Germany halts arms sales to Israel after Gaza takeover plan approved
The move from Berlin, which has historically been a stalwart supporter of Israel, comes after the Israeli Cabinet announced plans to take over Gaza City.
In a statement, Merz emphasised that Israel "has the right to defend itself against Hamas' terror" and said that the release of Israeli hostages and "purposeful" negotiations toward a ceasefire in the 22-month war "are our top priority".
He also said Hamas must not have a role in the future governance of Gaza.
"The even harsher military action by the Israeli army in the Gaza Strip, approved by the Israeli (security) cabinet last night, makes it increasingly difficult for the German government to see how these goals will be achieved," he added.
"Under these circumstances, the German government will not authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in the Gaza Strip until further notice."
The German government remains deeply concerned about the suffering of civilians in Gaza, he said. "With the planned offensive, the Israeli government bears even greater responsibility than before for providing for their needs," Merz explained.
He called on Israel to allow comprehensive access for aid deliveries, including for UN organisations and other NGOs, and said Israel "must continue to comprehensively and sustainably address the humanitarian situation in Gaza."
Germany also called on Israel's government "not to take any further steps toward annexing the West Bank."
Israel imports almost 70% of its military arsenal from the US, the world's largest arms exporter. Germany is Israel's second biggest supplier and since the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza started in October 2023, Berlin has exported €485 million worth of weapons.
Italy ranks third, supplying less than 1% of Israel's military kit.
Merz's comments come amid a sea change of opinion among a number of Western countries about how the war on Hamas in Gaza is being fought and the resulting humanitarian crisis.
In July, the foreign ministers of 28 countries, including Belgium and the United Kingdom, issued a joint statement saying the war "must end now" and that Israel must comply with international law.
The foreign ministers said "the suffering of civilians in Gaza has reached new depths' and condemned 'the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food."
In January, Israel banned the main UN organisation delivering aid to Palestinians in Gaza, UNRWA, from operating, claiming the agency turned a blind eye to Hamas members in its ranks.
Responsibility for aid distribution was handed over to the opaque US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), which had no previous experience of delivering aid to combat zones.
Its delivery method has been criticised by established aid groups and deliveries at its four distribution sites across Gaza have often seen people killed, either in crowd crushes or after Israeli forces or security contractors opened fire near aid-seekers.
Also last month, French President Emmanuel Macron said France would recognise Palestine as a state at the UN General Assembly in September, adding that he hoped the move would help bring peace to the region.
Shortly after that announcement, Portugal's government said it was consulting the country's main political parties about potential recognition of a Palestinian state. — Euronews
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Arabiya
25 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Netanyahu's missing political vision
The decision by the Israeli security cabinet to approve Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's proposal for the Israeli army to take over Gaza City, home to around 800,000 Palestinians, has produced outrage and condemnation inside Israel as well as from abroad. The families of the remaining Israeli hostages still held in Gaza staged an angry protest in Tel Aviv on the eve of the cabinet vote and, when it was announced, accused the government of sentencing their loved ones to death. Opinion polls regularly report that a majority of Israelis support the call by the hostage families for the government to call an immediate halt to the war and negotiate the release of their loved ones, even if this means leaving Hamas in power in Gaza. Opposition leaders called the decision by the security cabinet to step up rather than halt the war, in defiance of public opinion and the demands of the hostage families, a disaster. They accused Netanyahu of sacrificing the security of Israeli citizens for political calculations by bowing to pressure from the extreme right-wing members of his coalition, who advocate a full reoccupation of Gaza 20 years after Israel pulled out completely from the strip. While Netanyahu has long been adept at wrong footing his political rivals and resisting calls for an end to the war, opposition to the latest move has also come from the highest echelons of the military itself. Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir warned that such a move would endanger the lives of the hostages. So far the army has been careful not to operate in areas where it thinks the hostages are held, since Hamas has warned it will execute them if Israeli forces come near. A year ago, Hamas made good on this threat by killing six hostages when the army drew close to where they were being kept. Pushing into more of Gaza therefore puts more of them at risk. Zamir also warned that, after 22 months of war, his forces were exhausted and a new push to reoccupy more of Gaza would cause the 'erosion' of the army. Harrowing accounts of civilian suffering in Gaza had prompted even Israel's allies to call for a ceasefire, even before the latest cabinet decision to instead intensify the war. A statement by 25 Western nations on July 21 said the conflict must end immediately as the 'inhumane' killing of civilians and the 'drip feeding' of aid which had brought the suffering of Gazans to 'new depths.' So why has Netanyahu decided now to defy such calls for a halt to the war both from inside Israel and from its allies, and instead to step up the military campaign? Three days after the statement by Western countries, the peace talks taking place in Doha, aimed at reaching a ceasefire and release of hostages broke down. The US presidential envoy, Steve Witkoff, returned home accusing Hamas of having no desire to reach a ceasefire. Netanyahu, who had condemned the Western statement as playing into the hands of Hamas, drew the lesson – rightly or wrongly – that it had emboldened Hamas to escalate its demands in the ceasefire talks. And when President Trump said Israel had to 'finish the job' in Gaza and get rid of Hamas, Netanyahu will have felt he had the backing of his strongest ally to carry on the war. The prime minister is also even more reliant than ever on the support of the two small extreme right parties in his coalition, who insist on pressing on with the war until Hamas is eliminated. This is because of the decision by one of the parties representing Haredi – ultra-orthodox – Jews to pull out of Netanyahu's coalition government over the issue of the draft. Ironically it is the refusal of Haredis to serve in the army that is causing much of its manpower shortage, as well as stoking resentment from mainstream Israelis, whose sons and daughters are spending months on the front line in Gaza. So the combination of Hamas intransigence, pressure from his coalition partners and an apparent US green light appear to have pushed Netanyahu into deciding that expanding the campaign is the only way forward. But there are serious military and political questions over such a strategy. If the aim is to really defeat Hamas or pressure it to resume negotiations, why is the military focused on Gaza City, rather than the central Gazan refugee camps of Deir al-Balah, al-Nuseirat and Khan Younis, where Palestinian analysts say Hamas presence is strongest? Nor is Hamas a regular army that will surrender and disarm when faced with military defeat. It will declare victory simply if one fighter emerges from the rubble holding a Kalashnikov and a Hamas flag. A conventional army loses if it does not win, while a guerilla army wins if it does not lose, as Henry Kissinger observed. But most seriously of all, there remains no political vision in Netanyahu's plan. He speaks vaguely of 'Arab forces' taking over control of Gaza from the Israeli military. But as long as he rejects any Palestinian Authority role in securing and governing Gaza, Arab countries will not take on the onerous task of fighting Hamas and then securing and overseeing the rebuilding of the territory. It is true that countries and organisations who blithely call for a ceasefire, rebuilding of Gaza and implementation of a two-state solution fail to explain how any of that is possible while Hamas remains in power. But the current Israeli government is equally at fault for pressing on with the war in Gaza without providing any positive vision of the future for the long-suffering inhabitants of that devastated land.
Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Israel's Gaza plan risks ‘another calamity,' UN official warns
A UN official on Sunday warned the Security Council that Israel's plans to occupy Gaza City risked 'another calamity' with far-reaching consequences, as Benjamin Netanyahu insisted his goal was not to occupy the territory. The United Nations Security Council held a rare emergency weekend meeting after Israel said its military would 'take control' of Gaza City in a plan approved by Prime Minister Netanyahu's security cabinet that sparked a wave of global criticism. 'If these plans are implemented, they will likely trigger another calamity in Gaza, reverberating across the region and causing further forced displacement, killings, and destruction,' UN Assistant Secretary General Miroslav Jenca told the Security Council. The UN's humanitarian office OCHA said 98 children had died from acute malnutrition since the start of the conflict in October 2023, with 37 of those deaths since July, according to Gaza's authorities. 'This is no longer a looming hunger crisis – this is starvation, pure and simple,' said OCHA's coordination director Ramesh Rajasingham. Palestinian ambassador to the UN Riyad Mansour said Sunday 'over two million victims are enduring unbearable agony,' calling Israel's plans for Gaza City 'illegal and immoral,' and for foreign journalists to be allowed into Gaza. Netanyahu announced on Sunday a plan to allow more foreign journalists to report inside Gaza – accompanied by the Israeli military. Sanctions calls Britain, a close ally of Israel which nonetheless pushed for an emergency meeting on the crisis, warned the Israeli plan risked prolonging the conflict. 'It will only deepen the suffering of Palestinian civilians in Gaza. This is not a path to resolution. It is a path to more bloodshed,' said British deputy ambassador to the UN James Kariuki. But Netanyahu said Sunday his country was 'talking in terms of a fairly short timetable because we want to bring the war to an end,' as he insisted Israel did not want to occupy Gaza. Outside the meeting at UN headquarters in New York, a small but noisy protest calling for an end to the conflict was met by a large police presence. The United States, a veto-wielding permanent member of the Security Council, accused those nations who supported Sunday's meeting of 'actively prolonging the war by spreading lies about Israel.' 'Israel has a right to decide what is necessary for its security and what measure measures are appropriate to end the threat posed by Hamas,' said US envoy to the UN Dorothy Shea. Israel's deputy ambassador to the UN Jonathan Miller said 'pressure should not be placed on Israel, who suffered the most horrific attack against the Jewish people since the Holocaust, but on Hamas.' Algeria's ambassador Amar Bendjama called for sanctions on Israel in response to its Gaza City plan. 'The hour has come to impose sanctions on the enemy of humanity,' he said. 'If it was another country, you would have been imposing sanctions a long time ago,' the Palestinian envoy Mansour said.
Leaders
2 hours ago
- Leaders
Australia Criticized Over Continued Export of Weapons Parts to Israel
The Australian Greens condemned the Labor government of Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for continuing to export components to Israel used to make weapons, according to Arab News. 'The Australian public knows that the Albanese government is permitting the export of armored steel, F-35 weapons parts and other critical materials to Israel and wants it to stop,' the Australian Greens Foreign Affairs spokesperson, David Shoebridge, said. The remarks came after Australia's Defense Minister Richard Marles said that his country did not send weapons to Israel. However, the government would continue to manufacture and export parts for the Lockheed Martin F-35 fighter jet, which is used by the Israeli military. Germany's Unprecedented Step Marles's statement came after Germany made a bold stride of stopping exports of military equipment to Israel after Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced that his government would expand operations in Gaza. 'Australia is a key part of the F-35 fighter jet program. We are the only place in the world that makes parts like the bomb bay doors (mechanism), and we operate as one of the few regional distribution hubs,' Shoebridge said. Moreover, he noted that withholding F-35 component exports would limit Israel's ability to conduct operations in Gaza. 'The fact Albanese is choosing not to do that makes us complicit (in genocide),' Shoebridge added. Crucially, Albanese has previously noted that Australia already imposes appropriate sanctions on numerous Israeli government officials over their actions in the Gaza war. 'What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest,' Albanese said during a visit to New Zealand. Related Topics: US Backs Israel's Gaza Offensive Amidst Global Concern Morgan Challenges Israel: Call to Uncover the Truth in Gaza Israeli Security Cabinet to Decide on Gaza War Expansion Short link : Post Views: 26
