‘Corruption more dangerous than cancer': Justice B Veerappa
Here are the excerpts:
Who do you think the corrupt are — people or elected representatives?
Corruption has prevailed since pre-Independence. Society as a whole is full of corruption, except for a few.
Why is corruption so rampant?
There are good laws like the Prevention of Corruption Act, but the people appointed do not implement them properly.
What makes people in power corrupt?
Position and possession. With selfish agendas, everybody is fighting for position and wealth. Corruption is more dangerous than cancer. Cancer can be cured, but not corruption.
What is the role of the Lokayukta institution as a whole?
In all, about 25,000 cases are pending before the institution. Of them, nearly 8,000 are false. These pose the biggest problem, causing colossal waste of time and manpower. Many such complaints are being filed to achieve a selfish agenda. By the time we find out, three years would have been lost as we have to follow all the procedures to dispose them of, including issuing notices to the concerned, calling for explanation and scrutiny. People should resist filing such complaints and allow us to give quality time to genuine complaints. The more we visit the districts, the more complaints we receive. But the manpower is not enough to take up these complaints. The institution is facing a severe shortage of staff and vehicles. We write often to the authorities, but no government is interested in strengthening the institution.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Trial ought to continue in alleged encroachment of backwaters by apartment complex: HC
The Kerala High Court has said that trial ought to continue in a case regarding officials of Kochi Corporation allegedly abusing their official power and permitting encroachment of the backwaters and CRZ violation by an apartment complex located on the banks of Chilavanoor lake. The order by Justice A. Badharudeen came on a petition filed by Girija Devi, who had served as assistant executive engineer in the zonal office, seeking cancellation of further legal action in the case being considered by the Enquiry Commissioner and Special Judge, Muvattupuzha, under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The court said that there was material in abundance to see the involvement of the petitioner in permitting illegal constructions, which led to encroachment in government land prima facie. The prosecution records show that the framing of charge and trial thereof are absolutely necessary, the court said and dismissed her plea. The officials had been charged with abusing their official power to make unlawful gain to Heera Construction Company, conspired with its Managing Director, K.R. Babu and the project's architect Gopakumar, and permitted to construct a flat by encroaching on government-owned 'Kayal Purambok' of Elamkulam Village at Chilavanoor. Partial occupancy and final occupancy documents were issued by the said accused during the period 2005 to 2010. The petitioner who was the fourth accused in the case contended that she had not issued any licence or permit for making illegal constructions by encroaching upon government land, and that such constructions were carried out without her knowledge or consent. Further permits were issued on satisfying that the construction sought was legally allowable. She further submitted that the procedure for recovery of the government land by demolishing the unauthorised construction had already been initiated, though the same had been stayed by the court, in a writ petition filed by the owners of the apartment. This is still pending consideration. Rebutting this contention, the public prosecutor submitted that as per the order of the LSG Tribunal, it is evident that 17.74 cents of river area and 2.815 cents of land, thus totalling an extent of 20.55 cents of land were encroached upon by the builder who constructed a flat in his property and in government land. There is clear evidence of CRZ violation, from the onset. The court said that going through the prosecution allegations and other material, including the CRZ notification modified in the year 1997, it could be gathered that there are material in abundance to see the involvement of the petitioner in permitting illegal constructions, which led to encroachment in government land prima facie. In such a case, quashing of the entire proceedings against the petitioner could not succeed. The prosecution records would go to show that, in this matter, framing of charge and trial thereof are absolutely necessary, it added and dismissed the petition.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Punjab Vigilance Bureau arrests ASI for accepting Rs 1.55 lakh bribe
Chandigarh (Punjab) [India], August 20 (ANI): The Punjab Vigilance Bureau (VB) has arrested an Assistant Sub-Inspector (ASI), Om Prakash, on charges of demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs 1.55 lakh. The police official, earlier posted at Sohana police station and currently serving at Kharar police station in Mohali district, was apprehended as part of the Bureau's ongoing crackdown on official of the VB said the arrest followed an investigation into an online complaint lodged at the Chief Minister's Anti-Corruption Action Line. According to the complaint, a case had been registered against one Gurjit Singh and his wife at the Sohana police station. The accused ASI, who was associated with the investigation of that case, allegedly demanded a bribe of Rs 2.5 lakh from the complainant for cancelling the added that ASI Om Prakash subsequently accepted Rs 1.55 lakh as part payment of the demanded bribe. A verification conducted by the Vigilance Bureau found the allegations to be true, following which the official was arrested.A case has been registered against him under the Prevention of Corruption Act at the VB police station in SAS Nagar (Mohali).Reiterating the state government's zero-tolerance policy towards corruption, the spokesperson said the arrest underlines the Vigilance Bureau's determination to take stringent action against corrupt public servants, irrespective of their position or rank.A week earlier, on August 11, PVB, in its ongoing crusade against corruption, had apprehended 10 officials red-handed while accepting bribes in eight different trap cases, stated officials in a official of PVB stated that the department had put up its best efforts to eradicate corruption amongst public servants and others in every sphere during the period. He informed that the Bureau had submitted challans about 28 vigilance cases in various competent courts in the last month. Apart from this, six vigilance enquiries have also been registered to thoroughly probe the corruption cases. He added that eight criminal cases were also registered against 13 accused, which include nine government employees. (ANI)
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
How a dead man's signature sparked a 20-year-old corruption case against govt official
In 2005, Food Safety Officer Sunil Kumar Sachan renewed the licence of a Kerosene Oil Depot (KOD) — an industrial facility used for bulk storage of kerosene and other petroleum products — in Northeast Delhi's Gokulpur. The catch? The licence for Shiv KOD was allegedly renewed using the signature of Dunger Singh, a licence holder with a major share in the depot — who had been dead for over a year. In 2006, the Delhi government's Anti-Corruption Branch (ACB) lodged an FIR under sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act against Sachan. Close to two decades later, on August 18, a Delhi court directed that charges be framed against Sachan and two others — Simpal Garg, and Dunger's business partner Rajeev Kumar — in this case. 'A grave suspicion arises indicating active involvement of accused Sunil Kumar Sachan with co-accused Simpal Garg and Rajeev Kumar that they have conspired to cheat and forge the signatures of a deceased person, namely Dunger Singh, to illegally obtain the KOD licence to cause financial benefit to accused Rajeev Kumar,' noted Special Judge Dr Ruchi Aggarwal Asrani of Rouse Avenue Court in her order. What landed the government servant and his alleged co-conspirators in trouble was a signature in Hindi and a statement given by Dunger's real brother confirming his date of death. While all of Dunger's signatures on the files concerned before his death had been in English, the ones on the licence renewal form were in Hindi, the probe found. Dunger's brother and his daughter-in-law also told the ACB that he had passed away on August 5, 2004. The licence renewal application was dated July 12, 2005. There was another twist to the tale — two death certificates were issued. The then Gram Panchayat Adhikari and Registrar, Births and Deaths, of Baghpat had mentioned the date of Dunger's death as August 5, 2004, on one death certificate and October 2005 on another death certificate. The judge said: 'This court is of the view that there is a strong contention that Sh. Dunger Singh had actually died on 05.08.2004. The ACB had told the court that the two dates had been given by the Registrar to 'save the accused'. 'The prosecution has established that the accused, Sunil Kumar Sachan, had attested the signatures and photographs of Sh. Dunger Singh when he was allegedly not alive. It is an admitted case of the accused persons that accused Rajeev Kumar was a partner in M/s Shiv KOD and, thus, he had the underlying interest in the grant of the licence…,' Judge Asrani said, adding that FSL reports showed that Singh's signatures had been forged. Earlier, the ACB had filed a closure report in this case. This was rejected by Judge Asrani's predecessor, who stated: 'Dunger Singh had always put his signature in English. The entire file, from the day he got the licence in 1986 till the last renewal in 2002, bears his signature in English… except this last application for renewal of licence in 2005, the same is signed very neatly in Hindi'. The court had also noted that not enough efforts were made to question Rajeev Kumar.
