Cancellation of children's camp after opposition to GAA inclusion ‘deeply worrying', O'Neill says
Co Down
after opposition to the inclusion of the
GAA
is 'deeply worrying and unacceptable', First Minister
Michelle O'Neill
has said.
North Down Cricket Club, based in Comber, had planned the sports camp for young people from different backgrounds and 10 different groups were to be involved, including East Belfast GAA.
However, the local Orange Order lodge said there were concerns among local residents about the 'perceived move of the GAA into the local community'.
The cricket club later published a statement saying it had cancelled the cross-community event because it felt the spirit of the camp was at risk of being lost.
READ MORE
Responding to commentary on social media, the club said it welcomes people from all walks of life and had aimed to build friendships through shared activity.
'A small group of children from a GAA club was just one part of that broader mix,' it said. 'As reaction to the event grew, we felt the spirit of the camp was at risk of being lost. With regret – and out of respect for all involved – we chose not to proceed.
'But let's be clear: openness is not a threat. Respect is not surrender. And our culture is not so fragile that it can't be shared.'
Ms O'Neill, the Sinn Féin vice-president, said she believed children should be allowed 'to play together at summer camp without facing intolerance'.
'These developments are deeply worrying and unacceptable. Sport has the power to unify,' she said in a social media post.
'Political representatives must call this out. We need to send a clear message that we will continue moving forward together to build a brighter society and overcome such unacceptable intolerance.'
Brian MacNeice, chair of Cricket Ireland, said the organisation and the Northern Cricket Union are 'dismayed' at the events that led to the camp's cancellation.
[
The future for GAA clubs: Changing demographics leave rural and urban clubs with major challenges
Opens in new window
]
'It can only be to the detriment of the children concerned that this cancellation has occurred,' he said.
'We are committed to following through on the initiative and Cricket Ireland and the Northern Cricket Union are making plans to run a similar sports camp at Stormont. We have therefore approached East Belfast GAA and offered an opportunity to participate in this alternative sports camp which will also include other sports clubs.'
He called on 'all community leaders to show leadership and actively support this initiative'.
UUP MLA Doug Beattie told the BBC: 'People may have concerns but we need to put this in perspective, this is about children and we should allow children to be children, and if that's playing sport, then playing sport.' – PA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
2 days ago
- Irish Times
Don't expect votes for 16-year-olds to change the world. It's the 25-35s who are the rebels
The UK government has confirmed it will deliver its manifesto pledge to lower the voting age to 16 before the next general election, due in 2029. It intends this to apply to all types of elections across the UK, including Assembly and council contests in Northern Ireland . Naturally, the first question this has raised is how it will affect the balance between unionism and nationalism. The presumption is that nationalism will benefit due to the younger age profile of the Catholic population. This explains a sharp orange-green split on the issue: in an opinion poll last year, 70 per cent of nationalists supported votes at 16 compared with 6 per cent of unionists. The consensus among experts is that while nationalism will gain, the electoral impact will be negligible, amounting to less than a 1 per cent advantage. That does imperil two marginal DUP Westminster seats, but it looks trivial in terms of Assembly and council elections, which are held under proportional representation in Northern Ireland, rather than Westminster's first-past-the-post system. READ MORE Rather than fretting over tribal headcounts, perhaps unionists should be more concerned about the remarkable incuriosity towards Britain this story reveals. Scotland has had votes at 16 since its 2014 independence referendum, extended shortly afterwards to council and Scottish parliament elections. Wales reduced the voting age to 16 for assembly elections in 2021 and council elections the following year. These changes have generated a wealth of evidence, research and debate, with specific relevance to devolution, yet Northern Ireland appears completely oblivious to it. Devolution was meant to foster engagement between the constituent parts of the UK. Votes at 16 is a striking illustration of how the regions have instead become wrapped up in their own little worlds. [ Should 16-year-olds have the right to vote? A political scientist and a youth leader debate Opens in new window ] There ought to be particular fascination with the Scottish independence referendum, the first time 16- and 17-year-olds could vote in the UK. Contrary to almost everyone's expectations, they backed the union by a similar percentage to the electorate overall. The outliers were people aged 25 to 35, who exhibited by far the strongest backing for independence. Had unionists and nationalists in Northern Ireland paid this the slightest notice, their hopes and fears over lowering the voting age might not be so pronounced. The clearest finding from research on Scotland, Wales and other countries with voting at 16 is that it boosts long-term participation in elections. A person enfranchised at that age is more likely to continue voting as they get older than would otherwise have been the case. The second-clearest finding is that this makes no long-term difference to how they vote or their interest in politics. As they get older, their voting patterns and political activity are exactly as would always have been expected given their socio-economic background. The rebelliousness of 25- to 35-year-olds in the Scottish independence referendum was repeated across the UK in the 2019 general election. Photograph: Richard Baker/Because few places had voting at 16 until a decade ago, there is only evidence for its long-term effects up to the age of about 30. Some of that evidence suggests the effect fades with time. Nevertheless, it raises total participation and this has a simple explanation: 16- and 17-year-olds are generally in the care of adults who will assist and cajole them into the habit of voting. By contrast, the few years of flux from 18 onwards are the worst time to acquire civic duties. Merely maintaining a registered address can be a challenge. The importance of family explains why young first-time voters can be surprisingly conservative. They are influenced by their parents, although there is some evidence parents are influenced in turn, especially on issues where teenagers and adults tend to disagree, such as immigration or climate change. The image of a nuclear family discussing politics around the dinner table is a cliche that will infuriate the left, which ironically helps explain why the left is not as popular as it believes. All this points to business as usual in Northern Ireland, where politics is largely seen to be hereditary. The rebelliousness of 25- to 35-year-olds in the Scottish independence referendum was repeated across the UK in the 2019 general election, when that age group backed Labour under Jeremy Corbyn far more than the younger voters he was predicted to win over. It turns out that what radicalises voters is not youth but the struggles of settling down. The implication for Northern Ireland is that relatively affordable housing may be more crucial to the union than appreciated. Voting at 16 has focused attention in Scotland and Wales on better civic education in the classroom. This can cause contention and be a lose-lose situation, with schools accused either of not doing enough or of propagandising. Northern Ireland's divided education system will have to handle this with care. It could look to Scotland and Wales for models and warnings. But first, it will have to remember the other devolved regions exist.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Convicted soldiers' return to service showed it was ‘all right to kill a Paddy', Sinn Féin figure complained
The British army's decision to readmit two soldiers convicted for murder showed it was 'all right to kill a Paddy', a senior Sinn Féin figure furiously complained in 2000. Eighteen-year-old Peter McBride was shot in the back by Scots guardsmen Mark Wright and James Fisher in 1992 after he ran away from an army patrol that had searched his home in north Belfast . The two soldiers were convicted of murder in 1995 and sentenced to life imprisonment. However, they served only three years before they were given early release under the 1998 Belfast Agreement . Later, a British army board ruled they could return to military service, but this decision was overturned by a British court. A second board then ruled they could continue as soldiers, but this decision was kept secret for nearly two years. READ MORE Once it became public, it provoked a public outcry. Sinn Féin's Gerry Kelly complained furiously in a phone call with the Northern Ireland Office's political director, Bill Jeffrey. In a note of Mr Kelly's remarks later, Mr Jeffrey quoted him as saying: 'The decision was a disgrace and had been greeted with incredulity, even by people who had expected nothing of the British. 'The army dismissed large numbers of soldiers every year for smoking dope, but it was all right to kill a Paddy. We were dragging our heels over OTRs (on-the-runs), but murderers were taken back into the British army,' he said. Denying involvement, Mr Jeffrey said the British army operated independently 'in matters of this kind'. Replying, Mr Kelly said: 'In that case, the prime minister should take the matter out of their hands.' Mr Kelly remains a Sinn Féin Assembly member for North Belfast. In 1983, Mr Kelly – a convicted IRA bomber – was part of a mass breakout of prisoners from the Maze/Long Kesh prison outside Belfast, during which one prison officer died and another was shot. He is a former hunger striker and was part of Sinn Féin's negotiating team during the years leading up to the Belfast Agreement.
Irish Times
4 days ago
- Irish Times
Omagh bombing inquiry: Survivors and families seek representation at closed hearings
Survivors and families of those killed in the Omagh bomb have asked to be represented by a special advocate in closed hearings at the public inquiry. Omagh bombing inquiry chairman Lord Turnbull is hearing arguments around various applications during dedicated hearings this week. Paul Greaney KC, counsel to the inquiry, which is examining whether the 1998 dissident republican bomb attack could have been prevented, said it will hear some sensitive security evidence in closed hearings. A total of 31 people, including unborn twins, died and hundreds were injured when a car bomb planted by the dissident republican group the Real IRA exploded in the centre of the Co Tyrone town on August 15th, 1998. READ MORE Speaking during hearings in Belfast on Monday, Mr Greaney said the inquiry's legal team recognises that survivors and the bereaved have spent 25 seeking the truth. He said some may be 'suspicious or even cynical of the UK state's willingness to engage in a way that is straightforward and wholehearted with this inquiry'. 'We acknowledge too, that the idea of evidence being heard in circumstances in which the families and survivors will be excluded is one that they will find difficult to accept, to say the least, and accordingly, we regard it as entirely understandable that some, although not all, have suggested special advocates should be appointed to represent their interests in any closed hearings, and have made applications for that to occur,' he said. Mr Greaney last month said the inquiry would not begin examining the atrocity itself until next year due to the 'pace of disclosure'. He said chapter three of the inquiry, which 'will consider the bombing itself', would commence in March of next year. The inquiry, which opened last year, was ordered by the UK government in the wake of a court judgment to examine whether the atrocity could reasonably have been prevented by British state authorities. During a four-week sitting in the Strule Arts Centre in Omagh earlier this year, the inquiry heard emotional testimony from bereaved relatives who delivered pen portraits of their loved ones, as well as from the injured and first responders. – PA
