logo
Committee on air safety flags non-implementation of past regulatory recommendations

Committee on air safety flags non-implementation of past regulatory recommendations

India Today09-07-2025
At a crucial meeting of the Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture on air safety held Wednesday, several members raised concerns over the "non-implementation of previous recommendations" made by the panel on civil aviation oversight, sources said. The meeting, held at Parliament Annexe, was attended by top officials from the Ministry of Civil Aviation (MoCA), Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), Airports Economic Regulatory Authority (AERA), Airports Authority of India (AAI), Bureau of Civil Aviation Security (BCAS), and senior representatives from airline operators including Air India, IndiGo, and chopper service stakeholders.advertisementSources told India Today that prior to the meeting, some committee members had planned to directly question the Civil Aviation Secretary and MoCA officials about the Air India 171 crash, seeking details on what led to the incident, how far the investigation had progressed, and when the central question - why the crash occurred - would be answered.
According to sources, the members also intended to seek updates on the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) preliminary findings and whether they would be made public soon.The Standing Committee, chaired by JD(U) MP Sanjay Jha, convened with the stated agenda of "an overall review of civil aviation sector safety", but the June 12 Air India crash in Ahmedabad took centre stage during discussions.The crash involved flight AI 171, which slammed into the BJ Medical College hostel building just seconds after take-off, killing 260 people - 241 passengers and crew onboard, and 19 on the ground.While Wednesday's meeting focused on oversight and systemic issues, air safety had already become a contentious issue during the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) meeting on Tuesday. Though originally intended to address airport levy charges, the PAC session turned into a charged discussion on aviation safety post-AI 171.Sources said PAC members pressed aviation authorities about oversight gaps, urged an audit by BCAS, and raised questions over increasing safety incidents in May and June. Lawmakers also flagged a surge in airfares following the Pahalgam terror attack as another sign of regulatory failure.Air India CEO Wilson Campbell, along with top MoCA, DGCA, AERA, AAI and BCAS officials, attended the PAC meeting and defended the Boeing 787 Dreamliner involved in the crash. Air India stated the aircraft was among the safest in the world, with over 1,000 Dreamliners currently in operation globally.Speaking after the PAC meeting, former Civil Aviation Minister and PAC member Praful Patel highlighted a shortage of skilled senior personnel at DGCA and recommended that retired officials be brought back on short tenures to plug the gap."Safety is paramount. Anyone who flies wants to be safe and assured that they will reach their destination. Many events took place in the wake of the Air India crash. Obviously, when a crash happens, everything is taken with sensitivity," Patel said.He added, "Indian aviation is safe, and we don't need to panic. All airlines, including Air India, follow all safety protocols. DGCA is well equipped and does a very good job. However, DGCA needs to have more people. It is facing a shortage of staff at the top level, of skilled people. Retired officials can be brought back to deal with this understaffing and ensure safety standards are fully compliant at the earliest. Maybe an audit of the entire sector or all the aircraft should be done at the earliest so that passenger confidence is restored."- EndsMust Watch
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Post-Godhra riots case: 19 years after conviction, Gujarat HC acquits 3 for want of reliable evidence
Post-Godhra riots case: 19 years after conviction, Gujarat HC acquits 3 for want of reliable evidence

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

Post-Godhra riots case: 19 years after conviction, Gujarat HC acquits 3 for want of reliable evidence

NEW DELHI: The Gujarat High Court has acquitted three men who were convicted and sentenced to five years of rigorous imprisonment by a fast track court for their alleged involvement in a 2002 post-Godhra riots case, stating their conviction was not based on reliable evidence. The acquittal comes 19 years after their initial conviction. The high court bench of Justice Gita Gopi granted appeals filed by Sachin Patel, Ashok Patel , and Ashok Gupta, who had challenged their conviction by a fast-track court in Anand and the sentencing order from May 29, 2006, according to PTI. "The learned trial court judge had erred in the appreciation of the evidence. Conviction is not based on reliable and corroborative evidence. The identification of the accused has not been proved during the trial," the high court stated in its Monday order. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad The case originally involved nine individuals, with four being convicted and sentenced to five-year rigorous imprisonment under various Indian Penal Code sections for rioting, arson, and unlawful assembly. One appellant passed away in 2009. According to the prosecution, the three convicts were part of a crowd that gathered in Anand a day after the Sabarmati Express train incident at Godhra station on February 27, 2002. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 11 Foods That Help In Healing Knee Pain Naturally Undo The crowd allegedly damaged and set fire to shops, violating the district magistrate's order under section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The high court observed that the prosecution failed to prove whether the appellants were members of the unlawful assembly and their involvement in arson. "None of their acts in prosecution of the common object -- of setting things on fire and damaging the private and public property -- has been proved during the trial," the high court stated. The case stemmed from the February 27, 2002 incident when 59 people were killed after the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt at Godhra, which triggered riots in Gujarat.

Air Passenger Complaints In India Nearly Match 2024 Total In Just Six Months
Air Passenger Complaints In India Nearly Match 2024 Total In Just Six Months

News18

time4 hours ago

  • News18

Air Passenger Complaints In India Nearly Match 2024 Total In Just Six Months

Last Updated: Ram Mohan Naidu told the Parliament on Monday that the DGCA has received almost as many complaints in just the first half of 2025 as it did in all of 2024. The Indian aviation sector is under close watch as complaints from passengers and technical glitches within the aircraft are rising fast. Civil Aviation Minister Ram Mohan Naidu told the Parliament on Monday that the DGCA has received almost as many complaints in just the first half of 2025 as it did in all of 2024. In a written answer to a question asked by MP Mukul Balkrishna Wasnik, the Minister said that 3,925 passenger complaints were filed with the DGCA from January to June this year. The number of complaints in all of 2024 was 4,016. In previous years, there were 5,513 complaints in 2023, 3,783 in 2022, and 4,131 in 2021. The numbers indicate that the problems faced by passengers have been ongoing for years. Besides passenger complaints, technical issues in aircraft are also a major concern. The Minister's reply in the Parliament noted that as of June 2025, 183 technical defects have been reported, which account for 43% of the 421 glitches found last year. In the past years, 448 defects were found in 2023, 528 in 2022, and 514 in 2021. Over the last five years till June 2025, the DGCA has investigated 2,094 serious issues in the aircraft. 'Serious issues must be reported to the DGCA immediately," he said. 'DGCA has comprehensive and structured civil aviation regulations for safe operation of aircraft and its maintenance. These regulations are continuously updated and aligned with the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO)/European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) standards. Post-accident, DGCA enhanced the check and inspection of the critical component of safety assurance in order to identify and rectify immediate systemic issues," the Minister added. His remarks came after the Air India-171 crash shortly after take-off in Ahmedabad, killing 241 on board. view comments First Published: July 29, 2025, 14:29 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

China rolls out $500 child subsidies to boost birth rate: But is it enough
China rolls out $500 child subsidies to boost birth rate: But is it enough

Business Standard

time5 hours ago

  • Business Standard

China rolls out $500 child subsidies to boost birth rate: But is it enough

China has announced a nationwide annual childcare subsidy of 3,600 yuan (approximately ₹43,000 or $500) per child under the age of three, Chinese state-media Xinhua reported on Monday. This is a significant step towards the country's efforts in reversing the plunging birth rate and ageing population crisis. The initiative, retroactive from January 1, 2025, marks Beijing's most comprehensive pro-birth move yet — but will this amount, though welcome, be sufficient to reverse deep-rooted demographic trends? What's happening with China's population? China recorded its lowest-ever birth rate in 2023, with just 6.39 births per 1,000 people. Although 2024 saw a modest rebound of 520,000 additional births, analysts widely attribute this to a temporary post-Covid-19 recovery. Moreover, 2024 was the year of the Dragon according to Chinese zodiac signs. Children born during this year are believed to possess unique personality traits and are associated with good fortune, which could explain the rare uptick in birth rates. However, the overall population still shrank by two million, its steepest decline since 1961, officially ceding the title of most populous country to India. This is no small concern. By 2035, China is projected to have 400 million citizens over the age of 60—nearly one-third of its total population—raising red flags over future labour shortages, pension sustainability, and economic stagnation. China's one-child policy China's one-child policy, in place from 1980 to 2015, has also left a cultural imprint that will be difficult to erase. The country has been actively reversing the policy, allowing two children from 2016 and three from 2021. While these efforts are slowly being realised, they are not keeping up with the population decline. New subsidy to aid 20 million The new subsidy, which will not be taxed or counted against other welfare benefits, is expected to benefit over 20 million families annually, Xinhua reported. It follows years of local pilot schemes offering more generous incentives, such as Hohhot's 10,000-yuan annual grants per child and Shenyang's monthly payments of 500 yuan for third children. While these schemes have shown some encouraging signs— Tianmen city, for instance, recorded a 17 per cent spike in newborns in 2024 —experts warn against overstating the impact of cash handouts alone. Professor Mao Zhuoyan of Capital University of Economics and Business told Xinhua that while subsidies are helpful in easing day-to-day expenses like formula or diapers, they are not a 'cure-all' to the full cost of raising a child in China. Cost of parenthood in China According to a 2024 report by the YuWa Population Research Institute, the average cost of raising a child from birth to college graduation in China now stands at 680,000 yuan (about ₹82 lakh or $94,557). Even raising a child to the age of 17 costs over 538,000 yuan, placing China among the most expensive countries in the world to have children. Compare this with average annual urban salaries of 125,100 yuan in affluent provinces like Jiangsu and just 58,100 yuan in hospitality sectors—according to Statista, based on annual salaries drawn in 2023—and it becomes evident why many young Chinese are reluctant to start families. Parenthood crisis: What's really deterring China's youth? Beyond finances, broader cultural and societal shifts are at play. Many young people, especially women, cite career pressures, lack of childcare support, and unaffordable housing as key deterrents to parenthood, a report by Think Global Health showed. Delayed marriages, rising infertility, and a longstanding preference for smaller families have further complicated matters. How is the Chinese govt responding to population crisis? In response, Beijing has been introducing a plethora of reforms. Some of these are: Promoting flexible work hours and work-from-home options for parents Offering preferential housing for families with multiple children Expanding childcare and preschool infrastructure Providing IVF and fertility treatments under public health insurance Mandating epidural access in large hospitals by 2027 Is the subsidy too little, too late? While the subsidy signals serious intent, experts argue it's far from a silver bullet. Yang Yiyong from the Academy of Macroeconomic Research told Xinhua that China needs affordable education, accessible child and maternity care, workplace protections for mothers, and social support structures. And time is running out. Projections of the United Nations estimate China's population could shrink to 1.3 billion by 2050, and further to 633 million by 2100, losing over 750 million people this century. Are there lessons for India here? As India assumes the role of the world's most populous nation, Beijing's policy evolution holds crucial lessons. India, too, is seeing a fertility slowdown, and the economic and social costs of parenthood are rising rapidly in urban areas. Last month, a LinkedIn post by Bengaluru-based startup founder Meenal Goel went viral, where Goel estimated the cost of raising a child in India to be between ₹38-45 lakh. Other media reports suggest these costs can even go above ₹1 crore, depending on school fees, tuition, college, lifestyle, etc. China's experiment is a sign that reversing a demographic slide is complex and expensive. Moreover, while subsidies may be helpful, a much wider structural transformation is still needed. The bottom line China's 3,600-yuan subsidy is a notable step, but unless backed by deeper social reforms, it may not be enough to convince families that parenthood is affordable or desirable in the modern Chinese economy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store