Jack Dorsey Announces Bitchat Messaging App
Twitter co-founder and CEO of Block Jack Dorsey launched the beta version of a new peer-to-peer messaging app on TestFlight. Unlike WhatsApp and others like it that rely on internet connectivity and central servers, Dorsey says that Bitchat operates entirely over Bluetooth mesh networks, promising true decentralization and privacy for its users. He made "an ugly whitepaper describing protocol" available on GitHub.
CNBC broke down the tech and its features. In essence, Bitchat allows users to communicate via Bluetooth-connected devices. But here's where it gets interesting: "As users move through physical space, their phones form local Bluetooth clusters and pass messages from device to device, allowing them to reach peers beyond standard range — even without Wi-Fi or cell service."
Related: Jack Dorsey Says Intellectual Property Law Shouldn't Exist, and Elon Musk Agrees: 'Delete All IP Law'
Messages that are sent via Bitchat are encrypted from end to end and do not live in the cloud — they are only stored on devices and are set to delete. The message "never touch centralized infrastructure," reports CNBC, "echoing Dorsey's long-running push for privacy-preserving, censorship-resistant communication."
Dorsey's post on X has received over 1.3 million views, with beta testers eager to jump in. The TestFlight page is no longer available after hitting its 10,000-user maximum.
my weekend project to learn about bluetooth mesh networks, relays and store and forward models, message encryption models, and a few other things.
bitchat: bluetooth mesh chat...IRC vibes.
TestFlight: https://t.co/P5zRRX0TB3
GitHub: https://t.co/Yphb3Izm0P pic.twitter.com/yxZxiMfMH2 — jack (@jack) July 6, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
a few seconds ago
- Android Authority
The handy CUKTECH 15 Ultra Power Bank is at a record-low price!
Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority Do you keep running out of battery? I've been searching for a battery pack that's both easy to carry and powerful, and so far, the CUKTECH 15 Ultra Power Bank offers the perfect balance for my needs. It's at a record-low price, too, and you can take it home for $71.99. That's much more enticing than paying the full $109.99 retail price! Buy the CUKTECH 15 Ultra Power Bank for just $71.99 ($38 off) This offer is available from Amazon, and it comes in two stages. First, there's an automatic 'limited time deal' that brings the price down to $79.99. Then, you can press the Redeem button right below the price to get an extra 10% coupon applied. The CUKTECH 15 Ultra is a really nice battery pack if you value both portability and power. At 5.98 x 2.25 x 1.75 inches, it's smaller than similar competitors, and it weighs 1.3 pounds. This means it can easily fit in most purses and backpacks. I have even carried it in my pants pocket! It has a 20,000mAh battery capacity, which is good enough to charge a smartphone about 3-4 times, depending on your battery size and other factors. For the size, it's a really nice amount of juice. Edgar Cervantes / Android Authority The main highlight of the CUKTECH 15 Ultra Power Bank is how fast it is. It can output as much as 165W. It has two USB-C ports and a USB-A connection. The fastest USB-C port can reach 140W, while the second is limited to 65W. Arguably, though, even the slower port is pretty fast. The USB-A connection can output 18W, which is slower, but more than enough for accessories or slow charging a smartphone. This one has become my go-to power bank, so I am sure many of you will love it. If you're interested, act quickly, as this is an all-time low price, and those don't tend to last long. Extra deal: The Anker Laptop Power Bank is $40.50 off Another popular battery pack at a similar price level is the Anker Laptop Power Bank. It's going for $94.49, which is a nice discount on its $134.99 full retail price. This one is not exactly better in every way, but it has some nice touches many of you will appreciate. It also comes from a more recognized brand, which we know many of you will prefer. The Anker Laptop Power Bank gets a larger 25,000mAh battery, so you're getting an extra 5,000mAh with this one. It also has a max output of 165W. All three USB-C ports can output as much as 100W, so there's no need to pick and choose specific ports here. The single USB-A connection can push out 33W, so that one is also faster than the one on the CUKTECH battery. Dave Carr The other main difference in ports is that Anker has built two of the USB-C connections in. Only one is a standard USB-C port; the other two are integrated cables. One of them is retractable, and the other doubles as a loop, adding a bit of functionality to its ports. This is nice if you prefer not having to worry about carrying cables all the time. I worry about built-in cables, as they are essentially non-replaceable. This means that, if damaged, that port is pretty much done for. I would honestly be worried about damaging these all the time. Anker mentions these are rated for 20,000 bends, though. Also, our co-worker Dave Carr mentions the whole unit feels pretty sturdy. Additionally, it comes with an 18-month warranty.
TechCrunch
a few seconds ago
- TechCrunch
Tesla wants to bring its robotaxis to San Francisco. Here is what's standing in the way.
Tesla is launching an even-more-limited version of its early robotaxi service in San Francisco this weekend, according to Business Insider, after an initial rollout began last month in Austin, Texas. The company plans to send invites to Tesla owners to test the service, according to the report. Depending on how and if Tesla proceeds, its actions could violate state regulations — and even if there's a human safety driver sitting behind the wheel while its vehicles operate autonomously. Two state agencies regulate aspects of autonomous vehicles in California. The California Department of Motor Vehicles regulates the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles, and requires permits for all three stages: testing with a driver, testing without a driver, and driverless deployment. Tesla holds a permit for testing autonomous vehicles with a human safety operator behind the wheel. It doesn't have a permit for driverless testing or deployment. And as of Wednesday it had not yet applied for additional permits, according to the DMV. (Mercedes-Benz, Nuro, and Waymo are the only three companies that hold driverless deployment permits.) Nor does Tesla have the proper permits from the California Public Utilities Commission, which regulates the commercial aspects of ride-hailing and chartered transportation by humans as well as those steered by autonomous vehicle systems. Tesla has a Transportation Charter Party permit, which allows a human driver to drive a traditional vehicle (not an AV) for charter services with the public, CPUC spokesperson Terrie Prosper told TechCrunch in an email. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW This is distinctly different from an autonomous vehicle permit for passenger transportation, according to Prosper. So-called AV authorizations, which Tesla doesn't have, allows for the testing and deployment of autonomous vehicles with or without a driver. Tesla has not received approval from the CPUC to offer autonomous passenger service to customers, paid or unpaid, with or without a driver (nor has the company applied), Prosper explained in the email. Tesla also doesn't hold a 'Drivered Pilot AV permit' from the CPUC, so it cannot even use an autonomous vehicle with a human operator behind the wheel for passenger service. This means that if Tesla deploys its robotaxis and the autonomous systems are engaged it will be violating state regulations even if the rides are free and there is a human safety operator behind the wheel. The push into California comes as the DMV is currently trying to stop Tesla from selling vehicles in the state as part of a years-long lawsuit over the promises the company has made about its cars' self-driving abilities. Tesla is also currently on trial in a lawsuit over deaths related to the use of its less-capable driver assistance system, Autopilot. Tesla has been running an invite-only version of its robotaxi service in Austin since June 22. It's so far been a far cry from what Musk has spent years teasing. The service is mostly limited to Austin's downtown core and main corridors. There is a safety operator in the front passenger seat who can intervene if the car is about to do something wrong or dangerous. While the service launched with around 10 vehicles, it's not clear how many Model Y SUVs are in operation in the city, nor is it clear how many times those safety operators have had to intervene. That's a long way from the 'general solution' that Musk said Tesla was working on for a decade. Musk was once so confident in the autonomous software Tesla was developing that he said it would take a car from Los Angeles to New York — a stunt that never happened. Musk said this week that Tesla is also trying to expand to Florida and Arizona. TechCrunch reported earlier this month that Tesla had begun the required certification process to test and operate with and without a driver in Arizona.
Forbes
a minute ago
- Forbes
AI Action Plan Channels Rally Energy, Ignites U.S. Policy Debate
WASHINGTON, DC - JULY 23: Jacob Helberg, Hill and Valley co-founder and Under Secretary of State for ... More economic growth designate; NVIDIA co-founder and CEO Jensen Huang; Founders Fund partner and Varda Space Industries co-founder Delian Asparouhov; and Environmental Protection Agency Administrator (EPA) Lee Zeldin give a standing ovation to U.S. President Donald Trump at the "Winning the AI Race" summit. At the Winning AI Race Summit, President Donald Trump delivered a speech combining campaign-style showmanship with concrete policy proposals for America's future in artificial intelligence. Speaking in his trademark improvisational style, assertive and theatrical, punctuated with rally-style slogans, Trump laid out a private-sector-driven strategy to reassert U.S. dominance in AI. It is the start of a 'golden age of America,' he said, punctuating the message with chants of 'Drill, baby, drill and build, baby, build!' and urging American technology companies to go 'all in for America.' The president announced an executive order banning what he called woke AI, a move that immediately sparked debate over the government's role in shaping the values embedded in AI systems. Additionally, Trump also called for expedited permitting for data centers and energy projects, and launched an initiative to make the U.S. an 'AI export powerhouse.' An AI Agenda Tailored For The Tech Industry Trump's speech outlined the plan to boost America's AI global standing, empowering private-sector growth through deregulation, incentives and diplomacy for market access. He called for clearer copyright rules that would let AI systems learn from publicly available content without being blocked by licensing restrictions. He advocated for a single federal AI regulatory standard. A mix of state laws, he warned, could slow innovation and strain early-stage companies and small businesses. The president made clear that he sees the private sector, not government, as the primary engine of innovation. He said Washington should enable innovation, not interfere with it, and declared his intention to keep bureaucrats 'out of the way.' Trump pledged to accelerate the build of AI infrastructure, including data centers, power plants and semiconductor fabs, via deregulation and expedited permitting. He linked this effort to a broader industrial revival, citing the need for electricians, heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) technicians and construction workers to meet the rising demand. The speech referred to the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, the budget reconciliation bill at the core of Trump's second-term agenda with tax cuts, spending adjustments and a debt ceiling increase. It highlighted its provisions allowing companies to deduct capital expenses upfront to accelerate private investment in infrastructure. Internationally, Trump proposed turning the U.S. into an AI export powerhouse of full-stack solutions that include American AI models, applications and the hardware it runs on. The goal is to promote sales to allied nations, backed by diplomatic and trade support from the State and Commerce Departments. On energy, he called for an 'all of the above' strategy, including coal, oil, gas and nuclear to meet AI's rapidly growing power demands. According to the Energy Information Administration, China produced more than twice as much energy as the U.S. in 2023. With abundant power generation, China can support large AI factories, even when powered by less energy-efficient chips, such as older generations of Nvidia chips or locally produced semiconductors from Huawei. Trump vowed to eliminate what he called woke mandates from federally supported AI, criticizing prior policies that tied government funding to diversity goals. President Biden's industrial strategy for semiconductor manufacturing included language encouraging companies to broaden their hiring pipelines. Under a new executive order, the government would be barred from using systems that incorporate ideological screening or require diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) benchmarks. Lastly, Trump said he would support small tech firms to ensure competition and innovation beyond the dominant platforms, arguing that 'the future of AI shouldn't belong to a few companies alone.' The AI Plan Draws Mixed Reactions Critics of the plan warn that it favors entrenched corporate interests while sidelining democratic safeguards and public accountability. Nicholas Garcia, senior policy counsel at Public Knowledge, calls it 'a handout to already-entrenched, powerful tech companies'. The plan's emphasis on deregulation and expedited permitting has raised alarm among environmental advocates, who point to the potential climate impact of large-scale data centers and fossil fuel-heavy power generation. Civil society organizations created the 'People's AI Action Plan,' a manifesto stating that 'We can't let Big Tech and Big Oil lobbyists write the rules for AI and our economy at the expense of our freedom and equality.' Civil liberties groups are also sounding the alarm. The ban on woke AI and the proposed removal of misinformation safeguards have drawn criticism from speech and privacy experts. The Electronic Privacy Information Center said the move is 'placing business interests ahead of consumer protection.' 'The government's interest in only supporting AI that upholds free speech gives me pause,' said Manasi Vartak, chief AI architect at Cloudera. 'In an age of misinformation and where AIs are becoming a key source of information, this banner of free speech can easily be misused.' At the same time, she praised the 'support for open-source and open-weight models and datasets, which are essential for innovation and for continuing research.' The Politics Of AI Policy Trump's AI strategy uses a familiar Silicon Valley formula: deregulate, invest in infrastructure and trust the market to deliver. While the plan is ambitious, much of it remains a framework, leaving federal agencies and Congress to fill in the details. Whether it can move from rally to policy will depend on engagement from civil society, which, until now, has remained at the margin of the administration's approach. As agencies begin translating priorities into rules and funding decisions, implementation could drift into partisan favoritism. But the moment also opens space for new types of governance that move past the usual tug-of-war between regulation and laissez-faire. Policy experts are calling for governance models that pair public-private collaboration with independent audits and oversight systems designed to evolve with the fast-changing AI tools. A report by Fathom, an independent nonprofit, reminds that 'no matter how well-intentioned any government's efforts might be, the reality is that direct government regulation simply cannot keep up with the pace of innovation. Worse yet, it might suffocate it.' How the plan plays out will influence U.S. competitiveness and the rules that shape AI worldwide. As other nations advance their AI strategies, Trump's private-sector-first emphasis will be tested. The plan positions the U.S. for leadership in technology, innovation and global adoption. But its success will ultimately depend on whether people around the world trust and use American-made AI.
