Bid for 'SIS' special registration number starts tomorrow
14 Aug 2025 12:10pm
Members of the public who wish to have a special registration number (NPI) with the index 'SIS' which means 'Sultan Idris Shah' can place bids starting tomorrow. Photo: Facebook
SHAH ALAM - Members of the public who wish to have a special registration number (NPI) with the index 'SIS' which means 'Sultan Idris Shah' can place bids starting tomorrow.
A post on the Selangor Royal Office's Facebook page announced that the 'SIS' plate bidding is open in conjunction with the 80th birthday celebration of the Sultan of Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah in December and the Silver Jubilee celebration of his 25th year of reign next year. The 'SIS' plate bidding is open in conjunction with the 80th birthday celebration of the Sultan of Selangor Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah in December and the Silver Jubilee celebration of his 25th year of reign next year. Photo: Facebook
The special registration number is being offered by the Transport Ministry through the Road Transport Department (JPJ) through online bidding via the JPJeBid System.
"The public bidding is based on the following regulations, namely the opening date is August 15 (Friday) and closing at 10pm, August 19 (Tuesday).
"The date for the bidding results is August 20 (Wednesday)," according to the posting.
The bidding method is subject to the existing terms and conditions set through the JPJeBid System, while the bid price is according to the minimum price set by JPJ.
According to the posting, JPJ is the only entity that will manage the sale of this NPI and no third party is involved in the related process.
A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the NPI will be channelled to a foundation under the patronage of the Sultan of Selangor to be used for charitable activities including scholarships and emergency funds to help those in need.
The foundation which will be chaired by Selangor Royal Council member and former Bank Negara governor Tan Sri Muhammad Ibrahim, will be subject to transparent procedures and governance, according to the post. - BERNAMA
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
37 minutes ago
- Borneo Post
JPJ seals 270 luxury vehicles without road tax, insurance coverage through Ops Luxury
The operation is being carried out continuously across all states to take firm action against luxury vehicles being driven without a valid motor vehicle licence (LKM) or insurance. – Bernama photo JOHOR BAHRU (Aug 16): The Road Transport Department (JPJ) has seized 270 luxury vehicles nationwide for not having valid road tax and insurance under Ops Luxury, carried out since July 1. Its director-general, Datuk Aedy Fadly Ramli, said the operation is being carried out continuously across all states to take firm action against luxury vehicles being driven without a valid motor vehicle licence (LKM) or insurance. 'This operation is a stern measure against luxury vehicles that are being driven without paying road tax, with some also without insurance coverage. The vehicles will be detained and seized until the owners settle all outstanding road tax, insurance, and summonses before they are released,' he told a press conference at JPJ Taman Daya recently. Also present were JPJ senior director (Enforcement) Muhammad Kifli Ma Hassan and Johor JPJ director Azmil Zainal Adnan. Aedy said the seized vehicles included a Ferrari in Johor Bahru, which was without road tax and insurance, a Lamborghini Huracán with an annual road tax of RM12,000, and a Rolls-Royce in Kuala Lumpur with unpaid road tax of RM29,000 per year. He revealed that some of the vehicles had not had their road tax renewed for more than a year, with one case in Kuala Lumpur involving a lapse of up to three years, where the owner claimed to have 'forgotten' to renew it. 'Ops Luxury will be expanded nationwide, including to Perlis, Sabah, and Sarawak. This is not a one-off action, but a continuous effort. 'We do not want luxury vehicles on the road without valid road tax and insurance, as the risks to public safety in the event of an accident are extremely high,' he said. Aedy added that legal action has been taken against several vehicle owners in court, while those who have settled their road tax and insurance arrears have been allowed to reclaim their vehicles. – Bernama Aedy Fadly Ramli lead luxury vehicles road tax Road Transport Department
The Star
7 hours ago
- The Star
Part of Maryland digital ad tax law declared unconstitutional
FILE PHOTO: A 3-D printed Facebook logo is seen on U.S. dollar banknotes in this illustration picture, June 18, 2019. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File photo (Reuters) -A federal appeals court on Friday declared unconstitutional a Maryland law prohibiting companies that pass on the costs of the state's first-of-its-kind digital advertising tax from telling customers why prices went up. Reversing a lower court ruling, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously agreed with the Chamber of Commerce and two other trade groups that the restriction violated members' First Amendment free speech rights, while insulating Maryland lawmakers from criticism and political accountability. The offices of Maryland's Attorney General Anthony Brown and the only defendant, state Comptroller Brooke Lierman, did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Aimed at larger businesses such as Meta Platforms' Facebook and Alphabet's Google, Maryland's 2021 law taxed companies that generated at least $1 million of gross revenue from digital ad services in the state. Maryland imposed levies on a sliding scale based on companies' global revenue, and lawmakers said the tax could raise $250 million annually. The Chamber of Commerce, NetChoice and the Computer & Communications Industry Association sued, calling the law a punitive assault on digital rather than print advertising. Friday's decision concerned their objection to a provision against passing on the cost of the tax "by means of a separate fee, surcharge, or line-item," saying it effectively forbade businesses from shifting blame to lawmakers. Circuit Judge Julius Richardson wrote for a three-judge panel, however, that the provision ensured that companies would bear economic and legal responsibility for the tax. He said Maryland didn't justify this, and the provision was facially unconstitutional. "The pass-through prevents companies from describing the tax in the one setting where the consumer is guaranteed to look: the invoice," the judge wrote. "Keeping out of hot water with voters is not among the interests that can justify a speech ban." Richardson added: "As much today as 250 years ago, criticizing the government - for taxes or anything else - is important discourse in a democratic society. The First Amendment forbids Maryland to suppress it." The Richmond, Virginia appeals court returned the case to U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby in Greenbelt, Maryland, to determine appropriate remedies. In separate statements, the trade groups welcomed the decision. "The Fourth Circuit was absolutely correct," said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center. "Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship." The case is Chamber of Commerce et al v. Lierman, 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 24-1727. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Andrea Ricci)
The Star
15 hours ago
- The Star
Retired teacher lost RM467,237 to investment scam, bogus fund recovery firm
JOHOR BARU: A retired teacher was duped into losing RM467,237 after joining a non-existence investment scheme and legal services. Johor Baru South OCPD Asst Comm Raub Selamat said the 60-year-old woman came across an advertisement of 'Advance Fin Advisory' investment company. He said the victim was at her home in Taman Puteri Wangsa, Ulu Tiram, when she saw the advertisement on Facebook on June 17, 2025. 'The victim was attracted to the 94% profit promised within a day as advertised,'' ACP Raub said in a statement. The victim, he said, contacted the suspect and was added to a WhatsApp group and taught how to start trading the shares. ACP Raub said the victim made 20 transactions to different bank accounts from June 17 until Jun 26, 2025, amounting to RM 286,377. 'The victim was directed to make additional payments when she wanted to withdraw the profits,'' he said. Unable to withdraw the profits the victim sought assistance from a legal firm from an advertisement on Facebook. She then contacted an individual who claimed to be the representative of the 'Benjamin Lee & Co' legal firm. 'The victim was taught on how to recover the profits but had to pay RM180,900 as legal fees,'' he said, adding the victim made seven transactions into seven different banks from July 4 to Aug 2, 2025. He said the victim only realised she was cheated when asked to bank in more money. The case is being investigated under Section 420 of the Penal Code for cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property. ACP Raub reminded the public to be alert and careful especially in matters involving financial transactions or job offers when dealing with unknown persons. The public can go to Semak Mule, CCID Scam Response Centre at 03-26101559 or 03-26101599. Scam victims are advised to call the National Scam Response Centre at 997 to report their case.
