logo
Gen X, millennials are about three times more likely than their parents to be diagnosed with appendix cancer, study finds

Gen X, millennials are about three times more likely than their parents to be diagnosed with appendix cancer, study finds

CNN10 hours ago

Cancer
Age & GenerationsFacebookTweetLink
Follow
The pain was so sharp that Chris Williams took himself to the hospital.
It was a Tuesday evening in September 2021 when Williams started to feel throbbing abdominal pain and nausea. By the next morning, it had gotten worse.
'I had to go to the ER,' said Williams, who lives in Brooklyn.
At the hospital, he was diagnosed with appendicitis and had his appendix surgically removed. About a week later, he met with his medical team to get the staples removed and discuss next steps – and that's when he received shocking news.
'They found a tumor sitting on my appendix, and they biopsied that tumor and determined it was cancer,' said Williams, who was 48 at the time.
'It was actually a blessing,' he said. 'This was really just a godsend, in my eyes, and a blessing for me to detect the tumor – for the tumor to trigger my appendix to almost rupture for them to find it – because later on, they discovered it was stage III. Had it stayed in me for a while longer, it would have been stage IV,' which is the most advanced stage of cancer and more difficult to treat.
Williams, who is now cancer-free after finishing treatment in November 2022, is among a growing group of appendix cancer patients in the United States who were diagnosed at a young age.
The appendix, which plays a role in supporting the immune system, is a small pouch-like organ that is attached to the large intestine at the lower right side of the abdomen.
Although cancer of the appendix is rare – typically, it's estimated to affect about 1 or 2 people for every 1 million in the United States each year – diagnoses are rising sharply among Generation X and millennials, according to a new study.
Compared with people born from 1941 through 1949, incidence rates of appendix cancer have more than tripled among people born between 1976 and 1984 and more than quadrupled among people born between 1981 and 1989, according to research published this week in the Annals of Internal Medicine. These increases in incidence were found to have occurred from 1975 through 2019.
'It's alarming overall,' said Dr. Andreana Holowatyj, the lead study author and an assistant professor of hematology and oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center.
'We're seeing some of these generational effects for cancers of the colon, the rectum, the stomach, and so that's one of the reasons why we were curious to explore this in rare appendix cancers. But nonetheless, the rates and trends which we observed were alarming and worrisome,' she said.
The researchers on the new study – from Vanderbilt University Medical Center, West Virginia University and the University of Texas Health Science Center – analyzed data on 4,858 people in the United States, 20 or older, who had been diagnosed with appendix cancer between 1975 to 2019. The data came from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program database.
The data was separated into five-year age groups and showed rising rates in appendix cancer incidence by birth cohort, particularly among people born after 1945, the researchers wrote in the study.
Although the new study did not examine specifically why this incidence is on the rise, the researchers say it's 'unlikely' to be explained by advances in screening for the disease or diagnostic tools.
'There are no standardized screening techniques for appendiceal cancers. Many of them are incidentally found after presentation of something like acute appendicitis,' Holowatyj said.
Rather, the trend may be tied to 'environmental exposures that may increase risk for generations now entering mid-adulthood,' the researchers wrote. And similar trends 'have also been reported for colon, rectal, and gastric cancer,' suggesting that possible risk factors may contribute to gastrointestinal cancers as a whole.
For instance, obesity has been identified as a risk factor for appendix cancer diagnoses and is recognized as a risk factor for colon cancer, Holowatyj said, adding that identifying what risk factors might be driving these trends in cancer incidence could help reveal ways to prevent disease.
'The fact that we're seeing these trends parallel across other cancers of the gastrointestinal tract does tell us, or suggest, that there may be both shared and distinct risk factors that can contribute to cancer development across younger generations in the gastrointestinal tract,' Holowatyj said.
'That's going to be important to understand – what are those shared factors, or how do those risk factors differ, both in magnitude and absolute risk across these gastrointestinal cancer types – to help us support the development of effective prevention strategies and ultimately aim to reduce this burden or reverse these trends,' she said.
There are no specific screening recommendations for appendix cancers, but symptoms of the disease typically include abdominal or pelvic pain, bloating, nausea and vomiting – which often can mimic symptoms of appendicitis. Appendix cancer may be treated with surgery, in which the appendix is removed. If the cancer has spread, patients are often given chemotherapy.
'This is a disease where, if not caught before the appendix ruptures, tumor cells disperse throughout the abdominal cavity often,' Holowatyj said. 'That's why up to 1 in every 2 patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease' or cancer that has spread.
The study showing an increase in incidence of appendix cancer among younger adults comes as no surprise to Dr. Andrea Cercek, co-director of the Center for Early Onset Colorectal and GI Cancers at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, who treated Williams.
'We've known that early-onset appendix cancer is part of the bigger story of early-onset GI cancers, including colorectal cancer,' said Cercek, who was not involved in the new research.
She has seen the trend firsthand among her own patients – but it still remains unclear what specific factors may be driving these increases.
'There are a lot of suspects, including lifestyle changes, dietary changes. People talk about obesity, less activity. But there's nothing that quite fits everyone. And then there are environmental changes,' Cercek said. 'I think it's probably some type of combination, something multifactorial, but we have not yet identified it. There is thankfully now a lot of work, a lot of research going into this.'
Despite the rising incidence, Cercek emphasized that appendix cancers remain uncommon.
'It is very rare, even though it's rising,' she said. 'However, it is an important part of this overarching story of the rise in cancer in young adults.'
Williams' journey after his cancer diagnosis was not easy, he said, but he remains grateful for his care team. After he was diagnosed, he sought treatment at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center in New York, where he underwent additional surgery and received chemotherapy.
'For me, I could look at it in a couple of different ways. I could moan. I could complain. I could say, 'Woe is me.' Or I could be grateful that this was found and that there was a solution in terms of treatment,' Williams said. 'It could have ended up being something that killed me, and because it didn't, I feel like I have everything to be grateful for.'
Before his cancer diagnosis, Williams thought he was doing everything right. He was eating a mostly healthy diet and exercising regularly, but as a project manager at the time for the state of New York, he also was experiencing a lot of stress.
At age 42, he had his first heart attack, he said. He had a second heart attack a few weeks after his appendix cancer diagnosis. Then a third happened shortly after his surgery at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, he said. And just last year, Williams had a fourth heart attack. Blockages were found in his heart, and he said he was treated with stenting, in which a flexible tube was placed in the arteries to increase blood flow to the heart.
'A lot of what I've experienced has been due to stress,' Williams said.
'My personality has been one where I internalized a lot. Especially among men, we tend to internalize a lot because we feel like we have to carry the weight of the world on our shoulders,' he said. 'But in so doing, as you're internalizing, you're making yourself sick. That internalization leads to stress, and that can lead to heart disease, that can lead to strokes, that can lead to cancer.'
Inspired by his own health challenges, Williams has launched the Brooklyn-based nonprofit Heart, Body & Soul to connect communities of color, particularly Black men in underserved communities, with physical and mental health tools as well as increased communication with health care providers to help improve their overall health.
'We also teach them how to advocate for themselves as well because a big part of the challenges that are faced, especially when having conversations with men of color, is the concern of not being seen or heard when they get into a hospital,' Williams said, adding that he emphasizes the importance of listening to your body and having a primary care physician.
'Especially in the age where we see things happening like men and women being diagnosed at earlier ages with various diseases, I really think it's important for us to start prioritizing putting a care team together,' he said. 'We have to take a more holistic approach to how we treat ourselves and how we take care of ourselves.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The GOP's big bill would bring changes to Medicaid for millions
The GOP's big bill would bring changes to Medicaid for millions

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The GOP's big bill would bring changes to Medicaid for millions

WASHINGTON (AP) — Republican Sen. Josh Hawley has been clear about his red line as the Senate takes up the GOP's One Big Beautiful Bill Act: no Medicaid cuts. But what, exactly, would be a cut? Hawley and other Republicans acknowledge that the main cost-saving provision in the bill – new work requirements on able-bodied adults who receive health care through the Medicaid program -- would cause millions of people to lose their coverage. All told, estimates are 10.9 million fewer people would have health coverage under the bill's proposed changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act. That includes some 8 million fewer in the Medicaid program, including 5.2 million dropping off because of the new eligibility requirements. 'I know that will reduce the number of people on Medicaid,' Hawley told a small scrum of reporters in the hallways at the Capitol. 'But I'm for that because I want people who are able bodied but not working to work.' Hawley and other Republicans are walking a politically fine line on how to reduce federal spending on Medicaid while also promising to protect a program that serves some 80 million Americans and is popular with the public. As the party pushes ahead on President Donald Trump' s priority package, Republicans insist they are not cutting the vital safety net program but simply rooting out what they call waste, fraud and abuse. Whether that argument lands with voters could go a long way toward determining whether Trump's bill ultimately ends up boosting — or dragging down — Republicans as they campaign for reelection next year. Republicans say that it's wrong to call the reductions in health care coverage 'cuts.' Instead, they've characterized the changes as rules that would purge people who are taking advantage of the system and protect it for the most vulnerable who need it most. What's in the bill House Republicans wrote the bill with instructions to find $880 billion in cuts from programs under the purview of the Energy and Commerce Committee, which has a sprawling jurisdiction that includes Medicaid. In the version of the bill that the House passed on a party-line vote last month, the overall cuts ended up exceeding that number. The Kaiser Family Foundation projects that the bill will result in a $793 billion reduction in spending on Medicaid. Additionally, the House Ways & Means Committee, which handles federal tax policy, imposed a freeze on a health care provider tax that many states impose. Critics say the tax improperly boosts federal Medicaid payments to the states, but supporters like Hawley say it's important funding for rural hospitals. 'What we're doing here is an important and, frankly, heroic thing to preserve the program so that it doesn't become insolvent,' Speaker Mike Johnson said on NBC's 'Meet the Press.' House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, meanwhile, has denounced the bill as an 'assault on the healthcare of the American people' and warned years of progress in reducing the number of uninsured people is at risk. Who would lose health coverage The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that the GOP's proposed changes to federal health programs would result in 10.9 million fewer people having health care coverage. Nearly 8 million fewer people would be enrolled in Medicaid by 2034 under the legislation, the CBO found, including 5.2 million people who would lose coverage due to the proposed work requirements. It said 1.4 million immigrants without legal status would lose coverage in state programs. The new Medicaid requirements would apply to nondisabled adults under age 65 who are not caretakers or parents, with some exceptions. The bill passed by the U.S. House stipulates that those eligible would need to work, take classes, or record community service for 80 hours per month. The Kaiser Family Foundation notes that more than 90% of people enrolled in Medicaid already meet those criteria. The legislation also penalizes states that fund health insurance for immigrants who have not confirmed their immigration status, and the CBO expects that those states will stop funding Medicaid for those immigrants altogether. Why Republicans want Medicaid changes Republicans have cited what they call the out-of-control spending in federal programs to explain their rationale for the changes proposed in the legislation. 'What we are trying to do in the One Big Beautiful Bill is ensuring that limited resources are protected for pregnant women, for children, for seniors, for individuals with disabilities,' said Rep. Erin Houchin, R-Ind., in a speech on the House floor. Senate Majority Whip John Barrasso argued that Medicaid recipients who are not working spend their time watching television and playing video games rather than looking for employment. Republicans also criticize the CBO itself, the congressional scorekeeper, questioning whether its projections are accurate. The CBO score for decades has been providing non-partisan analysis of legislation and budgetary matters. Its staff is prohibited from making political contributions and is currently led by a former economic adviser for the George W. Bush administration. What polling shows While Republicans argue that their signature legislation delivers on Trump's 2024 campaign promises, health care isn't one of the president's strongest issues with Americans. Most U.S. adults, 56%, disapproved of how Trump was handling health care policy in CNN polling from March. And according to AP VoteCast, about 6 in 10 voters in the November election said they wanted the government 'more involved' in ensuring that Americans have health care coverage. Only about 2 in 10 wanted the government less involved in this, and about 2 in 10 said its involvement was about right. Half of American adults said they expected the Trump administration's policies to increase their family's health care costs, according to a May poll from KFF, and about 6 in 10 believed those policies would weaken Medicaid. If the federal government significantly reduced Medicaid spending, about 7 in 10 adults said they worried it would negatively impact nursing homes, hospitals, and other health care providers in their community. For Hawley, the 'bottom lines' are omitting provisions that could cause rural hospitals to close and hardworking citizens to lose their benefits. He and other Republicans are especially concerned about the freeze on the providers' tax in the House's legislation that they warn could hurt rural hospitals. 'Medicaid benefits for people who are working or who are otherwise qualified,' Hawley said. 'I do not want to see them cut.'

The next wearable tech could be a face 'tattoo' that measures mental stress
The next wearable tech could be a face 'tattoo' that measures mental stress

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The next wearable tech could be a face 'tattoo' that measures mental stress

Researchers are developing a digital "tattoo" that measures "mental workload." The "e-tattoo" is meant for workers with high-risk jobs like air traffic controllers. It's thinner and lighter than older EEG models. Tattoos can reveal a lot about a person. One day, they could even reveal a person's brain waves. At least, that's the goal for researchers at the University of Texas at Austin. "This tattoo is not like a normal tattoo," Nanshu Lu, a professor in the university's Department of Aerospace Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, told Business Insider. Lu worked alongside engineering professor Luis Sentis and others to develop an ultra-thin, wireless wearable device that she compared to a temporary tattoo sticker. The non-invasive device, applied to the skin with an adhesive, measures brain activity and eye movement to gauge an individual's mental workload. Lu said the device is intended for people working in high-stakes or high-demand jobs, such as aircraft pilots, air traffic controllers, drone operators, and robot teleoperators. These jobs could be considered high-stress since they require focus, quick-thinking skills, and a small margin for error. "Technology is developing much faster than human evolution, so it is very hard to keep up with the technological demand in modern jobs," she said. "Therefore, it's very important not to overload the operator because not only would that jeopardize the outcome of the mission, it would also harm their health." Although the idea of an electronic tattoo might sound like something out of a sci-fi novel, humans and technology have been melding for a while. Nearly 40 years ago, for example, the first fully digital hearing aid became available to the public, according to the Hearing Health Foundation. And now, Elon Musk is embedding computer chips into people's brains through his company, Neuralink. Recent wearable tech inventions include smartwatches, Bluetooth headphones, VR headsets, and fitness trackers, to name a few. Some health-conscious folks invest in wearable technology like the Oura Ring, which collects data on everything from sleep activity to body temperature. However, those devices don't analyze brain activity and eye movement. "Over the years, we developed a series of non-invasive skin conformable e-tattoos to measure cardiovascular health, then measure the mental stress from the palm sweating," Lu said of previous devices she helped develop. "Now, finally, we move on to the brainwave." Lu said the device certainly isn't the first or only EEG sensor on the market, but it's smaller and lighter than previous models. Conducting an EEG test typically requires attaching electrodes to an individual's full scalp with a gel or paste to collect data, which can be time-consuming. Researchers at the University of Texas at Austin are attempting to streamline that process by proving mental workload can be measured only from the forehead. During lab tests, participants did memorization drills that involved a screen with flashing boxes. "In the past, there was no way to objectively assess mental workload. The subjects have to finish the test and then a questionnaire," Lu said. "But in the future, if we can implement some lightweight machine learning model directly on a microprocessor in the Bluetooth chip on e-tattoo, then yes, our goal is to one day be able to do it in real time." A report by Grand View Research said that the global wearable technology market was worth $84.2 billion in 2024 and is expected to reach $186.14 billion by 2030, underscoring consumers' willingness to integrate technology into their everyday lives. However, electronic tattoos won't be commercial anytime soon. Lu and her fellow researchers are still conducting tests on and developing the tech. Still, she can imagine a world where the e-tattoo is used by people not employed in high-stakes jobs. It could be used by "people who would like to focus as well as people who want to meditate to see if they are truly relaxed," Lu said. Read the original article on Business Insider

Chicago Cubs spotlight men's health for Father's Day
Chicago Cubs spotlight men's health for Father's Day

CBS News

timean hour ago

  • CBS News

Chicago Cubs spotlight men's health for Father's Day

This Father's Day, the Chicago Cubs are reminding dads that when it comes to things health-related, sometimes it's not enough just to rub some dirt on it. The Cubs teamed up Sunday with Advocate Health Care to spotlight men's health. They hosted a Father's Day brunch for Advocate patients. Among those in attendance was 67-year-old prostate cancer survivor Clark Atwater. Atwater lost his own father to prostate cancer years ago. But he was still shocked when he himself got the diagnosis. "I didn't really have any symptoms, so a week before my yearly checkup, and gosh, here I am with a PSA elevated," Atwater said. "It's very important to get checked. Get your annual physicals, and ask for your PSA." Atwater is now in remission and feeling good. In fact, he is feeling so good that he threw out the ceremonial first pitch at Wrigley Field on Sunday, with his grandson by his side.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store