Exclusive-US, Russia explore ways to restore Russian gas flows to Europe, sources say
By Anna Hirtenstein and Marwa Rashad
LONDON/MOSCOW (Reuters) -With a frost covering Europe's energy relations with Russia, officials from Washington and Moscow have held discussions about the U.S. helping to revive Russian gas sales to the continent, eight sources familiar with the talks have told Reuters.
Europe slashed its imports of Russian gas following Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, a move that saw Russian exporter Gazprom post a $7 billion loss the following year.
U.S. President Donald Trump is pushing for peace in Ukraine, raising the prospects of a thaw in gas ties.
Sources close to the bilateral discussions said carving out a renewed role for Moscow in the European Union's gas market could help cement a peace deal with Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Though much of Europe has sought alternative supply, some buyers have remained, and industry officials say more could return once a peace deal is agreed.
As for Russia, nothing has hit its economy harder than the loss of most of Europe's gas market three years ago.
It now supplies 19% of Europe's demand, down from 40%, mainly consisting of liquefied natural gas (LNG) and some piped via Turkey along the TurkStream pipeline.
Washington's involvement in restoring the gas sales could help Moscow navigate political opposition in much of Europe.
U.S. involvement would also benefit Washington, giving it visibility, and possibly some control, over how much Russian gas returns to Europe, two diplomatic sources and a White House source said.
Since 2022, Europe has turned to other gas providers, including U.S. exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG).
U.S. envoy Steve Witkoff and Putin's investment envoy, Kirill Dmitriev, have held conversations about gas as part of Ukraine peace talks, two of the eight sources said.
Witkoff's spokesperson declined to comment when asked if he discussed the issue of Russian gas exports to Europe.
"Currently, there are no such discussions," Russia's Direct Investment Fund, headed by Dmitriev, said in a statement to Reuters.
Gazprom would consider selling gas to Europe if a new owner took control of the gas network between Russia and Europe, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told French magazine Le Point in April.
On the route crossing the Baltic Sea Gazprom controls the two twin pipelines of Nord Stream 1 and 2 backed by European firms which hold stakes.
Moscow is ready to trade its gas and knows that some European countries still want to buy it, Peskov said in the Le Point interview. "There is a gas seller, there are potential buyers," Peskov told reporters in April.
Countries still buying include Hungary and Slovakia which receive gas through the TurkStream pipeline. Belgium, France, the Netherlands, and Spain get LNG from Russia's Novatek under long-term contracts.
Regarding how the Americans might get involved, five sources said talks to date have discussed U.S. investors taking stakes in the Nord Stream pipeline connecting Russia and Germany, or in the pipeline crossing Ukraine, or in Gazprom itself.U.S. firms could also serve as the buyers, purchasing gas from Gazprom and shipping it to Europe, including to Germany, the sources said. Two of the sources said diplomatic talks involving potential U.S. investors have also looked at the idea of a U.S. buyer taking Russian gas and then exporting it on to Europe as a way of alleviating European political opposition to resuming supplies.
BlackRock, Vanguard and Capital Group each hold stakes of 1-2% in Gazprom.
BlackRock, Vanguard and Gazprom did not respond to requests for comment. Capital Group declined to comment.
The European Commission declined to comment. Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has expressed her opposition to returning to Russian energy supplies.
"Some are still saying that we should re-open the tap of Russian gas and oil. This would be a mistake of historic dimensions and we would never let it happen," she told a European Parliament session on May 7.
"Russia has proven, time and again, that it is not a reliable supplier."
Brussels wants to ban new Russian gas deals by the end of 2025 and ban imports under existing deals by the end of 2027. The plan, to be debated next month, would require approval from the European Parliament and a majority of member states. Hungary and Slovakia have expressed their opposition to the move.
Trump has said he hopes for a Ukraine peace deal soon and expects this to pave the way for both Russia and Ukraine to do big business with the U.S.
Russia is ready to restart gas exports to Europe immediately if there is political will to do so, Putin has said.
Kyiv and Washington signed a U.S.-Ukraine minerals deal on April 30 to include all Ukrainian government-owned natural resource assets and infrastructure but did not explicitly mention the pipeline.
"If this level of engagement between Russia and the U.S. continues, it's very likely that there will be a resumption of Russian gas flows... involving U.S. intermediaries," said a person who is familiar with the discussions.
Gazprom, keen to resurrect its European sales, is considering offering German clients short-term 24-month contracts and steep price discounts, two sources said.
Traditionally it has asked buyers to sign contracts lasting decades, two sources noted.
HURDLES
Yet the EU remains broadly opposed, and there are other hurdles to overcome. There are numerous legal cases hanging over breaches of legacy contracts.
The Nord Stream pipelines were damaged in a sabotage attack in September 2022. Three of the four pipes were ruptured, leaving just one still able to pump gas.
The war in Ukraine has also changed the situation, with Russian attacks damaging pipelines crossing Ukraine, though the key transit route remains in working order.
A more technical matter is that Nord Stream 2 also never received German government approval to begin sending gas to Germany, a spokesperson from Germany's economy and energy ministry noted, declining to comment further.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
Indianapolis homebuyers gain the upper hand
Homebuyers hold an edge in Indianapolis and across the nation — so long as you can cover the bigger tab. The big picture: There are nearly 500,000 more sellers than buyers in the U.S. housing market, Redfin estimates based on April figures. Why it matters: That's the widest gap on record — and a big reversal from just a few years ago, when buyers were desperate to find a place to live, sending prices into the stratosphere, Axios' Emily Peck and Sami Sparber report. By the numbers: There are 33.7% more sellers than buyers nationally. At no other point since Redfin began tracking in 2013 have sellers outnumbered buyers by such a large percentage. A year ago, sellers outnumbered buyers by 6.5%, and two years ago, buyers outnumbered sellers. Zoom in: The Indy metro had nearly 1,500 more sellers than buyers, a 21% difference, signaling a home buyer's market. Indianapolis also ranks fifth overall when tracking metros with the biggest year-over-year increases in pending home sales. Context: Redfin counted sellers as the number of active listings in a given area and created a model to estimate the total buyers. Where it stands: The one-two punch of still-soaring home prices and mortgage rates is making it hard for buyers, especially first-timers, to find a place they can afford despite the shift. Add to that the extreme economic uncertainty of 2025. Tariff news, layoff fears and, for many federal workers, layoff realities, are tamping down buyer demand. Yes, but: For home sellers "the mortgage rate lock-in effect is easing," per Redfin. "For most people, it's not realistic to stay put forever; job changes, return-to-office mandates and divorce force people to move." Elevated mortgage rates are becoming the norm. "The idea of taking on a higher mortgage rate also isn't as shocking as it was when rates first skyrocketed in 2022." Between the lines: Buying a home remains out of reach for most Americans, as the National Association of Realtors pointed out in a recent report. The median home price sold in the U.S. in the first three months of this year was $417,000, per federal data — 33% more than during the same period in 2019, before the housing market went haywire, outpacing inflation and incomes. Indy's median home sale price was $255,000 as of April per Redfin, a 4.9% increase when compared to the previous year. The household income required to afford a median home in the Indianapolis-Carmel-Anderson metro has also increased nearly 4% since last year. What to watch: Historically, when sellers outnumber buyers, prices drop. And in some markets, listings have already started falling. Redfin believes prices will dip 1% by the end of the year (not exactly a huge discount, to be sure). The bottom line: "The balance of power in the U.S. housing market has shifted toward buyers, but a lot of sellers have yet to see or accept the writing on the wall," said Redfin senior economist Asad Khan in the report.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs on canola seen supercharging Canadian farmers' shift to spring wheat
By Ed White WINNIPEG, Canada (Reuters) -In the U.S. Great Plains, where spring wheat once dominated fields, farmers are turning away from the crop. But across the border in Canada, the pinch and prospect of Chinese and U.S. tariffs on canola have prompted farmers to pick up the slack on wheat. Farmers are still putting their crops in the ground, so it is not yet possible to know the extent of the acreage shift into wheat. However, early signs, based on interviews with more than 20 Canadian and U.S. farmers, agricultural analysts, traders and industry organizations, show that the grain primarily used to bake bread is proving to be a big winner in this year's global trade war. China's 100% tariffs on Canadian canola meal and oil and its threat to impose duties on canola seed, amid President Donald Trump's broader global trade war, have rattled Canadian farmers, who since 1990 had nearly quadrupled their canola acres before paring back in recent years because of growing problems with drought, high production costs and crop diseases. Now, tariffs are expected to accelerate the likelihood that thousands of farmers could further cut back, adding up to hundreds of thousands or even millions of acres less canola, and more wheat, farmers and analysts estimated. "There is going to be a massive switch," said Jerry Klassen, a Manitoba farmer and market analyst with Resilient Capital. He has switched hundreds of acres on his own farm from canola to spring wheat this year and thinks like-minded farmers will do the same. Reuters' reporting on fallout from tariffs in grain markets illustrates how global trade turmoil is causing the neighboring countries to diverge on spring wheat production. Canada's rebounding supply of wheat has kept prices down for millers who fuel global bread demand as well as consumers. The shift to Canadian fields has also offset some worry about the long-term decline in U.S. production area. Politicians in Canada are funding and supporting the shift toward greater wheat production as a way to shield the thinly-populated agricultural export powerhouse of Western Canada from foreign pressure. And farmers have their own motivation: improved wheat varieties have boosted the grain's profitability. Adam Dyck of U.K. breadmaker Warburtons in Winnipeg said some Canadian farmers had tripled their production to 90 to 100 bushels per acre since the 1990s. The shift toward wheat reflects canola's vulnerability to tariffs. Most of the C$14.5 billion ($10.59 billion) 2024 Canadian canola exports go to the U.S. and China, with the U.S. biofuels market consuming most of Canada's canola oil while China buys most of Canada's seed exports to crush for edible oil and animal feed, while wheat is sold to dozens of countries around the world. Some Canadian farmers are expecting that in a prolonged trade war, globally-diverse wheat is a safer bet than U.S. and China-dependent canola. In 2024 Canada shipped two-thirds of its total canola seed exports to China, and 95% of total canola oil exports of 3.5 million tons to the U.S. But Canada's wheat exports were "highly diversified," the U.S. Department of Agriculture noted. The world's wheat and canola markets will be guessing for weeks about Canadian farmers' final decisions on what to seed. Statistics Canada's next report is scheduled for June 27, and the numbers for that report are being collected before farmers have finished planting. 'POVERTY GRASS' Scott Huso, a farmer in Aneta, North Dakota, said that across the northern Great Plains, stretching from Minnesota to the Montana Rockies, farmers have been planting less wheat in favor of crops like corn and soybeans, which are generally more profitable. University of Minnesota data found that last year, farmers in central Minnesota earned hundreds of dollars in operating profit per acre with corn and soybeans, but lost money on spring wheat in 2024. "Wheat, you're not making money on it," Huso said. U.S. total hard red spring wheat production hasn't changed much since the mid-1990s because of substantial improvements in the amount grown per acre. However, total acres are in long-term decline, dropping from 15-20 million acres in the mid-1990s to 13-15 million in the mid-2000s to 10-13 million in the mid-2010s. The U.S. Department of Agriculture said on March 31 that it expects hard red spring wheat acreage in 2025 to drop to 9.4 million acres -- the lowest since 1970. Yet spring wheat is in great demand from the world's millers and bakers. Its high protein content allows it to be used as the base for top-quality bread flour, or as something to blend with lower-quality, cheaper wheats. The U.S. and Canadian plains are the most reliable major source of the world's high-quality spring wheat. Yet that doesn't always lead to the kind of premium prices U.S. farmers might need to justify growing the crop, with steady Canadian supplies and those from overseas competitors like Russia keeping millers comfortable enough to avoid bidding wars, a frustration for many U.S. farmers like Huso. "You just can't convince guys to love wheat these days," said Huso, a member of the North Dakota Wheat Commission. Committed wheat growers like him and organizations like the commission and export-focused U.S. Wheat Associates are trying to convince buyers to pay higher prices and breeders to produce better wheat crop varieties to help wheat compete for U.S. farmers' fields. It's been an uphill struggle. In Canada, the mood is different. Rather than getting knocked out of the crop roster, more farmers are warming to wheat. In May, farmer Korey Peters finished seeding 1,700 acres of spring wheat on his farm near Winnipeg. With new varieties providing more crop per acre, and canola costly and hard to grow profitably in his area, he said he's been putting more and more of his land into wheat and corn. "I know some people call it 'poverty grass,' but it works for us," Peters said. ($1 = 1.3691 Canadian dollars) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
5 Major Social Security Mistakes Boomers Can't Stop Making
Retirement planning is both complicated and high-stakes — a recipe for mistakes with major financial consequences. And sure enough, Business Insider reported that more than half of Americans over 65 earn less than $30,000 a year. As you plan your own retirement, watch out for these Social Security mistakes plaguing current baby boomers. Check Out: Read Next: Too many people reach their early 60s and think: 'I've been paying into the system for decades, I need to lock in my share!' Unfortunately, that leaves them with far lower lifetime benefits than if they'd waited. 'Filing early means locking in a permanent reduction in benefits, up to 30% if your full retirement age is 67,' explained Christine M. Parisi, senior wealth advisor at R.W. Rogé & Company. If you take benefits at age 62, you receive just 70% of your full retirement benefit. At 67, you collect 100%. Wait until 70, and you receive 124% of your full Social Security benefit. Learn More: Plan to continue working for a while? Hold off on taking Social Security — and not just to secure higher benefits. 'If your earnings exceed the annual limit, the Social Security Administration may withhold $1 in benefits for every $2 you earn over the threshold,' Parisi added. 'Benefits can also push your income higher for Medicare-related costs like IRMAA, meaning you could end up paying more in premiums.' Plus, combining your salary with Social Security can push you into a higher tax bracket. You can end up handing much of that money right back to Uncle Sam. If one spouse earned significantly higher income, or worked for many years longer, their benefits will be higher. Plan to optimize those, perhaps by having that spouse delay benefits while the family lives on earned income or distributions from retirement accounts before taking benefits. Parisi noted that different rules apply to surviving spouses. 'If your late spouse worked long enough to qualify for Social Security, you may be able to start collecting survivor benefits as early as age 60. Unfortunately, many don't realize this is even an option until it's too late.' First and foremost, when you planned your retirement income, did you account for taxes? You'll still owe income taxes in retirement, at least under current tax laws. 'A portion of Social Security benefits are taxable, up to 85%, based on your provisional income,' said Keith Hensley of Florida Financial Planning. Many states tax Social Security benefits as well. The upshot? You may need more money saved for retirement than you thought. Again, you may be better off working another year and delaying Social Security benefits. It may not be too late for a Roth conversion to make sense. If you have a year with lower income, consider taking the tax hit and converting some of your traditional retirement funds to Roth accounts, so they can compound tax-free and you can avoid paying taxes on withdrawals in retirement. If Social Security is your only — or your primary — plan for retirement income, expect stormy seas ahead. William Connor, CFA and CFP with Sax Wealth Advisors, added some historical context. 'Social Security was created as a safety net for older Americans. It was not designed as a primary source of retirement income, and won't replace your working income.' Instead, combine it with other sources of income such as retirement accounts, health savings accounts (HSAs), taxable brokerage accounts, real estate investments and perhaps part-time fun working gigs. The less you rely on Social Security income, the more comfortable and secure your retirement will be. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks How Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Every State? This article originally appeared on 5 Major Social Security Mistakes Boomers Can't Stop Making Sign in to access your portfolio
