Feathers evolved for looks, not warmth, says UCC research into 247 million year old reptile fossil
"This discovery suggests that feather-like structures may not have first evolved for keeping animals warm, but as a display symbol,' said Prof McNamara about the research reported in Nature.
She said it was 'akin to peacock feathers that were used to advertise fitness and attract potential mates, or as a visual threat signal to compete with other members of the species or warn off dangerous predators."
The analysis of tissue from the structures on the 'bizarre' reptile's back by the UCC team has revealed similarities to tissues found in animal feathers today. If they are confirmed as early feathers the date of when feathers evolved must be put back by 70 million years.
The fossil was found in the Grès à Voltzia region of southern France, and came into the hands of the State Museum of Natural History in Stuggart, Germany. Scientists there led the research which included UCC's Prof McNamara, Dr Valentina Rossi and Dr Tiffany Slater.
Pterosaurs, a species of flying reptiles that dominated the skies for 150 years and only went extinct 66 million years ago, were the first vertebrates known to have evolved powered flight.
In 2018, Prof McNamara's team made global headlines when they reported that pterosaurs had feathers that covered the entire body, and this was in keeping with the idea they regulated temperature.
Feathered dinosaurs had been discovered in China in the 1990s. In following years, the fossil remains of small dinosaurs were found that were covered in feathers, while, in larger dinosaurs, feathers were often restricted to the end of the tail, or a tuft behind the head.
Other dinosaurs were found with long plumes, or decorative groups of feathers. In those cases, said Prof McNamara, it was 'absolutely ridiculous' to think that the feathers were regulating body heat.
'They are the wrong shape and size,' said Prof McNamara. 'When you look at modern animals with similar structures the primary function is display. It's in visual communication to augment your body size to help you look bigger, as a deterrent to predators.'
Similarly, there is no evidence, she said, that the feather-like structures in Mirasaura were used for regulating temperature.
'This little specimen is telling us is that thermoregulation may not have been the first function (of its feathers),' said Prof McNamara. 'It may have been visual display.'
'Based on the distribution of these integumentary appendages, it's completely inconsistent with something to generate body heat. This is going to shatter what people believe about feathers.'
The use of synchrotron CT imaging by the UCC team revealed that fossil reptile had a delicate, bird-like skull with a largely toothless snout, large forward-facing eyes, and a high domed skull.
These features, plus grasping forelimbs, suggest it was a tree-dwelling reptile that lived on insects and other small prey.
The UCC team analysed tissue from the fossil's integumentary structures using a powerful microscope and x-ray technology. They found the tissue was full of preserved melanosomes, tiny organelles that reside in vertebrate skin, hair and feather cells today.
'We know that in modern animals, melanosome shape is closely linked to tissue type,' said Dr Rossi. This gives the UCC team confidence, she said, the structures have similarities to feathers.
In 2018 the Cork-based team made international headlines with the finding that pterosaurs - the earliest known vertebrates to evolve powered flight which died out 66 million years ago – had feathers.
The Prof McNamara led team predicted feathers evolved from a shared reptilian ancestor of pterosaurs and dinosaurs. It was a shock, she said, to find a reptile, from an entirely separate lineage and such an early period had developed feather-like structures.
'That's really what blows your mind,' said Prof McNamara.
The 'amazing' fossil finding, said Dr Slater, a co-author of the paper, has forced the UCC team to return to the drawing board to determine when feather-like structures first evolved on Earth.
'Mirasaura reveals a deeper, more complex evolutionary story than we ever expected,' said Dr Slater.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Agriland
12 hours ago
- Agriland
Researchers Develop Cost Effective Ammonia Sensor for Farmers
Researchers at University College Cork (UCC) have developed a groundbreaking new sensor that they say significantly advances the detection of ammonia pollution in real-time. This technology is aimed at transforming environmental monitoring, removing the cost barriers to farmers and supporting the enhancement of sustainable farming practices. Efficient detection of ammonia (NH3) is essential for reducing air and water pollution, safeguarding human health, promoting sustainable agriculture, and shaping climate and environmental policies, according to the research team. Current technologies for NH3 measurement include spectroscopic techniques and sensors that can be expensive, bulky, and impractical for widespread or field applications. The new silicon nanowire sensor developed by UCC researchers is described as a "promising alternative". This breakthrough is a result of the EU-funded RADICAL project led by UCC, with the findings published in the journal ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces. The team has stated that the nanowire sensor is sensitive and precise, consumes minimal power, and operates at room temperature, allowing for real-time air quality monitoring. As the sensor design is compatible with existing technology, it is said to be cost effective and simple to produce. It reportedly can also quickly and reliably detect ammonia, even in small amounts, and provide a portable solution for use in diverse environments. Ammonia pollution primarily originates from agricultural activities and poses significant environmental and health risks. In Ireland, where agriculture plays a major role, ammonia emissions are a critical concern. Urban sources such as vehicle emissions also contribute. Once in the atmosphere, ammonia reacts with acidic gases to form particulate matter (PM2.5), which is harmful to human health and can lead to respiratory and cardiovascular diseases. Direct exposure can irritate the skin, eyes, and lungs, the research team has said. Environmentally, excess ammonia causes water pollution, leading to algal blooms and eutrophication, which harm aquatic life. It also impacts air quality and climate. Dr. Vaishali Vardhan, lead author of the paper said: 'This new sensor is a powerful tool for both air quality monitoring and research. It is low in cost, small, and suitable for large-scale deployment. "What distinguishes our technology is the use of bare silicon nanowires - avoiding complex hybridisation techniques - which makes the sensor more affordable and scalable. "The integration of UV light further boosts its sensitivity, enabling efficient detection of ammonia at low concentrations." RADICAL project coordinator, Prof. Justin Holmes added: "This pioneering technology is set to revolutionise environmental monitoring in the agricultural sector. "It will allow farmers to make more informed decisions, benefiting both their businesses and the environment as a whole."
Irish Examiner
3 days ago
- Irish Examiner
Sexual assault defendants and complainants equally prone to memory gaps, study says
Both defendants and complainants in sexual assault cases are equally prone to memory distortions, new research suggests. The results of the study from University College Dublin and University College Cork puts a focus on why complainants' memories in sexual assault cases are scrutinised in court when the accused can be equally prone to error. Published in Nature's Scientific Reports, the 'He Said, She Said' study involved a series of experiments using an immersive first-person video playing out a date scenario. Those taking part were later assigned the role of either the complainant or the accused before being shown fabricated 'witness' accounts that included misleading details and altered key facts from the video. For example, some participants were shown testimony from a barman claiming that the accused was plying the complainant with drinks, even though this was not in the original video. The study found that individuals in the role of both complainant and accused were equally likely to absorb and recall false details, even when those details supported their assigned narrative. There were more than 1,300 participants in three separate experiments. 'We hope that this study will encourage people to re-examine their assumptions regarding the role of memory in sexual assault cases,' said lead author Associate Professor Ciara M Greene of UCD School of Psychology. 'We have noticed that these cases often hinge on discussions of the complainant's memory. 'As memory scientists, we find this strange, since we know that everyone — male or female, complainant or accused — is human and has the same memory frailties. 'This study provides concrete evidence that memory errors and distortions are not unique to one side of contentious legal cases.' For the study, two versions of the simulated date were filmed, one featuring a male actor and the other featuring a female actor. The two videos were identical in all other respects, with each filmed from the perspective of a person going on a date with the man or the woman. The first cohort of participants in both roles received the same misinformation details (experiment 1), wherein those in experiment 2 and 3 were provided misinformation that was tailored to their assigned roles — that is, information designed to make the sexual assault appear more likely or less likely to have occurred. Strong misinformation effects were observed in both groups, with the complainant and accused equally likely to misremember details of the events leading up to the sexual encounter. The study included both male and female victims and perpetrators, but interestingly found that memory distortion effects were not affected by gender. While the study was based on fictional scenarios, its authors argue it highlights that memory is reconstructive and subject to bias, regardless of one's role in a dispute. Co-author and Associate Professor Gillian Murphy said: 'We have a responsibility as memory scientists to banish myths about memory. 'In our book and in this paper, we stress that our memories mostly serve us very well and provide a good account of our experiences, but they can sometimes be prone to error, no matter what side of the courtroom you're on.'
RTÉ News
24-07-2025
- RTÉ News
Why our Stone Age brains aren't designed for sustained attention
Analysis: Our modern world demands sustained vigilance, but we're using brains that weren't designed for this kind of focus We've all been there. You're trying to focus on an important task, but your mind starts wandering. Maybe you're a student struggling to pay attention during a long class or lecture, or you're at work trying to concentrate on a detailed report. You might think the solution is simple: just try harder, practice more, or maybe find the right productivity hack. But what if we told you that perfect, unwavering attention isn't just difficult but actually impossible to achieve? Recent research from cognitive scientists reveals something that might surprise you: the human brain simply isn't designed for perfect sustained attention. This isn't a personal failing or something you can overcome with enough willpower. It's a fundamental feature of how our minds work. From RTÉ Radio 1's Today with Claire Byrne, why is our attention more vulnerable than ever and what can we do about it? Think of your attention like a flashlight with a flickering battery. No matter how much you want that beam to stay perfectly steady, it's going to flicker. Scientists have discovered that our brains operate through rhythmic pulses, with attention naturally cycling several times per second. It's not something you can control or train away. The brain networks responsible for attention, particularly areas in the front and sides of your head, show constant fluctuations in activity. Even when you think you're paying perfect attention, brain scans reveal that your neural activity is constantly shifting. It's like trying to hold water in your cupped hands. During World War II, researchers noticed something troubling: radar operators whose job was to spot enemy aircraft on screens would inevitably miss targets after just a short time on duty. This wasn't because they weren't trying hard enough or lacked training. Even the most skilled, motivated operators showed the same pattern. From RTÉ Radio 1's Drivetime, Dr. Philipp Hövel from UCC on what's competing for our shrinking attention spans Scientists called this the "vigilance decrement", which is the inevitable decline in attention over time. This finding has been replicated thousands of times across different jobs and situations. Air traffic controllers, security guards watching CCTV screens, and even lifeguards at busy beaches all show the same pattern. It doesn't matter how important the job is or how much training someone has received: performance starts to drop within minutes of starting a vigilance task. You might wonder why evolution would give us such a seemingly flawed attention system. The answer seems to lie in survival. Having attention that automatically shifts and scans the environment was actually a survival advantage for spotting danger in the wild. Our "distractible" attention system kept our ancestors alive. Even experienced meditators, who spend years training their attention, don't achieve perfect sustained focus. Brain scan studies of Buddhist monks with decades of meditation experience show they still have, and can't eliminate, natural fluctuations in attention. What meditation does teach is awareness of these fluctuations and the ability to gently redirect attention when it wanders. From RTÉ 2fm's Morning with Laura Fox, tech journalist Elaine Burke on how the entertainment industry is adapting to shorter attention spans Our attention limitations create real problems in today's world. Medical errors in hospitals, aviation accidents and industrial disasters often involve attention failures. We've built a modern world that demands sustained vigilance, but we're using Stone Age brains that weren't designed for this kind of focus. The traditional response has been to try harder: more training, more motivation, more discipline. But this approach is like trying to make water flow uphill. It fights against the fundamental nature of human attention rather than working with it. Instead of fighting our attention limitations, we need to design systems that work with them. This means creating technology that can handle the boring, repetitive vigilance tasks while humans focus on what we do best: creative problem-solving, understanding context (including emotions aroused), and making complex decisions. Some industries are already moving in this direction. Modern aircraft use automation to handle routine monitoring while pilots focus on higher-level decision-making. Medical devices can continuously monitor patients while nurses provide care and interpret complex situations. The key is finding the right balance. Complete automation isn't the answer either. Humans need to stay engaged and maintain skills. But neither is expecting perfect human attention in situations where technology could provide better, more reliable monitoring. Accepting that perfect attention is impossible might actually be liberating. Instead of feeling guilty when your mind wanders during a long meeting or beating yourself up for losing focus while studying, you can recognise this as normal human behaviour. The goal isn't to eliminate attention fluctuations but to work with them. Take regular breaks, change tasks periodically, and design your environment to support rather than fight your natural attention rhythms. Perfect attention isn't just difficult to achieve but theoretically impossible - and that's OK.
