Canadian dollar strengthens as investors ditch US currency
Summary
TORONTO, April 9 (Reuters) - The Canadian dollar strengthened against its U.S. counterpart on Wednesday as investors weighed signs of an exodus from American financial assets amid a widening global trade war and despite further losses for oil, one of Canada's major exports.
The loonie was trading 0.7% higher at 1.4160 per U.S. dollar, or 70.62 U.S. cents, after touching its strongest intraday level since Friday at 1.4133.
here.
"For a variety of reasons, investors are bailing out of American financial markets," Karl Schamotta, chief market strategist at Corpay, said in a note.
"The U.S. could soon find itself running smaller trade and financial imbalances, but at the cost of much lower growth rates."
The U.S. dollar (.DXY), opens new tab tumbled against a basket of major currencies as China said it will impose 84% tariffs on U.S. goods from Thursday, up from the 34% previously announced.
U.S. "reciprocal" tariffs on dozens of countries took effect earlier on Wednesday, including massive 104% duties on Chinese goods.
Yields on U.S. Treasuries, normally a safe-haven asset, jumped while Wall Street edged higher after heavy losses in recent days.
"The CAD is taking the heightened market volatility and increased uncertainty in its stride, at least for now," Shaun Osborne, chief currency strategist at Scotiabank, said in a note.
The price of oil hit a fresh four-year low, down 4.4% at $56.93 a barrel, as tariff increases stoked fears of a global recession.
Japan and Canada, which is this year's chair of the G7 developed economies, have agreed to cooperate to maintain stability in financial markets and the global financial system, Japan's Ministry of Finance said.
Canadian bond yields rose across the curve, but the moves were less than for U.S. bonds.
The 10-year was up 1.8 basis points at 3.155%, after earlier touching its highest level since February 20 at 3.228%.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Borrowing costs rise as Reeves splashes cash: Nervous investors fret over spending spree
British borrowing costs edged higher yesterday as 'nervous' investors fretted over how Rachel Reeves will pay for her lavish spending spree. The yield on ten-year gilts rose as high as 4.62 per cent on speculation that the Chancellor will be forced to increase borrowing or raise taxes to make her Budget numbers add up. It eased later in the session to 4.55 per cent – thanks to weaker-than-expected US inflation boosting hopes of interest rate cuts across the Atlantic – but remained the highest in the Group of Seven major industrialised nations. This means that Britain is paying more to borrow on international bond markets than every other leading developed economy on Earth. Oliver Faizallah, an analyst at wealth manager Charles Stanley, said: 'Markets remain nervous about the potential for either higher taxes or an increase in borrowing in the future. 'An increase in taxes may be seen as more market-friendly, but would be politically damaging, while an increase in borrowing would put further pressure on already elevated gilt yields. Fiscal concerns in the UK will no doubt keep gilt yields higher for longer.' He noted that the easing in gilt yields after early rises 'had nothing to do with the spending review but came on the back of lower-than-expected inflation in the United States'. US inflation nudged up only slightly from 2.3 per cent in April to 2.4 per cent in May, lifting pressure on bond yields around the world. The mood was further boosted after US President Donald Trump declared that a US-China trade deal is 'done' – an announcement that suggested tensions between the world's two largest economies were thawing. It was not enough, however, for the FTSE 100 to close at new highs, with the index ending the day up just 0.1 per cent at 8864.35, having spent much of the session above March's record close of 8871. Investors warned that doubts remain over Labour's handling of the economy – and the outlook for tax, spending and the public finances. 'Another fiscal event goes by with little resolved in terms of allaying investor fears that fiscal policy is on a sustainable footing,' said Neil Mehta, portfolio manager at capital market company RBC BlueBay Asset Management. 'With Labour's favourability rating in free fall with the public, the Government is bending to political pressure and proposing a raft of spending measures, seemingly taking their eye off the ball regarding fiscal responsibility. 'Until fiscal policy is brought back on a sustainable path, investors will continue to demand a higher premium for investing in UK assets, such as gilts, than peers.' Gordon Shannon, a fund manager at Twenty Four Asset Management, said he was 'disappointed that there wasn't more clarity' on how the Chancellor intended to meet her fiscal rules. Matthew Amis, investment director at Aberdeen, said that Reeves yesterday had 'offered just enough detail and security for the gilt market to focus away from the UK's fiscal situation until the autumn at least'. But he added: 'Scrutiny will be high and any mis-step from the Chancellor will be reflected in higher gilt yields. 'Big decisions are required from Chancellor Reeves in the autumn.' Ian Stewart, chief economist at Deloitte, said: 'The autumn Budget will be the big test of whether the Government's fiscal plans are holding in the face of global economic headwinds.'
Reuters
37 minutes ago
- Reuters
TRADING DAY Good vibrations turn sour
ORLANDO, Florida, June 11 (Reuters) - TRADING DAY Making sense of the forces driving global markets By Jamie McGeever, Markets Columnist I'm excited to announce that I'm now part of Reuters Open Interest (ROI), an essential new source for data-driven, expert commentary on market and economic trends. You can find ROI on the Reuters website, and you can follow us on LinkedIn and X. The US and China have reached a trade deal, or at least agreed on the framework of a deal, which together with surprisingly soft U.S. inflation data, gave markets a lift on Wednesday. But Wall Street's gains were mild, and they were later wiped out by rising tensions in the Middle East. In my column today I look at the 'equity risk premium' and other metrics that suggest relative U.S. equity and bond valuations are getting very stretched. More on that below, but first, a roundup of the main market moves. If you have more time to read, here are a few articles I recommend to help you make sense of what happened in markets today. Today's Key Market Moves Good vibrations turn sour It's a "done" deal, according to U.S. President Donald Trump, although the he and Chinese leader Xi Jinping still have to finalize the wording of the trade agreement between the two superpowers and sign off on it. The main points of the deal appear to be: China will remove export restrictions on rare earth minerals and other key industrial components; U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods will total 55%; Chinese tariffs on U.S. goods will total 10%. Trump could not have been more enthusiastic in his praise for the agreement on Wednesday, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said 'deal after deal' with other countries will follow in the weeks ahead. Yet, judging by the relatively muted market reaction, investors are less enthused. And given the chaotic and unpredictable nature of the Trump administration's tariff announcements thus far, the irony of Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent calling on China to be a "reliable partner" in trade negotiations will not be lost on some observers. Especially, one suspects, in Beijing. Based on these proposed China levies, and with the US expected to conclude more trade deals in the coming weeks, the overall U.S. effective tariff rate will be lower than feared a couple of months ago. That's a relief. But the effective tariff rate of around 15% that many economists expect will still be significantly higher than the 2.5% rate at the end of last year, and would be the highest since the 1930s. Also, as the May inflation figures showed, tariffs have yet to be felt on prices. Investors - and Fed policymakers, who meet next week - are in a state of limbo. How will corporate profits and consumer spending be affected? What proportion of the tariffs will companies "swallow", and how much will they pass on to their customers? Zooming out, inflation appears to be cooling around the world, although this trend is expected to reverse once tariffs start to fuel higher goods price inflation. Figures on Wednesday showed that U.S. consumer inflation and Japanese wholesale inflation were lower than expected in May. These reports follow similar numbers from Europe recently, and China remains stuck in its battle against deflation. Next up is India, which releases consumer inflation figures on Thursday, which are expected to show annual inflation slowed to 3.0% in May, the lowest in more than six years. Another focus for investors on Thursday will be the auction of 30-year U.S. Treasury bonds. US stocks-bonds warnings flash amber again Calm has descended on U.S. markets following the 'Liberation Day' tariff turmoil of early April. But Wall Street's rally has revived questions about U.S. equity valuations, as stocks once again look super pricey compared to bonds. Since the chaotic days of early April, U.S. equities have rebounded fiercely, with the S&P 500 up 25%, putting the Shiller cyclically adjusted price-earnings (CAPE) ratio for the index in the 94th percentile going back to the 1950s, according to bond giant PIMCO. Stocks are looking expensive in absolute terms, and in relation to bonds. The equity risk premium (ERP), the difference between equity yields and bond yields, is near historically low levels. According to analysts at PIMCO, the ERP is now zero. The previous two times it fell to zero or below were in 1987 and 1996–2001. In both instances, the ultra-low ERP precipitated a steep equity drawdown and sharp fall in long-dated bond yields. "The U.S. equity risk premium ... is exceptionally low by historical standards," they wrote in their five-year outlook on Tuesday. "A mean reversion to a higher equity risk premium typically involves a bond rally, an equity sell-off, or both." But reversion to the mean doesn't just happen by magic. A catalyst is needed. Equities have recovered largely because they were oversold in April, trade tensions have been dialed down, and investors remain confident that Big Tech will drive solid AI-led earnings growth. So even though huge economic, trade, and policy risks continue to hang over markets, there is no sign of an imminent catalyst that would cause an equity market selloff. The flip side of equities looking expensive is that bonds look like a bargain. Indeed, the relative divergence between stocks and bonds is such that, by one measure, U.S. fixed income assets are the cheapest relative to equities in over half a century. Using national flow of funds data from the Federal Reserve, retired strategist Jim Paulsen calculates that the total market value of U.S. bonds as a percentage share of the total market value of U.S. equities is the lowest since the early 1970s. "Since the aggregate U.S. portfolio is currently aggressively positioned, investors may have far more capacity and desire to boost bond holdings in the coming years than most appreciate," Paulsen wrote last week. But bonds are 'cheap' for a reason. Washington's profligacy – the reason ratings agency Moody's recently stripped the U.S. of its triple-A credit rating – and inflation worries have kept yields stubbornly high. The term premium - the risk premium investors demand for holding long-term debt rather than rolling over short-dated loans - is the highest in over a decade, reflecting concerns about Uncle Sam's long-term fiscal health. And the diagnosis here shows no signs of improving. Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is expected to add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. debt over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, likely putting more upward pressure on yields. Of course, equity investors do seem to be pricing in a very rosy scenario, and the past few months have shown how quickly the market landscape can change. The U.S. economy could weaken more than expected, the trade war could escalate, or there could be a geopolitical surprise that causes bond yields and equity prices to fall. Investors should therefore be mindful of the warnings being sent by ERPs and other absolute and relative valuation metrics. However, they should also remember that stretched valuations can get even more stretched. As the famous saying goes, markets can stay irrational longer than investors can remain solvent. What could move markets tomorrow? Opinions expressed are those of the author. They do not reflect the views of Reuters News, which, under the Trust Principles, opens new tab, is committed to integrity, independence, and freedom from bias.
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Palace chief 'sets price' to sell stake as club sweat on Europa League fate
Crystal Palace shareholder John Textor is ready to offload his stake in the Londoners in order to ensure they are able to compete in the Europa League next season John Textor is said to be prepared to sell his stake in Crystal Palace for less than market value in a bid to ensure that the FA Cup winners are able to compete in the Europa League next season. The American, 59, holds a 43 per cent stake in Palace via Eagle Football Holdings but the company also holds a stake in Lyon, who have also qualified for Europe next term. Textor's involvement at both clubs has led to scrutiny from UEFA, who are set to rule on whether or not the Eagles can feature in the competition later this month. Textor and Steve Parish, the Palace chairman, met with Uefa officials last week in a bid to persuade them that the former's 25 per cent voting rights means he is not, in fact, a person of influence at Selhurst Park. But with Palace still facing the threat of missing out on Europe altogether it has now emerged that Textor is willing to offload his stake in the club for a lower price. The Times report that Textor offloading his stake is seen as the most viable way to resolve the matter with a potential sale to his Palace cohorts a possibility. American co-owners Josh Harris and David Blitzer have matching 18 per cent stakes and a sale to them, if viable, is seen as the 'simplest outcome' for all parties. The report adds that sources close to Textor feel the outlined price of £170million is significantly less than he would stand to recoup otherwise given the club's current market value. Textor's involvement at both Palace and Lyon has caused unrest in the Premier League, too, in light of Uefa's recent meeting over the former's Europa League fate. It emerged earlier this week that Nottingham Forest have written to the authorities to express concern given the multi-club ownership rules that are in place. Forest would stand to profit if Palace were expelled from the Europa League; they are currently set to participate in the Europa Conference League as a reward for their stellar 2024-25 campaign, where they finished seventh in the Premier League. Even if Textor is successful in selling his stake there are concerns that the case could make its way to the Court of Arbitration for Sport, further muddying the waters surrounding Palace and their fate. Textor did attempt to put his shares into blind a trust to enable Palace to compete in Europe next season - an act other club chiefs have done - but Uefa ruled their attempts were too late, citing a deadline of March 1.
