Landmark town centre pub up for sale for £385k
The Court House on New Street is for sale, with notes stating that staff would be transferred to the new owner on completion.
Sales notes state that it is a "substantial handsome building within Dudley town centre."
They go on to say that the pub has an open plan bar, separate snug, seating for 115 customers, a large function room on the first floor with a bar and catering kitchen.
It also has four-bedroom living accommodation on the second floor.
Sales notes state that there is "planning consent for seven bedsits / flats on upper floors.
"All staff employed at the property will transfer on completion under the TUPE regulations.
"A staff schedule will be made available.
"Freehold offers are invited in excess of £395,000."
The pub is being marketed by Matthew Phillips Surveyors in Lichfield.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Energy Domain Acquires Clerk Records, LLC and Proprietary Technology from Founder Jason Smith, Who Joins in Advisory Role
Joint Effort Will Integrate Structured, AI-extracted Courthouse Records into the Energy Domain Data Platform and Expand Standalone Product FORT WORTH, Texas, August 12, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Energy Domain, the Fort Worth-based technology company behind Energy Domain Marketplace and Energy Domain Data, announced it has acquired the domain along with the proprietary technology behind the project — a next-generation, AI-enhanced courthouse records platform. Together with Clerk Records founder and CEO Jason Smith, Energy Domain is developing two ways for users to access the technology: Energy Domain Courthouse, which will feature seamless integration into the user-friendly, cost-efficient Energy Domain Data tool, and an expanded, standalone platform. After decades shaping and guiding one of the leading courthouse data providers, Jason Smith launched Clerk Records earlier this year to pursue a more advanced, AI-driven vision. With this acquisition, Energy Domain gains not just his new technology, but also Smith himself in an advisory role — bringing with him the relationships and strategic insight needed to turn that technology into the next standard in courthouse data access. "A big part of collecting courthouse records is knowing how to work with hundreds of counties, understanding their formats and schedules, and having the personal relationships to actually get these documents," said Energy Domain CEO Ben Heinzelmann. "Once you've got the documents, though, it's all about the technology you use to index and integrate the data — and with Jason and Clerk Records, we're getting the best of both worlds." Smith expanded on that theme, explaining how recent advancements in AI are transforming what's possible (and newly affordable) across the market. "Up until very recently, extracting data from courthouse documents was almost entirely manual," Smith said. "If you wanted to pull attributes from an oil and gas lease, you were typing it all out, so companies could only afford to capture a handful of data points. With AI, we're pulling details from every page and every clause. That means our users can understand what the document actually says, and search on all those attributes." "An inflection point like this may not come around again in our careers," Smith continued. "I knew this was an unmissable opportunity to build something that leverages that kind of power from the ground up." With the technology in hand to extract the full range of courthouse data, both Smith and the Energy Domain leadership team saw the advantages of working together. Energy Domain Data already delivers proprietary rig tracking, well status, and production datasets through a user-friendly, map-based platform with flexible, transparent pricing. Adding Clerk Records' courthouse documents and mineral appraisal rolls brings new depth to the platform — helping Energy Domain deliver enterprise-grade intelligence in a format that's efficient, affordable, and built for real-world users. "This is about delivering what the market has been missing," Energy Domain COO Malcolm Smith said. "Land professionals, title researchers, and energy data teams have been stuck piecing together information from fragmented sources or paying enterprise-level prices for inflexible plans. Energy Domain is changing that. We're providing a single, powerful tool with transparent pricing, built for how research actually gets done." "We're preparing to launch Energy Domain Courthouse as a fully integrated companion to Energy Domain Data, while also expanding for users in real estate, legal, or surveying who prefer a standalone option," Heinzelmann concluded. "And we're not stopping there. We're currently indexing records from Texas, but we're looking to expand into New Mexico and Louisiana next. We're also developing tools that support common language search. That has always been a challenge in this space because of the inconsistent formats of courthouse documents across counties. But with structured AI extraction, we can finally build tools that reflect how people work — intuitive, complete, and available to everyone." To find out more about Energy Domain Data, visit to sign up for a free 7-day trial in your choice of basin. To receive updates on the upcoming availability of fully searchable courthouse records through Energy Domain Courthouse, contact sales@ ABOUT CLERK RECORDS, LLC Founded by courthouse data search pioneer Jason Smith, Clerk Records, LLC is building the next generation of courthouse records access, using AI-enhanced indexing and seamless API integration to help businesses access, analyze, and integrate land and mineral data into their operations. Visit for more information. ABOUT ENERGY DOMAIN Energy Domain has transformed into an upstream technology platform with two products — Energy Domain Marketplace and Energy Domain Data — to affordably, efficiently and synergistically serve their clients' needs. Born from a desire to revolutionize the oil and gas asset transaction process, Energy Domain began as a pioneering online marketplace fueled by data and driven by results. Having secured roughly $150MM in gross transaction volume under contract since 2021, Energy Domain Marketplace continues to empower both sellers and buyers with a streamlined platform, nationwide reach, and powerful analytics. Energy Domain Marketplace has now been joined by Energy Domain Data, an upstream intelligence platform designed to help oil and gas industry buyers and sellers underwrite assets and make informed decisions, with simplified data access, cost-effective flexibility and transparent pricing. Visit for more information. View source version on Contacts D'Arla Tyler DArla@ 817-405-9878 Sign in to access your portfolio
The Verge
21-06-2025
- The Verge
Inside the courthouse reshaping the future of the internet
The future of the internet will be determined in one building in Washington, DC — and for six weeks, I watched it unfold. For much of this spring, the E. Barrett Prettyman Courthouse in downtown Washington, DC, was buzzing with lawyers, reporters, and interested onlookers jostling between dimly lit courtrooms that hosted everyone from the richest men in Silicon Valley to fired federal workers and the DOGE-aligned officials who terminated them. The sprawling courthouse, with an airy atrium in the middle and long, dark halls that spring from it, is where cases involving government agencies often land, and that meant it was hosting two of the most consequential tech cases in the country, all while fielding a flurry of unprecedented lawsuits against President Donald Trump's administration. Between mid-April and late May, Judges James Boasberg and Amit Mehta respectively oversaw FTC v. Meta and US v. Google, a pair of long-running antitrust lawsuits that seek to split up two titans of Silicon Valley. Over the same period, several DC judges — including Boasberg — had a full docket of cases related to Trump's first 100 days in office, covering the administration's attempt to mass-deport immigrants, strip security clearance from law firms, and fire thousands of federal workers. On the first day of the Google trial, a sign with a comically contorted arrow directed visitors toward their chosen antitrust case. It was soon joined by directions to the high-profile hearing over Trump's order against law firm Jenner & Block. While the FTC's lawyers were calling witnesses against Meta in one courtroom, a nearby room was hosting arguments about whether Trump could fire two of the agency's own commissioners. My colleagues gathered around the feed waiting for a Google witness, only to see a prison-jumpsuited defendant step into the box For reporters, the weeks were an exercise in constant case-juggling. During the overlap of Google and Meta, I'd arrive to long security lines that would sometimes jut into the small park that adjoins the courthouse, waiting to hunt down a media room that streamed video for reporters and avoid the electronics-free courtrooms. I'd occasionally show up to find out no such room existed, and in a small stampede of reporters, I'd rush up a few flights of spiral stairs to the courtroom, scribbling handwritten notes from the back rows. One day, my colleagues gathered around the feed waiting for a Google witness, only to see a prison-jumpsuited defendant step into the box — in the brief moment before reporters realized Mehta was taking a quick break for a criminal hearing, they wondered which high-profile tech executive it was. The executives, for their part, were plentiful. On one day a witness box saw Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg praising Instagram's success; a week later, former colleague and Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom sat there describing him as a jealous boss. Google CEO Sundar Pichai would soon testify a couple floors up, followed by executives at some of Google's biggest rivals, including Microsoft and OpenAI. For all of them, the stakes were high. Judge Boasberg is tasked with determining whether Meta built an illegal monopoly by gobbling up Instagram and WhatsApp, while Judge Mehta will decide whether Google must spin off its Chrome browser or syndicate its search data. For the judges, the gauntlet seemed nothing short of exhausting. Boasberg, chief judge of the US District Court in DC, had been assigned to the Meta case long before Trump took office, but after the inauguration, he became one of the busiest judges in America — overseeing a challenge of the administration's use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants, and a lawsuit over Trump's cabinet's use of encrypted messaging app Signal to communicate about attack plans. As I concluded a day of the Meta trial at 5PM, a fresh crop of reporters arrived to cover Boasberg's consideration of the Alien Enemies Act, which Trump was using to deport Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador. Outside the courtroom, Boasberg fielded attacks from Trump — who labeled him a 'Radical Left Lunatic' and a 'troublemaker and agitator' and called for his impeachment. At the Meta trial, Boasberg appeared even-keeled — sometimes to the point of boredom. He rarely mentioned the rest of his docket beyond subtle references to his overflowing schedule; his interventions were astute, signaling a deep understanding of the case. But he'd often sit with his head in his hand, only occasionally gently encouraging attorneys to move on from a particularly tedious line of questioning. He used a lunch break in the Meta trial to file one of the most scathing legal rulings of the early Trump administration, accusing the administration of 'willful disregard' for his temporary restraining order on deportation flights to El Salvador, with 'probable cause' to find it in criminal contempt. By the Meta trial's end in late May, Boasberg sounded relieved as the final day wrapped. 'I will take a welcome respite from thinking about this between now and when the first brief is due,' he told the attorneys. In 1998, the E. Barrett Prettyman courthouse played host to another tech giant fighting for its life: Microsoft. US v. Microsoft was a landmark monopoly case that determined the company had illegally wielded its dominance over Intel-compatible PC operating systems to tamp down threats to its monopoly, including up-and-coming web browsers like Netscape. But in the wake of that case and subsequent settlement, regulators took a hands-off approach to the next generation of tech companies. It would take two decades for the government to return to the battleground — until 2020, when the cases against Meta and Google were filed. The search and social networking landscape has changed dramatically in the last five years, with the rise of TikTok and generative AI. But so too has the zeitgeist around tech. As Silicon Valley remains politically embattled, the goal of more aggressive antitrust enforcement has won bipartisan support. At the same time, there's a growing fear of foreign competition, particularly from TikTok, which appeared in the very same courthouse last year to argue against a (since-delayed) nationwide ban. The company found itself back there as a witness during Meta's trial, where lawyers confronted a TikTok executive with statements made during its failed 2024 fight. Those weeks of courthouse testimony helped illuminate countless decisions that made the tech world as we know it Inside the courthouse, it was easy to forget about everything else going on in Washington — until it wasn't. I was removed from the day-to-day antics of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) hacking away at the federal workforce, but the cases about its handiwork — including gutting the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) — kept winding through court. During a break on the fourth day of Meta's trial and days before the start of Google's, I got a New York Times push notification walking back from the bathroom, telling me Virginia Judge Leonie Brinkema had ruled against Google in the DOJ's separate ad-tech antitrust case. I hustled back to the media room and found several of my colleagues from other outlets already in the hallway writing up their stories. Of course, we commiserated, a decision we expected months ago would drop right now. Rulings in this spring's Google and Meta trials will likely take months to arrive, and their fallout probably won't be seen for years. But those weeks of courthouse testimony helped illuminate countless decisions that made the tech world as we know it. During the early 2010s, Facebook executives expressed fears that Google might buy WhatsApp and bundle it with Android, giving itself a stranglehold over mobile messaging. With the context of the Google trial, that fear looks prescient — the company cemented its search dominance by making Android phone makers preinstall its search engine in the same way. It's also possible to see the shape of giants yet to rise. Should Judge Mehta order Google to sell Chrome, several witnesses said they'd be more than happy to buy it, including Yahoo, Perplexity, and OpenAI. The Justice Department's landmark antitrust trial against Microsoft is widely credited with opening up the tech industry for innovative players like Google, and a quarter-century later, there's hope something similar could happen for new companies today. Yet it seems equally possible that in another decade or two, we'll be back in this same courthouse, hearing the government argue they've nailed the doors shut once again.
Yahoo
12-04-2025
- Yahoo
Landmark town centre pub up for sale for £385k
A PROMINENT Dudley pub has gone up for sale for offers over £385k. The Court House on New Street is for sale, with notes stating that staff would be transferred to the new owner on completion. Sales notes state that it is a "substantial handsome building within Dudley town centre." They go on to say that the pub has an open plan bar, separate snug, seating for 115 customers, a large function room on the first floor with a bar and catering kitchen. It also has four-bedroom living accommodation on the second floor. Sales notes state that there is "planning consent for seven bedsits / flats on upper floors. "All staff employed at the property will transfer on completion under the TUPE regulations. "A staff schedule will be made available. "Freehold offers are invited in excess of £395,000." The pub is being marketed by Matthew Phillips Surveyors in Lichfield.
