logo
Victim says she was ‘humiliated' having to strip for Omagh compensation claim

Victim says she was ‘humiliated' having to strip for Omagh compensation claim

Independent11-02-2025
A traffic warden who was seriously injured in the Omagh bombing has told how she was 'humiliated' by having to take off her clothes so her scars could be examined in a compensation claim.
Rosemary Ingram said she was made to 'feel like a victim all over again' by the experience in 2002, four years after a Real IRA bomb devastated the centre of the town.
Ms Ingram's statement to the Omagh Bombing Inquiry was read on her behalf by a lawyer.
She told how on the day of the explosion, she had been asked to divert traffic in Omagh away from the courthouse following a bomb alert.
She said a photograph taken by a tourist shows her standing close to the red Vauxhall Cavalier on Market Street which contained the bomb.
I saw a cloud of debris and dust, all with the smell of burning flesh and I could hear people screaming.
Rosemary Ingram
Describing the moment the bomb exploded, her statement said: 'I suddenly felt a thud in my back and I first thought I had been struck by a car from behind.
'I saw a cloud of debris and dust, all with the smell of burning flesh and I could hear people screaming.'
She said she was taken to hospital which was 'full of injured people and in complete turmoil'.
Ms Ingram was treated for multiple injuries. She said she has been left with chronic debilitating pain as well as post-traumatic stress disorder and she had to take early retirement.
She said: 'Twenty-six years after the explosion I still have shrapnel coming out of my body, sometimes with ongoing bleeding.'
Ms Ingram added: 'We had to leave our home in Omagh because it was close to the hospital and each time I heard the sirens I had flashbacks and experienced PTSD symptoms.'
Ms Ingram then said she had suffered 'humiliating' treatment after claiming compensation from the government for her injuries in 2002.
She said: 'I was called to the High Court in order to assess my injury.
'The assessment took place in a small room with a plain window in front of six lawyers who arrived with their briefcases.
'They asked to see the scars on my body.
'I was told to strip to my underwear and to stand in the corner of the room, facing the wall, in front of the panel of lawyers so that the Northern Ireland Office's compensation agency could examine my scars to assess how much money I should be given.
' One of the lawyers even pulled with his pen at my underwear to see the extent of the scars.'
She added: 'The experience made me feel like a victim all over again.
'I was close to tears.
'Thankfully, my husband, who had been asked to leave the room, refused, and stayed with me.
'He took off his jacket and put it around my shoulders to give me some dignity and eventually said to the lawyers that that was enough.'
Ms Ingram said she had campaigned for other victims who claimed compensation to be assessed through medical reports and photographs of injuries.
Concluding her statement, she said: ' Justice would have been done by seeing that those responsible for this terrorist atrocity were convicted and bore the consequences of their heinous crime, but this has not happened.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'Please don't move us': Epping asylum seeker speaks to ITV News after High Court ruling
'Please don't move us': Epping asylum seeker speaks to ITV News after High Court ruling

ITV News

time3 hours ago

  • ITV News

'Please don't move us': Epping asylum seeker speaks to ITV News after High Court ruling

After Tuesday's High Court ruling that migrants should be removed from a hotel in Essex, ITV News understands that 24 other councils are now considering their own legal challenges. ITV News UK Editor Paul Brand reports An asylum seeker living in the Bell Hotel in Epping has told ITV News he feels "helpless" after the High Court ruled that migrants should be moved out of the hotel. In the first interview with an asylum seeker in the hotel since the council won a legal challenge on Tuesday, Khadar Mohamed told ITV News his message to the people of Epping was: "Please don't do this to us". "Please don't move us, if you move us everyone else will want to do the same to us," he said. It comes as more than 20 other local councils told ITV News they were looking closely at the ruling to consider their next steps. And Conservative party leader Kemi Badenoch is encouraging Tory councils to fight asylum hotels in their areas. In a letter to all Conservative controlled councils, she welcomed the ruling in favour of Epping Forest District Council, writing: "I am encouraging Conservative council leaders to take the same steps if your legal advice supports it." However, for Mohamed, 24, who is from Somalia, said the High Court decision was "scary" and "emotionally painful". He told ITV News Senior Producer Nathan Lee he was surprised by the mass protests outside the Essex hotel in recent weeks. "I never thought I'd be coming here and then that would be happening to me, people not wanting me there," he said. On Tuesday, a High Court judge ruled the former Bell Hotel in Epping must stop housing asylum seekers by September 12. The hotel has been at the centre of a series of protests in recent weeks after an asylum seeker who was staying there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu has denied the charges against him and is due to stand trial later this month. A second man who resides at the hotel, Syrian national Mohammed Sharwarq, has separately been charged with seven offences, while several other men have been charged over disorder outside the hotel. Mohamed told ITV News that since the arrests, he had found the situation "hostile" and "difficult". "Everything changed," he said. "Now we're seen as criminals, before we were just normal people." But Mohamed said he wanted to speak out because - "I want to make the people know that I'm not what they say I am". "After the incident, people look at you and they're scared for their life, they're scared for their kids and pushing them behind their backs. "I'm not here to harm anybody, I'm here to look for safety, to look for a better life," he insisted. Mohamed travelled through Turkey, Austria and Germany before crossing the channel to get to the UK, and has now been granted asylum. He said he thinks the people of Epping "have a reason to be mad" because of the number of asylum seekers coming to the area. "I know they're mad over the whole thing about the government and how they dealt with this - I'm sorry, but I'm not at fault, I'm looking for a better life," he said. "I'm not trying to take anything from them, not trying to make their lives difficult," Mohamed insisted. "The only offence I've committed is coming to this country illegally, I'll confess to that. But I had to do it - I had no option," he told ITV News. Th e government says it is looking at "contingency options" for asylum seekers at the Bell Hotel in Epping, insisting it will also "find alternative locations" for other asylum seekers in hotels across the country. Responding to the ruling, Home Office minister Dan Jarvis said: "We're looking very carefully at the court ruling that was handed down yesterday, we'll want to identify a range of contingency options for how those people can be appropriately accommodated elsewhere." Jarvis refused to say what the alternative locations for asylum seekers would be, insisting "it would vary depending on different locations", and the government will "have to look at a range of different scenarios". Multiple councils are now considering the Epping ruling to see whether they could mount similar legal News has contacted every council across the country to ask how they intend to respond to the High Court judgement. So far, 24 said they were looking closely at it to consider their next steps, leaving open the option of taking their own legal action. A Labour Party spokesperson, responding to Kemi Badenoch's letter to Tory councils on asylum hotels, said: "This is desperate and hypocritical nonsense from the architects of the broken asylum system.

Boarding school pupils ‘were abused by paedophiles', inquiry finds
Boarding school pupils ‘were abused by paedophiles', inquiry finds

Glasgow Times

time7 hours ago

  • Glasgow Times

Boarding school pupils ‘were abused by paedophiles', inquiry finds

Findings on the Keil School in Dumbarton, West Dunbartonshire – which closed in 2000 – were delayed until the conclusion of the prosecution against a former physics teacher who was branded a 'prolific' paedophile. William Bain admitted 11 charges and was jailed for nine years in June at the High Court in Glasgow, after a criminal investigation was sparked by evidence at the SCAI in 2021. In a report published on Wednesday, chair of the inquiry, Lady Smith, condemned the school's failure to investigate Bain and said it was a 'disgraceful abdication of responsibility' which allowed predators 'free rein', including another recently convicted paedophile ex-teacher. Bain, of Crieff, Perthshire, was described as a sadist by detectives and the scale of his abuse of pupils aged between 11 and 14 was deemed 'horrendous', following his sentencing on June 30. Lady Smith found that school leaders carried out a 'cover-up' to protect their reputation and hailed the 'fresh prosecutions' of Bain and another recently convicted paedophile, following evidence heard at the inquiry. She warned that further abusers could be prosecuted as a result of the SCAI. The findings are part of SCAI's Boarding Schools case study, including Loretto School, Gordonstoun and Merchiston Castle School. READ NEXT: Residents oppose this to be built near Ibrox Stadium Keil School was established by philanthropists to educate rural boys and moved to Dumbarton in the 1920s, where it became an environment where pupils 'were expected to endure violence and suffer in silence', according to the SCAI. From the 1950s until the 1980s, abuse was 'normalised', with prolific abuser Bain remaining at the school until it closed in 2000 and other offences carried out by paedophile English teacher David Gutteridge in the early 1990s. Both men were house tutors and the SCAI condemned a lack of oversight. Bain, who worked there for 23 years, was previously convicted in May 2016 of offences at Keil and jailed for six-and-a-half years, while Gutteridge was jailed last year for indecent assault of a pupil at the school, set up by the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust. In her report, Lady Smith said that a headteacher was responsible for a 'cover-up', while abusers such as Bain had 'free rein on a daily basis'. Lady Smith said: 'Protection of the reputation of the school was prioritised over the interests of children, that was a disgraceful abdication of responsibility. The prevailing culture allowed two paedophiles to operate without fear. 'William Bain sexually abused some children on hundreds of occasions, on an almost daily basis. The abuse Bain perpetrated persisted for years, despite concerns arising early on, after a parent complained.' She branded an investigation 'inadequate' and said parents were falsely reassured. Boarding school pupils 'were abused by paedophiles', inquiry finds READ NEXT: Police report identifies 'growing threat' from Glasgow and Edinburgh gang violence Lady Smith said: 'The problem was covered up by headmaster Christopher Tongue and other senior staff. Despite parents being assured that reports would go on record, this did not happen. Tongue's successor was never told about it.' Gutteridge, who taught at Keil from 1989 to 1991, abused a pupil, having 'carefully engineered the circumstances', according to the SCAI. He was jailed for 17 months following a conviction for indecent assault at Forfar Sheriff Court in September 2024. But his predatory behaviour towards teenage boys predated Keil and in 2015, he was jailed for 18 months after being convicted of two charges of indecent assault at Harrow Crown Court, committed in England in the 1980s. Other staff physically abused pupils, justifying it as 'officially sanctioned punishment', including a housemaster remembered for his 'sadistic brutality' and 'mass beatings', including using the belt, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'Keil was a school with inadequate senior leadership and a lack of the most basic of child protection systems.' She branded it a 'remarkable example of naivety and false optimism trumping reality', which resulted in children being abused. Lady Smith added: 'The cases of Bain and Gutteridge are examples of a significant outcome. 'Fresh prosecutions followed exposure of their behaviour through the inquiry's investigations and evidence – demonstrating that those who abuse children in care may find it catching up with them decades later.' Responsibility for running boarding houses was left to senior boys appointed 'chiefs', who controlled squads of junior boys, with some staff considering themselves 'immune from management', a report from the inquiry said. Governors of the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust 'failed to challenge the situation' and have since apologised for the abuse, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'I would encourage anyone who has relevant information on any aspect of our work to get in touch with our witness support team. We want to hear from you.' On Wednesday, nuns from a Catholic order, Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul, said that children were abused in the care of their establishments for deaf and disabled children. Sister Eileen Glancy, speaking about St Vincent's School for the Deaf and Blind in Glasgow, told a hearing of the inquiry in Edinburgh: 'We'd have to accept some children were abused.' She added: 'Children weren't as well protected as they should have been.' A former pupil of St Vincent's, using the pseudonym Gordon, said in a witness statement that he told his mother about abuse from nuns, and was punished after she contacted the police. The man said that he told his mother on two occasions, and said: 'The physical abuse used to shock me as these were Christians. We lived with fear and intimidation all the time.' He said: 'My mum spoke to a nun and challenged her about the treatment of children. I know the nun told my mum it wasn't true and I had been a bad boy. 'After that, I was assaulted again and my mum told the police, but nothing happened.' Gordon alleged that he was subjected to sexual abuse as well as physical violence, including having his head 'batted against a desk'. He said that the nuns and a priest were 'hypocrites', and that the school felt like a 'prison' as it was surrounded by 15-foot walls – but there was no alternative, as it was the only school for deaf children. Gordon said: 'There was so much cruelty at St Vincent's and none of us could understand that, the Sisters were supposed to be so holy and caring but were so cruel. This was a period of suffering for all deaf children of my generation. We all suffered, we were all terrified. 'I would like to see charges brought against the people who were responsible.' The inquiry continues.

Boarding school pupils ‘exposed to paedophiles' amid ‘cover-up', inquiry finds
Boarding school pupils ‘exposed to paedophiles' amid ‘cover-up', inquiry finds

Leader Live

time9 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Boarding school pupils ‘exposed to paedophiles' amid ‘cover-up', inquiry finds

Findings on the Keil School in Dumbarton, West Dunbartonshire – which closed in 2000 – were delayed until the conclusion of the prosecution against a former physics teacher who was branded a 'prolific' paedophile. William Bain admitted 11 charges and was jailed for nine years in June at the High Court in Glasgow, after a criminal investigation was sparked by evidence at the Scottish Child Abuse Inquiry (SCAI) in 2021. In a report published on Wednesday, chair of the inquiry Lady Smith condemned the school's failure to investigate Bain and said it was a 'disgraceful abdication of responsibility' which allowed predators 'free rein', including another recently convicted paedophile ex-teacher. Bain, of Crieff, Perthshire, was described as a sadist by detectives and the scale of his abuse of pupils aged between 11 and 14 was deemed 'horrendous', following his sentencing at the High Court in Glasgow on June 30. Lady Smith found that school leaders carried out a 'cover-up' to protect its reputation and hailed the 'fresh prosecutions' of Bain and another recently convicted paedophile, following evidence heard at the inquiry. She warned that further abusers could be prosecuted as a result of the SCAI. The findings are part of SCAI's Boarding Schools case study including Loretto School, Gordonstoun, and Merchiston Castle School. Keil School was established by philanthropists to educate rural boys, and moved to Dumbarton in the 1920s where it became an environment where pupils 'were expected to endure violence and suffer in silence', according to the SCAI. By the 1950s until the 1980s, abuse was 'normalised', with prolific abuser Bain remaining at the school until it closed in 2000, and other offences carried out by paedophile English teacher David Gutteridge in the early 1990s. Both men were house tutors, and the SCAI condemned a lack of oversight. Bain, who worked there for 23 years, was previously convicted in May 2016 of offences at Keil and jailed for six-and-a-half years, while Gutteridge was jailed last year for indecent assault of a pupil at the school, set up by the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust. In her report, Lady Smith said that a headteacher was responsible for a 'cover-up', while abusers such as Bain had 'free rein on a daily basis'. Lady Smith said: 'Protection of the reputation of the school was prioritised over the interests of children, that was a disgraceful abdication of responsibility. The prevailing culture allowed two paedophiles to operate without fear. 'William Bain sexually abused some children on hundreds of occasions, on an almost daily basis. The abuse Bain perpetrated persisted for years, despite concerns arising early on, after a parent complained.' She branded an investigation 'inadequate' and said parents were falsely reassured. Lady Smith said: 'The problem was covered up by headmaster Christopher Tongue and other senior staff. Despite parents being assured that reports would go on record, this did not happen. Tongue's successor was never told about it.' Gutteridge, who taught at Keil from 1989 to 1991, abused a pupil having 'carefully engineered the circumstances', according to the SCAI. He was jailed for 17 months following a conviction for indecent assault at Forfar Sheriff Court in September 2024. But his predatory behaviour towards teenage boys predated Keil, and in 2015 he was jailed for 18 months after being convicted of two charges of indecent assault at Harrow Crown Court, committed in England in the 1980s. Other staff physically abused pupils justifying it as 'officially sanctioned punishment', including a housemaster remembered for his 'sadistic brutality' and 'mass beatings' including using the belt, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'Keil was a school with inadequate senior leadership and a lack of the most basic of child protection systems.' She branded it a 'remarkable example of naivety and false optimism trumping reality' which resulted in children being abused. Lady Smith added: 'The cases of Bain and Gutteridge are examples of a significant outcome. 'Fresh prosecutions followed exposure of their behaviour through the inquiry's investigations and evidence – demonstrating that those who abuse children in care may find it catching up with them decades later.' Responsibility for running boarding houses was left to senior boys appointed 'chiefs', who controlled squads of junior boys, with some staff considering themselves 'immune from management', a report from the inquiry said. Governors of the Mackinnon-Macneill Trust 'failed to challenge the situation', and have since apologised for the abuse, according to the SCAI. Lady Smith said: 'I would encourage anyone who has relevant information on any aspect of our work to get in touch with our witness support team. We want to hear from you.' On Wednesday, nuns from a Catholic order, Daughters of Charity of St Vincent de Paul, said that children were abused in the care of their establishments for deaf and disabled children. Sister Eileen Glancy, speaking about St Vincent's School for the Deaf and Blind in Glasgow, told a hearing of the inquiry in Edinburgh: 'We'd have to accept some children were abused.' She added: 'Children weren't as well protected as they should have been.' A former pupil of St Vincent's, using the pseudonym Gordon, said in a witness statement that he told his mother about abuse from nuns, and was punished after she contacted police. The man said that he told his mother on two occasions, and said: 'The physical abuse used to shock me as these were Christians. We lived with fear and intimidation all the time.' He said: 'My mum spoke to a nun and challenged her about the treatment of children. I know the nun told my mum it wasn't true and I had been a bad boy. 'After that, I was assaulted again and my mum told the police, but nothing happened.' Gordon alleged that he was subjected to sexual abuse as well as physical violence, including having his head 'batted against a desk'. He said that the nuns and a priest were 'hypocrites', and that the school felt like a 'prison' as it was surrounded by 15-foot walls – but there was no alternative, as it was the only school for deaf children. Gordon said: 'There was so much cruelty at St Vincent's and none of us could understand that, the Sisters were supposed to be so holy and caring but were so cruel. This was a period of suffering for all deaf children of my generation. We all suffered, we were all terrified. 'I would like to see charges brought against the people who were responsible.' The inquiry continues.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store