dominance. So, even if America's current-account balance improves temporarily, the overall deficit is likely to persist, as will the surpluses of other major economies, such as China, the EU and Japan.
While Trump's tariffs will probably have little lasting impact on America's current-account balance, they can upend bilateral trade balances. We have seen this first-hand: since 2018, when Trump's first administration began imposing high tariffs on China, the country's share of US imports has fallen from over 21 per cent to about 14 per cent. Meanwhile, China's share of EU imports has risen slightly from its 2018 level of about 20 per cent.
The narrowing in the US-China deficit might be enough for Trump, who is fixated on bilateral trade balances, making them the basis of his reciprocal-tariff calculations. The US-China trade talks just yielded a preliminary agreement that both countries will substantially reduce import tariffs, at least temporarily. Even so, US tariffs on Chinese goods will remain 30 per cent higher during the just-agreed 90-day 'pause' than they were at the start of the year.
As a result, Chinese exports to the US are set to fall further, with Chinese producers diverting US-bound goods to other markets – especially the EU. But increased imports from China will not affect the balance of savings and investment in these markets, as they will be offset either by reduced imports from other countries or by higher exports, including to China, which will be importing less from the US. Meanwhile, the countries facing the lowest US tariffs will have higher bilateral trade surpluses with the US, while their trade balances with China and other countries deteriorate.
So, a major reshuffling of bilateral trade balances is in the offing. This process will demand considerable flexibility from industry, which will have to adjust production to meet the needs of consumers in different markets. It will also require policymakers to resist the temptation to protect their domestic markets from 'surging' imports from countries such as China. These changes in bilateral trade flows between non-US markets constitute a more diffuse – and possibly greater – challenge to the global trading system than the direct impact of US tariffs. PROJECT SYNDICATE
The writer is director of the Institute for European Policymaking at Bocconi University
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
38 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Trump travel ban in effect, citizens from 12 nations barred from US
Many of the nations covered by the restrictions have adversarial relations with the United States. PHOTO: AFP Trump travel ban in effect, citizens from 12 nations barred from US WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump's sweeping new travel ban came into effect early on June 9 immediately after midnight, barring citizens from a dozen nations from entering the United States and reviving a divisive measure from his first term. The move is expected to disrupt refugee pathways and further restrict immigration as the Trump administration expands its crackdown on illegal entries. Many of the nations covered by the restrictions have adversarial relations with the United States, such as Iran and Afghanistan, while others face severe crises, like Haiti and Libya. In announcing his restrictions last week, Mr Trump said the new measure was spurred by a recent 'terrorist attack' on Jews in Colorado. The group had been protesting in solidarity with hostages held in Gaza when they were assaulted by a man the White House said had overstayed his visa. That attack, Mr Trump said, 'underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted' or who overstay their visas. The move bans all travel to the United States by nationals of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, according to the White House. Mr Trump also imposed a partial ban on travellers from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Some temporary work visas from those countries will be allowed. New countries could be added, Mr Trump warned, 'as threats emerge around the world.' Ms Mehria, a 23-year-old woman from Afghanistan who applied for refugee status, said the new rules have trapped her and many other Afghans in uncertainty. 'We gave up thousands of hopes and our entire lives... on a promise from America, but today we are suffering one hell after another,' she told AFP. World Cup, Olympics, diplomats excluded The ban will not apply to athletes competing in the 2026 World Cup, which the United States is co-hosting with Canada and Mexico, or in the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, Mr Trump's order said. Nor will it apply to diplomats from the targeted countries. United Nations rights chief Volker Turk warned that 'the broad and sweeping nature of the new travel ban raises concerns from the perspective of international law.' US Democratic lawmakers and elected officials blasted the ban as draconian and unconstitutional. 'I know the pain that Trump's cruel and xenophobic travel bans inflict because my family has felt it firsthand,' congresswoman Yassamin Ansari, who is Iranian-American, posted on June 8 on X. 'We will fight this ban with everything we have.' Rumours of a new travel ban had circulated following the Colorado attack, with Mr Trump's administration vowing to pursue 'terrorists' living in the United States on visas. US officials said suspect Mohamed Sabry Soliman, an Egyptian national according to court documents, was in the country illegally having overstayed a tourist visa, but that he had applied for asylum in September 2022. Mr Trump's new travel ban notably does not include Egypt. His proclamation said Taliban-ruled Afghanistan and war-torn Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Yemen lacked 'competent' central authorities for processing passports and vetting. Iran was included because it is a 'state sponsor of terrorism,' the order said. For the other countries, Mr Trump's order cited an above-average likelihood that people would overstay their visas. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
China exports slow as trade war takes toll
BEIJING: Chinese exports grew slower than expected in May, according to official data on Monday (Jun 9), as shipments to the United States tumbled amid global trade turmoil triggered by Donald Trump's tariff blitz. The figures also showed imports suffered a forecast-beating drop, with weak domestic consumption in the world's number two economy highlighted by data earlier in the day revealing another month of falling prices. The 4.8 per cent year-on-year drop in overseas shipments last month was an improvement on April but bigger than the 6.0 per cent forecast in a survey of economists by Bloomberg. The reading included a 12.7 per cent plunge in exports to the US compared with April, when Trump unveiled his eye-watering tariffs on China. Imports from the US tanked 17.9 per cent after Beijing imposed tit-for-tat measures. Exports tumbled by a third year-on-year in May. In contrast, the data showed shipments to Vietnam increased from the previous month. Those to other Southeast Asian countries, including Malaysia, Thailand, Singapore and Indonesia, all declined slightly after soaring in April, the figures indicated. "The trade war between China and the US led to sharply lower exports to the US, but the damage was offset by stronger exports to other countries," Zhiwei Zhang, resident and Chief Economist at Pinpoint Asset Management, said in a note. "The trade outlook remains highly uncertain at this stage," he added, pointing to the impact of "frontloading", when overseas buyers increase shipments ahead of potentially higher tariffs. CONSUMER PRICES Monday's readings added to concerns about the Chinese economy, with a report from the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) showing the consumer price index - a key measure of inflation - dropped 0.1 per cent year on year in May. The reading, which was slightly better than expected but marks the fourth straight month of falling prices, comes as Beijing struggles to boost the sluggish domestic consumption seen since the end of the pandemic. Leaders' failure to kickstart demand threatens their official growth targets and complicates their ability to shield their economy from Trump's tariff blitz. While deflation suggests the cost of goods is falling, it poses a threat to the broader economy as consumers tend to postpone purchases under such conditions, hoping for further reductions. A lack of demand can then force companies to cut production, freeze hiring or lay off workers, while potentially also having to discount existing stocks - dampening profitability even as costs remain the same. Deepening a slump that has now lasted more than two years, factory gate prices also dropped in May, the NBS said on Monday. The producer price index decline of 3.3 per cent - accelerating from a 2.7 per cent drop in April - was faster than the 3.2 per cent estimated in the Bloomberg survey. Representatives from China and the US are expected to meet on Monday in London for another round of high-stakes trade talks, markets hope will ease tensions between the economic superpowers. A key issue in the negotiations will be Beijing's shipments of rare earths, crucial to a range of goods including electric vehicle batteries and which have been a bone of contention between the two for some time. Figures Monday showed Chinese exports of 17 minerals rose last month to 5,865 from 4,785 tons in April. The London talks will be the second set of formal negotiations between the two since Trump launched his global trade blitz on Apr 2. They were announced after a phone call last week between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, which the US president described as "very good".
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Auto companies ‘in full panic' over rare-earths bottleneck
Car executives have once again been driven into their war rooms, concerned that China's tight export controls on rare-earth magnets could cripple production. PHOTO: REUTERS BERLIN/LONDON/DETROIT - Frank Eckard, chief executive of a German magnet maker, has been fielding a flood of calls in recent weeks. Exasperated automakers and parts suppliers have been desperate to find alternative sources of magnets, which are in short supply due to Chinese export curbs. Some told Mr Eckard their factories could be idled by mid-July without backup magnet supplies. 'The whole car industry is in full panic,' said Mr Eckard, CEO of Magnosphere, based in Troisdorf, Germany. 'They are willing to pay any price.' Car executives have once again been driven into their war rooms, concerned that China's tight export controls on rare-earth magnets – crucially needed to make cars – could cripple production. US President Donald Trump said on June 5 that Chinese President Xi Jinping agreed to let rare earths minerals and magnets flow to the United States. A US trade team is scheduled to meet Chinese counterparts for talks in London on June 5. The industry worries that the rare-earths situation could cascade into the third massive supply chain shock in five years. A semiconductor shortage wiped away millions of cars from automakers' production plans, from roughly 2021 to 2023. Before that, the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 shut factories for weeks. Those crises prompted the industry to fortify supply chain strategies. Executives have prioritized backup supplies for key components and reexamined the use of just-in-time inventories, which save money but can leave them without stockpiles when a crisis unfurls. Judging from Mr Eckard's inbound calls, though, 'nobody has learned from the past,' he said. This time, as the rare-earths bottleneck tightens, the industry has few good options, given the extent to which China dominates the market. The fate of automakers' assembly lines has been left to a small team of Chinese bureaucrats as it reviews hundreds of applications for export permits. Several European auto-supplier plants have already shut down, with more outages coming, said the region's auto supplier association, CLEPA. 'Sooner or later, this will confront everyone,' said CLEPA secretary-general Benjamin Krieger. Cars today use rare-earths-based motors in dozens of components – side mirrors, stereo speakers, oil pumps, windshield wipers, and sensors for fuel leakage and braking sensors. China controls up to 70 per cent of global rare-earths mining, 85 per cent of refining capacity and about 90 per cent of rare-earths metal alloy and magnet production, consultancy AlixPartners said. The average electric vehicle uses about .5 kg of rare earths elements, and a fossil-fuel car uses just half that, according to the International Energy Agency. China has clamped down before, including in a 2010 dispute with Japan, during which it curbed rare-earths exports. Japan had to find alternative suppliers, and by 2018, China accounted for only 58% of its rare earth imports. 'China has had a rare-earth card to play whenever they wanted to,' said Mark Smith, CEO of mining company NioCorp, which is developing a rare-earth project in Nebraska scheduled to start production within three years. Across the industry, automakers have been trying to wean off China for rare-earth magnets, or even develop magnets that do not need those elements. But most efforts are years away from the scale needed. 'It's really about identifying ... and finding alternative solutions' outside China, Joseph Palmieri, head of supply chain management at supplier Aptiv, said at a conference in Detroit last week. Automakers including General Motors and BMW and major suppliers such as ZF and BorgWarner are working on motors with low-to-zero rare-earth content, but few have managed to scale production enough to cut costs. The EU has launched initiatives including the Critical Raw Materials Act to boost European rare-earth sources. But it has not moved fast enough, said Noah Barkin, a senior advisor at Rhodium Group, a China-focused US think tank. Even players that have developed marketable products struggle to compete with Chinese producers on price. David Bender, co-head of German metal specialist Heraeus' magnet recycling business, said it is only operating at 1 per cent capacity and will have to close next year if sales do not increase. Minneapolis-based Niron has developed rare-earth free magnets and has raised more than US$250 million (S$322 million0 from investors including GM, Stellantis and auto supplier Magna. 'We've seen a step change in interest from investors and customers' since China's export controls took effect, CEO Jonathan Rowntree said. It is planning a US$1 billion plant scheduled to start production in 2029. UK-based Warwick Acoustics has developed rare-earth-free speakers expected to appear in a luxury car later this year. CEO Mike Grant said the company has been in talks with another dozen automakers, although the speakers are not expected to be available in mainstream models for about five years. As auto companies scout longer-term solutions, they are left scrambling to avert imminent factory shutdowns. Automakers must figure out which of their suppliers – and smaller ones a few links up the supply chain – need export permits. Mercedes-Benz, for example, is talking to suppliers about building rare-earth stockpiles. Analysts said the constraints could force automakers to make cars without certain parts and park them until they become available, as GM and others did during the semiconductor crisis. Automakers' reliance on China does not end with rare earth elements. A 2024 European Commission report said China controls more than 50 per cent of global supply of 19 key raw materials, including manganese, graphite and aluminum. Andy Leyland, co-founder of supply chain specialist SC Insights, said any of those elements could be used as leverage by China. 'This just is a warning shot,' he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
