From Syria's war to US uncertainty: A refugee caught in Trump's aid freeze
Born and raised in Damascus, Saaid had dreamt of moving to the US since he was 12. When Syria's civil war broke out in 2011 and pro-democracy protests spread across the country, calling for an end to president Bashar Al Assad's authoritarian rule, his desire to leave grew stronger.
'I left Syria because I was at the age of joining the military,' Saaid tells The National. 'When I turned 18, I tried to get my passport and come here as I did not want to fight my people, because the military was fighting our people."
Saaid, 27, spent several years in Cairo, Egypt, where he met his wife, Reham Allahham. In October, his long-held dream finally began to take shape. He arrived in Maryland with Reham and their daughter Mirna, 5. He had nothing – no money, no home, just the will to start over.
The family was supported by Lutheran Social Services of the National Capital Area, a refugee resettlement agency that covered their hotel stay on arrival. By December, with the agency's help, they had moved into a two-bedroom apartment in Calverton, with three months of rent funded.
For decades, the federal refugee resettlement programme has supported people fleeing war, disaster and persecution, offering limited cash and medical assistance along with case management, English-language classes and job placement services.
But for Saaid, rebuilding his life came with unexpected hurdles. Just as his family began to settle, the Trump administration froze refugee resettlement funds, leaving tens of thousands of newly arrived families in sudden uncertainty and hardship.
'We were honestly upset that unfortunately [the funding] stopped but we hope that the situation will get better,' Saaid says.
The funding freeze led to delays in his rent payments, leaving him anxious about how long the support would last.
Families who arrived after him received no assistance at all. Many were at risk of eviction. That is when the non-profit Homes Not Borders stepped in, using private donations to help several refugee families keep food on the table and roofs over their heads. The organisation also furnished apartments, including Saaid's, with beds, sofas and other essentials, helping refugees make a fresh start.
'We had been doing about seven to 10 home setups a week. But then the refugee resettlement stopped when President Trump took over,' says Laura Thompson Osuri, executive director of Homes Not Borders.
'Now we've been doing about four home set-ups a week, mostly for Special Immigrant Visa holders that used to work for the US government in Afghanistan. They're not getting any support from the US government. They're coming here on their own dime or sponsored by a non-profit here.'
With the funding freeze, resettlement agencies nationwide were forced to lay off hundreds of staff. So, Homes Not Borders hired some case workers part-time to help refugees connect to their benefits. The group has also helped many refugee families pay their rent.
'We used to be vendors of the resettlement agencies and get money from them for doing home set-ups. That has stopped, so that has been a hit to our budget,' Ms Osuri says.
With fewer new arrivals, the organisation has decreased the number of home set-ups it conducts. While this has reduced the need for staff time and resources, the group continues to seek donations and grants to support continuing resettlement work.
Refugees are an important part of the fabric of America, Ms Osuri says. 'We need to start resettling all these people, especially the Afghan people that we promised that we'd bring them here.'
Navigating a new life
In April, Saaid began working at a slaughterhouse in Baltimore, earning $2,500 a month. It was a step forward, but it came at a cost. The new income made him ineligible for food stamps and cash assistance. With $1,850 going towards rent each month, there's little left to support his family.
Reham has enrolled in free English classes in Prince George's County and helps Saaid improve his language skills, as his work hours prevent him from attending classes.
'When I first came here it was hard, but each month I feel that I'm improving and so is my English, hopefully,' he said. 'I'm really happy that I came here and as I said it was my dream. I wish my home rent was lower so I could live a better life.'
Despite the challenges, Saaid remains hopeful. He expresses gratitude to Mr Trump for lifting sanctions on Syria – a move he believes may ease the burden on his parents and siblings still living in Damascus.
'I wish I could send money home but my current situation doesn't allow me as I can barely pay rent and cover my expenses,' he said.
Although the future remains uncertain, Saaid dreams of becoming a chef and building a stable life in the US. He continues to hold on to hope — for himself, for his family and for the people of Syria.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Khaleej Times
2 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
Meet the Dubai mum building a screen-free parenting community
We've all been guilty of it at some point. Reaching for the phone at dinner. Handing a restless child an iPad just to finish a meal in peace. Scrolling endlessly while promising ourselves it's 'just five minutes'. Screens have seeped so deeply into our daily lives that their presence feels almost subconscious, yet their hold is anything but harmless. Today, children as young as four or five are handed devices as pacifiers — tools to keep them quiet, still, or 'disciplined'. And, lord forbid, when the screen is taken away, the reaction can even resemble severe withdrawal: tears, tantrums, and the unmistakable anxiety of dependency. So, as families transition from the carefree sprawl of summer into the structure of a new school year, the question feels more pressing than ever: with devices increasingly woven into classrooms and homework, how can parents draw the line between healthy digital literacy and overexposure? Well, a Dubai mum might just have some answers. Building a screen-free home Indian expat Adveta Dwivedi has taken this challenge head-on — not only within her own home but also by building a growing community determined to reimagine what childhood can look like without screens. At 40, Dwivedi balances her role as Chief Digital Officer in the gaming industry with being a mother of two. And despite a career immersed in technology, she and her husband have made a bold, intentional choice: to raise their children — a five-year-old and a toddler — screen-free. 'No tablets, no TV, and even with our household help, we follow a strict no-phone policy,' she says. 'Phones are only used for emergency calls. Family life is simple, connected, and full of being present in the moment.' Evenings in their home are phone-free zones, reserved entirely for the children. Weekends are sacred too, filled with nature outings, animal visits, or unstructured play rather than tightly scheduled extracurriculars. 'That time has given our kids resilience and imagination,' she explains. 'My older child can solve 500-piece puzzles, immerse himself in books for hours, and play independently without needing constant stimulation.' From book club to UAE-wide community The seed for this screen-free parenting community was planted in a children's book club, recalls Dwivedi. 'Every Saturday, families would gather, sometimes bringing their own books, sometimes borrowing from my personal library of more than 300 titles. The idea was to create a space where children could fall in love with reading, and parents could connect over shared values.' That book club has now grown to more than 60 member families, with shelves lined with classics, encyclopedias, and imagination-building stories. But slowly, the conversations moved beyond books. Parents began talking about the pressures of screens, sharing concerns about gaming, and swapping strategies for reducing screen time at home. Morphed into a screen-free community, the space has now become a sanctuary for both children and parents. 'For the little ones, the focus is on sensory play, storytelling, and the freedom of unstructured play. Older children are encouraged to explore a growing library of more than 200 carefully curated titles, ranging from Animalium to Oceanarium, which spark curiosity and open up long conversations about nature, wildlife, and conservation,' says Dwivedi. For parents, the community provides a safe space for candid conversations around digital wellness, says Dwivedi. 'Parents are grateful for practical insights into platforms like Roblox or Fortnite [games popular amongst kids], understanding what's safe, what's risky, and how to manage boundaries.' The risks of early screen exposure Screens may feel like harmless companions, but the toll they take on children begins earlier than most parents realise. What starts as a distraction at mealtime can rewire attention spans, disrupt sleep, and delay vital developmental milestones. 'The risks are clear and research-backed,' says Dwivedi. 'The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends no screen time for children under 2, and very limited exposure for those aged 2–5. A University of Calgary study in 2019 found that just 30 minutes of daily screen use in toddlers was linked to measurable delays in communication and problem-solving skills.' In her own home, she witnesses the contrast every day, having created a device-free environment. 'My children thrive on books, puzzles, creative play — exactly the kind of skills research shows are undermined by early screen exposure.' Practical alternatives for parents For many parents, going screen-free can sound daunting. Dwivedi insists it doesn't have to be. 'First of all, if a child is under the age of five, I encourage parents to stop screen use immediately and replace it with presence and engagement,' she adds. 'The first week may feel challenging, but children quickly adapt, and by the second week they develop a natural rhythm of independent play. After that, parents don't need to constantly entertain them.' Dwivedi also believes the shift begins with parents themselves. 'Even 20–30 minutes of phone-free, focused time after work can transform a child's sense of connection,' she explains. 'It's also essential to align caregivers — household help should remain phone-free and instead be guided to support children with reading, puzzles, or simple creative tasks.' From her experience, the alternatives don't need to be elaborate. 'Independent play setups with open-ended toys like Magna-Tiles, puzzles, and art materials are wonderful. Books and audiobooks spark imagination, and even something as simple as a walk outdoors or unstructured play can inspire more creativity than hours of passive screen use.' Recalling her own evenings at home, she adds, 'In our house, evenings are always fully dedicated to the kids. That consistent presence keeps them thriving and reduces the pressure to rely on screens.' A bigger vision What started as a children's book club has grown into a full-blown screen-free parenting community, and for Dwivedi, this is just the beginning. 'I see it growing into a movement, with us leading conversations around digital wellness and mindful parenting,' she says. 'Beyond supporting families at home, I want this community to inspire schools and policymakers to rethink how children are introduced to technology.' Childhood, she believes, is being rushed into a digital world far earlier than it needs to be. 'By Year 4, children in the UAE average around 40 downloaded apps. That's too much, too soon,' she adds. 'My vision is that technology should be introduced later and more mindfully. While basic digital literacy is important, children in Year 2 or Year 3 don't need heavy device exposure.' However, at its core, screen-free parenting is less about rigid templates or seeking perfection and more about trial and error. 'We're not rejecting technology, it's essential to the future,' says Dwivedi. 'But childhood deserves a foundation built on books, play, imagination. That's what creates emotionally resilient, digitally literate children when the time is right.'
Zawya
5 hours ago
- Zawya
Fed's expansive experiment in strategy to get a reboot at Jackson Hole
The U.S. Federal Reserve's pivot toward the labor market in 2020 will get a reboot on Friday when Fed Chair Jerome Powell is expected to release a new framework for the central bank that accounts for a half-decade in which inflation surged, jobs were plentiful, and uncertainty became the watchword. The new document may not completely discard the language rolled out when the Fed, in the midst of the pandemic and a burgeoning social justice movement, pledged not to short-circuit labor market gains on the mere threat of inflation in hopes of achieving "broad-based and inclusive" levels of employment. But Powell has flagged that a recalibration is coming, potentially emphasizing stable inflation as a foundation for the best labor market results, and relegating some ideas to times when the economy is abnormally weak or inflation is abnormally low, as occurred in the decade before the pandemic. In those years, as the Fed organized a nationwide series of community listening tours, staffers would ask about inflation and "people would look at us like we had two heads. It was not the topic" when employment and growth concerns were more paramount, said Duke University professor Ellen Meade, who helped organize the 2020 framework review as a top Fed adviser. "The world looks very different today." Powell has already acknowledged that the language adopted in 2020 had been overtaken by the surge of inflation during the COVID-19 pandemic and was likely on its way out. He is expected to detail the new strategy document when he addresses an annual Fed research conference on Friday. Minutes of the Fed's July 29-30 meeting released on Wednesday said the committee was close to finalizing changes to its statement of principles and reiterated that it "would be designed to be robust across a wide range of economic conditions." The current approach has been criticized for introducing complexities that may have slowed the Fed's response to emerging inflation in 2021 and proved irrelevant to how the economy evolved during the pandemic. Much of what was introduced in 2020, especially a controversial promise to allow periods of high inflation to offset low ones so it averages 2% over time, grew out of the Fed's experience trying to lift interest rates from near-zero where they had been mired after the 2007-to-2009 recession. That approach may remain appropriate during prolonged economic weakness, said former Fed Vice Chair Richard Clarida, who helped oversee the last framework revisions. But the approach for normal times may revert to the more straightforward inflation-targeting the Fed previously used. "A verbatim reading of the 2020 statement holds up pretty well operating in the environment the Fed had been operating in for a dozen years. Inflation below target. Secular stagnation," said Clarida, now global economic adviser for Pimco. But "2025 is not 2020. We have policy space." The Fed's current benchmark rate is set between 4.25% and 4.50%, but had been a full percentage point higher last year, a level more in line with prior decades. From around March 2008 to September 2022 it was never above 2.5%. RETHINKING TRADEOFFS The challenge for Powell and the Fed now will be to avoid the appearance of giving up on the labor market in favor of an inflation-first approach. The job market recovered slowly from the 2007-to-2009 crisis, but the unemployment rate eventually fell well below the level Fed officials regard as consistent with stable inflation. Yet inflation remained tame, sparking a small revolution in thinking. Rather than seeing an inevitable tradeoff between inflation and jobs, policymakers decided they no longer needed to view a low unemployment rate as a sign of inflation to come. Job gains could continue until there were more obvious signs of rising prices. As the pandemic threw millions out of work, Powell at the Jackson Hole forum in 2020 spoke about the Fed's "appreciation for the benefits of a strong labor market, particularly for many in low- and moderate-income communities," and described a new strategy that "reflects our view that a robust job market can be sustained without causing an outbreak of inflation." The approach added to an emerging Republican critique of a "woke" Fed that downgraded price control to address income inequality. But it also was true to what the data suggested in the 2010s, and again more recently when the unemployment rate fell to very low levels even as inflation declined, defying many mainstream economists' predictions that high unemployment would be needed to lower inflation from its peak in 2022. Though the Fed's two congressionally mandated goals of stable inflation and maximum employment are considered equally important, Powell has begun using a formulation in which stable inflation is described as necessary for the job market to reach its potential - an approach that would let the Fed justify steps to fight inflation as still consistent with its employment goals. "Without price stability, we cannot achieve the long periods of strong labor market conditions that benefit all Americans," Powell said at the press conference following the Fed's July meeting. Meade said that harkens back to an approach former Fed Chair Alan Greenspan used to try to balance the two sometimes conflicting priorities, even if the understanding of how low unemployment does or does not influence inflation has changed. "You achieve price stability and that lays the groundwork for maximum employment...I do think Powell found his way back to that framing," Meade said. "You have to get to price stability first and that is in the front part of their brains." (Reporting by Howard Schneider; Editing by Dan Burns and Andrea Ricci)
Zawya
6 hours ago
- Zawya
Wall St futures slip ahead of Walmart's results, Fed meet
U.S. stock index futures slipped on Thursday, as investors stepped to the sidelines and awaited an earnings report from big-box retailer Walmart and clues on the Federal Reserve's next policy move from a three-day conference in Jackson Hole. A sharp decline in technology stocks such as Nvidia, AMD, Palantir and Meta earlier this week signaled investor fears that the stocks, which have soared since April lows, are now overvalued, while Washington's growing interference in the sector has also raised alarms. The selloff could also be a result of investors paring back their stock exposure during a traditionally rocky period for equities, according to the Stock Trader's Almanac. "Equities could be more at risk of volatility amid this week's selloff in AI-related stocks on the back of renewed doubts about AI valuations," said Raffi Boyadjian, lead market analyst at brokerage XM. "Although dip buyers have stepped in to stabilize the market, it's too early to rule out a further slump in mega-cap tech stocks." In premarket trading, Nvidia, Advanced Micro Devices and Palantir were marginally up, while Meta was flat. The market focus is now on Walmart's results, expected before the bell. Its shares were down 1.3%. Investors expect the major retailer to strike a cautious tone on customer demand as the labor market cools and inflation ticks up. Reports from other retailers such as Target and Home Depot earlier this week painted a mixed picture, and now investors are trying to gauge how U.S. tariffs would impact holiday sales later this year. At 05:43 a.m. ET, Dow E-minis were down 110 points, or 0.24%, S&P 500 E-minis were down 6.25 points, or 0.10% and Nasdaq 100 E-minis were down 5.25 points, or 0.02% The Fed's annual symposium is expected to kick off on Thursday, with Powell scheduled to speak on Friday at 10 a.m. ET. Traders are looking for any commentary from Chair Jerome Powell that would signal an interest rate cut in September following recent job market weakness. Minutes from the central bank's July meeting showed on Wednesday that policymakers had struck a cautious tone and expect the current interest rates to be not far above the neutral level - where economic activity is neither stimulated nor constrained. That led traders to pare back odds of a 25-basis-point interest rate cut in September to 79% from 99.9% last week, according to data compiled by LSEG. A weekly report on jobless claims, a private report on business activity and remarks from Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic, are also expected on Thursday. Among other market movers, Coty slumped 22% after the beauty products maker forecast a drop in current-quarter sales on weak U.S. spending. CoreWeave rose 1.7% after trading firm Jane Street Group reported it has a 5.4% passive stake in the Nvidia-backed company. (Reporting by Johann M Cherian; Editing by Shinjini Ganguli)
