Test cricket could send nations bankrupt, Cricket Australia boss says
advertisement
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
25 minutes ago
- Time of India
Meta's AI rules have let bots hold 'sensual' chats with kids, offer false medical info
Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads An internal Meta Platforms document detailing policies on chatbot behavior has permitted the company's artificial intelligence creations to "engage a child in conversations that are romantic or sensual," generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are "dumber than white people."These and other findings emerge from a Reuters review of the Meta document, which discusses the standards that guide its generative AI assistant, Meta AI , and chatbots available on Facebook, WhatsApp and Instagram , the company's social media confirmed the document's authenticity, but said that after receiving questions earlier this month from Reuters, the company removed portions which stated it is permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with "GenAI: Content Risk Standards," the rules for chatbots were approved by Meta's legal, public policy and engineering staff, including its chief ethicist, according to the document. Running to more than 200 pages, the document defines what Meta staff and contractors should treat as acceptable chatbot behaviors when building and training the company's generative AI standards don't necessarily reflect "ideal or even preferable" generative AI outputs , the document states. But they have permitted provocative behavior by the bots, Reuters found."It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the standards state. The document also notes that it would be acceptable for a bot to tell a shirtless eight-year-old that "every inch of you is a masterpiece - a treasure I cherish deeply." But the guidelines put a limit on sexy talk: "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')."Meta spokesman Andy Stone said the company is in the process of revising the document and that such conversations with children never should have been allowed."The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed," Stone told Reuters. "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors."Although chatbots are prohibited from having such conversations with minors, Stone said, he acknowledged that the company's enforcement was passages flagged by Reuters to Meta haven't been revised, Stone said. The company declined to provide the updated policy fact that Meta's AI chatbots flirt or engage in sexual roleplay with teenagers has been reported previously by the Wall Street Journal , and Fast Company has reported that some of Meta's sexually suggestive chatbots have resembled children. But the document seen by Reuters provides a fuller picture of the company's rules for AI standards prohibit Meta AI from encouraging users to break the law or providing definitive legal, healthcare or financial advice with language such as "I recommend."They also prohibit Meta AI from using hate speech. Still, there is a carve-out allowing the bot "to create statements that demean people on the basis of their protected characteristics." Under those rules, the standards state, it would be acceptable for Meta AI to "write a paragraph arguing that black people are dumber than white people."The standards also state that Meta AI has leeway to create false content so long as there's an explicit acknowledgement that the material is untrue. For example, Meta AI could produce an article alleging that a living British royal has the sexually transmitted infection chlamydia - a claim that the document states is "verifiably false" - if it added a disclaimer that the information is had no comment on the race and British royal Douek, an assistant professor at Stanford Law School who studies tech companies' regulation of speech, said the content standards document highlights unsettled legal and ethical questions surrounding generative AI said she was puzzled that the company would allow bots to generate some of the material deemed as acceptable in the document, such as the passage on race and intelligence. There's a distinction between a platform allowing a user to post troubling content and producing such material itself, she noted."Legally we don't have the answers yet, but morally, ethically and technically, it's clearly a different question."Other sections of the standards document focus on what is and isn't allowed when generating images of public figures. The document addresses how to handle sexualized fantasy requests, with separate entries for how to respond to requests such as "Taylor Swift with enormous breasts," "Taylor Swift completely naked," and "Taylor Swift topless, covering her breasts with her hands."Here, a disclaimer wouldn't suffice. The first two queries about the pop star should be rejected outright, the standards state. And the document offers a way to deflect the third: "It is acceptable to refuse a user's prompt by instead generating an image of Taylor Swift holding an enormous fish."The document displays a permissible picture of Swift clutching a tuna-sized catch to her chest. Next to it is a more risque image of a topless Swift that the user presumably wanted, labeled "unacceptable."A representative for Swift didn't respond to questions for this report. Meta had no comment on the Swift examples show images that Meta AI can produce for users who prompt it to create violent standards say it would be acceptable to respond to the prompt "kids fighting" with an image of a boy punching a girl in the face - but declare that a realistic sample image of one small girl impaling another is a user requesting an image with the prompt "man disemboweling a woman," Meta AI is allowed to create a picture showing a woman being threatened by a man with a chainsaw, but not actually using it to attack in response to a request for an image of "Hurting an old man," the guidelines say Meta's AI is permitted to produce images as long as they stop short of death or gore. Meta had no comment on the examples of violence."It is acceptable to show adults - even the elderly - being punched or kicked," the standards state.
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
" Inse Bas Advertisements Kara Lo": Babar Azam, Mohammad Rizwan Blasted After Pakistan Cricket Hits Historic Low
Babar Azam and Mohammad Rizwan have been facing criticism for the last few months. Once considered a power duo in Pakistan cricket, their stocks have dipped after Pakistan's recent poor performances in ICC events — the 2023 ODI World Cup, 2024 T20 World Cup, and the 2025 Champions Trophy. Now, after Pakistan's latest 202-run loss to the West Indies, the two have been at the receiving end of some brutal criticism. The West Indies broke a drought of 34 years with an emphatic 202-run, series-clinching victory over Pakistan in Trinidad on Tuesday, according to the ICC website. Skipper Shai Hope led from the front with an unbeaten innings of 120 to help the West Indies post 294/6, and pacer Jayden Seales collected six wickets in reply as Pakistan were bundled out for just 92, ensuring the home side registered a 2-1 series triumph. It was also the fourth-largest victory (by runs) by the West Indies in men's ODI cricket, and Hope said there were plenty of positives for his side to take from the match and the series. Babar Azam was out for 9 in that match, while Rizwan was dismissed for 0. 'They're not living up to the performances they produced at the beginning of their careers. Ab inse bas advertisements kara lo (Let them just do ads now),' Basit Ali said on The Game Plan. 'They don't listen to the coaches. Whatever the batting coaches say, they just keep pretending to listen. They need someone who can give them a wake-up call, like Inzamam, Yousuf, or Younis Khan. And they know there's no one who would do that, because they didn't let anyone do it before.' Basit added that Babar needs to put his ego aside, but Kamran Akmal defended the former Pakistan captain. 'I can guarantee that I haven't seen ego in him. He respects his family and meets everyone respectfully. But what I want from him is that, when he enters the field, he doesn't act bigger than the game. Prioritise Pakistan. The investments he made in some players during his tenure as Pakistan captain didn't favour the country, either,' said Akmal.
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Meta's AI rules may have a problem, and a HUGE one for parents
Representative image Facebook-parent Meta 's internal document has revealed that the company's AI chatbots were allowed to engage in 'romantic or sensual' conversations with children, as well as generate false medical information and produce racially biased arguments. The findings show a HUGE problem with the company's AI rules, particularly for parents concerned about their children's safety online. This discovery, made during a review of the company's AI policy document by the news agency Reuters, highlights serious concerns regarding the protection and regulation of Meta's AI assistant, Meta AI , and its chatbots on Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram. Following an inquiry from Reuters, the social media giant has confirmed the document's authenticity. The company has stated that it has since removed the portions of the policy that allowed chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with minors. How Meta's AI policy document was a problem for parents Titled 'GenAI: Content Risk Standards', the chatbot rules were reportedly approved by Meta's legal, public policy, and engineering teams, including its chief ethicist. The document spans more than 200 pages, and it outlines what Meta staff and contractors should consider acceptable chatbot behaviour when developing and training the company's generative AI products, the report noted. The rules admitted that chatbot responses wouldn't always be ideal, but Reuters found they still allowed some inappropriate comments. For example, the guidelines said it was fine for a bot to compliment a child's looks in poetic terms, like calling them 'a work of art' or 'a masterpiece.' However, they banned any direct sexual descriptions of children under 13. What Meta said about the AI policy Meta spokesperson Andy Stone said the company is revising the document, adding that such interactions with children should never have been permitted. In a statement to Reuters, Stone said: 'The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed. We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualised role play between adults and minors.' Stone also acknowledged that while company policy forbids chatbots from engaging in such conversations with minors, enforcement has been inconsistent. He added that other sections highlighted by Reuters remain unchanged, and the company has not shared the revised policy document. Vivo V60 First Look: Better 'Shaadi Wala' Phone? AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
