Train passengers face potential 5.8% fares hike
The Government has not confirmed how it will determine the cap on regulated fare rises in 2026, but this year's 4.6% hike was one percentage point above RPI in July 2024.
If that formula is used to set next year's fare increase, the cost of train travel will jump by 5.8%.
That would mean an annual season ticket from Woking to London rising by £247 to £4,507.
A flexi ticket for travel two days per week over a year from Liverpool to Manchester would increase by £120.30 to £2,195.10.
Train punctuality in Britain is at its lowest level in more than five years.
Ben Plowden, chief executive of lobby group Campaign for Better Transport, said: 'Today's inflation figure could mean a big fare rise for rail passengers next year, especially if the Government decides to go with an above-inflation increase like we saw this year.
'With the railways now moving under public control, the fundamental question for the Government is how to use its role in setting fares policy to deliver a more affordable rail network and encourage more people to travel on it.
'Next year's annual rise represents the first real opportunity for the Government to show passengers – both current and future – just how it plans to do this.'
About 45% of fares on Britain's railways are regulated by the Westminster, Scottish and Welsh Governments.
They include season tickets on most commuter journeys, some off-peak return tickets on long-distance routes, and flexible tickets for travel around major cities.
The Department for Transport (DfT) said there will be an update on changes to regulated fares later this year.
Operators set rises in unregulated fares, although these are likely to be very close to regulated ticket increases because their decisions are heavily influenced by governments.
Office of Rail and Road figures show trains in Britain reached 66.7% of scheduled stops within a minute of the timetable in the year to July 19.
That is the worst performance since the year to May 30 2020.
Some operators are currently struggling with dry weather.
A lack of moisture in clay soil embankments has disturbed track levels, preventing trains from safely travelling at full speed in parts of south-west and south-east England.
A DfT spokesperson said: 'The Transport Secretary has made clear her number one priority is getting the railways back to a place where people can rely on them.
'The Government is putting passengers at the heart of its plans for public ownership and Great British Railways (GBR), delivering the services they deserve and driving growth.
'No decisions have been made on next year's rail fares but our aim is that prices balance affordability for both passengers and taxpayers.'
The Government is nationalising train operators as their contracts expire.
GBR is an upcoming public sector body that will oversee Britain's rail infrastructure and train operation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Japan's core inflation slows in July, stays above BOJ target
TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuters) - Japan's core inflation slowed for a second straight month in July but stayed above the central bank's 2% target, keeping alive market expectations for another interest rate hike in the coming months. The nationwide core consumer price index (CPI), which excludes fresh food items, rose 3.1% in July from a year earlier, government data showed on Friday, faster than a median market forecast for a 3.0% gain. The rise was smaller than the 3.3% increase in June, due largely to the base effect of last year's rise in energy prices, which came from the termination of government subsidies to curb fuel bills. A separate index that strips away both fresh food and fuel costs - closely watched by the BOJ as a measure of domestic demand-driven prices - rose 3.4% in July from a year earlier after increasing by the same rate in June. Rising food and raw material costs have kept Japan's core inflation above the Bank of Japan's 2% target for well over three years, causing some BOJ policymakers to worry about second-round price effects. The BOJ last year exited a decade-long, massive stimulus and raised short-term interest rates to 0.5% in January on the view Japan was close to durably hitting its 2% inflation target. While the bank revised up its inflation forecasts last month, Governor Kazuo Ueda has stressed the need to tread cautiously on further rate hikes, due to an expected hit to the economy from U.S. tariffs. The Japanese economy has been showing resilience even though sweeping U.S. tariffs are dragging down exports. Last week's unexpectedly strong second-quarter gross domestic product data, combined with a U.S.-Japan trade deal struck last month, has fuelled market expectations that a tariff-driven recession will be averted - bolstering the case for another rate hike later this year. Some analysts also point to Washington's pressure for more rate hikes, following rare and explicit comments from U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent who said the BOJ was "behind the curve" on policy. The latest Reuters poll showed 63% of economists surveyed this month expect the central bank to raise base borrowing costs to at least 0.75% from 0.50% by the end of this year, an increase from 54% in last month's poll.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Japan MOF preparing to raise long-term rate estimate in FY2026 budget request, Yomiuri reports
TOKYO, Aug 22 (Reuters) - Japan's Ministry of Finance is preparing to raise its assumed interest rate for long-term government bonds at 2.6% for fiscal 2026/27 budget requests, the highest level in 17 years, the Yomiuri newspaper reported on Friday. The country's assumed bond interest rate was 2.1% during the fiscal 2025 budget request phase before being adjusted to 2.0% in the final budget. The increase for the next budget would lead to higher debt servicing costs, the report also said without citing sources.
Times
5 hours ago
- Times
Why a capital gains tax raid is the last thing homeowners need
A new tax on the sale of expensive homes would cause the property market to grind to a halt, and would be unlikely to raise much revenue, experts say. The government is said to be considering a shake-up of property taxes in the budget this autumn as it tries to fill a multibillion-pound black hole in the public finances. Many options seem to be under discussion, according to widespread reports this week, but most appear to be aimed at those selling high-value homes. The Times reported on Wednesday that the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, was considering charging capital gains tax (CGT) on the sale of main homes worth £1.5 million or more. This would be on top of stamp duty paid by buyers, which raised £13.8 billion in the 2023-24 tax year. CGT raised £13 billion in that year. Jonathan Brandling-Harris from the London estate agency House Collective said: 'Handing sellers a large CGT bill on sale will simply discourage them from moving.' Geoff Wilford from the estate agency Wilfords London said: 'It would be the single worst decision any government could make for the housing market. It would grind activity to a halt. Instead of boosting Treasury receipts, it would kill them off completely.' At the moment the sale of your main home is exempt from CGT. If it wasn't, the Treasury would make an estimated £31 billion a year. CGT is charged at 24 per cent for higher rate taxpayers and 18 per cent for basic rate taxpayers on the sale of assets including second homes, shares and art, for example. HM Revenue and Customs said that not charging CGT on the sale of main homes costs it £31 billion a year. Heather Powell from the accountancy firm Blick Rothenberg said: 'Abolishing this relief would be hugely controversial and would mean the end of the principle that no tax is payable on the sale of your family home.' Tom Bill from the estate agency Knight Frank said that because CGT is only charged on sales, many homeowners would simply decide to stay put. He said: 'If CGT applied from when the property was last bought, it would divide sellers into two groups: those sitting on a gain and those who are not. 'Anyone with a taxable gain would think twice before selling, which would reduce transaction numbers. That's despite the government seeming to want a predictable flow of revenue that is skewed towards the wealthiest homeowners.' • Ben Wilkinson: This tax policy chaos does not bode well Homes worth more than £1.5 million make up about 1 per cent of the 1.2 million property sales in England every year, and about 5 per cent of the sales in London, according to Hamptons. The average gain on the sale of a £1.5 million-plus home in England and Wales in the past 20 years was £836,219 — a rise of 71 per cent. The CGT bill on that gain for a higher-rate taxpayer would be £199,973. Aneisha Beveridge from the estate agency Hamptons said that when buyers of more expensive homes were last hit by big changes to property taxes, sales fell. Stamp duty moved from a 'slab' system where a single 5 per cent rate was charged to a 'slice' system where bands of the purchase price were taxed at 2 per cent, 5 per cent and 10 per cent. The change left anyone buying a home worth less than £935,000 paying less, but those who bought higher-value homes paying more. Under the old system someone buying a £1.5 million home would have paid 5 per cent across the entire property's value — £75,000. They now pay £93,750. • Read more money advice and tips on investing from our experts In 2014 about 4 per cent of homes sold in London went for more than £1.5 million, according to Hamptons. Last year 2.9 per cent sold at that level, once you accounted for property price inflation, the lowest share on record. Beveridge said: 'What we saw with the stamp duty changes was that demand for those homes at the top end of the market slowed because they became much more expensive, so people did not move as often.' A property sales tax on expensive homes would have a knock-on effect on all those further down a sales chain if the sellers at the top simply decided not to move. Wilford said: 'Imagine finally deciding to move after decades only to be stung with a bigger bill for selling than you would ever have paid for buying. That leaves a very sour taste.' Experts argue that anything that deters older homeowners from downsizing is bad news for the market in general. Some 53 per cent of homes in England and 35 per cent of homes in Scotland have at least two spare bedrooms, according to Nationwide Building Society. Polling of 4,300 people by Barclays suggested that 37 per cent of those with one or more spare bedrooms were over 65. • How could Rachel Reeves reform stamp duty and other property taxes? Barclays said that those who downsize should be given grants or be allowed to offset any moving costs against their stamp duty bill. Brandling-Harris said: 'Downsizers should be helped because every move they make unlocks the housing ladder beneath them — freeing up family homes for those moving up the ladder, and so starter homes for first-time buyers. That's why the focus should be the exact opposite of a sellers' tax: rather than penalising people for moving, we should be encouraging it.' Wilford added: 'Downsizing is already a daunting process. People want to stay near friends, family and their GP yet often suitable homes locally are scarce. 'Add in the emotional attachment to the family home, the slog of clearing out a lifetime of belongings, plus legal fees, removals and surveys, and it is no wonder many decide it is easier to stay put — they just don't want the hassle. Add a seller's tax into the mix and you risk wiping out a whole segment of the market that keeps the housing ecosystem moving.'
