NZ firm buys, sells and moves homes
Fenton House Removals is one of New Zealand's most trusted house moving companies, with over 30 years of experience relocating, buying, and selling homes across the North Island. Whether you're a developer clearing a site, a homeowner looking for a cost-effective housing solution, or managing a subdivision project, we offer a full-service approach to make the process straightforward and stress-free.
Our current range of transportable homes is limited and in high demand if you're looking to buy a home ready for relocation, now is the time to act.
What we do
We provide a complete relocation solution that includes buying homes for removal, relocating homes across the North Island, and repositioning homes on the same property. Our Helensville-based team can assist with every part of the process from council consents and structural lifting to transportation and piling. We're known for our efficiency, reliability, and expert care.
We buy houses for removal
If you're clearing a section or redeveloping land, we can offer a fast and fair cash offer for your house. We'll manage the removal process helping you avoid costly demolition.
We relocate homes across the North Island
From family homes and large bungalows to character villas, we specialise in transporting all types of houses safely and efficiently. Our end-to-end service includes site inspections, assisting with consent management, transport logistics, and re-piling.
Same-site house shifting
Need to reposition your existing home within your property? Ideal for subdivisions, site improvements, or new builds, we can shift your house on-site to open up space or enhance views and access.
Specialists in villas and timber-framed homes
Character homes and older timber buildings require extra care. We've moved hundreds of villas and bungalows and understand how to preserve their integrity during every stage of the move.
New pile foundations
As part of our relocation service, we install pile foundations to suit the requirements of your new site. Clients will need to engage a geotechnical engineer to assess soil conditions and provide a customised design, we'll take care of the rest, following your engineer's plans to the letter.
Why choose Fenton House Removals?
With a strong reputation for honesty, communication, and professional service, we've become a preferred partner for home relocations across the North Island. Our experienced team ensures every move is handled with care, attention to detail, and long-term value in mind.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Techday NZ
4 hours ago
- Techday NZ
Dosh partners with Visa & Pismo to build NZ digital banking
Dosh has announced a collaboration with Visa and Pismo aimed at developing its digital banking platform in New Zealand. The Auckland-based digital wallet provider, established in 2021, is progressing towards becoming a registered bank and says its partnership with Visa and Pismo will support this next phase of its business. The collaboration is set to allow Dosh to deliver digital banking services with greater speed, security, and scalability to customers throughout New Zealand. Partnership details Dosh will use Pismo's cloud-native core banking and payments platform, which Visa acquired in 2024, to underpin its expanding financial offerings. Currently, the digital wallet serves more than 40,000 accounts, all of which are expected to be migrated to the Pismo platform by May 2026. According to the company, the migration will be seamless with no service disruption for existing users. "Working with Visa and Pismo allows us to move faster and scale with confidence," said Shane Marsh, CEO of Dosh. "As we step into this exciting next chapter, our focus is on offering New Zealanders a modern banking experience that's smart, simple, and puts value back in their pockets. This collaboration is a key step in that journey." Pismo's platform will allow Dosh to consolidate spend, save, and borrow features within a single banking application, giving it the infrastructure required to broaden its digital services and scale its user base over the coming years. Strategic goals Dosh's stated ambition is to become New Zealand's first fully digital, locally owned registered bank, with an application currently underway at the Reserve Bank of New Zealand. By leveraging this new partnership, Dosh aims to offer solutions that it says are aligned to the needs and preferences of modern New Zealanders. Anthony Watson, Visa Country Manager for New Zealand and the Pacific Islands, said: "We want Kiwi fintechs to thrive, so we're proud to support Dosh in their mission to bring more innovation and choice to New Zealanders. Their vision aligns closely with Visa's ongoing commitment to digital innovation and financial inclusion." This partnership marks the first client engagement for Pismo in New Zealand. Vishal Dalal, CEO at Pismo, commented: "Dosh is known for delivering a simple and intuitive customer experience. We're excited to help enable that with a modern, scalable platform powering it behind the scenes. We're also proud to welcome Dosh as our first client in New Zealand." Local focus with global technology Dosh highlighted the importance of a local customer focus while leveraging the expertise and technologies of international partners. The collaboration intends to merge global payments infrastructure with local requirements. Marsh said: "Collaborating directly with Visa, a global leader in payments innovation, reinforces our ambition to bring world-class digital banking technology to Kiwis. Together, with Pismo, we're building the foundation for the future of banking in New Zealand." Dosh is positioning its model to streamline costs, adopt new technologies including artificial intelligence, and offer a service described as tailored for New Zealand customers as it seeks regulatory approval to operate as a digital-only bank. Follow us on: Share on:
Otago Daily Times
21 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Kmart accused of links to slave labour factories
Retail giant Kmart is facing accusations it misled customers on its ethical credentials by sourcing clothing supplies from factories in China with links to slave labour. An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed a lawsuit against the outlet in the Federal Court, seeking to gain documents so they can see whether it knowingly sourced stock from suppliers who used forced labour from those in the ethnic group. In its ethical sourcing statement, Kmart said it aimed to provide products that respected human rights according to its ethical sourcing code which committed to abiding by international standards, including guidelines set out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The lawsuit filed by the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association claims Kmart included on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists two suppliers with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It said this region in China's west has been well-documented for "systemic state-sponsored forced labour and other atrocities against Uyghur and other Turkic Muslim people". The group wants proof from Kmart that it has abided by its ethical sourcing promises regarding these suppliers and whether its public statements have been misleading or deceptive. Kmart must ensure it is not profiting off forced labour in China, association president Ramila Chanisheff said. "We're demanding answers from Kmart so we know whether its actions live up to its words about addressing forced labour risks in its supply chain," she said. The retailer risks a legal claim that it breached Australian Consumer Law by misleading and deceptive conduct if documents show it had failed to monitor the risk of it using forced labour in its supply chain. Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the firm was using this first-of-its-kind case to bring real accountability to Australian retailers. "Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights – but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang," Ms Kanis said. Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Freya Dinshaw said the case highlighted the weaknesses in Australia's laws when members of the public are left to take companies to court on suspicions of modern slavery. Unlike the United States, Australia has not banned imports of products made in the Xinjiang region, instead opting for a transparency approach which requires businesses to report annually on their actions to identify and address slavery risks. Wesfarmers, the parent company of Kmart, has been contacted for comment.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Rocky road predicted due to Trump's tariff expansions, not least for US
The global rollercoaster ride of US trade tariffs has entered a new phase with sobering ramifications for many countries including the US. Auckland-based Economics professor Niven Winchester explains. The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump Administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US-European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. ADVERTISEMENT For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). Table: The Conversation; Source: Niven Winchester (Source: Supplied) For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. Economic impacts The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. ADVERTISEMENT GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. Table: The Conversation; Source: Niven Winchester (Source: Supplied) An economic own goal The tariffs reduce US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. ADVERTISEMENT The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including the West Auckland builder sentenced over massive meth haul, fire on a commuter train, and how Bluey could teach kids about resilience. (Source: 1News) Global impacts For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. ADVERTISEMENT Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead. Niven Winchester is a Professor of Economics, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons Licence.
